Dialogical psychotherapy

1. Introduction

Version followed: the dialogical approach of the Institute for Dialogical Psychotherapy (San Diego, founded 1984 by Maurice Friedman and Richard Hycner) as set out in Friedman (1985) The Healing Dialogue in Psychotherapy, Hycner (1991; Gestalt Journal Press ed. 1993) Between Person and Person: Toward a Dialogical Psychotherapy, and Hycner & Jacobs (1995) The Healing Relationship in Gestalt Therapy: A Dialogic/Self Psychology Approach, all resting on Martin Buber's texts. These books were not available in full online; their content is taken from secondary sources that quote them with page numbers, and from Buber's own texts as quoted in an academic thesis. Points not traced to those quotations are tagged [uncertain]. [source: Wikipedia, Friedman; Vavassori 2017; Solomons 2003; Newman, IAHIP]

What it is. Dialogical psychotherapy is an attitude and an approach, not a school with its own techniques. Its founders present it as applicable whatever the therapist's orientation or technique, grounded in the conviction that human existence is centred on the "interhuman" dimension (relation between persons). In practice it is most fully developed inside Gestalt therapy (Hycner & Jacobs) and as a relational frame for existential and psychodynamic work (Friedman). There is no treatment manual, no session protocol and no fixed course length. [source: Wikipedia, Friedman; Newman, IAHIP]

How change happens. Buber's formula, taken up by Friedman and Hycner, is that healing comes through meeting: "healing is through meeting". Psychological suffering is understood as arising in the relational "between" (Buber: "A soul is never sick alone"), typically from failures of confirmation that leave the person's centre of selfhood underdeveloped. Healing happens in moments of genuine I-Thou meeting between therapist and client. These moments cannot be manufactured, only prepared for and allowed. Through them the client is confirmed as a unique person and gradually recovers the capacity for dialogue with others and the world. Hycner & Jacobs locate the curative factor in the relationship itself and define the dialogical as "the exploration of the between" (their p. 29, Portuguese edition, translated). [source: Newman, IAHIP; Solomons 2003, ch. 3–4; Vavassori 2017]

2. Framework

No formal phase model. None of the sources sets out a staged protocol, session count or explicit criteria for moving between phases. Friedman and Hycner present dialogue as an attitude that should run through the whole of therapy, not a start-up phase (Vavassori 2017 makes the same point for Gestalt practice). The working structure below is assembled from what the sources describe; its grouping into phases is [synthesis].

Format. Individual adult psychotherapy, open-ended. Session frequency and length follow the host orientation (usually weekly, 50 minutes) [synthesis]. Friedman also extended the approach to families and communities and drew on Boszormenyi-Nagy's contextual family therapy, but no family-therapy procedure is described in the sources [uncertain]. The Institute's training was a two-year programme (Wikipedia, Friedman). [source: Wikipedia, Friedman; Newman, IAHIP]

Phase A: Acceptance and trust (bonding).

Goal: build enough trust for the client to risk being present. The therapist is present, available and trustworthy, listens flexibly and validates the client's experienced meanings and self-narratives. [source: Newman, IAHIP]
Buber distinguished accepting the person as they are (this phase) from confirming what they can become (next phase). [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 3.6, citing Buber 1965]
Move on when (inferred): the client brings live, present-moment material to the relationship, can tolerate the therapist's direct responses, and refers to the therapist as a real person rather than only a function [synthesis].

Phase B: Confirmation and challenge.

Goal: confirm the client's potential, which may mean opposing them. Buber held that the therapist sometimes has to struggle against the patient for the patient, and criticised Rogers for not separating acceptance from confirmation firmly enough. Newman describes a deliberate move toward "a more challenging, confrontative engagement" when inclusion calls for it. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 3.6; Newman, IAHIP]
Hans Trüb, a Jungian analyst and Buber's friend whom Hycner draws on, framed neurosis as a flight from the world. The dialogical task is to call the person back into responsible relationship with the world beyond the consulting room. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 4.4; Almeida 2010 citing Hycner 1995] Trüb's own two-phase structure (analytic, then dialogical) is not drawn on [uncertain].

Phase C: Return to the world and ending.

Goal: the client carries the regained capacity for dialogue into relationships outside therapy. Progress is judged by more frequent moments of authentic meeting, in and out of session. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 4.5]
Ending criteria (inferred): the client meets others with less defensive "seeming", can stand their own ground while including others' viewpoints, and can repair mismeetings themselves [synthesis].

Running through all phases: the I-Thou / I-It rhythm. Life and therapy alternate between I-Thou (meeting) and I-It (observing, assessing, using method). Both are necessary (Buber: "without It man cannot live"), every Thou becomes an It again, and the therapist cannot stay in I-Thou continuously. Diagnosis, case notes and techniques belong to I-It; they are legitimate as long as they serve meeting. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 2.2, 4.6; Vavassori 2017]

3. Guiding principles

The between is primary. Attend to what happens between you and the client, not only to what happens inside the client. Practically: ask "what is happening between us right now?" before "what is going on in them?". [source: Newman, IAHIP; Hycner & Jacobs via Vavassori 2017]
Healing through meeting. Meeting is the agent of change; method is subordinate. Practically: judge each intervention by whether it opens or closes contact. [source: Newman; Solomons 2003 citing Friedman 1985]
Presence, not technique. Presence is "a meditative stance, a practice and not a technique" (Newman). Practically: prepare yourself before sessions and return your attention to the person whenever you drift into theorising. [source: Newman, IAHIP]
Inclusion, not empathy. Experience the other side of the relationship while staying centred in your own (Buber: "without forfeiting anything of the felt reality of his own activity"). Practically: imagine concretely what the client feels and wills now, then come back to your own response. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 2.4.1; Newman]
Confirmation, beyond acceptance. Confirm the person as they are and as they may become. Practically: support the person while challenging what diminishes them. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 2.4.2, 3.6]
Being, not seeming. Unreserved communication, without image management, builds trust. Unreserved does not mean saying everything. Practically: say what is true and relevant for this moment; never perform warmth or neutrality. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 2.4.3]
Unfold, do not impose. Be Buber's "educator", who helps the other's own potential unfold, not the "propagandist", who pushes a view. Practically: offer, don't install, interpretations and directions. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 2.4.4]
Limited (normative) mutuality. The relationship is mutual in meeting but not in role. The client cannot practise inclusion toward you the way you do toward them, and the therapist keeps responsibility for the relationship. Practically: be real, but do not ask the client to look after you. [source: Newman, IAHIP, on Buber–Rogers 1957]
Holy insecurity and existential trust. Stay open without knowing in advance what will happen; Buber said the therapist cannot know beforehand what method they will use. Practically: tolerate not-knowing rather than escaping into a fixed plan. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 3.5]
The narrow ridge. Walk between method and openness: "without methods one is a dilettante" (Buber), yet method must not replace meeting. Practically: keep your skills and hold them loosely. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 3.5]
I-Thou cannot be forced. Meeting is grace as well as will. Practically: create conditions for it and do not chase "moments". [source: Vavassori 2017; Solomons 2003, ch. 4.6]
Suspend presuppositions without abandoning them. Practically: bracket your theory long enough to hear the client's world, then use it. [source: Newman, IAHIP]
No spurious shortcuts to integration. Respect developmental and psychodynamic stages of the self. Practically: do not push for unity or reconciliation before the client's self can carry it. [source: Newman, IAHIP]
The four conditions of contact. Hycner names presence, inclusion, confirmation and communication. Practically: use them as a self-check after sessions. [source: Vavassori 2017, citing Hycner 1995]

4. Intervention inventory

The founders deliberately do not offer a technique list. The "interventions" below are the relational practices the sources describe, written as operational steps. Step sequences and all example language are [synthesis] built on the cited concept unless stated otherwise. Host-orientation techniques (for example Gestalt experiments) are used inside this frame, not replaced by it.

4.1 Preparing and practising presence

Purpose / when: before and throughout every session; the precondition for every other practice. Presence is described as a meditative stance and an ongoing way of being, not something switched on to produce a feeling of centredness. [source: Newman, IAHIP; Juliano 1999 via Vavassori 2017: a relaxed, attentive, whole and available attitude]
Steps: (1) Before the session take a minute to arrive: notice body, breath, preoccupations, and set aside what belongs elsewhere. (2) On meeting, take in the whole person (face, posture, voice), not just the presenting problem. (3) During the session, notice when you have left: planning the next intervention, theorising, defending yourself. Return to what the client is saying and showing now. (4) Stay with the present moment even when content is about the past. [synthesis on Newman]
Example language (illustrative): "I'd like to slow down for a moment. I notice I was busy thinking about what to say, and I'd rather just hear you."
Watch for: presence turning into a performance of calm, or mechanical ritual (Newman warns against both). Signs it is working: the client slows, speaks more directly to you, and pauses feel full rather than awkward.

4.2 Turning toward and becoming aware of the whole person

Purpose / when: at the start and whenever you notice you are relating to a diagnosis, a case formulation or a "type". Buber describes this "awareness" as perceiving the other as a whole, concrete, unique person without reducing them to a set of traits. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 2.4.1, citing Buber 1965]
Steps: (1) Notice the labels you are using for this client ("borderline", "the resistant one"). (2) Deliberately set them aside for this hour. (3) Ask about and respond to the specific person: their particular words, their particular way of being in the room. (4) Turn your body and attention to them; reduce note-taking during key moments.
Example language (illustrative): "I don't want to file this under a category too quickly. Tell me what it's like for you, specifically."
Watch for: the client feeling seen as individual ("no one's put it like that"). Warning sign: you can summarise the case but cannot say what this person cares about.

4.3 Inclusion ("imagining the real")

Purpose / when: whenever the client's experience matters and differs from yours, especially in conflict, in rupture, and with clients whose world is unfamiliar to you. Buber's inclusion means experiencing the other side of the relationship while keeping your own standpoint; Friedman calls it "a whole imaginative swinging into the life of the other" (quoted in Newman). Hycner & Jacobs describe it as a going-and-returning movement, being able to leap to the other side (p. 42, translated). Inclusion is distinguished from empathy understood as losing oneself in the other. [source: Newman, IAHIP; Solomons 2003, ch. 2.4.1; Vavassori 2017]
Steps: (1) Listen to the content and the concrete situation. (2) Imagine as specifically as you can what the client is feeling, wanting and perceiving right now, including how you look from their side. (3) Return to yourself: notice your own reaction, which you keep. (4) Speak from both: show that you have grasped their side and remain a distinct other. (5) Check: let the client correct you.
Example language (illustrative): "From where you sit, I imagine I looked like one more person who wasn't going to take this seriously. Is that close? I can see why you'd hold back. And I'm also here, and I do take it seriously."
Watch for: confluence (you lose your own position, agree with everything, feel what they feel without perspective). Inclusion is working when the client feels understood and still meets resistance or difference from you. Under strain, Newman lists substitutes for real contact: objectifying, taking on the client's feelings instead of your own, withdrawing, or hiding in technique.

4.4 Confirmation

Purpose / when: throughout, and especially where early non-confirmation has left an "atrophied personal centre" (Newman). Confirmation is accepting the person as they are while also affirming what they can become, which may include opposing them. [source: Newman, IAHIP; Solomons 2003, ch. 2.4.2, 3.6]
Steps: (1) Communicate genuine, specific interest in the client's own experience (Hycner, as paraphrased by Vavassori). (2) Acknowledge the person's existence and uniqueness, not just their feelings. (3) Distinguish the person (confirmed) from a stance or action (which you may question). (4) Name the potential you see, tentatively and concretely. (5) When needed, oppose what works against that potential, while making clear you are on the person's side.
Example language (illustrative): "I take seriously how hopeless this feels. And I don't agree that you're someone who can't change; I've watched you do something different in here twice today."
Watch for: confirmation sliding into flattery, or into confirming the defensive "image" instead of the person. Working signs: the client starts to own and voice their own perspective, including disagreement with you.

4.5 Unreserved communication (being rather than seeming)

Purpose / when: when trust is low, when the client tests your genuineness, when you notice yourself managing your image. Buber contrasts "being" (spontaneous, unreserved) with "seeming" (cultivating an impression). Unreserved does not mean saying everything; it means sharing a real part of oneself, which can be considered. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 2.4.3, citing Buber 1965]
Steps: (1) Notice gaps between what you feel and what you are showing. (2) Ask whether sharing your actual reaction would serve the meeting, not relieve you. (3) If yes, say it briefly, owning it as yours. (4) Return attention to the client's response.
Example language (illustrative): "I'll be honest: I'm not sure what to say, and I don't want to fill the silence with something that sounds wise."
Watch for: disclosure that shifts the focus to you. Signs it is working: the client becomes less guarded and less performative.

4.6 Unfolding rather than imposing

Purpose / when: when you have a strong view of what the client should do, believe or feel. Buber contrasts the "propagandist", who imposes, with the "educator", who helps the other's potential unfold. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 2.4.4]
Steps: (1) Notice your agenda for the client. (2) Name your view as a view. (3) Offer it as one input and invite the client's own judgement. (4) Follow and support the direction the client's potential is taking, even if it isn't your preferred one, unless there is risk.
Example language (illustrative): "I have a hunch here, and you can throw it out: it sounds as if part of you already knows you want to leave. What do you make of that?"
Watch for: compliance (the client adopts your words without conviction). Working signs: the client's choices begin to sound like their own.

4.7 Exploring the between (process attention to the relationship)

Purpose / when: when something is happening in the relationship (tension, distance, a shift in closeness) or when the presenting problem is relational. Hycner & Jacobs define the dialogical as exploration of the between; Buber locates illness in the between. [source: Vavassori 2017; Solomons 2003, ch. 3.3]
Steps: (1) Notice a shift in the contact (the client goes vague, looks away, becomes polite). (2) Name your observation, including your own part. (3) Invite the client to say how it is for them with you, now. (4) Explore the shared moment as jointly made, not as the client's pathology. (5) Link, when it fits, to patterns in the client's other relationships.
Example language (illustrative): "Something changed between us a moment ago. You got quieter after I asked about your father, and I felt myself get more careful. What happened for you?"
Watch for: turning this into interpretation of the client only. Working signs: the client can talk about the relationship with you directly, and later about relationships elsewhere.

4.8 Using method in the I-It mode, in service of meeting

Purpose / when: assessment, risk evaluation, case formulation, structured techniques. Buber held that method is necessary ("without methods one is a dilettante") but that the therapist cannot know in advance which method a moment needs. The therapist walks a "narrow ridge" between method and openness. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 3.5, 4.6]
Steps: (1) Do the I-It tasks openly (history taking, risk assessment, measures) and tell the client you are doing them. (2) Choose a technique only after sensing what the moment calls for, not from a plan made before the session. (3) Introduce it as an offer. (4) Afterwards, return to the person: ask how the technique was for them in relation to you. (5) Drop a technique that is creating distance.
Example language (illustrative): "I need to step back for a few minutes and ask some routine questions about safety. They matter, and then I want to come back to what you were telling me."
Watch for: technique becoming a hiding place (Newman's "reliance on technique" as a substitute for trust). Working signs: structured work deepens rather than interrupts contact.

4.9 Bracketing and obedient listening

Purpose / when: when theory, your worldview or your expectations are filling in what the client means. Newman describes suspending, without abandoning, one's presuppositions and using creative imagination to enter the client's world of meaning. Buber's own practice was described as "obedient listening" rather than applying one school's theory. [source: Newman, IAHIP; Solomons 2003, ch. 3.5]
Steps: (1) Notice an interpretation forming. (2) Hold it back. (3) Ask open, descriptive questions about the client's lived experience (what, how, when). (4) Reflect their meanings in their words. (5) Bring your understanding in only after theirs is fully heard.
Example language (illustrative): "When you say 'empty', what is it like? Where do you notice it?"
Watch for: bracketing becoming detachment. Working sign: the client says more than you would have predicted.

4.10 Challenge and confrontation within confirmation

Purpose / when: once trust is established, when the client's ways of living narrow their life or avoid the world, or when they invite collusion. The sources place this after the acceptance phase and describe it as part of confirmation, not a break from it. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 3.6; Newman, IAHIP]
Steps: (1) Check the relationship can bear it. (2) State what you see, specifically and without diagnosis. (3) Make your care explicit. (4) Stay with the client's reaction (anger, hurt) rather than retracting. (5) Repair if it landed as rejection (see 4.13).
Example language (illustrative): "I'm going to push back, because I'm on your side: every week we end up talking about your son's anxiety, and I wonder whether that keeps us from your own fear of going out."
Watch for: challenge used to discharge your frustration. The source vignette (Solomons, vignette two) showed this kind of pointing out of a displacement gradually opening the client back toward the world.

4.11 Calling back to the world (Trüb's line)

Purpose / when: with clients whose symptoms protect them from the demands of relationship and the world (Trüb: neurosis as flight from reality; defences protect but narrow life). Hycner draws on Trüb, for example in quoting him that we cannot point to a truth we possess, only to one we look for together. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 4.4; Almeida 2010 citing Hycner 1995, p. 71]
Steps: (1) Acknowledge what the withdrawal protects. (2) Explore what the world is asking of the client (a relationship, a responsibility, a choice). (3) Explore together what it would mean to answer. (4) Support small, real steps of re-engagement and bring the experience back into session.
Example language (illustrative): "Staying in has kept you safe from being judged. I also hear that your friend keeps calling. What would it be like to answer her?"
Watch for: pushing too early (see Newman's warning against shortcuts). Working signs: the client's world widens.

4.12 Disclosing your own experience of an impasse

Purpose / when: when therapy is stuck and the therapist's guardedness is part of the stuckness. In a vignette from Goldberg (2000), cited by Solomons, a therapist with a non-responsive patient admitted his own impasse and feelings; the patient then opened up, saying she did not want to be the only one admitting feelings. This is a reported example, not a rule set by the founders [uncertain as a general prescription].
Steps: (1) Check your motive (to open the meeting, not to unload). (2) Speak briefly and in the first person about your experience of the impasse. (3) Do not ask the client to fix it. (4) Invite their experience of the same impasse.
Example language (illustrative): "I've been feeling stuck with you for a few weeks, as if I keep reaching and missing. I'd rather say so than pretend. How has it been for you?"
Watch for: the client taking care of you (a breach of limited mutuality). Working signs: reciprocal openness and new material.

4.13 Recognising and repairing mismeeting

Purpose / when: when sessions produce insight but no meeting, or after a rupture. Mismeeting is a failed meeting in which the client's centre stays unaddressed even if analytic insight grows (Newman). [source: Newman, IAHIP]
Steps: (1) Notice signs: intellectualised sessions, the client agreeing without feeling, your own boredom or relief at session end. (2) Own your part. (3) Name the miss without blame. (4) Use inclusion (4.3) to understand how it was from their side. (5) Try again, more simply. [steps: synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "I think I've been explaining you to yourself, and missing you. Can we start again from what matters most right now?"
Watch for: repeated cycles of insight without change. Working signs: the client feels met after a repair, and the relationship becomes sturdier for it.

4.14 Holding the limits of mutuality

Purpose / when: whenever closeness, disclosure or role questions arise. Buber, against Rogers in their 1957 dialogue, held that mutuality in therapy is real but "limited" and "normative": the therapist includes the client, but the client cannot fully include the therapist. [source: Newman, IAHIP]
Steps: (1) Be personally present without making the client responsible for you. (2) Keep frame, fees and boundaries clear, as part of meeting rather than against it. (3) When the client wants equality ("tell me about your life"), acknowledge the wish and the real asymmetry. (4) Use personal material only when it serves the client's process.
Example language (illustrative): "I'm glad you want to know me. I'm real with you in here, and I also think it helps you most if this hour stays yours."
Watch for: overly rigid neutrality (no meeting) or overly loose mutuality (role confusion).

4.15 Working with existential guilt [uncertain]

Purpose / when: when a client carries guilt for real injury to others, which is different from neurotic guilt feelings. Buber's essay "Guilt and Guilt Feelings" (1957) and Friedman's applications make this distinction. These texts are not drawn on here: what follows is [uncertain] and should be checked against Buber (1965), The Knowledge of Man.
Steps (as commonly summarised, uncertain): (1) Distinguish real guilt (a broken relationship or responsibility) from guilt feelings without such a basis. (2) For real guilt, support the client to illuminate honestly what happened, (3) to remain the same person who did it rather than disowning it, and (4) where possible, to repair or reconcile in the actual world.
Example language (illustrative): "It sounds like this isn't only an irrational feeling: you did let her down. What would it mean to face that, and is there anything you can still do toward her?"
Watch for: turning real guilt into a symptom to be removed, or harsh self-punishment replacing repair.

4.16 Integrating host-orientation techniques (Gestalt and others) [synthesis]

Purpose / when: dialogical psychotherapy is meant to run within any orientation (Wikipedia, Friedman). In Gestalt therapy, dialogue is one of three pillars alongside field and phenomenology, with experiments such as two chairs used inside the dialogical relationship (see the table of contents of Mann's Gestalt Therapy: 100 Key Points, 2nd ed.). How Hycner & Jacobs sequence experiments in their book is not drawn on [uncertain].
Steps: (1) Establish contact first. (2) Offer the experiment as an invitation co-created with the client. (3) Stay present during it as a partner, not a director. (4) Afterwards, explore what it was like between you.
Example language (illustrative): "Would you be willing to try something? You could speak to your father as if he were here, and I'll stay right beside you."
Watch for: experiments used to bypass the relationship.

5. Handling problems

The sources give principles rather than troubleshooting protocols. Responses below are tagged by origin.

Stuck therapy / impasse. First ask whether you are in mismeeting: insight without contact (4.13). Check your own presence (4.1) and whether you are hiding in method (4.8). If the impasse persists, consider brief, owned disclosure of your experience of being stuck, as in the Goldberg vignette (4.12). [source: Newman; Solomons 2003, ch. 3.4.1; ordering = synthesis]
Resistance. In a dialogical frame, "resistance" is treated as something that happens between two people, and as protection the person needs, rather than as an obstacle in the client to overcome. Breshgold (1987) argued from Gestalt's dialogic-existential foundations that the label itself can set therapist against client, and that dropping it supports alliance and understanding. Practical response: (1) honour what the guardedness protects; (2) ask what in your way of relating might make it necessary; (3) use inclusion to feel the danger from the client's side; (4) confirm the person while staying available. [source: Breshgold 1987 abstract; Trüb via Solomons 2003, ch. 4.4.1] Hycner's book has a dedicated treatment of resistance that is not drawn on [uncertain].
Overwhelm / dysregulation. Meeting must be dosed. Move deliberately into the I-It mode (grounding, structure, safety planning), tell the client you are doing so, and return to contact once they are settled. Newman's warning against forcing shortcuts to integration applies here. [synthesis on Solomons 2003, ch. 2.2; Newman]
Severe withdrawal or psychosis. Buber himself named a limit: when the person fully shuts themselves in, dialogue cannot go on (quoted in Solomons). Psychosis is described as "I-solitude" with loss of the Thou. Do not assume relational presence alone is sufficient; combine it with standard psychiatric assessment and care, and keep offering contact at the client's pace. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 3.3, 4.4.3; combination = synthesis]
Non-adherence. The approach has no homework, so "non-adherence" usually shows up as missed sessions, lateness or broken agreements. Treat these as messages within the between: explore what they say about the relationship before treating them as administrative problems. Keep the frame clear (4.14). [synthesis]
Ruptures. Own your contribution, include the client's experience of the rupture, confirm the person, and try again (4.13). Gestalt texts in this tradition treat rupture and repair as part of the dialogical relationship (Mann, 100 Key Points, table of contents). [source: Newman; Mann TOC; steps = synthesis]
Suicide or self-harm risk. Relational presence does not replace risk assessment. Switch openly into I-It assessment (4.8): ask directly about ideation, intent, plans and preparatory behaviour; agree a collaborative safety plan with lethal-means counselling (safe storage or removal); involve crisis services when needed. Then return to the relationship. [synthesis; current standard practice]

Modality-specific difficulties

Confusing inclusion with empathic merging. Signs: you feel what the client feels with no perspective of your own, cannot challenge, or are exhausted after sessions. Response: deliberately do the "returning" half of inclusion (4.3), and take it to supervision. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 2.4.1; Vavassori 2017]
"Authenticity" used as licence. Unreserved communication is not saying everything (Buber, via Solomons 2003, ch. 2.4.3). Test any disclosure: does it serve the meeting and the client? Avoid disclosures that ask the client to look after you (limited mutuality, 4.14). [source + synthesis]
Chasing I-Thou moments. I-Thou cannot be induced (Vavassori 2017). Trying to manufacture peak moments turns the client into an object of your technique. Response: return to ordinary, careful presence. [source]
Acceptance without confirmation. Endless validation can freeze a client in their current state. Buber's distinction calls for moving, once trust exists, to confirming potential, including disagreement (4.4, 4.10). [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 3.6]
Propagandist drift. If you notice persuading the client toward your values (spiritual, political, relational), step back to unfolding (4.6). [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 2.4.4]
Abandoning method in the name of dialogue. Buber himself warned that without methods one is a dilettante. Keep diagnostic thinking, risk assessment and evidence-based techniques available. [source: Solomons 2003, ch. 3.5]
Therapist depletion. A practice that asks for presence and inclusion every hour requires your own support: supervision, personal therapy, a contemplative or presence practice (Newman frames presence as a practice). [synthesis on Newman]
Shame in the relationship. Lynne Jacobs (in Hycner & Jacobs 1995) writes about shame in the therapeutic dialogue; that chapter is not drawn on [uncertain]. Practical, unsourced suggestion: when a client freezes or hides after a disclosure, slow down, attend to how it felt to be seen by you, and own any part of your response that may have felt evaluating. [synthesis]

Sources

Sources

Books and papers cited (primary texts not drawn on in full; content via the secondary sources above)

Buber, M. (1923/1970). I and Thou (trans. W. Kaufmann). New York: Scribner.
Buber, M. (1965). The Knowledge of Man (ed. M. Friedman), including "Elements of the Interhuman", "Distance and Relation", "Guilt and Guilt Feelings" and the 1957 Buber–Rogers dialogue. New York: Harper & Row.
Buber, M. (1967). A Believing Humanism. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Friedman, M. (1985). The Healing Dialogue in Psychotherapy. New York: Jason Aronson.
Friedman, M. (1992). Dialogue and the Human Image: Beyond Humanistic Psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hycner, R. (1991). Between Person and Person: Toward a Dialogical Psychotherapy. Highland, NY: Gestalt Journal Press (1993 printing). Portuguese edition: De pessoa a pessoa: psicoterapia dialógica (1995).
Hycner, R., & Jacobs, L. (1995). The Healing Relationship in Gestalt Therapy: A Dialogic/Self Psychology Approach. Highland, NY: Gestalt Journal Press. Portuguese edition: Relação e cura em Gestalt-terapia (1997).
Trüb, H. (1952). Heilung aus der Begegnung. Stuttgart: Klett.

← Previous · III-004Self-disclosure and the transparent self Next · III-006 →Italian humanistic-existential psychology