CBT for gambling

1. Introduction

Version followed: a composite. The session spine is Petry's 8-session individual CBT (Petry 2005; Petry et al. 2006). The cognitive core is the Laval (Québec) cognitive-behavioural programme of Ladouceur and colleagues, in its 2007 Treatments That Work form (Ladouceur & Lachance, about 12 sessions over 12 weeks). Step-by-step procedures come from one full manual: the UCLA Individualized Treatment for Problem Gamblers therapist manual (Fong & Rosenthal, Version 1, 2009, 6 sessions). Where these versions differ, the text says which one it follows. The Ladouceur & Lachance guide and Petry's book are not drawn on directly. Their content here comes from published summaries and reviews and is tagged accordingly. [source: Ledgerwood & Petry 2005; Fong 2009 review of Ladouceur & Lachance; Fong & Rosenthal 2009; Rizeanu chapter, IntechOpen]

CBT for gambling is not one branded therapy. It is a family of closely related, manualised, short-term outpatient protocols for problem gambling and gambling disorder. They can be delivered individually, in groups or as guided self-help and online programmes. The protocols share two ideas about how change happens:

Behavioural. Gambling is a learned habit, kept going by cues (money, places, ads, moods) and by intermittent wins and relief. Change comes from mapping these links, changing the environment and building rewarding alternatives and coping skills.
Cognitive (the Ladouceur emphasis). Gamblers persist because of erroneous beliefs about chance: illusion of control, the gambler's fallacy, reading near misses as almost-wins, superstitions, and the hope of winning back losses. Once the client sees that outcomes are random and that the expected return is negative, the motive to keep playing weakens.

Most current versions add motivational interviewing (MI) at the start and finish with relapse prevention. [source: Ledgerwood & Petry 2005; Fong & Rosenthal 2009, Introduction and Session 1; Chrétien et al. 2018]

2. Framework

Named versions and their dose [source: Ledgerwood & Petry 2005 table; Fong 2009 review; Fong & Rosenthal 2009]

Version	Format	Dose
Sylvain, Ladouceur & Boisvert 1997 (CBT)	Individual, 60–90 min	Twice weekly, up to 30 hours
Ladouceur et al. 2001 (cognitive therapy)	Individual, 60 min	Up to 20 sessions
Ladouceur et al. 2003 (group cognitive therapy)	Group, 120 min	10 weekly sessions
Ladouceur & Lachance 2007 (TTW guide plus client workbook)	Individual	About 12 sessions over 12 weeks; workbook has 10 chapters
Petry et al. 2004/2006	Individual, 50 min, plus referral to Gamblers Anonymous (GA)	8 weekly sessions; tested alongside a self-directed 8-chapter workbook arm
Fong & Rosenthal 2009 (UCLA)	Individual, optional conjoint sessions	6 sessions, the first two 3–7 days apart
Hodgins et al. 2001	Self-help workbook plus one motivational phone call	Self-paced

Internet-delivered CBT with minimal therapist support is also used. [source: CAMH GGTU page, citing Hedman et al. 2012]

Phases. These are common to the versions above; the sequence follows Petry, with UCLA procedures.

Engagement, assessment and motivation (sessions 1–2).
- Goals: build the alliance, assess gambling, debts, suicidality and supports, give personalised feedback, and agree a goal (abstinence or controlled gambling) and a rationale.
- In Petry, session 1 is psychoeducation and identifying the client's triggers.
- In UCLA, session 1 is assessment and session 2 is feedback and consequences.
- Move on when the client agrees to a block of sessions (UCLA asks for a 6-session commitment) and the most urgent crises (debt, legal, risk) have a plan. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, Sessions 1–2; IntechOpen summary of Petry 2005]
Behavioural analysis and change (Petry sessions 2–6). Content in Petry's order:
- functional analysis of gambling;
- increasing pleasant activities;
- a self-management plan (environment, access to money);
- coping with urges;
- assertiveness and refusing gambling.
- Move on once the client can describe their own chain from cue to bet and is using at least some control measures. [source: IntechOpen summary of Petry 2005; Ledgerwood & Petry 2005] [synthesis: the move-on criterion]
Cognitive correction (Petry session 7; in Ladouceur, the core of most sessions).
- Teach how randomness and the house edge work.
- Elicit the client's erroneous thoughts (an imagined gambling session narrated aloud, or a detailed account of the last episode).
- Record the thoughts with the ABCD model and correct them.
- Move on when the client can spot and correct their own gambling thoughts between sessions. [source: Fong 2009 review; Chrétien et al. 2018; Fong & Rosenthal 2009, Sessions 3–4]
Stress coping, problem-solving, social skills (Ladouceur; UCLA session 5). Wider life stressors that drive gambling are addressed. [source: Rizeanu chapter, summarising Ladouceur et al. 2002; Fong & Rosenthal 2009, Session 5]
Relapse prevention and ending (Petry session 8; UCLA session 6).
- Distinguish a slip from a relapse, write an emergency plan and review high-risk situations.
- Plan aftercare: GA, significant-other support and booster sessions.
- Ladouceur & Lachance include post-treatment assessment after the 12 weeks.
- Ending criteria are not specified in the sources. A practical criterion is several weeks of goal-consistent gambling (or abstinence) plus a written plan the client can explain. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, Session 6; Fong 2009 review] [synthesis: ending criterion]

Session format [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, Session 2 procedure] [synthesis: the agenda and money-check elements]

Brief check-in, time-limited (UCLA: about 5 minutes on the past week).
Homework review.
The session's module.
New between-session practice.
Optional, my addition: a fixed agenda and a quick review of the week's gambling and money.

3. Guiding principles

Gambling is a learned habit, not a character defect. Present the model that way; it lowers shame and makes the habit a target that can change. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S1]
Understand before you judge; don't lecture. Ask about the client's own experience before you give information. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S1]
The client chooses the goal (abstinence or control). The therapist supports it and revisits it with data. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S1] [uncertain: Petry's and Ladouceur's protocols generally aim at abstinence; Ladouceur's group has also studied controlled-gambling goals, but those papers are not drawn on]
Managing resistance is the therapist's job. Never argue, confront or challenge head-on; use reflection, double-sided reflection, shifting focus and reframing instead. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S2]
Feed back in numbers, not labels. Give money spent, percentage of income and percentiles. Avoid "pathological" or "compulsive gambler". [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S2]
Elicit beliefs before correcting them. While mapping the client's thinking, probe with curiosity and do not challenge yet; correction comes afterwards. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S4; Chrétien et al. 2018]
Erroneous beliefs about chance are a central target. Every session should include some correction of how the client thinks games work. [source: Fong 2009 review of Ladouceur & Lachance]
Situations signal danger but do not cause gambling. High-risk situations are warning lights; the decision, shaped by thoughts, is what triggers the bet. Coaching therefore targets the decision point. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S4]
Change the environment, not just the mind. Reduce access to gambling and to money, and add rewarding alternatives. [source: Ledgerwood & Petry 2005]
Homework extends the session. Explain why each task matters. If it isn't done, explore why without guilt and without a power struggle. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, Introduction]
Give something to take away from every session: an insight, a sense of being understood, hope that this is treatable, or a short plan. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S1]
Assess suicide risk from the first session and give crisis numbers. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S1]
Combine therapy with mutual help where acceptable. Refer to GA and support active involvement, but don't pressure. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, Additional modules; Petry et al. 2006 design]
Lapses are expected and are learning events, not failures. Plan for them in advance. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S6]
Adapt to culture and gambling type. Use examples from the client's own game (slots, sports, horses, stocks) and respect cultural beliefs about luck. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S3; CAMH GGTU]

4. Intervention inventory

The items are grouped by phase. Steps are written in my own words from the cited sources. All example therapist language is my illustrative wording unless it is in quotation marks with a citation.

A. Engagement and assessment

4.1 Assessment and engagement interview

Purpose / when. Session 1. Find out why the client has come now and what they need from this session. Map gambling and life structure, assess risk and build the alliance. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S1]
Steps:
1. Introduce yourself and the purpose: getting to know the client, understanding their gambling and motivation, and previewing treatment.
2. Ask what they most need from today, then go first to the most pressing issue (crisis, debt, family ultimatum).
3. Cover:
  - work, home and leisure;
  - gambling forms, frequency and spending;
  - previous treatment and self-quit attempts;
  - how serious they think the problem is;
  - what they expect from treatment.
4. Assess past and current suicidal thoughts and behaviour (see 5.7).
5. Assess structure and support: work, family, social life, interests, emotional support. Note gaps to strengthen.
6. Validate mixed feelings: shame, coercion, second thoughts.
7. Give a crisis card with 24-hour numbers.
8. Book the next session within 3–7 days.
Standard screening/severity measures named by the sources, used under their own licences:
- South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS);
- NODS;
- DSM criteria count;
- Inventory of Gambling Situations (IGS) for later relapse planning. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009; CAMH GGTU]
Example language (illustrative):
- "Before we get into the history, what would make today worth coming in for?"
- "A lot of people feel pushed into coming, or half want to be here. Where are you on that?"
Watch for:
- shame shutting disclosure down;
- an acute financial or legal crisis that has to be dealt with first;
- suicidality.
- Working signs: the client gives concrete figures and names a reason of their own for change.

4.2 Treatment rationale: gambling as a learned habit

Purpose / when. End of session 1. Gives a shame-reducing model and a reason to do the work. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S1]
Steps:
1. Explain briefly, without lecturing, that gambling is a learned habit triggered by cues. Three kinds of cue:
  - time cues (a daily routine);
  - environmental cues (cash in pocket, passing a betting shop or venue, ads);
  - internal cues (stress, boredom, loneliness, low mood, anger).
2. Ask for the client's own examples.
3. Check their reaction (UCLA suggests asking how it sounds to them).
4. Ask for a commitment to a set number of sessions. Ask them to talk about it before dropping out, rather than just stopping.
5. Introduce between-session practice and GA as two ways to add structure.
Example language (illustrative): "Gambling works like any strong habit. Certain times, places and feelings switch it on, and it pays off often enough to keep going. If we learn your switches, we can change them."
Watch for:
- The client hears "habit" as a sign of weak will; reframe it as learning.
- Working signs: the client starts naming their own cues.

4.3 Goal setting (abstinence or controlled gambling)

Purpose / when. Session 1, revisited later. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S1] [uncertain: how other versions handle controlled-gambling goals was not verified]
Steps:
1. Say plainly that the client chooses the goal and you will support it.
2. If they choose control, define it in concrete terms:
  - which games;
  - how often;
  - a money limit set before play, cash only. Agree to review it against the monitoring data. [synthesis: the specific limits]
3. If control repeatedly fails, use the data to reopen the abstinence option without arguing. [synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "You decide the goal. Let's write it so precisely that in two weeks we'll both know whether it's working."
Watch for: Goals vague enough that any amount of gambling seems to meet them.

4.4 Personalised feedback on assessment (motivational)

Purpose / when. Session 2. Shows the extent of the harm in a way that builds motivation rather than defensiveness. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S2]
Steps:
1. Let the client talk about the past week for about 5 minutes, then review homework.
2. Present concrete figures:
  - weekly spending;
  - cumulative losses;
  - share of income. Ask what they make of each.
3. Report screening results as percentile comparisons with the general population, without diagnostic labels.
4. Reflect the client's emotional reaction. Use double-sided reflections for ambivalence.
5. Summarise, highlighting the client's own statements in favour of change. Do not dismiss their reluctance.
Example language (illustrative):
- "Over the last year that comes to about a third of your take-home pay. What do you make of that number?"
- (double-sided) "Part of you is shocked by this; part of you feels gambling is the one thing that's yours."
Watch for:
- minimising, blaming, arguing, sidetracking (see 5.2);
- Working signs: more change talk, and the client asks what to do next.

4.5 Reframing the function of gambling

Purpose / when. Any time the client defends gambling, or says it "helps". Shows that gambling meets a need, so other ways of meeting that need can be found. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S2]
Steps. Name the function the client describes, using the three functions UCLA lists:
- adaptive (e.g., avoiding conflict at home);
- protective (e.g., shielding a partner from money stress);
- reward (e.g., treating oneself after stress). Then ask what else could serve the same purpose.
Example language (illustrative): "So the casino is where you go to unwind after a brutal shift. That's a real need. What else has ever done that for you?"
Watch for: The client may feel you are agreeing gambling is fine. Link the reframe straight to finding an alternative.

4.6 Case formulation ("dynamic formulation")

Purpose / when. After session 1. A one-page written summary to guide treatment. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, Additional modules]
Steps. In a couple of paragraphs, record:
- situation and demographics;
- diagnosis and criteria count (as a rough severity marker);
- most significant consequence;
- most pressing problem and why the client came now;
- treatment goal;
- supports and structure;
- what the client sees as the benefits of gambling;
- avoidance or escape functions;
- other psychological, medical and practical problems;
- former interests;
- early relationship, strengths and likely obstacles. UCLA advises not sharing these last items with the client.
Watch for: Revise the formulation as monitoring and functional analysis add information. [synthesis]

4.7 Self-monitoring of gambling, urges and money

Purpose / when. From session 1 throughout. Produces the data used for functional analysis, goal review and relapse detection. [source: monitoring is a named step in Blaszczynski's self-help programme (IntechOpen summary); Petry et al. 2006 recorded gambling days and dollars] [uncertain: no source gives a diary format; the format below is a synthesis]
Steps [synthesis]:
1. Give a simple daily log with these columns: date; urge (0–10); situation/trigger; thoughts; gambled? (Y/N); time and money spent; outcome.
2. Review it at the start of each session.
3. Graph spending and gambling days every few weeks.
Example language (illustrative): "Jot down every urge, even the ones you resist. Those are the most useful entries."
Watch for: Blank logs; see 5.4. Working signs: the client spots patterns in their own log.

B. Behavioural analysis and change

4.8 Functional analysis of gambling

Purpose / when. Petry session 2. Map what comes before gambling (triggers, thoughts, urges) and what follows it (short-term positives, longer-term negatives). Every later intervention is chosen from this map. [source: Ledgerwood & Petry 2005; IntechOpen summary of Petry 2005]
Steps:
1. Choose one or two recent episodes.
2. For each, record:
  - the external trigger (where, when, who, money available);
  - internal triggers (feelings, thoughts);
  - the urge;
  - the gambling itself;
  - short-term positive results (excitement, escape, a win);
  - longer-term negative results (losses, lies, guilt, conflict).
3. Look for repeated patterns across episodes.
4. Mark each link where an intervention could break the chain. [synthesis: the layout; the antecedent and consequence content follows Ledgerwood & Petry]
Example language (illustrative): "Take me back to Friday, the hour before you went in. Where were you, what was in your pocket, and what was going through your head?"
Watch for:
- The client may say "it just happens"; slow the account down minute by minute.
- Working signs: the client can predict their own high-risk moments.

4.9 Separating high-risk situations from triggers (the gas-station analogy)

Purpose / when. UCLA session 4. Makes the decision point visible, so the client stops seeing gambling as automatic. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S4]
Steps:
1. Ask when urges occur and what makes them stronger. If the client says "always", ask what makes them worse.
2. Prompt with common situations from the manual's list:
  - payday;
  - unpaid bills;
  - buying presents;
  - a recent win or loss;
  - sports pages;
  - passing a betting outlet;
  - ads;
  - invitations when broke;
  - conflict or work problems;
  - boredom, loneliness, anger;
  - alcohol.
3. Explain that a high-risk situation is a warning light, not a cause. In UCLA's analogy, petrol is dangerous but needs a spark; the spark is the decision, shaped by thoughts.
4. Test this against the client's own life: have they ever been in that situation and not gambled? What was different in their thinking?
Example language (illustrative): "Payday is the petrol. What's the thought that strikes the match?"
Watch for:
- Attributing gambling to feelings, circumstances or personality ("I'm just impulsive"); steer back to the thought that comes before the decision.
- Working signs: the client reports noticing the decision moment between sessions.

4.10 Self-management plan: stimulus control, environmental restructuring and money access

Purpose / when. Petry session 4, and early on whenever losses are ongoing. Make gambling harder to reach and alternatives easier. [source: IntechOpen summary of Petry 2005 ("self-management plan"); Ledgerwood & Petry 2005 ("environmental restructuring")] [uncertain: Petry's session content is not drawn on; the specific measures below are common clinical practice, marked synthesis]
Steps [synthesis]:
1. From the functional analysis, list the client's access routes: cash, cards, credit, apps and accounts, venues, routes past venues, gambling companions.
2. For each route, agree one concrete barrier the client chooses. Options include:
  - carrying limited cash;
  - handing day-to-day money management to a trusted person, with consent;
  - asking the bank to block gambling transactions;
  - closing betting accounts and installing blocking software;
  - venue or online self-exclusion;
  - changing the route home.
3. Write the plan down with a start date.
4. Review it at each session.
Example language (illustrative): "Let's make the next bet take more effort than the urge lasts. Which door should we close first?"
Watch for:
- The client keeps a hidden access route ("just one account").
- Shared money control can increase family conflict or be misused; set it up with consent and review it.
- Self-exclusion on its own is rated weak in the evidence summarised by the IntechOpen chapter, so use it as one layer only. [source: IntechOpen, citing Chambless & Ollendick 2001]

4.11 Increasing pleasant activities / activity scheduling

Purpose / when. Petry session 3. Gambling leaves gaps in time, reward and company, and these need filling. [source: IntechOpen summary of Petry 2005; Ledgerwood & Petry 2005; Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S5 "developing activities"]
Steps:
1. List activities the client used to enjoy, plus new ones. Include social, physical, creative and restful options.
2. Schedule specific activities into the client's high-risk times, such as payday evening or after a shift.
3. Rate enjoyment afterwards.
4. Review and adjust. The IntechOpen chapter's model favours a daily schedule that leaves little idle time. [source: Rizeanu, IntechOpen]
Example language (illustrative): "Your log shows Thursday nights are the danger zone. What could be in that slot that you'd actually look forward to?"
Watch for: Activities that are too costly, too solitary or near gambling venues. Working signs: fewer urges at the scheduled times.

4.12 Coping with urges

Purpose / when. Petry session 5 and UCLA session 4 onwards, whenever urges are frequent. [source: IntechOpen summary of Petry 2005 and of Raylu & Oei 2010; Blaszczynski self-help programme as summarised there]
Techniques named in the sources:
- STOP. Silently and firmly tell yourself "STOP", then deliberately turn attention to something else. [source: Raylu & Oei 2010, via IntechOpen]
- Picture the consequences. Vividly imagine the aftermath of gambling: the empty account, the conversation at home. [source: Raylu & Oei 2010, via IntechOpen]
- Decision card / decisional balance. At the moment of an urge, review short- and long-term pros and cons of gambling. [source: IntechOpen, uncited technique]
- Relaxation or guided imagery for urges driven by stress. [source: Blaszczynski 2010, via IntechOpen]
Steps [synthesis: the delivery sequence]:
1. Rehearse each technique in session while the client recalls a recent urge.
2. Write the chosen techniques on a pocket card or phone note.
3. Add delay (wait a set period and leave the situation) and contacting a support person.
4. Practise daily and log use.
Example language (illustrative): "When the urge hits, run the card: stop, picture Sunday morning after a loss, read your reasons, then call or walk."
Watch for: Techniques the client has rehearsed but never used in real life. Working signs: urges logged and survived, and urges getting shorter.

4.13 Assertiveness and refusal skills

Purpose / when. Petry session 6. Covers being invited to gamble, social pressure and interpersonal conflict that leads to gambling. Ladouceur's programme includes social-skills training. [source: IntechOpen summary of Petry 2005 and Ladouceur et al. 2002; Ledgerwood & Petry 2005, citing Echeburúa et al. 1996 refusal training]
Steps [synthesis: role-play structure]:
1. Identify the client's pressure situations and the people involved.
2. Model a clear refusal: a direct "no", a brief reason if wanted, then suggest an alternative or leave.
3. Role-play with the client, then swap roles.
4. For conflict, practise stating feelings and requests without aggression.
5. Set an in-vivo practice for the coming week.
Example language (illustrative, client refusal): "No thanks, I'm not betting any more. Fancy getting food instead?"
Watch for: Over-long justifications that invite argument. Working signs: refusals carried out.

4.14 Dealing with consequences: debts, disclosure, legal and work problems

Purpose / when. UCLA session 2, or straight away in a crisis. Practical harm keeps the cycle going, including chasing losses to pay debts. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S2]
Steps:
1. List all debts.
2. Prioritise them, putting housing, utilities and anything with legal consequences first. [synthesis: priority order]
3. Plan honest disclosure to family, rehearsing in session where helpful.
4. Identify legal and employment problems.
5. Refer to debt counselling or legal aid as needed. [synthesis: referral]
Example language (illustrative): "Let's get every debt onto one page. It's easier to face a list than a fog."
Watch for: Bailouts that remove consequences and fund more gambling [synthesis]; the urge to gamble to fix the debt (target this with 4.20).

4.15 Stress coping and problem-solving

Purpose / when. UCLA session 5, and the problem-solving component of Ladouceur's programme. Life stressors drive gambling as an escape.
- UCLA names three techniques: avoiding avoidance, coping strategies, and developing activities.
- UCLA gives headings only, with little procedure. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S5; Fong 2009 review of Ladouceur & Lachance; IntechOpen]
Steps [synthesis: standard CBT problem-solving sequence, because the sources name the component without giving steps]:
1. Define one current stressor concretely.
2. Brainstorm options without judging them.
3. Weigh pros, cons and barriers. UCLA stresses discussing barriers.
4. Choose one option and plan its steps.
5. Role-play difficult parts. UCLA uses role-play.
6. Carry it out and review it at the next session. UCLA requires follow-through.
Example language (illustrative): "Instead of the casino taking the edge off the rent worry, let's take the rent worry itself apart."
Watch for: Avoidance of problems that the client keeps re-labelling as "no time".

C. Cognitive correction (Ladouceur core; Petry session 7; UCLA session 3)

The Laval group groups gambling-specific erroneous thoughts into five categories [source: Chrétien et al. 2018, citing Ladouceur et al. 2001]:

misunderstanding randomness, for example the gambler's fallacy ("it's due");
misunderstanding the negative expected return, for example believing losses can be won back;
reading near misses as almost-wins;
superstitions;
illusions of control, for example a favourite machine, switching machines, timing or stopping devices, or "feel".

In the Laval studies, most of what gamblers say aloud during play is erroneous. [source: Chrétien et al. 2018, citing Gaboury & Ladouceur 1989]

4.16 Psychoeducation on chance, independence of events and the house edge

Purpose / when. UCLA session 3 and the first Ladouceur component. It shows that outcomes are random and uncontrollable and that the game's return is negative, so winning in the long run is impossible. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S3; IntechOpen summary of Ladouceur et al. 2002]
Content (UCLA's list):
- negative rate of return, using a coin-toss illustration;
- independence of events;
- illusion of control;
- superstitions;
- hope of recouping losses;
- the "chain" of thoughts that keeps excessive gambling going. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S3]
Steps:
1. Use the client's own game (slots, sports, horses, cards, stocks).
2. Show with a concrete demonstration that each outcome is independent of the last. For example, toss a coin repeatedly and ask before each toss whether the previous results change the odds. [synthesis: the live demonstration]
3. Explain how the operator's margin means the player loses over time, however they bet.
4. Work out what the client's own losses imply about the long-run return. [synthesis]
5. Give a game-specific handout. UCLA provides one on horse-race betting; write your own for other games.
6. Where skill really affects outcomes (sports or horse knowledge, poker), acknowledge it and show that the margin and the variance still dominate. [synthesis] [uncertain: the sources don't detail skill-game handling]
Example language (illustrative):
- "The coin has no memory. Neither does the machine."
- "Every bet you place is priced so the house comes out ahead over time."
Watch for:
- Agreement in principle ("I know, but…") that doesn't change behaviour. That gap is what 4.17–4.20 work on.
- Working signs: the client corrects their own "due" or "lucky" statements.

4.17 Detailed reconstruction of a recent episode, with non-challenging probes

Purpose / when. UCLA session 4. Brings out the client's actual thoughts before, during and after gambling without making them defensive. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S4]
Steps:
1. Ask for a step-by-step account of the last gambling episode.
2. Ask about strategies used, what felt exciting, and whether it would still be exciting with no money at stake.
3. Write down the reasons and beliefs that come up.
4. Probe only with curious questions. UCLA's examples are "What do you mean by…?", "How do you know that…?" and "How did you choose…?". The manual explicitly says not to challenge the client's beliefs at this stage.
5. Thank the client and say you'll come back to the account.
Example language (illustrative): "You switched machines at that point. How did you decide which one to move to?"
Watch for:
- Challenging too early makes clients clam up.
- Working signs: the client starts voicing beliefs openly, such as "that machine was warming up".

4.18 Imaginal exposure with thinking aloud (eliciting erroneous thoughts)

Purpose / when. The Laval method for reaching the thoughts that only appear while gambling. The client imagines a typical session and says their thoughts aloud as they come, while the therapist uses Socratic questions to bring out situations, emotions and thoughts. Use it after the client is engaged, when reconstruction (4.17) produces only rationalised, after-the-fact thoughts. [source: Chrétien et al. 2018, citing Ladouceur et al. 2000/2001 and Bouchard et al. 2017]
Steps:
1. Explain the purpose and get consent, warning that urges may rise.
2. Have the client close their eyes and describe arriving at the venue (or opening the app), choosing a game and betting, in the present tense, saying every thought.
3. Use neutral prompts ("what's going through your mind now?"). Use "why" follow-up questions to uncover the reasoning behind each statement. [source: Chrétien et al. 2018]
4. Record the thoughts verbatim for later correction.
5. Before ending, wind down the scene. Check urge level and only end the session once the urge has dropped. Then review the coping plan. [synthesis]
In vivo variant. Laval researchers have used real gambling with thinking aloud. Chrétien et al. call it questionable because the therapist can't control when play stops and because spending real money raises ethical concerns. Virtual-reality gambling environments are a research alternative. I do not recommend in vivo gambling in routine practice. [source: Chrétien et al. 2018] [synthesis: recommendation]
Safety and contraindications [synthesis]:
- Expect cravings during exposure; schedule it early in the session, not at the end.
- Avoid exposure on payday or when the client has cash or credit to hand.
- Agree a post-session plan, e.g., go straight home or contact a support person.
- Defer exposure during acute suicidality, intoxication or severe crisis.
Example language (illustrative): "You've just sat down at your usual machine. Talk me through everything you're thinking, even if it sounds silly."
Watch for: Urge levels; the client spontaneously correcting themselves (a good sign); distress about losses that needs containing.

4.19 Contrast example: the client's thinking vs a non-gambler's thinking

Purpose / when. UCLA session 4, after the reconstruction. Lets the client see their beliefs from outside without being directly challenged. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S4]
Steps:
1. Describe the same situation twice: once with the client's thoughts and once with a friend's realistic thoughts. UCLA gives examples for a big horse race, scratch cards and slots.
2. Ask which person is more likely to bet, and why.
3. Ask the client which thoughts they recognise as their own.
Example language (illustrative): "Same machine, same money. You're thinking 'it's due'; your friend is thinking 'it's random and I'll lose on average.' Who stays longer?"
Watch for: The client defending their thoughts; return to 4.17-style curiosity.

4.20 ABCD recording and cognitive correction

Purpose / when. The core Ladouceur & Lachance technique, used in most sessions and in Petry session 7. The client learns to catch gambling thoughts in real situations and correct them. [source: Fong 2009 review of Ladouceur & Lachance; IntechOpen summary of Petry 2005 and Raylu & Oei 2010]
The ABCD record. Ladouceur & Lachance's model has four columns:
- Antecedent: a high-risk situation, such as being paid.
- Belief: the automatic thought, such as a sense of being entitled to gamble now.
- Behaviour: what the client did, such as gambling more than planned.
- Consequence: shame, and no money until the next payday. [source: Fong 2009 review] [uncertain: the review gives the letters as A-B-B-C (antecedent, belief, behaviour, consequence) under the name "ABCD"; the exact labels in the original guide were not verified]
Steps:
1. Teach the record using one of the client's episodes.
2. Assign it for every urge or episode between sessions.
3. In session, pick the belief that drives the most gambling.
4. Examine it with questions: what effect does the belief have; what is the evidence for it; is it logical and does it reflect how the game really works; what is a realistic alternative? [source: IntechOpen; one quoted question there is "Is my belief logical and does it reflect reality?"]
5. Write the corrected belief and re-rate how strongly the client believes the original. Typical replacements: the outcome depends on chance, not skill or ritual; past results don't affect the next one; losses can't be won back by playing on. [source: IntechOpen, Rizeanu]
6. Turn the corrected beliefs into a flash card for urge moments (link to 4.12).
Thoughts to target beyond chance beliefs. Chrétien et al. propose also correcting addiction-type thoughts: permission ("I deserve it"), relief ("it's the only thing that calms me"), anticipatory and self-control thoughts. They note these are under-studied in gambling. [source: Chrétien et al. 2018] [uncertain: a proposal, not part of a tested protocol]
Example language (illustrative):
- "You wrote 'I've lost so much it has to turn.' Walk me through how the machine would know that."
- "What would you tell a friend who said that?"
Watch for:
- Intellectual agreement without emotional conviction. Keep collecting real-time ABCD records rather than arguing.
- Working signs: the client corrects beliefs live, and conviction ratings fall.

D. Support, relapse prevention and delivery formats

4.21 Involving a significant other

Purpose / when. Optional conjoint sessions with a willing partner, relative or close friend. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, Additional modules]
- Goals:
  - build rapport with the significant other;
  - raise their awareness of the problem;
  - give them a voice;
  - strengthen their commitment to support;
  - use them, with the client's agreement, to confirm progress.
- Use when the client agrees, when money is shared, or when family conflict is a trigger.
Steps:
1. Prepare the client and agree what will and won't be discussed.
2. Invite the significant other to describe the impact on them.
3. Focus on strengths and on specific ways they can help (e.g., the money plan in 4.10).
4. Plan aftercare for them, including support groups for family members.
Example language (illustrative): "You've carried a lot of this. What would genuinely help from here, and what wouldn't?"
Watch for:
- Session time turning into complaint and criticism. UCLA says not to let large parts of a session go this way.
- Serious domestic conflict. UCLA advises conjoint work only after motivational work, and screening for abuse first. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009] [synthesis: screening for abuse]

4.22 Gamblers Anonymous facilitation

Purpose / when. From session 1. Petry's trial gave CBT alongside GA referral. UCLA reports that therapy plus GA does better than either alone, though the best amount is unknown. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009; Petry et al. 2006 design]
Steps:
1. Explain what GA can offer: structure, less shame, reminders of the harm, and a spiritual element for some.
2. Encourage active involvement: speaking, getting a sponsor, reading the literature, working the steps.
3. Suggest trying several meetings.
4. Explore reluctance (shame, mistrust, religious discomfort, past bad experiences) without pressure.
5. Note that GA has fewer meetings and fewer meeting types than AA. Options for young people, women, specific ethnic groups and non-English speakers may be scarce, so be ready to suggest online or alternative peer support. [synthesis: the alternatives]
Example language (illustrative): "Meetings vary a lot. Would you try three different ones before deciding?"
Watch for: Going to GA in place of therapy work, or the reverse; both are fine if gambling is improving.

4.23 Relapse prevention: slip vs relapse, behaviour-chain review and emergency plan

Purpose / when. Petry session 8 (emergency planning and relapse prevention) and UCLA session 6. Use the Inventory of Gambling Situations to identify risk areas. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S6; IntechOpen summary of Petry 2005; CAMH GGTU]
Steps:
1. Review progress and give credit for it.
2. Check what gambling thoughts and urges remain; re-apply 4.20 where needed.
3. Explain the difference between a slip (a single lapse) and a relapse (a return to the old pattern). Abstinence is hard but achievable.
4. Go back through the behaviour chain and high-risk situations, and mark where a slip is most likely.
5. Teach UCLA's emergency procedure, which uses a fire analogy:
  - "stop, look, and listen";
  - stay calm;
  - remember the commitment;
  - analyse what led to the slip or urge;
  - ask for help;
  - learn from it.
6. Write a personal emergency plan: names and numbers, money-blocking steps, alternative activities.
7. Plan future treatment and booster contacts. [synthesis: boosters]
Example language (illustrative): "If you slip on a Friday, what's the first thing you'll do on Friday night, not Monday?"
Watch for: "Abstinence violation" thinking after a slip ("I've blown it, so I might as well") [synthesis: term from general relapse-prevention practice]; overconfidence at the end of treatment.

4.24 Guided self-help, workbook and online delivery

Purpose / when. For clients who can't or won't attend weekly, for waiting lists, or as step-down care. [source: Ledgerwood & Petry 2005; Petry et al. 2006 workbook arm; CAMH GGTU]
- Petry's trial included an 8-chapter CBT workbook arm.
- Hodgins et al. combined a CBT/relapse-prevention workbook with one motivational phone interview.
- Internet-delivered CBT with minimal therapist support is used.
Steps [synthesis: the support routine]:
1. Agree which chapter or module to do each week.
2. Make brief scheduled check-ins by phone or message to review monitoring and ABCD records.
3. Step up to face-to-face sessions if gambling isn't falling after a few weeks, or if risk rises.
Watch for: Silent dropout; arrange a proactive call after any missed check-in.

5. Handling problems

What the UCLA manual covers is cited. Everything else is my synthesis and is marked.

5.1 Ambivalence and the stuck client

Signs: attends but nothing changes; goals stay vague; "I know, but…".

Respond with MI-style work [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S1–S2]:
- repeat the personalised feedback (4.4);
- use double-sided reflections;
- reframe gambling's function (4.5).
Then:
- Narrow to one behavioural target for a week, such as one access route closed (4.10).
- Review the monitoring data together rather than arguing. [synthesis]
- If the controlled-gambling goal keeps failing, show the pattern from the data and reopen the goal (4.3). [synthesis]

5.2 Resistance in session (minimising, denying, blaming, arguing, sidetracking)

UCLA treats resistance as the therapist's job to manage and links it to worse outcomes. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S2]

Never argue or challenge head-on.
Respond with simple or double-sided reflection, by shifting the focus back to the task, or by reframing.
In the cognitive phase, go back to curious probing (4.17) whenever a correction provokes defence. [synthesis]
Example (illustrative): "It sounds like the word 'problem' doesn't fit for you. Let's just look at what the last month cost."

5.3 Overwhelm: debt crisis, shame, distress during exposure

Debt and legal crisis. Address it first with 4.14 and refer for debt or legal advice. Gambling to fix debt is itself a belief to target ("I can win it back", 4.20). [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S2] [synthesis: the link]
Shame. Use the learned-habit model (4.2), avoid diagnostic labels, and keep a non-judgemental stance. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009]
Strong urges or distress during imaginal exposure [synthesis]:
- stop the scene;
- bring attention back to the room;
- wait for the urge to fall before the client leaves;
- agree a safe journey home. Reduce the intensity next time by using a less vivid scene first.

5.4 Non-adherence: homework not done, logs blank

UCLA lists possible reasons [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, Introduction]:

associations with school;
literacy problems;
fear of failing;
painful feelings when writing it down;
ambivalence;
feeling it means submitting to the therapist.

Explore the reason without guilt or a power struggle, and use the discussion to move therapy forward.

Practical fixes [synthesis]:

complete the first log together in session;
simplify to a single phone note per urge;
use voice notes if literacy is a barrier;
link the log to an existing routine.

5.5 Missed sessions and dropout

UCLA asks clients to talk about stopping rather than simply not coming. Its first sessions are 3–7 days apart to hold engagement. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S1]
Dropout is common in gambling treatment. [uncertain: the sources don't give dropout rates]
Responses [synthesis]:
- make a proactive phone or text contact within a day of a missed session;
- offer a workbook or remote option (4.24);
- leave the door open after relapse.

5.6 Lapses and relapse during treatment

Treat a lapse as information: go through the behaviour chain of the episode (4.8), use the emergency procedure (4.23), and update the self-management plan (4.10). [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S6]
After a large loss, check suicide risk and chasing, and secure money access straight away. [synthesis]

5.7 Suicide risk

Assess past and current suicidality at intake and give a 24-hour crisis card. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S1]
Reassess after major losses, when debts or gambling are discovered, and at legal or job crises; these are common acute stressors in gambling. [synthesis]
Follow your service's standard risk-assessment and safety-planning procedure. Include lethal-means counselling: safe storage or removal of means, with family help where appropriate. Include the financial "emergency" thinking ("there's no way out of this debt"), which can be addressed with practical debt planning. [synthesis]

5.8 Ruptures

[synthesis] Ruptures are not addressed in the sources.

Likely triggers:
- the client feels judged over a lapse or lies;
- the client feels corrected too early in the cognitive work;
- a significant other uses sessions to attack.
Responses:
- name the strain;
- own your part (e.g., "I pushed too hard on that belief");
- go back to the client's goals;
- move to curious questioning.
Lies about gambling. Frame them as part of the problem pattern, not a betrayal of you, and agree what honesty is needed for the plan to work.

5.9 Modality-specific difficulties

"I know it's random, but I still feel it's due." There is a gap between intellectual and emotional belief. Elicit the belief while it is active (imaginal exposure, 4.18; real-time ABCD records, 4.20) rather than repeating psychoeducation. [source: Chrétien et al. 2018 on eliciting thoughts during exposure] [synthesis: the framing]
Skill-based gamblers (sports, horses, poker, trading) argue that their knowledge gives them an edge. Acknowledge skill where it is real, then work through the margin, variance and their actual record. [synthesis] [uncertain: specific protocol guidance]
Online and app gambling offers access 24/7. Put more weight on blocking software, bank gambling blocks, account closure and self-exclusion schemes (4.10). [synthesis]
Near-miss and big-win memories (selective recall of wins). Use monitoring totals to counter biased memory. [source: Ledgerwood & Petry 2005 on biased memories of wins and losses] [synthesis: the method]
Cultural beliefs about luck. Work respectfully within the client's culture. Separate belief systems from beliefs about how specific games work. Use culturally relevant examples. [source: CAMH GGTU equity notes] [synthesis: the method]
Co-occurring substance use, depression or anxiety are common. Alcohol is one of the high-risk situations UCLA lists. Screen for these and treat or refer in parallel. [source: Fong & Rosenthal 2009, S4] [synthesis: parallel treatment]
Family member wants to bail the client out. Discuss how bailouts can keep gambling going, and route any help through a structured debt plan. [synthesis]
Group format (Ladouceur et al. 2003, 10 × 120 min). Use group exercises for the cognitive work, such as members spotting each other's erroneous beliefs. Keep individual relapse plans. [uncertain: group procedures; synthesis]

Sources

Sources

Further reading (not drawn on) [uncertain: content known only through the summaries above]

Ladouceur, R., & Lachance, S. (2007). Overcoming Pathological Gambling: Therapist Guide (and client workbook). Oxford University Press, Treatments That Work.
Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., & Doucet, C. (2002). Understanding and Treating the Pathological Gambler. Wiley.
Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., Lachance, S., Doucet, C., Leblond, J., & Jacques, C. (2001). Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189, 774–780.
Ladouceur, R., et al. (2003). Group therapy for pathological gamblers: a cognitive approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 587–596.
Sylvain, C., Ladouceur, R., & Boisvert, J.-M. (1997). Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 727–732.
Petry, N. M. (2005). Pathological Gambling: Etiology, Comorbidity, and Treatment. American Psychological Association.
Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., et al. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 555–567.
Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2010). A Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Programme for Problem Gambling: Therapist Manual. Routledge.
Hodgins, D. C., Currie, S. R., & el-Guebaly, N. (2001). Motivational enhancement and self-help treatments for problem gambling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 50–57.
Littman-Sharp, N., et al. (2009). Inventory of Gambling Situations: User's Guide. CAMH.

Further reading (not drawn on): the Okuda et al. (2009) case paper, the Europe PMC records, and the Oxford Academic chapter pages.

← Previous · II-125Matrix Model Next · II-127 →Complicated or prolonged grief treatment