Helping-skills model

1. Introduction

Version followed: the four-skill Carkhuff Helping Model as set out in Robert R. Carkhuff, The Art of Helping (HRD Press; the January 2009 printing listed on O'Reilly, ISBN 9781599961798; the edition number was not shown [uncertain]). Its chapter structure is taken from that edition's table of contents and previews. Empathy level definitions come from Carkhuff & Berenson, Beyond Counseling and Therapy (2nd ed., 1977), as reproduced in a thesis appendix. Training procedures come from Carkhuff's Systematic Human Relations Training (1969, 1971), as described in studies that used it. [source: O'Reilly TOC and previews of The Art of Helping; White Rose thesis appendix; Leckett 1976; Conklin et al.]

What it is. A skills model and training programme for any helper, not a separate school of psychotherapy. It is also called the human resource development (HRD) model or Carkhuff Helping Model. Carkhuff and Berenson derived it from Rogers' core conditions: they turned empathy, respect/warmth and genuineness into rated levels, then into teachable skills. Responding and initiative came first; attending and personalizing were added later. [source: inflibnet Art of Helping Skills; Leckett 1976]
How change happens. Each helper skill sets off a matching step of the helpee's own ("intrapersonal") processing:
- attending leads to involvement;
- responding leads to exploring where the helpee is;
- personalizing leads to understanding where they are compared with where they want or need to be;
- initiating leads to acting to get there.
Recycling. Action produces feedback, which starts a new round of exploring, understanding and acting at a deeper level. [source: O'Reilly TOC chs. 2–3, 8; rch08.h5]
How it sits in practice. In psychotherapy it works as a core relational and problem-solving skill set that can carry, or sit inside, other treatments. [synthesis]

2. Framework

The helping process runs in the phases below. Each phase is the helper's contribution matched to the helpee's response. The five "levels of helping" place the helper's performance on one ladder: 1.0 nonattending, 2.0 attending, 3.0 responding, 4.0 personalizing, 5.0 initiating. [source: O'Reilly rch08.h5; TOC]

Pre-helping: Attending → Involvement.
- Goal: the helpee is willing to engage and disclose.
- Helper work: prepare the context and yourself, attend personally (posture, eye contact), observe, listen.
- Move on when the helpee is talking about their own experience, not just reporting events or holding back. [source: inflibnet; TOC ch. 4] [synthesis: the move-on test]
Phase I: Responding → Exploring.
- Goal: the helpee explores where they are: experiences, behaviours, feelings.
- Helper work: respond to content, then feeling, then meaning, and summarise.
- Move on once you have an interchangeable base: your responses capture the helpee's feeling and meaning about as well as they did themselves (empathy Level 3). The helpee confirms them ("Yes, exactly") and goes deeper on their own. [source: TOC ch. 6 "Interchangeable Base"; Carkhuff & Berenson 1977 via White Rose thesis; rch06.h8]
Phase II: Personalizing → Understanding.
- Goal: the helpee understands their own part in the situation and turns the problem into a goal.
- Helper work: personalize meaning, the problem, the feeling and the goal.
- Move on when the helpee accepts a problem in the form "I can't …" and states the goal as its flip side. [source: rch06.h5; Rudick 1981; inflibnet]
- If the helpee is not ready to own their part, go back to responding. [source: inflibnet]
Phase III: Initiating → Acting.
- Goal: the helpee carries out an action programme.
- Helper work: define the goal operationally; develop the programme (steps and substeps), the schedule and the reinforcements; prepare to carry out the steps; plan check steps.
- Move on when the helpee is acting and checking their progress. [source: TOC ch. 7; rch03.h4; Rudick 1981]
Feedback and recycling.
- Results of action, and "critical incidents" (setbacks), feed back into new attending, responding, personalizing and initiating. [source: TOC ch. 3 "Facilitating Feedback"; rch08.h5]

Session count and format

The previews give no fixed session count or session plan. The model describes a process, not a manualised course of sessions. [uncertain]
In practice, one cycle can happen inside a single contact for a focused problem, or run across several sessions; complex problems need repeated cycles. [synthesis]
Training formats are better documented. One counsellor programme ran 5 weeks, 30 hours, with discrimination and communication testing before and after. Its graduates then trained peers for 20 hours. [source: Conklin et al.]

How to check your level

Rate your own responses against the levels.
Personalizing has its own three-level rating:
- low: accurate response to meaning;
- moderate: also personalizes the meaning (the helpee's assumptions and the implications for them);
- high: also personalizes the problem, goal and feelings, including the helpee's deficits and assets.
[source: rch06.h8]

3. Guiding principles

Helping can be for better or worse. Helpers who function at low levels can harm. Practical meaning: you are responsible for your own level of functioning. [source: ch. 1 title "For Better or Worse" in TOC] [uncertain: the claim fits Carkhuff & Berenson's well-known position]
The process is sequential and cumulative. Each skill is the base for the next: content → feeling → meaning → personalizing → initiating. Practical meaning: don't jump to advice or plans before you have an accurate base. [source: rch05.h1]
Build an interchangeable base before adding anything. Practical meaning: match the helpee's feeling and meaning first. Additive or personalized responses only land on top of that. [source: TOC ch. 6; Carkhuff & Berenson 1977]
Stay in the helpee's frame of reference and don't hand out advice. Practical meaning: a "you should" reply blocks exploring. [source: Rudick 1981]
Use fresh words, not parroting. Practical meaning: restate the message in your own words. Repeating the helpee's words verbatim is not responding. [source: rch05.h1]
Feeling and content together make meaning. Practical meaning: a response is incomplete without both. [source: inflibnet]
Personal responsibility. Practical meaning: help the helpee see what they do or fail to do in the problem, as the part they can change, not as blame. [source: rch03.h3; inflibnet] [synthesis: the "not as blame" wording]
A goal is the flip side of a problem. Practical meaning: once "you can't X" is accepted, the goal is "to be able to X". [source: rch06.h5]
Helping ends in action. Practical meaning: the process isn't finished until the helpee leaves with an action programme. [source: rch03.h4]
Small steps, and a first step that can't fail. Practical meaning: break the goal down until the first step is something the helpee can surely do now. [source: Rudick 1981]
Recycle. Practical meaning: treat setbacks and "critical incidents" as chances to go round the skills again, not as failure. [source: rch08.h5]
Respond before you initiate. Practical meaning: earn the right to confront or direct. In Carkhuff's system, the responsive dimensions (empathy, respect, concreteness) come before the initiative dimensions (genuineness, self-disclosure, confrontation, immediacy). [source: Leckett 1976 lists these dimensions] [uncertain: the responsive/initiative split is from Carkhuff 1969]
Systematic training and measurement. Practical meaning: skills are learned by discrimination (rating responses) and then communication (producing them), checked against rated levels. [source: Leckett 1976; Conklin et al.]
Whole-person functioning. Physical, emotional and intellectual functioning tend to rise or fall together. Practical meaning: programmes may target physical, emotional and intellectual assets, not only the presenting problem. [source: Rudick 1981; Conklin et al.] [uncertain: the "HRD problems and goals" sections are not drawn on]

4. Intervention inventory

The inventory follows the skill sequence of The Art of Helping, chapters 4–8. The subskill names come from that edition's table of contents. Where only the heading is available, the steps are built from secondary accounts or are marked [synthesis]/[uncertain]. All example lines are illustrative unless shown in quotes with a source. [source: O'Reilly TOC]

A. Attending (involving the helpee)

A1. Preparing for attending (attending contextually)

Purpose / when: At the start of every contact, and before any session where the helpee may be guarded. Sets up conditions that invite involvement. [source: TOC ch. 4 "Preparing for Attending"]
Steps: [uncertain: steps below are synthesis consistent with the heading]
1. Arrange a private, comfortable, low-distraction setting with no barrier between the chairs.
2. Review what you know of the helpee and the purpose of the meeting.
3. Settle yourself: put your own preoccupations aside.
4. Greet the helpee by name and orient them to the time available.
Example language (illustrative): "We have about fifty minutes, just for you. Where would you like to start?"
Watch for: The helpee settles, makes eye contact and starts talking on their own. Restless glancing at the door or clock suggests the setting or your stance is not yet safe enough. [synthesis]

A2. Attending personally (physical attending)

Purpose / when: Throughout the contact. Shows full attention through your body and draws the helpee in. [source: TOC ch. 4 "Attending Personally"; inflibnet]
Steps:
1. Face the helpee squarely.
2. Keep an open posture.
3. Lean slightly toward them.
4. Hold natural eye contact without staring.
5. Stay relaxed and avoid fidgeting.
Note on the steps: The steps above follow the secondary account. That source labels them with Egan's SOLAR acronym and calls them guidelines, not rigid rules. Carkhuff's own list of attending behaviours is not drawn on. [source: inflibnet] [uncertain]
Example language: Mostly non-verbal. Brief encouragers (illustrative): "Mm-hm … go on."
Watch for: Adapt the posture and eye contact to cultural norms and to trauma history; for some helpees, sitting side-on is safer. [synthesis] Sign it is working: the helpee talks more freely and moves toward personal material.

A3. Observing

Purpose / when: Continuously, and especially before you first respond. Lets you infer the helpee's energy level and feelings, and spot mismatches between what they say and how they look. [source: inflibnet; TOC ch. 4]
Steps:
1. Note appearance, posture and grooming.
2. Note energy: alert and upright, or slumped and slow.
3. Infer feeling from face and body.
4. Note whether the non-verbal message confirms, contradicts or emphasises the words.
5. Hold your inferences as hypotheses to check through responding.
Example language (illustrative, used as a later response): "You're telling me it's fine, and you look exhausted as you say it."
Watch for: Over-reading single cues. Observing is checked through your responses, never announced as a diagnosis. [synthesis]

A4. Listening

Purpose / when: At all times. Takes in the full message so that your responses can be accurate. [source: TOC ch. 4; inflibnet]
Steps:
1. Listen for three things: experiences (what happens to the helpee), behaviours (what they do or fail to do), and affect (the feelings attached to either).
2. Suspend judgement and your own agenda while listening.
3. Mentally repeat the key words and ask yourself the 5WH questions: who, what, why, when, where, how.
Source note: Step 1 is from the secondary account. Steps 2–3 are synthesis consistent with the 5WH content focus (rch05.h1). [uncertain]
Example language: None; listening prepares the response.
Watch for: Rehearsing your reply while the helpee is still talking. A quick test: could you restate the who/what/why right now? [synthesis]

B. Responding (facilitating exploring)

B1. Responding to content

Purpose / when: First thing once the helpee has said something substantial. Builds an accurate base of facts about the helpee's experience; feeling, meaning and later personalizing are built on top of it. [source: rch05.h1]
Steps:
1. Pick out the key 5WH elements.
2. Restate them in fresh words, not the helpee's own words.
3. Use the stem "You're saying …" while learning; drop it as you become fluent. [source: rch05.h1] [synthesis: dropping the stem]
4. Pause and let the helpee confirm, correct or continue.
Example language (illustrative): "You're saying that since the restructure, your manager has stopped including you in the planning meetings."
Watch for: Parroting, and adding your own interpretation. Signs it is working: "Yes, and …", and the helpee adds detail.

B2. Responding to feeling

Purpose / when: Once the content is clear, or straight away when the feeling is strong. Gives words to what the helpee feels, which deepens exploring. [source: inflibnet; TOC ch. 5]
Steps:
1. Ask yourself: if I were in their place, how would I feel?
2. Identify the dominant feeling and its intensity from the words, observing and the situation.
3. Pick a feeling word that matches both the kind and the strength of the feeling (the book has a feeling-word list as Appendix A; not reproduced here).
4. Say it in a short sentence, for example "You feel …".
Source note: Step 2 and the existence of Appendix A are sourced (inflibnet; TOC). The empathic self-question in step 1 is a common training device not confirmed. [uncertain]
Example language (illustrative): "You feel shut out." "You're really furious about it."
Watch for: Two common errors. Under-shooting the intensity ("a bit upset" for rage) lowers the response to empathy Level 2. Naming a feeling the helpee hasn't reached yet is premature additive empathy. Signs it is working: the helpee's affect becomes visible and they say more about how it feels. [source: Carkhuff & Berenson 1977 levels via White Rose thesis] [synthesis: the application]

B3. Responding to meaning

Purpose / when: After feeling and content are clear. Joins the two into the basic interchangeable response, which the rest of the model stands on. [source: inflibnet; TOC ch. 5]
Steps:
1. Combine the feeling with the reason for it, using the format "You feel ___ because ___". The "because" clause restates the content that gives the feeling its meaning. [source: inflibnet; Rudick 1981]
2. Check with the helpee.
3. Repeat over several exchanges until the responses are consistently interchangeable.
Example language: In the source's own example, the helpee's friend moved away and the response is "You feel sad because your friend moved away" [source: inflibnet]. Illustrative: "You feel shut out because you've been left out of the meetings you used to run."
Watch for: A "because" clause that blames others or carries your interpretation. Keep it to the helpee's own reason. Signs it is working: the helpee confirms it and goes further into personal material (from mechanical talk toward spontaneous self-exploration, as on the helpee exploration scale). [source: White Rose thesis appendix, partly garbled] [uncertain]

B4. Summarising (completion)

Purpose / when: At the end of a stretch of exploring, or before moving into personalizing. Pulls the explored material together and checks your shared understanding. [source: inflibnet]
Steps:
1. Briefly restate the main themes, feelings and meanings.
2. Ask the helpee to approve or correct the summary.
Example language (illustrative): "Let me pull this together: … Have I got that right?"
Watch for: A summary that is really a disguised interpretation. Signs it is working: the helpee agrees, or corrects it and adds something new.

C. Personalizing (facilitating understanding)

Personalizing is the step that bridges responding and initiating. The helper draws on their own understanding to go beyond interchangeable responses, so that the helpee understands and takes ownership of their experience and turns problems into goals. [source: rch03.h3]

C1. Checking the interchangeable base

Purpose / when: Just before any personalizing response. Makes sure the base is accurate first. [source: TOC ch. 6 "Interchangeable Base"; rch06.h8]
Steps:
1. Give two or three meaning responses in a row.
2. Check that the helpee confirms each one and keeps exploring.
3. If any response misses, go back to responding before you personalize.
Example language (illustrative): "You feel trapped because every option seems to cost someone you love. Is that close?"
Watch for: Personalizing on a weak base gets heard as judgement. [synthesis]

C2. Personalizing meaning

Purpose / when: When the helpee keeps describing external causes. Brings out what the situation implies for them: their own assumptions and the personal implications. [source: rch06.h8; inflibnet]
Steps:
1. Ask yourself why this matters to this person, and what it says about them or does to them.
2. Rewrite the "because" clause in terms of the helpee's own stake: their standards, losses or hopes.
3. Check with the helpee.
Source note: The rating scale confirms personalizing meaning covers the helpee's assumptions and the implications of their experience. The exact sentence stem is not drawn on. [uncertain]
Example language (illustrative): "You feel shut out because being part of the planning is how you know you matter there."
Watch for: Signs it is working: the helpee shifts from "they" to "I" statements.

C3. Personalizing the problem

Purpose / when: Once the meaning is owned. Identifies what the helpee does, or fails to do, that makes up their part of the problem: the part they can change. [source: inflibnet; rch06.h8 "response deficits"]
Steps:
1. Find the behavioural deficit behind the personalized meaning.
2. Put it in the form "You feel ___ because you cannot ___". [source: Rudick 1981]
3. Choose a deficit that is specific and in the helpee's control.
Example language (illustrative): "You feel shut out because you can't find a way to raise this with your manager."
Watch for:
- Blame. Frame the deficit as a missing skill or step, not a character flaw. [synthesis]
- Timing. Helpees can take a long time to accept ownership. If they reject it, go back to responding. [source: inflibnet]
- Signs it is working: the helpee says, in effect, "Yes, that's the part I can't do."

C4. Personalizing the feeling

Purpose / when: Together with the problem. Updates the feeling to match the helpee's newly owned responsibility. This is often disappointment in themselves, alongside relief or excitement once a direction appears. [source: rch06.h5; rch06.h8 "personalizes … feelings"]
Steps:
1. Notice the shift from a feeling about others (anger) to a feeling about self (disappointment).
2. Put the new feeling word into the problem response.
Example language (illustrative): "You feel disappointed in yourself because you can't bring yourself to raise it."
Watch for: Shame spirals. Keep the warmth and respect explicit. [synthesis]

C5. Personalizing the goal

Purpose / when: As soon as the problem is accepted. Turns the problem into a goal: the "flip side" of the personalized deficit. [source: rch06.h5]
Steps:
1. Take the "cannot ___".
2. Name the opposite behaviour or asset.
3. Add it to the response: "… and you want to ___". The full format is "You feel ___ because you cannot ___ and you want to ___". [source: Rudick 1981]
4. Convey both the disappointment and the relief at having a direction.
5. Check with the helpee.
Example language (illustrative): "You feel disappointed in yourself because you can't raise this with your manager, and you want to be able to tell her directly that you want back in."
Watch for: A goal that is the helper's rather than the helpee's. Signs it is working: energy rises and the helpee starts to speculate about how.

C6. Personalizing HRD problems and goals

Purpose / when: When the helpee's deficit reflects a broader lack of resources. Frames problems and goals in terms of the helpee's physical, emotional and intellectual resources. [source: TOC ch. 6 headings; Conklin et al. (self-improvement programmes across physical, social, emotional, intellectual areas); Rudick 1981 (domains converge)]
Steps (synthesis):
1. Ask which domain of resources is underdeveloped, for example energy and fitness, handling emotions, or knowledge and skills.
2. Add a resource-building goal alongside the situational one.
Example language (illustrative): "Part of what makes it hard is that you're running on empty … you want to build back some energy so you can face these conversations."
Watch for: Don't add physical-domain goals without the helpee's agreement. Do not set fitness or weight targets. [uncertain]

C7. Personalizing decision making

Purpose / when: When the helpee faces a choice between courses of action. [source: TOC ch. 6 heading]
Steps (synthesis):
1. Personalize what each option means to the helpee.
2. Help them weigh the options against their own values.
3. Arrive at a personalized goal.
Example language (illustrative): "You feel torn because staying means safety and leaving means growth, and you want to choose the one you can live with."
Watch for: This section is not drawn on, so the procedure here is reconstructed, not Carkhuff's. [uncertain]

C8. Confrontation (when a personalized response is rejected)

Purpose / when: When the helpee rejects an accurate personalized response, or there is a clear discrepancy:
- between what they say they feel and how they look;
- between their real and ideal self;
- between their insight and their action.
- Strengths can be confronted as well as weaknesses.
[source: Rudick 1981, presenting Carkhuff's model; confrontation is one of Carkhuff's trained dimensions per Leckett 1976]
Steps:
1. Start with a mild confrontation, framed from the helpee's own perspective.
2. Only if that fails, use a direct confrontation from your own perspective, backed by observable facts.
3. Use the format "On the one hand you say ___ and on the other hand you do ___".
4. Follow every confrontation with a feeling-and-caring response.
Rules:
- Never confront twice in a row.
- Never use confrontation as an isolated device.
- If it opens no new exploration, acknowledge that you may have been inaccurate. [source: Rudick 1981]
Example language (illustrative): "On the one hand you say it doesn't bother you; on the other, you've brought it up three times today."
Watch for: Confrontation that comes before you have earned trust through responding. Signs it is working: renewed, deeper exploration, after which the cycle restarts from "You feel …". [source: Rudick 1981]

D. Initiating (facilitating acting)

Initiating helps the helpee define their personalized goal further, build an action programme and carry it out. Helping should end with programmes in hand. [source: rch03.h4]

D1. Defining goals

Purpose / when: Straight after a personalized goal is accepted. Makes the goal operational. [source: TOC ch. 7; Rudick 1981; inflibnet]
Steps:
1. Answer the 5WH questions for the goal: who, what, when, where, how, and why.
2. Make the goal observable and measurable.
3. Check that it is functional, achievable and realistic, and consistent with the helpee's values.
Example language (illustrative): "So what exactly would you do, with whom, by when, and how would we both know it had happened?"
Watch for: Vague goals ("feel better"). Restate them as observable behaviour.

D2. Developing programmes (steps and substeps)

Purpose / when: Once the goal is defined. Builds the route from where the helpee is to the goal. [source: TOC ch. 7; Rudick 1981]
Steps:
1. Set a first step so simple that the helpee cannot fail, starting from where they are now.
2. Set a first intermediate step roughly halfway to the goal.
3. Add more intermediate steps to fill any gaps the helpee could "fall through".
4. Treat each step as a mini-goal and break it into substeps: exactly what must be done.
5. Where needed, consider alternative programmes and pick the most realistic. [source: inflibnet]
Example language (illustrative): "What's the smallest thing you could do this week that you're sure you'd manage?"
Watch for: Trying to reach a goal in one huge step is a common cause of failure. [source: Rudick 1981] More detail means a higher chance of success.

D3. Developing schedules

Purpose / when: After the steps are set. Attaches start and finish times to each step. [source: TOC ch. 7 heading]
Steps (synthesis):
1. Give each step a date or time.
2. Order the steps.
3. Build in slack time.
Example language (illustrative): "When will you do the first step? Let's put it in your diary now."
Watch for: Section text is not drawn on. [uncertain]

D4. Developing reinforcements

Purpose / when: Before starting. Attaches consequences the helpee chooses to completing, or not completing, steps. [source: TOC ch. 7 heading; Conklin et al. (programmes specify a reinforcement contingency); inflibnet (contracts, reinforcement)]
Steps (synthesis):
1. Have the helpee pick meaningful rewards for completed steps.
2. Optionally, agree on a consequence for missed steps.
3. Write these into a simple contract.
Example language (illustrative): "What would be a real reward for getting that first conversation done?"
Watch for: Rewards the helpee doesn't actually value. [uncertain]

D5. Preparing to implement steps

Purpose / when: Just before the helpee acts. Gets them ready to carry out the first steps. [source: TOC ch. 7 heading]
Steps (synthesis):
1. Review the steps.
2. Identify what will help and what will hinder ("facilitating and restraining forces", source: inflibnet).
3. Rehearse difficult steps, for example by role-playing an assertive request. [source: inflibnet (assertiveness training)]
Example language (illustrative): "Let's practise the opening line; I'll be your manager."
Watch for: Section text is not drawn on. [uncertain]

D6. Planning check steps

Purpose / when: Built into the programme. Gives the helpee checkpoints for monitoring their own progress. [source: TOC ch. 7 heading; Rudick 1981 (are the steps measurable; is the reaction monitored)]
Steps (synthesis):
1. For each step, add a check question (did I do it? what happened?).
2. Record the answers.
3. Bring them to the next session.
Example language (illustrative): "After each step, jot down: done or not, and what happened."
Watch for: Checks reveal steps that are too big. Feed them into D7.

D7. Facilitating feedback and recycling

Purpose / when: At every review, and after setbacks or "critical incidents". Turns the results of action into new exploration and better programmes. [source: TOC chs. 2–3, 8; rch08.h5]
Steps:
1. Attend to and respond to the helpee's experience of acting.
2. Personalize what was learned.
3. Revise the goal or steps, starting the full sequence again ("go full circle"). [source: Rudick 1981]
Example language (illustrative): "You feel discouraged because the first step didn't go as planned. Let's look at what happened."
Watch for: Skipping straight to re-planning without responding to the feeling first.

E. Core-dimension responses (earlier Carkhuff system, 1969–1977)

Carkhuff's earlier work trained helpers on a set of dimensions, each rated on a five-point scale:

empathy;
respect (which took in warmth);
concreteness;
genuineness;
self-disclosure;
confrontation;
immediacy.

[source: Leckett 1976] Only the empathy level definitions are drawn on. Items E2–E5 give working definitions for practice and are marked accordingly.

E1. Additive empathy (Levels 4–5)

Purpose / when: Only once Level 3 interchangeable responding is established. Expresses feeling and meaning at a deeper level than the helpee managed to. [source: Carkhuff & Berenson 1977, via White Rose thesis]
The empathy levels:
- Levels 1–2 subtract from what the helpee expressed.
- Level 3 is interchangeable.
- Level 4 adds noticeably.
- Level 5 adds significantly, or stays fully with the helpee in their deepest moments.
Steps:
1. Respond at Level 3.
2. Add the feeling or meaning that is implicit but not yet spoken.
3. Check with the helpee.
How it links to the later model: Personalizing (C2–C5) is the later, more structured form of additive responding. [synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "You feel angry at him, and underneath that, maybe scared that this is how it will always be."
Watch for: Adding beyond the evidence. If the helpee doesn't recognise it, go back to Level 3.

E2. Respect

Purpose / when: Throughout. Communicates that you value the helpee and believe they can act on their own behalf. [uncertain]
Steps (synthesis):
1. Avoid condescending or rescuing responses.
2. Credit the helpee's competence.
3. Hand decisions back to them.
Example language (illustrative): "You've thought about this more than anyone; what do you make of it?"
Watch for: Advice-giving that implies the helpee can't cope.

E3. Concreteness

Purpose / when: When talk is vague or general. Moves toward specific feelings and experiences. This is closely tied to the 5WH focus of responding and goal-defining. [source: Leckett 1976 (dimension named); rch05.h1 (5WH)] [uncertain]
Steps (synthesis): Ask for, or respond to, a specific example: who, what, when, where.
Example language (illustrative): "Can you take me to the last time that happened?"
Watch for: Interrogation. Alternate questions with responses.

E4. Genuineness and self-disclosure

Purpose / when: Genuineness applies throughout. Self-disclosure is occasional, used when it may help the helpee's exploration or action. [source: Leckett 1976 (dimensions named)] [uncertain]
Steps (synthesis):
1. Keep what you say consistent with what you actually feel.
2. Disclose briefly, only when it serves the helpee.
3. Return the focus to the helpee at once.
Example language (illustrative): "I've had to have a conversation like that myself. It was hard. What feels hardest about it for you?"
Watch for: The focus drifting to you.

E5. Immediacy

Purpose / when: When something in the helper–helpee relationship is affecting the work: withdrawal, irritation, testing. Names what is happening between you, here and now. [source: Leckett 1976 (dimension named)] [uncertain]
Steps (synthesis):
1. Respond to the immediate relationship using the meaning format.
2. Invite the helpee's view.
Example language (illustrative): "You feel let down by me because I pushed toward a plan before you were ready."
Watch for: Use it only on a solid base. Follow it with responding.

F. Systematic training methods (for building your own skill, or training helpees)

F1. Discrimination training (rating)

Purpose / when: When learning the model, and periodically afterwards. Trains you to tell accurate responses from inaccurate ones before you try to produce them. [source: Leckett 1976; Conklin et al.]
Steps:
1. Study the operational definition and the 5-point scale for a dimension.
2. Rate a set of helpee statements, each with alternative helper responses.
3. Compare your ratings with expert ratings and note how far off you are.
4. Discuss the gaps.
Watch for: Systematic over-rating of your own favourite style of response.

F2. Communication training

Purpose / when: After discrimination training. Trains you to produce responses at the target level. [source: Leckett 1976; Conklin et al.]
Steps:
1. Write or speak responses to recorded or written helpee statements.
2. Have them rated on the scale.
3. Practise in rated role-plays.
4. Move on to real interviews with recordings reviewed.
Note: The earlier Truax–Carkhuff didactic-experiential programme also included reading, listening to graded tapes and quasi-group practice. Carkhuff dropped some of these in Systematic Training. [source: Leckett 1976]
Watch for: Ratings that improve on paper but not in live sessions. Record and rate actual sessions. [synthesis]

F3. Self-improvement programmes and training helpees

Purpose / when: For helpers, as personal development. For clients whose problems are interpersonal deficits. [source: Conklin et al. (trainees wrote self-improvement programmes using Carkhuff 1974 guidelines: goals, methods, reinforcement contingency, across physical, social, emotional, intellectual areas)]
Steps:
1. Apply D1–D6 to your own, or the helpee's, development goal in one domain.
2. Where relevant, teach the helpee the attending and responding skills directly, using F1–F2 in simplified form, as part of the treatment.
Source note on step 2: Carkhuff argued for "training as treatment" in the early 1970s. That paper is not drawn on. [uncertain]
Example language (illustrative): "Let's practise how you'd show your partner you heard them before you answer."
Watch for: Training that feels like homework drill. Link each skill to the helpee's own goal.

5. Handling problems

The sources give limited troubleshooting. Guidance below is tagged by origin. The model's built-in answer to most difficulties is to recycle: go back to the last skill that worked. [source: rch08.h5; inflibnet; Rudick 1981]

Helpee not getting involved: guarded, monosyllabic, "just here because I was sent".
- Go back to attending. Check the setting, your posture and your observing. [source: model sequence]
- Respond to the reluctance itself, in meaning format, e.g. "You feel annoyed because coming here wasn't your choice" (illustrative). [synthesis]
- Don't push content questions.
Exploring stays superficial or mechanical.
- Check that your responses are interchangeable and not subtractive. Raise the feeling word's intensity to match theirs.
- Add concreteness: ask for a specific episode. [source: Carkhuff & Berenson levels; Leckett 1976] [synthesis: the application]
Helpee rejects a personalized problem ("It's not me, it's them").
- Go back to responding until the base is solid. [source: inflibnet]
- Then try a mild confrontation from the helpee's own frame. If that fails, try a direct confrontation backed by facts. [source: Rudick 1981]
- Then return to a caring response. Never confront twice in a row.
- If nothing new opens up, acknowledge that you may have been inaccurate. [source: Rudick 1981]
Stuck: the helpee understands but doesn't act.
- The programme is usually the problem: steps too large, the first step not fail-proof, or substeps missing. Add intermediate steps and substeps. [source: Rudick 1981]
- Then check the schedule, the reinforcements and the check steps. [source: TOC ch. 7] [synthesis: the order of checking]
Non-adherence: steps not done between sessions.
- Respond to the experience of not doing them before re-planning: "You feel embarrassed because you didn't get to it" (illustrative). [synthesis]
- Treat the missed step as a critical incident and recycle. [source: rch08.h5]
- Shrink the step until it can't fail. Look at the hindering forces and rehearse the step. [source: Rudick 1981; inflibnet]
Overwhelm or flooding during exploring.
- Slow down and stay at interchangeable responding. Don't personalize or confront while arousal is high.
- Use grounding or containment from your wider practice.
- Return to personalizing in a later session.
- [synthesis: not addressed in the sources]
Ruptures: the helpee feels judged, pushed or misunderstood.
- Use immediacy in meaning format (E5) and own your part.
- Go back to responding.
- Rudick's rule of acknowledging your own inaccuracy after a failed confrontation applies more widely. [source: Rudick 1981] [synthesis: the wider use]
Personalizing heard as blame, especially with trauma, abuse, discrimination or poverty.
- The "you cannot" format can sound like holding the helpee responsible for harm done to them.
- Make clear that the external problem is real. Personalize only the part within the helpee's reach now (e.g. "you can't yet find safe people to tell").
- Never personalize responsibility for being victimised.
- [synthesis]
Formulaic, robotic responses.
- The stems are learning scaffolds. Once you are accurate, vary the wording and keep the structure (feeling + reason, deficit + goal). [synthesis]
- Avoid parroting. [source: rch05.h1]
Premature initiating: jumping to plans or advice.
- Hold off until the goal has been personalized. Advice blocks exploring. [source: Rudick 1981; rch03.h4]
Helper functioning below the minimal level, or ratings drifting.
- Re-do discrimination and communication training on recorded sessions. [source: Leckett 1976; Conklin et al.]
- Get supervision with rated tapes. [synthesis]
Cultural mismatch in attending behaviours.
- Treat posture and eye-contact guidelines as flexible. [source: inflibnet]
- Ask the helpee what feels comfortable. [synthesis]
Risk: suicidal or self-harm content comes up during exploring.
- Keep responding accurately, and move to a standard structured risk assessment and safety planning. This includes lethal-means counselling about safe storage or removal.
- The model does not replace risk protocols.
- [synthesis]
Use within a broader therapy.
- For complex or severe conditions, use the model as the relational and problem-solving framework around evidence-based specific treatments, not as a replacement for them. [synthesis]

Sources

Sources

Further reading (not drawn on)

Carkhuff, R. R. (2009 printing; edition not shown). The Art of Helping. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
Carkhuff, R. R., & Berenson, B. G. (1977). Beyond Counseling and Therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Carkhuff, R. R. (1969). Helping and Human Relations (Vols. 1–2). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Carkhuff, R. R. (1971). The Development of Human Resources. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Carkhuff, R. R. (1974). How to Help Yourself: The Art of Program Development. Amherst, MA: Human Resource Development Press. [uncertain: title as recalled; cited as "Carkhuff (1974)" programme-development guidelines in Conklin et al.]

← Previous · III-038Empathic or active listening training Next · III-040 →Theme-centred interaction