Atlas›Domain III · Humanistic, existential & experiential›Guide 106
Guide III-106

Tarango growth centre

Jorge Derbez, Andrés Leites, Anatolio Freidberg1966Mexico City, Mexico
A 29 · L 33 · M 3819 interventions in the Trinity explorer2 described for recognition only
Client cardCompare
[source: …] where a claim comes from[uncertain] not confirmed in a primary source[synthesis] the writer's reconstruction

1. Introduction

Version followed: Tarango as reconstructed in Ortiz Lachica (2020), from oral-history interviews with Anatolio Freidberg, Myriam Muñoz Polit and Miguel Reyes Garcidueñas. The visiting facilitators' methods are described from their own lineages' sources: Schutz's open encounter as Esalen describes it, Rogerian encounter, Perls-style Gestalt as Naranjo recalls it, and Painter's Postural Integration as taught by ICPIT. No Tarango manual, programme or writings by Derbez were found. [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020]

What it was. Tarango was not a single therapy. It was a Mexican growth centre on the Esalen model: an institute that ran weekend experiential workshops led by visiting US facilitators. Jorge Derbez, a psychoanalyst trained with Erich Fromm, founded it together with two of his patients. One of them, the engineer Andrés Leites, visited Esalen around 1966. He came back enthusiastic and persuaded Derbez and Anatolio Freidberg to set up an institute: a Summerhill-style school on weekdays and workshops on Saturdays and Sundays. [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, pp. 1998–1999]

The founding by "Derbez and others, 1960s" is supported only approximately. The founding came after Leites's visit to Esalen around 1966. Opening and closing dates are not given. [uncertain] The source does not give the site; the name suggests the Tarango district of western Mexico City. [uncertain]

Facilitators named as working there [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, p. 1999]:

  • Will Schutz (open encounter)
  • Bruce and Betty Meador (Rogerian, person-centred)
  • Aaron Hillman (Gestalt)
  • John Pierrakos (bioenergetic analysis, co-created with Lowen)
  • Jack Painter (Postural Integration)

Core idea of change (as practised, not as a stated Tarango theory). People change through intense, here-and-now experience in a group rather than through talk about the past. The routes were:

  • honest, direct expression of feeling
  • emotional discharge
  • body-centred release of chronic holding
  • a permissive group climate

This is the shared premise of the lineages above [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam; Ramírez Calderón 2011; ICPIT]. Tarango's own theory was not found in written form. [uncertain]

What remains today. Tarango is historical. Its lineage continues in:

  • Mexican Gestalt and "desarrollo humano" (human development) training. Freidberg trained under Hillman at Tarango, taught in the Universidad Iberoamericana's Desarrollo Humano master's programme and founded the Instituto Personas. Muñoz Polit, whom Freidberg taught, founded the Instituto Humanista de Psicoterapia Gestalt, with branches across Mexico and about 10,000 graduates. [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, pp. 2002–2009]
  • Postural Integration and Energetic Integration, still taught through ICPIT's international training centres. [source: ICPIT historic page]

Since 2011, Mexico City's mental-health law requires psychotherapists to be licensed psychologists with postgraduate training. This contrasts with Tarango's non-psychologist facilitators. Check your own jurisdiction's rules before offering any of the formats below. [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, p. 2009]

2. Framework

There was no published phase model for Tarango. What the sources support is a set of formats and a progression of participation. The workshop arc comes from the facilitators' lineages.

A. Participation progression at Tarango [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, pp. 1999, 2002]

  1. Entry. Early participants were Derbez's patients and acquaintances; Freidberg recalls groups of often only 6–10 people. Later intake was mostly professionals aged 25–40 from the upper-middle class, many with no psychology or psychiatry training.
  2. Weekend workshops. Saturday and Sunday experiential groups led by a visiting facilitator. Length and daily schedule were not found. [uncertain]
  3. Apprenticeship. Some participants became helpers. Freidberg first translated for Hillman's workshops, was encouraged to continue, then ran groups under Hillman's supervision whenever Hillman visited Mexico. There was no formal training programme at Tarango.
  4. Formal training elsewhere. Graduates went on to university programmes (Iberoamericana Desarrollo Humano) and founded institutes.

No explicit criteria for moving between stages are recorded. [uncertain]

B. Workshop formats used by the visiting lineages

  • Rogerian intensive encounter group: unstructured, with a facilitator rather than an expert. Rogers held that groups worked best over several days without interruption. Typical size was up to about 20. [source: UNAM thesis on Rogers' encounter groups, pp. 27–28, 36; secondary]
  • Schutz open encounter: groups sitting on the floor. Five-day "More Joy" workshops were run by teams Schutz trained, and the opening night deliberately raised discomfort. [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam] How these formats were adapted to Tarango weekends is not recorded. [uncertain]
  • Gestalt workshop (Perls lineage): the facilitator works with one participant at a time in front of the group, and learning comes through experience rather than lectures. [source: Ramírez Calderón 2011, pp. 289–292] Hillman's own format was not found. [uncertain]
  • Postural Integration: individual sessions, not group. A series of about 12 sessions loosely modelled on Rolfing; the first seven target specific body areas. [source: EPFL Graph Search concept page, secondary; ICPIT gives no session count] Painter's release work runs in four phases: initial release, elongation, pelvis, then head and neck. Reich's order of blocks is eyes, mouth/throat, chest, then pelvis. Clients with fragmented or needy styles may need many sessions before work moves to the lower areas. [source: ICPIT, Natural Energetic Cycle]

C. Suggested modern structure for a clinician adapting the format [synthesis]

  1. Screening interview before any intensive group or bodywork. Exclude or defer clients with active psychosis, mania, acute suicidality, dissociative disorders not yet stabilised, recent trauma, or pregnancy and medical conditions where deep tissue work is involved.
  2. Written informed consent. Cover the format, emotional intensity, touch, the right to decline any exercise without explanation, confidentiality, and that nudity is not part of the work.
  3. The group itself: a weekend or multi-day intensive of 8–12 participants with at least two facilitators.
  4. Integration session(s) 1–3 weeks later, individually or in the group.

Move a client to more activating work (cathartic or deep-body) only when they can:

  • say no in the group
  • come back down from arousal within the session
  • describe the experience afterwards in words

3. Guiding principles

  • Honesty and truth-telling. Schutz's encounter advocated "total honesty between people". In practice: invite participants to say what they actually feel about each other, here and now. [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam]
  • Express feelings directly and ask openly for what you want. In practice: replace questions and hints with direct statements and requests. [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam]
  • Trust the group process. A person's usual ways of relating show up in any group. In practice: work with what happens in the room rather than importing outside stories. [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam]
  • Feelings live in the body; too much thinking can mask them. This view came through Reich. In practice: track posture, breath and movement, and offer nonverbal routes when talk circles. [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam; ICPIT]
  • Eclecticism in the moment. Schutz combined T-group methods, psychosynthesis, bioenergetics, psychodrama and Gestalt as each seemed useful. In practice: choose the technique that fits what is happening now, not a fixed agenda. [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam; Wikipedia, William Schutz]
  • The facilitator is not the expert. Rogerian groups were unstructured and aimed at a non-threatening atmosphere for open, honest sharing. In practice: hold back from directing, reflect, and let members carry responsibility. [source: UNAM thesis pp. 27–28; Encyclopedia.com, Human Potential Movement]
  • Intensity through continuous time. Rogers favoured groups over several days without interruption, and Gibb's studies cited there favoured intensive over periodic sessions. In practice: use blocks of time long enough for defences to soften, and plan aftercare to match. [source: UNAM thesis pp. 28, 36]
  • Re-live, don't recount. In Perls's Gestalt, past conflicts are dramatised and lived in the present, and the therapist asks for expression rather than interpreting. In practice: "Say it to them now" rather than "Why do you think…?" [source: Ramírez Calderón 2011, p. 289]
  • See and act without fear. In practice: name what you observe, such as a clenched fist or a changed voice, and work with it promptly. [source: Ramírez Calderón 2011, p. 291]
  • Learning by experience. Professionals learned the work by undergoing and watching it. In practice: trainees take part as participants before they facilitate. [source: Ramírez Calderón 2011, p. 292; Ortiz Lachica 2020, p. 2002]
  • The relationship links the four pillars. In Postural Integration the pillars are energetic and breath work, deep tissue work, emotional work, and integration. In practice: no technique without the relationship carrying it. [source: ICPIT historic page]
  • Work from security outward; allow time. In practice: establish grounded, even breathing and safety before deeper pressure or feeling, and let held tissue and feeling release at their own pace. [source: ICPIT, Natural Energetic Cycle]
  • Invite, don't force. Painter warns that too much insecurity too fast makes the work ineffective. In practice: balance activation against release. [source: ICPIT, Natural Energetic Cycle]
  • Practitioner intuition, within principles. Painter considered the principles more central than the manual's anatomical detail. In practice: develop your own style, but keep it within the four pillars. [source: ICPIT historic page]
  • Character styles are flexible, not labels. In practice: use body-character readings as hypotheses, not diagnoses. [source: ICPIT, Natural Energetic Cycle]
  • Modern correctives absent from the historical sources [synthesis]:
    • Voluntary participation and the right to opt out of any exercise.
    • No nudity, sexual contact or pressure to undress.
    • No dual relationships, such as treating patients who are also business partners or co-founders. Tarango was founded by a therapist with his own patients.
    • Facilitators trained and licensed as local law requires.
    • No unvalidated adjuncts (Freidberg recalls astrology in Derbez's therapy) presented as clinical method. [source for the historical facts: Ortiz Lachica 2020, pp. 1998–1999, 2002]

4. Intervention inventory

This section covers what the sources show was offered at Tarango and by its named facilitators. The facilitators' exact Tarango scripts are not recorded. Each technique is described from its lineage's sources, and all step detail beyond those sources is marked [synthesis]. Example therapist language is illustrative throughout. Pierrakos's bioenergetic and core-energetic procedures are not drawn on here, so they are not itemised. [uncertain]

4.1 Weekend experiential workshop (the Tarango format)

  • Purpose / when: Tarango's core offer: a Saturday–Sunday group led by a visiting facilitator, for adults seeking personal growth rather than treatment of a disorder. [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, p. 1999]
  • Steps [synthesis, built on the sources' features]:
    1. Screen and consent each participant, as in Section 2C.
    2. Open with ground rules: confidentiality, the right to pass, no violence to people or property, no sexual contact, and clothes stay on.
    3. Begin with a check-in round.
    4. Alternate group-process time (4.2 and 4.3) with structured experiments (4.5, 4.9 and others) chosen to fit what emerges.
    5. Close each day with a round on what each person is taking away. On day 2, keep the last 60–90 minutes for integration and the return to daily life.
    6. Offer a follow-up contact.
  • Example language (illustrative): "This weekend is about what happens between us here. You can pass on anything, at any time, without explaining."
  • Watch for:
    • Participants who came under pressure from a therapist, partner or employer.
    • Anyone still highly aroused at close.
    • The workshop is working when participants describe new awareness in their own words and leave grounded.

4.2 Rogerian intensive encounter group (Meador lineage)

  • Purpose / when: Personal growth through an unstructured group in which members, not the leader, carry the process. Use it with relatively well-functioning adults. [source: UNAM thesis pp. 27–28, 36; Encyclopedia.com, Human Potential Movement]
  • Steps:
    1. Seat up to about 20 members for several days with as few interruptions as possible. [source: UNAM thesis]
    2. Give minimal structure. The facilitator states that the group has no set agenda. [source: UNAM thesis]
    3. Facilitate by accepting and reflecting feelings, keeping the atmosphere non-threatening, and joining as a person rather than an expert. [source: Encyclopedia.com; detail from Rogers 1970; uncertain]
    4. Let members respond to one another. Intervene mainly to protect a member under heavy pressure. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "I don't have a plan for us. I'm curious what each of us wants from this time." / "It sounds like you're furious and also scared they'll leave you."
  • Watch for:
    • Early frustration at the lack of structure. This is expected.
    • Scapegoating, which needs the facilitator to step in.
    • It is working when members give feedback to each other more openly and more kindly.

4.3 Honesty / truth-telling encounter (Schutz)

  • Purpose / when: Bring hidden feelings about other members into the open, so that habitual ways of relating show up and can change. Schutz's encounter advocated "total honesty between people". [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam]
  • Steps [synthesis beyond the principle]:
    1. Invite a member to say directly to another what they feel about them now.
    2. Ask the speaker to own it ("I feel…") rather than judge ("You are…").
    3. Ask the receiver what happens in them as they hear it.
    4. Stay with the pair until both have said what is true for them. Then open it to the group.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Tell Ana directly, not me." / "What's the sentence you're not saying?"
  • Watch for:
    • "Honesty" used as an attack.
    • Members ganging up on one person.
    • Pressure to disclose beyond what someone chooses.
    • It is working when a member hears hard feedback, can stay in contact, and tries a new response.

4.4 Direct expression and asking for what you want (Schutz)

  • Purpose / when: For members who hint, ask questions instead of making statements, or wait to be noticed. [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam]
  • Steps [synthesis]:
    1. Point out the indirect form.
    2. Ask for a first-person version.
    3. Have the member make the request to the person concerned.
    4. The other person answers honestly, and "no" is allowed.
    5. Process what each felt.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Turn that question into a statement." / "Ask him for exactly what you want."
  • Watch for:
    • A refusal felt as a catastrophe. Explore it, and don't push the other person to say yes.
    • It is working when requests become clear and refusals are survivable.

4.5 Pounding a mattress to express anger (Schutz, from bioenergetics)

  • Purpose / when: A nonverbal route to anger that a member is holding back in words. [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam; bioenergetic origin per Wikipedia, William Schutz]
  • Steps [synthesis]:
    1. Check consent and physical fitness: back, wrists, blood pressure and pregnancy.
    2. Place a firm mattress or cushion. The member kneels and uses both fists or a soft bat.
    3. Invite breath and sound, and words if they come, directed at the image of the person concerned, not at anyone in the room.
    4. Stop at a natural decline, or earlier on signal.
    5. Ground the member: feet on the floor, slow breath, eye contact.
    6. Ask what they notice now.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Let the sound out with each blow. You can stop whenever you choose." / "Feel your feet. What's here now?"
  • Watch for (risk):
    • Escalation without relief.
    • Dissociation, or flashbacks in trauma survivors.
    • Injury.
    • Rehearsing aggression rather than resolving it.
    • Do not use with clients whose problem is aggression or impulse control. [synthesis]
    • It is working when arousal rises, peaks and settles, and is followed by clearer words or softer feeling.

4.6 "High School Dance" (Schutz)

  • Purpose / when: Brings up inclusion and rejection fears quickly. Participants cross the room to ask someone to dance while the group watches, so acceptance or refusal is public. [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam]
  • Steps [synthesis]:
    1. Use it only in a group with established safety and an agreed right to decline.
    2. Explain the exercise and its emotional risk in advance.
    3. Let it run briefly.
    4. Spend more time processing it than doing it. Invite each person to speak about choosing, being chosen and not being chosen.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Notice what happens in you as you decide whether to cross the room."
  • Watch for (risk):
    • Public rejection can re-wound people with social anxiety, histories of bullying or attachment trauma. Consider a non-public variant, such as private imagery or writing. [synthesis]
    • It is working when members link the moment to lifelong patterns and receive support from the group.

4.7 Floor seating and holding a crying participant (Schutz)

  • Purpose / when: Informality and physical comfort. Schutz's groups sat on the floor, and facilitators would hold members who were crying. [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam]
  • Steps [synthesis]:
    1. Agree a touch policy at the start.
    2. Before touching, ask: "Would a hand on your back help, or would you rather I stay here?"
    3. Offer only what is accepted: side-by-side contact or a hand on the shoulder before any embrace.
    4. Withdraw at any sign of stiffening.
  • Example language (illustrative): "I'm right here. Do you want contact, or space?"
  • Watch for (risk):
    • Touch without consent.
    • Clients who cannot refuse.
    • Sexualised or culturally inappropriate contact.
    • Facilitator need overriding client choice.
    • It is working when the person settles and returns to speaking.

4.8 Deliberately raising discomfort at the opening (Schutz's "More Joy" workshops)

  • Purpose / when: Schutz's trained teams structured opening nights to raise discomfort, aiming to bring defences into view early. [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam] The specific opening exercises are not described. [uncertain]
  • Steps [synthesis]: If you adapt this, raise discomfort through awareness, not humiliation.
    1. Ask members to say their first impressions of the room and what they fear about the group.
    2. Name the tension openly.
    3. Contain it before the evening ends.
  • Example language (illustrative): "What are you afraid might happen here? Say it out loud."
  • Watch for (risk): Early drop-out, or members feeling ambushed. Pair any activation with explicit containment the same evening.

4.9 Dramatising a past conflict in the present (Gestalt, Hillman lineage)

  • Purpose / when: In Perls's Gestalt, past conflicts are dramatised so they are re-lived rather than remembered. [source: Ramírez Calderón 2011, p. 289] Hillman taught Gestalt at Tarango, but his own procedures were not found. [uncertain]
  • Steps [synthesis beyond the principle]:
    1. The member chooses a scene.
    2. The member speaks in the present tense, addressing the other person, imagined or represented by an empty cushion or a group member, as if they were here.
    3. Have the member switch roles to answer as the other person.
    4. Ask about body sensations and voice at each turn.
    5. Stop at a moment of new contact or completion.
    6. Debrief.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Don't tell us about your father. Talk to him, here." / "Change places. What does he say back?"
  • Watch for:
    • Flooding.
    • Trauma re-enactment without containment. Choose scenes of moderate intensity first.
    • It is working when the dialogue shifts from repetition to something new, such as a fresh statement, softening or a clear boundary.

4.10 Gestalt dream work as an existential message

  • Purpose / when: In Perls's Gestalt a dream is treated as an existential message about the dreamer's present life. [source: Ramírez Calderón 2011, p. 289]
  • Steps [synthesis, standard Gestalt practice, not confirmed for Tarango]:
    1. The dreamer tells the dream in the present tense and first person.
    2. Ask them to speak as several elements of the dream, people or objects, in turn ("I am the locked door…").
    3. Let elements speak to one another.
    4. Ask what message the dream has for their life now.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Tell it as if it's happening now." / "Be the door. What do you say?"
  • Watch for:
    • Intellectual decoding instead of experience. Bring the dreamer back to voice and body.
    • It is working when the dreamer recognises a disowned part as their own.

4.11 Asking for expression instead of interpreting; acting on what you see

  • Purpose / when: The core Gestalt facilitator move: notice observable behaviour and invite expression rather than offer explanations. [source: Ramírez Calderón 2011, pp. 289, 291]
  • Steps [synthesis]:
    1. Name a specific observation: voice, hands, breath or gaze.
    2. Invite the member to exaggerate it or give it words.
    3. Follow what emerges.
    4. Do not supply meanings.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Your hand is making a fist. Let it keep going, and give it a voice."
  • Watch for:
    • Observation that turns into confrontation or shaming.
    • It is working when members begin noticing their own process.

4.12 Going round: questions to each participant

  • Purpose / when: Perls asked each participant to answer questions during workshops. Rounds bring everyone into contact and show who is ready to work. [source: Ramírez Calderón 2011, p. 291]
  • Steps [synthesis]:
    1. Pose one short present-tense question.
    2. Go round in order. Passing is allowed.
    3. Note who has energy for work.
    4. Invite one person to the centre, or return to group process.
  • Example language (illustrative): "One sentence each: what are you aware of right now?"
  • Watch for: Pressure on people who pass.

4.13 Breath assessment and matching (Painter's Natural Energetic Cycle)

  • Purpose / when: The basis of Postural Integration. It locates the client's current breathing stage so that touch and invitations fit it. [source: ICPIT, Natural Energetic Cycle]
  • The stages (Painter's nine-step wave, summarised): secure (grounded), nurturing (fuller in-breath), exploring (stronger out-breath), free, exciting, then orgastic, ecstatic, fully discharging and relaxing breaths that complete the wave. The source calls the orgastic breath a fusion of energies and says it is not limited to sexual orgasm. [source: ICPIT]
  • Steps:
    1. Observe the breath in belly and chest.
    2. Support secure breathing with warmth, gentle rocking and calming imagery.
    3. Invite nurturing breath by asking the client to breathe into the practitioner's hands.
    4. Support exploring breath with massage on the out-breath.
    5. Support free breath with alternating pressure on in- and out-breath. [source: ICPIT]
    6. Return to secure breathing whenever the client needs stability. [source: ICPIT]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Breathe into my hand, and let your belly rise under it."
  • Watch for (risk):
    • Hyperventilation, dizziness or tingling. Slow the breath, ground, and lengthen the out-breath. [synthesis]
    • It is working when the breath becomes fuller and more even, and the client reports feeling present.

4.14 Deep fascial strokes timed to breath (Postural Integration)

  • Purpose / when: Soften and reorganise the fascial planes. Painter described tissue as becoming dispersed, collapsed, inflated, compressed or stringy, and the aim is a unified envelope. [source: ICPIT, Natural Energetic Cycle; ICPIT historic page]
  • Steps:
    1. Enter the fascia only as far as the breath allows.
    2. Lift tissue on the in-breath and press on the out-breath.
    3. Give held tissue time to drain and release.
    4. Return to quiet strokes when the client needs stability. [source: ICPIT]
  • Session sequence:
    • Four release phases: initial release, elongation, pelvis (including buttocks and deep pelvic tissue), then head and neck.
    • Reich's order of blocks: eyes, mouth and throat, chest, then pelvis.
    • Clients with fragmented or needy styles may need many sessions before work moves lower. [source: ICPIT]
    • A 12-session series is reported. [source: EPFL Graph Search, secondary; uncertain]
  • Example language (illustrative): "I'll press as you breathe out. Tell me if it's too much and I'll ease off."
  • Watch for (risk) [synthesis]:
    • Deep tissue work needs bodywork training and the legal scope to touch clients where you practise.
    • Medical contraindications include anticoagulation, osteoporosis, recent surgery or injury, thrombosis, pregnancy and skin conditions. Get medical clearance if in doubt.
    • Pelvic work needs explicit, specific, revocable consent and clothing or draping. Avoid it with sexual-trauma survivors unless specifically trained and agreed.
    • It is working when posture and breath free up and feeling emerges at a tolerable pace.

4.15 Emotional expression toward significant figures during bodywork (Postural Integration)

  • Purpose / when: When feeling surfaces under touch. Phrases and gestures help the client express fear, anger or need toward an important figure, for example fear toward a parent. Emotion is invited, never forced. [source: ICPIT, Natural Energetic Cycle]
  • Steps [synthesis beyond the source]:
    1. Pause the stroke.
    2. Ask who or what the feeling is about.
    3. Offer a short phrase or gesture for the client to try, such as pushing with the hands, reaching, or saying "no" or "I need you".
    4. Let the client change the words.
    5. Return to secure breath before ending.
  • Example language (illustrative): "If that fear could speak to your mother, what would it say? Try it, in your own words."
  • Watch for:
    • Too much insecurity too fast makes strokes ineffective. Painter's advice is to balance activation with release. [source: ICPIT]
    • With inflated styles, support strength and invite release rather than provoking defences ("fly under the radar"). [source: ICPIT]

4.16 Character-style and blockage reading (Postural Integration)

  • Purpose / when: Guide which areas and breath stage to work with. Painter names five blocks:
    • fragmented (eyes and head)
    • needy (mouth, jaw and throat)
    • inflated (chest and hips)
    • compressed (lower chest, belly, buttocks and anus)
    • rigid (genitals and heart)
    [source: ICPIT, Natural Energetic Cycle]
  • Steps:
    1. Observe posture, breath and tissue.
    2. Form a hypothesis about the dominant style.
    3. Choose a breath stage and strokes to match.
    4. Revise the hypothesis as the client changes. Styles are flexible patterns, not fixed labels. [source: ICPIT]
  • Example language (illustrative): "I notice your chest stays lifted even when you breathe out. Let's see what happens if we let it drop a little."
  • Watch for: Using the reading as a diagnosis or sharing it as a verdict. [synthesis]

4.17 Integration (Postural Integration's fourth pillar)

  • Purpose / when: Painter's four pillars end with integration, including subtle ("fine") energy work. [source: ICPIT historic page] Specific procedures were not found. [uncertain]
  • Steps [synthesis]:
    1. Close every session with quiet contact and slow breath.
    2. Have the client sit and then stand, feeling the ground.
    3. Ask them to put the experience into words.
    4. Agree what they will notice before next time.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Stand and feel your feet. What's different?"

4.18 Apprenticeship route to facilitation (Tarango practice)

  • Purpose / when: How Tarango produced Mexican facilitators. [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, p. 2002]
  • Steps:
    1. Take part in workshops.
    2. Assist the visiting trainer. Freidberg did this as translator.
    3. Lead groups under the trainer's supervision during their visits.
    4. Later, complete formal academic training. Freidberg's sense of insufficiency pushed him toward university backing.
  • Modern note [synthesis]: Today, combine experiential apprenticeship with accredited training and ongoing supervision, as current law may require (see Section 1).

Historical practices: do not reproduce

  • Nudity in workshops. In some Tarango workshops participants were asked to undress. This provoked strong conflict with the Instituto Mexicano de Psicoanálisis. [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, p. 1999]
  • Strong emotional discharge as a goal. Many workshops fostered strong emotional discharges. [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, p. 1999] Use catharsis only within screening, consent and containment (4.5, Section 5). [synthesis]
  • Astrology within therapy. Freidberg recalls astrology in Derbez's therapy and found it unorthodox. [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, p. 2002] Do not present it as a clinical method. [synthesis]
  • Therapist founding a centre with his own patients. This is a dual relationship by current ethics codes. [source for the fact: Ortiz Lachica 2020, p. 1998; ethics judgement is synthesis]

5. Handling problems

The sources say almost nothing about problem management at Tarango. Except where a source is cited, everything below is [synthesis], drawn from the principles above and standard group and body-psychotherapy safety practice.

  • Stuck or silent member.
    • Use a round (4.12) or a gentle observation (4.11) rather than confronting.
    • Offer a nonverbal route, such as posture or breath, since Schutz held that too much thinking can mask feeling. [source: Esalen, Will Schutz memoriam]
    • Accept "pass" as a valid answer.
    • Example (illustrative): "You've been quiet. No need to speak; I'm just checking how it is for you."
  • Resistance to an exercise. Treat refusal as information, not defiance. Ask what the "no" protects. Never repeat the invitation more than once in front of the group. Offer a private or lower-intensity variant.
  • Emotional overwhelm or flooding (cathartic and body work).
    • Stop the technique and come back to secure breathing: even, belly and chest, grounded. [source: ICPIT, Natural Energetic Cycle]
    • Orient the person: feet, room, names, eye contact.
    • Offer touch only with consent (4.7).
    • A co-facilitator stays with the person while the group continues, or the group pauses.
    • Do not end the day until the person is settled. Arrange a check-in the same evening.
    • Prevent overwhelm by grading intensity. Painter's warning that too much insecurity too quickly makes the work ineffective applies here. [source: ICPIT]
  • Dissociation, flashback or panic. Stop activating work, ground, slow and lengthen the out-breath, and reduce stimulation. Afterwards, assess whether the person needs trauma-focused individual treatment rather than further group catharsis.
  • Non-adherence (missed sessions, dropping out of a bodywork series). Review consent and pace. A client may be leaving because the work moved lower in the body or deeper too fast. Offer to return to earlier, safer stages. In Painter's model, some styles need many sessions before lower areas. [source: ICPIT]
  • Ruptures with the facilitator (felt shamed by honesty work or exposed by a public exercise, 4.3 and 4.6).
    • Acknowledge it openly in the group.
    • Take your part without over-explaining.
    • Ask the member what would repair it.
    • Change the format, for example drop public-choice exercises.
  • Group turning on one member. Interrupt. Ask the group what is being put onto that person, and redirect the feedback to "I" statements. Protect the member, and process it later.
  • Pressure to undress or sexualised contact. Tarango's history includes workshops where participants were asked to undress. [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, p. 1999] Today:
    • State at the start that clothing stays on and there is no sexual contact.
    • Stop any such exercise at once.
    • Debrief the people affected.
    • Document, and report as your professional code requires.
  • Touch problems in bodywork.
    • Get explicit consent for each body area, especially the pelvis.
    • Agree a stop signal.
    • Use draping or clothing.
    • Do not touch if you are not trained or permitted to.
    • Refer to a medically cleared bodywork practitioner where needed.
  • Unqualified or self-taught facilitators. Tarango attracted professionals with no psychology training, and its facilitators were trained by apprenticeship. [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, pp. 1999, 2002] Check that the facilitators' credentials meet local law; Mexico City has required licensed psychologists with postgraduate training since 2011. [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, p. 2009]
  • Dual relationships. Don't run growth workshops for your own individual therapy clients without a clear agreement, and never form business partnerships with clients. Tarango's founding with Derbez's patients is the cautionary example. [source for the fact: Ortiz Lachica 2020, p. 1998]
  • Conflict with professional bodies. Derbez's practices brought strong conflict with his psychoanalytic institute. [source: Ortiz Lachica 2020, p. 1999] Document your rationale. Keep experiential work within your declared scope, and seek supervision before introducing new methods.
  • After the weekend (re-entry). Intensive groups can leave people raw or euphoric. Advise against major life decisions for 2–3 weeks, give a follow-up date, and give crisis contacts.
  • Suicide risk. If a member discloses suicidal thoughts during a workshop, take them out of activating work at once. Do a standard risk assessment and safety planning, involve their usual clinician, and do not return them to cathartic exercises that day.

Sources

Sources:

Tried but not usable:

  • Derbez, J. (1981), Fromm en México: una reseña histórica (Fromm archive PDF) is not drawn on here. [uncertain]

Further reading (not drawn on) [uncertain]:

  • Schutz, W. (1967). Joy: Expanding Human Awareness. Grove Press.
  • Schutz, W. (1973). Elements of Encounter.
  • Rogers, C. R. (1970). Carl Rogers on Encounter Groups. Harper & Row.
  • Pierrakos, J. (1987). Core Energetics.
  • Painter, J. W. Technical Manual of Deep Wholistic Bodywork: Postural Integration.
  • Perls, F. S. (1969). Gestalt Therapy Verbatim.
← Previous · III-105Self-help therapy groupsNext · III-107 →Internal Family Systems