Atlas›Domain VI · Brief, integrative, trauma, hypnosis & coaching›Guide 129
Guide VI-129

Life review and reminiscence therapy

Robert N. Butler, Barbara K. Haight, Barrett S. Haight1963
A 27 · L 43 · M 3023 interventions in the Trinity explorer
Client cardCompare
[source: …] where a claim comes from[uncertain] not confirmed in a primary source[synthesis] the writer's reconstruction

1. Introduction

Version followed: the individual Structured Life Review of Barbara K. Haight and Barrett S. Haight (The Handbook of Structured Life Review, 2007): eight weekly one-to-one visits with a therapeutic listener, guided by Haight's life review question form. Source status: the Handbook's structure (the eight visits and their topics, the listener's interviewing and counselling skills, the form, the named reviewer types) is taken from the publisher's description and full table of contents; the question areas of Haight's form from the version reproduced with permission in SAMHSA's TIP 26; confidentiality and the reviewer's control of the process from Haight & Haight (2013); the Looking for Meaning / Op zoek naar zin course structure from its trial design paper (BMC Public Health, 2008); a published trauma-focused life-review writing protocol (Integrative Testimonial Therapy) from its developers' 2010 conference slides. The Handbook's text inside each visit, Butler (1963), Lewis & Butler (1974), the Maercker & Forstmeier (2013) and Watt (1996) full texts, and the Op zoek naar zin manual are used only through abstracts or secondary summaries [uncertain]. Named variants are added where sources describe them: life review therapy with autobiographical retrieval practice (Serrano et al., 2004), group life review with narrative reframing (De verhalen die we leven, Bohlmeijer et al., 2008), Looking for Meaning / Op zoek naar zin (Franssen & Bohlmeijer; Pot et al., 2010), integrative and instrumental reminiscence (Watt & Cappeliez), trauma-focused life review (Maercker & Forstmeier, 2013) and Integrative Testimonial Therapy, reminiscence for dementia, and the Life Story Book.

This is a family of interventions, not one manualised therapy. Robert N. Butler (1963) did not describe a technique. He described the life review as a universal, naturally occurring process in later life. In his account, past experiences return to consciousness, especially unresolved conflicts. Awareness of approaching death was presumed to prompt this, and current experience shapes it. The process can end in candour, serenity and wisdom, or it can contribute to late-life disorder, particularly depression. Butler rejected the view that reminiscence is pathology or escapism [source: UWE paper citing Butler; Social Work Today/Shilling citing Butler 1963]. Later clinicians built structured interventions on this idea and on Erikson's last psychosocial stage, integrity versus despair [source: Shilling].

How change happens (as the sources frame it): a person who recalls their whole life in sequence, including both good and bad memories, and then evaluates it can re-integrate unresolved conflicts. They can recognise what they achieved and reach a balanced, accepted view of their life [source: Shilling; Wenk]. Three variants name further mechanisms:

  • Practising the retrieval of specific memories counters the overgeneral memory seen in depression [source: Serrano et al., 2004].
  • Reappraising self-defining events builds meaning, and recalling past coping builds a sense of mastery [source: Watt, 1996].
  • Telling alternative stories in place of problem stories, such as victimhood or powerlessness, changes how the person sees their life [source: Bohlmeijer et al., 2008].

Spectrum of intensity [source: Bohlmeijer et al., 2008]:

  • Simple reminiscence is spontaneous, mostly positive and not very reflective about meaning. It often runs in groups.
  • Life review is structured, covers the whole lifespan, includes positive and negative memories, and evaluates their meaning.
  • Life review therapy is life review delivered as treatment for clinically relevant problems, such as depression or trauma sequelae.

Match the level to the client. This is your choice as clinician [synthesis].

2. Framework

2a. Structured Life Review (Haight model, individual)

[source: Haight & Haight 2007, publisher's description and table of contents (Health Professions Press); Haight & Haight 2013; Shilling; Wenk; NCT03851016 protocol]

  • Format: one-to-one only: one reviewer and one therapeutic listener. The Handbook plans eight visits, usually weekly, and names structure, duration, individuality and evaluation as the four features that distinguish it from other reminiscence work [source: Handbook publisher page]. The publisher states the listener may be a social worker, counsellor, activity staff member or volunteer, and lists uses with newly relocated people, depression prevention, substance-abuse recovery, the dying, the bereaved, and people with dementia and their caregivers [source: publisher page]. When it is used as treatment for depression or trauma, a trained clinician should deliver it [synthesis]. Practitioner summaries compress it to 6–8 one-hour sessions [source: Shilling; Wenk]. Group reminiscence is a different intervention.
  • Visit 1, getting started: meet the reviewer; give full disclosure of what the process involves; sign a written agreement; agree audiotaping; leave a business card; take tests and measures; assess the environment and the reviewer; open a reviewer file [source: Handbook contents]. A confidentiality agreement is signed at this first meeting, and the review needs a secluded, private setting [source: Haight & Haight 2013].
  • Visit 2, childhood: framed by Erikson's trust and autonomy (versus mistrust and shame); listener skill emphasised: acceptance [source: Handbook contents]. Start with the earliest memory [source: Shilling; Wenk].
  • Visit 3, adolescence: initiative versus guilt and industry versus inferiority; skill: caring [source: Handbook contents].
  • Visit 4, young adulthood: identity versus role confusion and intimacy versus isolation; skill: unconditional positive regard [source: Handbook contents].
  • Visit 5, older adulthood: generativity versus stagnation; skill: empathy [source: Handbook contents].
  • Visit 6, summary and evaluation: the reviewer looks back over the whole life; the contents name acceptance and denial, congruence and summarising [source: Handbook contents].
  • Visit 7, integration: integrity versus despair; reviewing successes, reframing difficult times and establishing a future emphasis [source: Handbook contents].
  • Visit 8, closure and outcomes: professional referrals where needed, contact information, thank-you notes, and assessment of tested outcomes, reviewer feedback and observed outcomes [source: Handbook contents]. Plan for life after the review, including relapse prevention [source: Wenk].
  • Inside each visit: the Handbook gives listener guidelines, preliminary tasks, step-by-step goals and sample dialogue for every visit, and each visit ends with a summary and planning for the next [source: publisher page]. The content of those per-visit guidelines is not reproduced here [uncertain]; the steps in section 4 come from the other sources or are marked [synthesis].
  • Evaluate every stage: the listener asks the reviewer to evaluate each developmental phase, not only recall it [source: Haight & Haight 2013].
  • Moving between phases: the order is a guide, not a rule. Reviewers often move back and forth between life stages. Follow them, then bring them back to the chronological thread [source: Shilling; Wenk]. Move on from a stage once its main events, people and places, including painful ones, have been told and its meaning touched on [synthesis].

2b. Variants and their formats

  • Life review therapy with autobiographical retrieval practice (Serrano, Latorre, Gatz & Montañés, 2004):
    • Individual, 4 weekly sessions: childhood, adolescence, adulthood, then a summary of the whole life.
    • Each session uses about 14 prompt questions adapted from Haight & Webster (1995). They aim at specific memories, mostly positive, some neutral or about adversity.
    • Studied in older adults with clinically significant depressive symptoms, without dementia, who were not on antidepressant medication.
    • The therapist delivered every prompt and gave no unscripted encouragement or advice (checked by audio-rated adherence).
  • De verhalen die we leven (Bohlmeijer, Hulzinga & Linssen, 2008):
    • Group of 4 participants, 7 meetings, adults 55+ with depressive complaints. It is indicated prevention.
    • Take-home questions per theme:
      1. youth;
      2. work and care;
      3. difficult periods;
      4. social relationships;
      5. high and low points;
      6. central life-story themes, including meaning and the future.
    • Facilitators are prevention workers, community psychiatric nurses or health-care psychologists after a 2-day training.
  • Looking for Meaning / Op zoek naar zin (manual: Franssen & Bohlmeijer, 2003, Trimbos Institute) [source: BMC Public Health 2008 trial design paper unless stated]:
    • A life-review group course with creative and sensory work, run as indicated prevention for adults 55+ with mild to moderate depressive symptoms. In the trial, candidates were screened with the CES-D and a MINI interview, and people with major depression were excluded. Pot et al. (2010) describe the target group as adults over 50 [source: Pot et al. abstract].
    • 12 similarly structured two-hour sessions, groups of about 8, led by two mental-health professionals who receive 2 days' training before the course and 1 day during it.
    • Each session takes one life theme and explicitly links past and present (themes in 4.20). It uses the senses to evoke memories, creative exercises for expression beyond words, and verbal exchange; course materials include poems, short stories and suggestions for further reading. After the pilot, more verbal exchange and problem-solving techniques were added.
    • Stated aim: shift negative reasons for reminiscing, such as reviving bitterness, toward integrative ones: accepting negative events, resolving past conflicts, seeing continuity between past and present, and finding meaning.
    • Local delivery varies. One Dutch mental-health prevention service currently runs a six-meeting version for adults 50+, with an intake conversation, themes such as the meaning of your name, important moments, what gives life meaning and wishes for the future, and work with reading, storytelling, writing, colours, scents and images; participants share only what they choose [source: Pro Persona Preventie leaflet].
    • The manual's exercise-by-exercise instructions are not reproduced here [uncertain].
  • Integrative and instrumental reminiscence (Watt, 1996, supervised by Cappeliez):
    • Two separate structured reminiscence therapies for older adults with moderate to severe depression [source: Watt abstract].
    • The two styles as defined in the reminiscence literature (Wong & Watt, 1991, summarised by Forstmeier & Maercker): integrative means accepting one's past including negative experiences, reconciling ideal and reality, and recalling lessons that led to growth; instrumental means recalling past plans and goal-directed actions, deriving solutions from earlier experience, and recalling successful coping [source: Forstmeier & Maercker, Der Lebensrückblick in Therapie und Beratung, reading sample].
    • Session-level detail of Watt's two therapies is not covered here [uncertain].
  • Trauma-focused life review (Maercker, 2002; Maercker & Forstmeier, 2013):
    • Maercker (2002) adapted life review for older adults with PTSD symptoms [source: Kuwert & Knaevelsrud 2010 slides]. Maercker & Forstmeier (2013) present structured life review as a psychotraumatology technique based on elaborating autobiographical memory and consolidating identity, illustrated with a World War II-traumatised patient; they note that only case studies existed with traumatised samples [source: abstract].
    • In one practitioner example, the traumatic experience gets its own session, placed just before the life stage in which it happened, within an 8-stage chronological plan [source: Wenk]. Whether this matches Maercker's own structure is [uncertain].
    • Integrative Testimonial Therapy (Knaevelsrud, Kuwert and colleagues) is a published, manualised life-review writing therapy for older adults with PTSD from childhood war experiences: 11 writing sessions over about 6 weeks, with a bounded trauma-narrative block, a resource-oriented life-story block and a closing letter (see 4.23) [source: Kuwert & Knaevelsrud 2010 slides].
  • Reminiscence with people with dementia (practitioner adaptation): uses multisensory triggers. Remote memory is usually preserved in early dementia, so life review is feasible at that stage [source: Wenk; Shilling].
  • Life Story Book (NCT03851016 protocol, nursing-home residents without cognitive impairment):
    • Structured life review using the Life Review and Experiencing Form (LREF), recorded and compiled into an illustrated book.
    • About 3–5 one-hour visits plus pre- and post-tests (the protocol is internally inconsistent on the count).
    • Haight & Haight (2013) name a life storybook for people with Alzheimer's disease as the one exception to keeping the review confidential [source].

2c. Indications and screening

  • Used with [source: Shilling; Wenk]:
    • older adults who are healthy, frail, chronically ill or terminally ill (including hospice);
    • people with depressive symptoms;
    • people with early dementia;
    • other reported groups: people with HIV/AIDS, people with substance problems, preoperative patients, survivors of sexual abuse.
  • Not recommended for everyone. People who refuse to recall the past, or who have a psychotic diagnosis, may need other mental health services [source: Shilling].
  • Bitterness: it is unclear whether life review helps people who are very bitter about their lives [source: Bohlmeijer et al., 2008].
  • Further screening, my own [synthesis]:
    • Assess suicide risk at baseline and again in the evaluation phase. Life evaluation can bring up despair.
    • Screen for PTSD and dissociation before an open-ended review. If either is present, use the trauma-focused format with stabilisation first (see 4.15 and 4.23).
    • In moderate to severe dementia, use non-evaluative sensory reminiscence instead of the full evaluative review.
    • In major depression, treat life review as an adjunct within a full treatment plan. Behavioural activation or cognitive therapy may be needed as well [source for the last point: Wenk].

2d. Monitoring

  • Use a pretest/posttest design with a baseline before the first session and a repeat after the last [source: Shilling; Wenk].
  • Instruments used in the cited protocols:
    • Geriatric Depression Scale (12-item revision) [NCT03851016];
    • Meaning in Life Questionnaire [NCT03851016];
    • CES-D [Serrano; Pot et al.];
    • Six-Item Screener for cognition [NCT03851016].
  • Do not reproduce items. Use the licensed forms.

3. Guiding principles

The listener's skills come from [source: Handbook publisher page; Haight & Haight 2013; Wenk; Shilling; NCT03851016]. The principles are drawn from all cited sources, with my own additions marked. Principles taken from Haight's own publications follow the first list.

  • The reviewer leads, the listener structures. Let the client steer the content while you keep the chronological frame and pace. In practice: follow detours, then return to where the timeline paused.
  • Cover the whole life. Go from earliest memory to the present, not just favourite episodes. In practice: keep a running timeline and notice any stage that has been skipped.
  • Include both positive and negative memories, and evaluate them. This is what separates life review from simple reminiscence [source: Bohlmeijer et al., 2008]. In practice: after each story, ask how the client sees it now, not only what happened.
  • Keep the balance positive overall. Let positive experiences dominate overall, and help the client find meaning in negative events [source: Wenk]. In practice: do not end a session on an unprocessed painful memory.
  • Prompt for specific memories. A specific memory is one event, lasting no more than a day, at a particular time and place [source: Serrano et al., 2004]. In practice: ask "one particular time when…".
  • Attentive, retentive listening. Show interest, remember what was said, make reflective comments and respond to non-verbal cues. In practice: refer back to earlier stories by name and detail [source: Wenk].
  • Empathy, unconditional positive regard and validation, especially with painful material [source: Shilling case; Wenk]. In practice: acknowledge the feeling before any reframing.
  • Use the senses. Invite the client to recall sights, sounds, smells, tastes and textures to enrich the memory [source: NCT03851016]. In practice: ask "what could you smell in that kitchen?"
  • Flexibility and respect for limits. The client may decline any question. Split, shorten or reschedule sessions around fatigue, meals, rest and medication [source: NCT03851016]. In practice: say at the start that "pass" is always allowed.
  • The person owns their story. In life-story products, the reviewer has the final say on content and keeps the book [source: NCT03851016]. In practice: nothing goes in without the client's approval.
  • More than one story fits the same event. When someone tells mainly problem stories, help them find alternative stories [source: Bohlmeijer et al., 2008]. In practice: ask what the story leaves out.
  • Adapt to culture and cognition. Adjust questions to cognitive ability and cultural background [source: Shilling]. In practice: in early dementia, use concrete cues, and with a different cultural background, check which life-stage events are meaningful.
  • Memories are the client's experience, not facts to uncover [synthesis, Domain VI rule]. In practice: never suggest events, never press for "forgotten" episodes, and never use imagery or suggestion to recover memories.
  • Confidentiality of the life material. Agree how recordings, transcripts and photographs are stored and destroyed, and who may see the book [source: NCT03851016 destroys audio after transcription; the rest is synthesis].
  • Know the boundary. Reminiscence work needs no formal qualification, but life review used as therapy for depression or trauma belongs to a trained clinician [source: Wenk for the first part; synthesis for the second].

Principles from Haight's own publications [source: Handbook publisher page and table of contents; Haight & Haight 2013]:

  • Confidentiality makes candour possible. Raise it at the first meeting, sign a confidentiality agreement, and meet somewhere secluded. In practice: say who will and will not hear what is said and what happens to any recording.
  • The process heals more than the story does. Haight & Haight contrast structured life review with reminiscence methods in which the story itself is central. In practice: the reviewer's evaluating and accepting matter more than a polished narrative.
  • The reviewer controls pace and content. Probe gently, but move on if the reviewer deflects, and recognise and respect a memory the reviewer is avoiding. In practice: one gentle invitation, then follow their lead.
  • The listener's acceptance supports self-acceptance. Repeatedly discussing a difficult subject with an accepting listener is described as fostering self-acceptance. In practice: allow the same painful story to come back more than once.
  • Help reviewers see problems differently, so they can reshape their story into a more acceptable one. In practice: reframe only after the memory has been heard (see 4.11).
  • Keep memories personal. The form directs reviewers to their own memories and the feelings tied to them. In practice: when the account drifts to other people or public events, ask what it was like for the reviewer.
  • Use the Handbook's listening toolkit. Interviewing techniques: attentive behaviour, repetition, reframing, responding, reflecting feelings, sharing, paraphrasing, self-disclosure, summarising. Counselling skills, one foregrounded per visit: acceptance, caring, unconditional positive regard, empathy, congruence. In practice: decide before each visit which skill you will foreground.
  • Expect the Handbook's additional considerations: the review is hard work; the listener's self; repetition; power and control; supervision; confidentiality; audiotaping; life reviews with relatives. These are the Handbook's section headings; their content is [uncertain]. In practice: arrange supervision, and think twice before reviewing a relative's life [synthesis].
  • Evaluation is built in: every stage is evaluated by the reviewer, and outcomes are assessed at the end by tests, reviewer feedback and observation.

4. Intervention inventory

Sources per item are given in brackets. All example language is my own illustrative wording; none is quoted from Haight's form or any manual. Haight's question form is called the Life Review and Experiencing Form (LREF) in papers and the Life Review Form (LRF, Appendix B) in the 2007 Handbook. It is organised by Erikson's life stages, reviewers read its questions to guide recall, and it directs them to examine the feelings tied to each memory [source: Haight & Haight 2013; Handbook publisher page]. A version adapted with permission of Haight and Health Professions Press is reproduced in SAMHSA's TIP 26 (Chapter 9 resources). It groups its questions into five sections: childhood, adolescence, family and home, adulthood, and a closing summary [source: TIP 26 resource]. Do not reproduce its items in your own materials; use the published form.

4.1 Preparation and contracting session

  • Purpose: check that the client is suitable, set up conditions in which they can talk, and set expectations. This is the Handbook's visit 1, "getting started" [source: Handbook contents; Haight & Haight 2013; Shilling; Wenk; NCT03851016].
  • Steps:
    1. Gather background: age, family, major life events the client already knows will come up, health, and sensory or mobility needs.
    2. Assess physical, psychological and cognitive functioning by observation and direct questions. Use a brief cognitive screen where dementia is possible, and mood measures. The Handbook's appendices include a baseline assessment, a test of physical function and a test of psychosocial function or mood [source: Handbook contents; which instruments these are is uncertain].
    3. Screen for psychosis, active suicidality, PTSD or dissociation, and refusal to revisit the past [Shilling for psychosis and refusal; the rest is synthesis].
    4. Give full disclosure of the process: weekly visits moving from earliest memories to the present, then visits that look back over the whole life and integrate it. Give a list of the kinds of questions you will ask [Handbook contents; Shilling].
    5. Agree the ground rules in writing: a written agreement including confidentiality, signed at this first meeting; the client may pass on any question; sessions can stop, pause or be rescheduled; consent to audiotaping, how notes and recordings will be stored and when audio will be destroyed [Handbook contents; Haight & Haight 2013; NCT03851016].
    6. Leave your contact details (the Handbook names a business card) and open a reviewer file [Handbook contents].
    7. Set up the room: private and secluded, well lit, quiet, with hearing aids and glasses in place, comfortable seating and a comfortable temperature. In residential care, avoid meal, nap and medication times [Haight & Haight 2013; NCT03851016].
    8. Take the baseline measures.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Over the next few weeks we'll go through your life from your earliest memories up to now, a stage at a time. Toward the end we'll step back and look at it as a whole. What you tell me stays between us, and you can always say 'let's skip that'."
  • Watch for:
    • Strong reluctance or fear about one period. Note it and plan to place it deliberately (see 4.15).
    • Hopelessness or suicidal ideation, which needs a risk assessment before you start.
    • Fatigue, which calls for shorter sessions.
    • Clients rarely anticipate how personal the review will become; Haight & Haight report reviewers saying they had never told anyone before [source: Haight & Haight 2013]. Say so at the outset.

4.2 Chronological structured prompting (core of Structured Life Review)

  • Purpose: take the client through the whole lifespan in order, so that memories from every stage are recalled and can later be integrated [source: Shilling; Wenk; NCT03851016; Serrano et al.].
  • Steps:
    1. Each session, name the stage you are on:
      • childhood;
      • family and home;
      • adolescence;
      • early adulthood, work and partnership;
      • parenthood and middle adulthood;
      • later life and retirement;
      • the present.
    2. Use the LREF or your own open questions for that stage as prompts, not as a fixed script. Cover people, places, events, feelings and turning points. The form's own areas give a checklist [source: TIP 26 resource]: for childhood, earliest memories, parents and siblings, losses, illness and accidents, religious life and whether childhood was enjoyed; for adolescence, school, work, hardships, relationships, and feelings about sexuality and identity; for family and home, the parents' relationship, the atmosphere at home, discipline and closeness; for adulthood, religion, key events, work, relationships, marriage and intimacy, and difficulties such as loss, illness, moves and feeling alone or needed. The summary section (overall satisfaction, regrets, proudest and unhappiest periods, feelings about ageing, hopes and fears, and how the review felt) belongs to the evaluation visits (4.16).
    3. Ask open questions first, then narrower ones if the client gives little [Wenk: narrow the question when a broad one feels threatening].
    4. After each memory, add a brief evaluative probe (4.10).
    5. When the client moves to another stage, follow briefly, then bridge back.
    6. Close each session with a short summary of what was covered and a preview of the next stage.
  • Example language (illustrative):
    • "What's the very first thing you can remember?"
    • "Tell me about the house you grew up in. Walk me through the front door."
    • "Who were you closest to as a teenager?"
    • "What was your first real job like?"
    • "Looking back now, what do you make of that time?"
  • Watch for:
    • Stages that are skipped or hurried, which may signal painful material.
    • Stories that stay purely factual, which need an evaluative probe.
    • Signs it is working: the client brings up memories between sessions, the narrative becomes richer and more connected, and affect is expressed and then settles.

4.3 Earliest-memory opener

  • Purpose: start the review at its natural beginning and set a reflective, personal tone [source: Shilling; Wenk].
  • Steps:
    1. Ask for the earliest memory.
    2. Elaborate it with sensory and relational detail (4.7).
    3. Ask what feeling goes with it.
    4. Use it as the anchor for the childhood stage.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Go back as far as you can. What's the earliest thing you remember, even a small picture?"
  • Watch for:
    • An early memory that is traumatic. Contain it, note it, and agree when to come back to it (4.15).
    • No early memory at all. That is normal, so move to family and home prompts [synthesis].

4.4 Historical-event prompt for blocked recall

  • Purpose: bring back personal memories when open questions produce nothing. Asking what the client was doing on the day of a widely known historical event feels less threatening, because there is no right or wrong answer [source: Shilling; Wenk].
  • Steps:
    1. Choose a public event from the stage you are covering that fits the client's age and country.
    2. Ask where they were and what they were doing that day.
    3. Follow the personal thread outward: who they were with, what life was like then.
  • Example language (illustrative): "When you heard the news that day, where were you? Who was with you?"
  • Watch for:
    • Events that were themselves traumatic for this client, such as war or disaster. Check before using them [synthesis].
    • Signs it is working: the client moves from the public event into their own life.

4.5 Timeline or lifeline

  • Purpose: give the review a visible structure, find gaps, and help clients with weaker recall [source: Shilling; Wenk].
  • Steps:
    1. Draw a horizontal line from birth to now.
    2. Mark major events (moves, schooling, work, relationships, births, deaths, illnesses) together with the client.
    3. Use the marks to plan which stages each session will cover.
    4. Add to it each session.
    5. In the evaluation phase, look at it as a whole [steps 3–5 are synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Let's put the big moves and milestones on this line, so we can see where we've been and where we're going next."
  • Watch for: long blank stretches. Ask gently about them, without pressing.

4.6 Genogram and family involvement

  • Purpose: map relationships across generations and enlist family to supply prompts and materials [source: Shilling; Wenk; NCT03851016 for families gathering materials with the resident's approval].
  • Steps:
    1. Build a genogram covering at least three generations.
    2. Ask about each key person.
    3. With the client's consent, invite relatives to bring photographs or to join a session.
    4. Keep family as supporters of the client's account, not as fact-checkers [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Tell me about your mother. What would she say about you as a child?"
  • Watch for:
    • Family conflict, secrets, and relatives correcting or contradicting the client. Protect the client's voice and the client's ownership of disclosure [synthesis].

4.7 Sensory elaboration

  • Purpose: deepen and enrich memories. Recall is anchored with detail from the five senses [source: NCT03851016, which cites Birren & Cochran; Wenk on stimulating the senses].
  • Steps:
    1. After a memory is named, ask in turn what the client saw, heard, smelled, tasted and touched.
    2. Ask about the emotion that came with it.
    3. Return to its meaning.
  • Example language (illustrative): "At that holiday dinner, what was on the table? What music was playing? What did the room smell like?"
  • Watch for:
    • Sensory detail can raise intense emotion, especially with traumatic material. Slow down, or ground the client (5.3) [synthesis].
    • Signs it is working: the client becomes more vivid, animated and emotionally present.

4.8 Props and multisensory triggers (including dementia reminiscence)

  • Purpose: trigger memories that words alone don't reach, especially in early dementia or with low verbal fluency [source: Shilling; Wenk].
  • Steps:
    1. Ask the client or family for personal items.
    2. Collect era-appropriate material:
      • photographs;
      • songs from the client's youth;
      • smells and aromas;
      • antiques and everyday objects;
      • journals;
      • art materials.
    3. Present one trigger at a time and let the client handle it.
    4. Ask what it brings to mind.
    5. With dementia, simple drama or role play, memory boxes and recorded life stories can be used [Wenk].
    6. Keep the focus on enjoyment and connection rather than accuracy [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "This song came out when you were about eighteen. What comes to mind when you hear it?"
  • Watch for:
    • Distress at what has been lost. Validate it.
    • Testing memory ("Do you remember…?"), which can shame people with dementia. Use "tell me about…" instead [synthesis].
    • Signs it is working: more engagement, smiling, conversation.

4.9 Specific-memory retrieval practice

  • Purpose: train retrieval of specific autobiographical memories in older adults with depressive symptoms. A specific memory is a single event lasting no longer than a day, at a particular time and place [source: Serrano et al., 2004].
  • Steps (Serrano format):
    1. Hold 4 weekly individual sessions: childhood, adolescence, adulthood, then a whole-life summary.
    2. In each session, ask a set of about 14 prompts adapted from Haight & Webster (1995). Most ask for a pleasant or notable specific event; some are neutral or about adversity.
    3. Deliver every prompt.
    4. Do not add advice or unscripted encouragement.
  • What to do with general memories: the paper does not say how to respond when a client gives a general memory such as "we always went to the seaside" [uncertain]. A reasonable response [synthesis]: acknowledge it, then ask for one occasion, with when, where and who.
  • Example language (illustrative): "You said summers were always happy. Pick one particular day from one of those summers. Where were you, and what happened?"
  • Watch for:
    • Persistent overgeneral answers, which are common in depression. Keep the specificity prompt gentle.
    • Signs it is working: memories become more specific and depressive symptoms fall.

4.10 Evaluative probing after each memory

  • Purpose: turn recall into review by evaluating the meaning of both positive and negative memories. This is the defining feature of life review [source: Bohlmeijer et al., 2008; Shilling].
  • Steps:
    1. Let the story be told.
    2. Reflect its feeling.
    3. Ask how the client sees the event now compared with then, what it meant, and what it says about who they are [steps 2–3 are synthesis based on the sources' definition].
  • Example language (illustrative):
    • "How did you feel about that then, and how do you see it now?"
    • "What did that teach you?"
  • Watch for:
    • Ruminative re-telling, where evaluation goes round the same blame or regret. Switch to 4.11, 4.12 or 4.13.
    • Moving on too fast. Do not reframe before the feeling has been acknowledged.

4.11 Finding meaning in negative events and cognitive restructuring

  • Purpose: help the client re-integrate painful memories and lingering negative beliefs, so that negative events are given meaning, sometimes including growth [source: Wenk; secondary source].
  • Steps:
    1. Elaborate the negative memory in enough detail to form a coherent account.
    2. Identify the belief the client still holds about it, such as "I failed my family" or "It was all my fault".
    3. Test that belief against the whole life story: other evidence, the constraints of the time, and what the client could have known then.
    4. Explore how the experience changed the client, including any strengths it built.
    5. Phrase a more balanced conclusion in the client's own words.
  • Example language (illustrative):
    • "You've carried the idea that you let them down. Knowing what you knew then and what you were dealing with, how would you judge a friend who did the same?"
    • "What did getting through that make possible later?"
  • Watch for:
    • Reframing too early, which invalidates the client. Make sure grief and anger have been heard first.
    • Pushing growth talk onto losses that were simply tragic [synthesis].
    • Signs it is working: less self-blame, more nuanced language, mood improving.

4.12 Alternative stories (narrative reframing within group life review)

  • Purpose: when participants mainly tell problem-saturated stories, such as victimhood or powerlessness, show that an event can be told in more than one way, and develop alternative stories [source: Bohlmeijer et al., 2008, De verhalen die we leven].
  • Steps:
    1. Before the meeting, the participant prepares answers to the theme's take-home questions (4.17).
    2. In the group of four, the participant tells their story.
    3. The facilitator notices the dominant problem storyline.
    4. The facilitator asks about moments that don't fit it: agency, resistance, care given or received.
    5. The group helps name the alternative story.
    6. Steps 3–5 are a generic narrative-practice sequence; the cited article gives only the principle [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "In this story you were the one things happened to. Was there a moment, even a small one, when you did something about it?"
  • Watch for:
    • Group members rushing to cheer someone up. Slow them down and validate first.
    • Very bitter participants. Effectiveness for them is unknown [source: Bohlmeijer et al., 2008].

4.13 Integrative reminiscence

  • Purpose: reappraise the first interpretations of, and emotional reactions to, past self-defining events. Reported gains were in self-esteem, purpose and personal meaning [source: Watt, 1996, abstract].
  • Steps: the published session format is [uncertain]. A procedure consistent with the abstract [synthesis]:
    1. Identify a self-defining event.
    2. Recall the original interpretation and the feeling at the time.
    3. Reconsider it with what the client knows now and from the wider life story.
    4. Note what it means for who they are and for the continuity of their life.
  • Example language (illustrative): "At the time you decided it meant you weren't good enough. Looking at your whole life since, what else could it mean?"
  • Watch for:
    • Unresolved regrets that need grief work rather than reappraisal.
    • Signs it is working: the client gains a sense of meaning and coherence.

4.14 Instrumental reminiscence

  • Purpose: use memories of earlier coping to:
    • normalise the current stress;
    • identify the needs at stake in coping with it;
    • show evidence of past successful coping;
    • identify coping strategies to apply now.
    Reported gains were in self-esteem, sense of control and problem-focused coping [source: Watt, 1996, abstract].
  • Steps: the published session structure is [uncertain]. A procedure consistent with the abstract [synthesis]:
    1. Name the current problem, such as bereavement, illness or a move to residential care.
    2. Recall a past difficulty that felt similar.
    3. Detail what the client did, who helped, and what worked.
    4. Name the need that was at stake then and now, such as autonomy or connection.
    5. Choose one strategy to try this week.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Have you faced something that felt like this before? How did you get through it? What from that could help now?"
  • Watch for:
    • Coping strategies that no longer fit current limits, such as physical ones. Adapt them.
    • Signs it is working: the client tries the strategy and reports more sense of control.

4.15 Trauma-focused life review session

  • Purpose: process a traumatic experience inside the chronological life review, so that it becomes one integrated chapter rather than a split-off memory. Maercker (2002) adapted life review for older adults with PTSD symptoms [source: Kuwert & Knaevelsrud 2010 slides]; Maercker & Forstmeier (2013) describe structured life review as a technique in psychotraumatology, built on elaborating autobiographical memory and consolidating identity, illustrated with a client traumatised in World War II [source: abstract].
  • Placement: in one practitioner example, the trauma gets its own session, placed just before the life stage in which it happened [source: Wenk]. The trauma is elaborated in detail into a coherent narrative [source: Wenk].
  • Published dosing found: Maercker & Forstmeier's own session plan is [uncertain]. The one published structure available is Integrative Testimonial Therapy (4.23): the trauma narrative takes 2 of 11 writing sessions of about 45 minutes, framed as moderate exposure embedded in the life story, and 7 resource-oriented life-story sessions follow [source: Kuwert & Knaevelsrud 2010 slides]. Forstmeier & Maercker's practice book also covers testimony therapy, narrative exposure therapy and a life-review therapy for Holocaust survivors (chapter headings only) [source: reading sample].
  • Readiness criteria:
    • exclusions used in the Integrative Testimonial Therapy study: acute suicidality, alcohol or substance misuse, schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, and physical illness that prevents participation [source: Kuwert & Knaevelsrud 2010 slides];
    • added from general trauma-therapy practice [synthesis]: stable living situation; the client can use at least one grounding skill; dissociation is mild enough that the client can stay present while narrating; earlier sessions have built a working alliance and the resource-rich parts of the life story.
  • Steps [synthesis, except where marked]:
    1. Agree in advance which session will hold the trauma, and agree a stop signal.
    2. Start with a brief check of the client's current state.
    3. Have the client narrate the event in sequence, in the first person, including thoughts, feelings and sensory detail, at a pace that keeps distress tolerable. Keep the exposure part to about 45 minutes and to one or two sessions, in line with the published writing protocol [dose from Kuwert & Knaevelsrud 2010; transfer to face-to-face work is synthesis].
    4. Pause at the worst moment to name the emotion.
    5. Continue to the point where the event was over and the client was safe.
    6. Then ask what came next in their life, and place the event in the timeline. Follow with resource-oriented review of the rest of the life story [Kuwert & Knaevelsrud 2010 for the sequence].
    7. Leave at least 15 minutes to ground, contain and orient to the present.
    8. Do not end in the middle of the narrative.
  • Example language (illustrative): "We'll go through it at your pace, from just before it started to the point when it was over. If it gets too much, raise your hand and we'll pause and come back to the room."
  • Watch for:
    • Dissociation: glazed look, flat voice, losing track. Stop and ground the client (5.3).
    • Intrusions in the days after the session.
    • Signs it is working: the narrative becomes more coherent and placed in time, distress falls when the story is retold, and the client is less avoidant.
  • Memory caution: never use this session, suggestion or imagery to search for traumatic events the client doesn't remember [synthesis, Domain VI rule].

4.16 Summary, evaluation and integration visits (Handbook visits 6–7)

  • Purpose: in visit 6, look back over the whole life and evaluate it; in visit 7, integrate it. The Handbook's contents name acceptance and denial, congruence and summarising for visit 6, and reviewing successes, reframing difficult times and establishing a future emphasis, under integrity versus despair, for visit 7 [source: Handbook contents; Shilling; Wenk].
  • Steps:
    1. Visit 6: review the timeline or notes from all the stages.
    2. Ask the client to say what they have learned.
    3. Ask for the three most important things in their life and why.
    4. Ask what they would change and what they would leave unchanged [steps 2–4 from Wenk].
    5. Notice what the client accepts and what they still deny or skip, and summarise back congruently [Handbook contents headings; how to do it is synthesis].
    6. Visit 7: go back over the successes the client has named; return to the difficult times and reframe them (4.11); then turn to the future: what matters most now and what they want to do with the time ahead [Handbook contents headings; Wenk for what matters now; the order is synthesis].
    7. Close each visit with a summary in the client's words [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "If you look at your life as a whole now, what stands out? If you could pick three things that mattered most, what would they be?" and, in visit 7, "Knowing all this, what do you want the next chapter to hold?"
  • Watch for:
    • Despair or "wasted life" conclusions. Respond as in 5.4.
    • Signs it is working: the client reaches a balanced view that holds both regret and accomplishment, and expresses acceptance or a renewed purpose.

4.17 Take-home theme questions

  • Purpose: prepare each group meeting and extend reflection between sessions [source: Bohlmeijer et al., 2008].
  • Steps:
    1. At the end of each meeting, give 3–5 written questions on the next theme. The six themes:
      • youth;
      • work and care;
      • difficult periods;
      • social relationships;
      • high and low points;
      • central life themes, meaning and the future.
    2. Participants jot notes at home.
    3. They bring the notes to the meeting.
    4. Steps 1–3 detail how to run it [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "For next week, think about your working life or the care you've given others: one moment you're proud of and one that was hard."
  • Watch for:
    • Non-completion, which may come from literacy or vision limits, or from avoidance. Offer an oral option instead.

4.18 Life Story Book

  • Purpose: produce a lasting, illustrated record of the review that belongs to the client [source: NCT03851016].
  • Steps:
    1. Record the sessions with consent, or take notes as scribe.
    2. Transcribe the recordings, then destroy the audio.
    3. Scan the client's photographs and memorabilia on site, so originals never leave the client.
    4. With approval, find substitute images where the client has none.
    5. Compile the material chronologically, with the client's own captions.
    6. Review the draft with the client. The client has final say over all content.
    7. Correct it promptly.
    8. Present it in an expandable album, so more can be added later.
    9. Give the book even if the client withdraws early or it is incomplete.
  • Example language (illustrative): "This is your book. Anything you don't want in it comes out, and you decide who gets to see it."
  • Watch for:
    • Privacy, since the book may reveal secrets to family or staff. Agree who it is shared with [synthesis].

4.19 Written biography

  • Purpose: an optional closing task in which the client writes their own life story [source: Wenk].
  • Steps:
    1. The client chooses to write either chronologically or by selected stages.
    2. For each stage, they record facts, feelings at the time and feelings now.
    3. Read it together in a final session [step 3 is synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "For each chapter, write what happened, how you felt then, and how you feel about it today."
  • Watch for:
    • Writing that stops at painful chapters. Offer to work on those in session.

4.20 Group life review course with creative elements (Looking for Meaning / Op zoek naar zin)

  • Purpose: life review delivered as a group course with creative and sensory work, as indicated prevention for older adults with mild to moderate depressive symptoms; people with major depression were excluded in the trial [source: BMC Public Health 2008 design paper; Pot et al., 2010].
  • Format: 12 similarly structured two-hour sessions, groups of about 8, two trained co-facilitators; each session links past and present [source: design paper].
  • Session themes, in order [source: design paper]: 1. your name; 2. smells from the past; 3. houses you have lived in; 4. recognising your resources; 5. hands; 6. photographs; 7. friendship; 8. balance; 9. the thread of life and turning points; 10. longing and desire; 11. the future in me; 12. identity.
  • Steps within a session [synthesis built on the elements the design paper names: sensory recall, creative expression, verbal exchange, poems and stories, problem-solving]:
    1. Open with a sensory or object cue tied to the theme (a scent, an object, a photograph).
    2. Give an individual recall or creative task (drawing, collage, a short piece of writing).
    3. Share in pairs or the whole group.
    4. Link the memories to the present and to current coping or a current problem.
    5. Close with a poem or short text and an optional reflection for home. The manual's own exercises are not reproduced here [uncertain]; use the manual if you deliver this course.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Today's theme is houses. Draw the layout of one house you lived in, then walk us through it: who was in which room?"
  • Watch for:
    • Bitterness revival: the course aims to move people from reminiscing to revive bitterness toward accepting and finding meaning [source: design paper].
    • The trial found larger effects in women and in participants above the depression screening cut-off [source: Pot et al., 2010].
    • Local versions differ; one current Dutch service runs six meetings for adults 50+ with an intake conversation [source: Pro Persona Preventie leaflet].

4.21 Simple (spontaneous) reminiscence

  • Purpose: sharing mostly positive memories for pleasure, connection and identity, without systematic evaluation. Distinguished from life review by Bohlmeijer et al. (2008).
  • Steps [synthesis]:
    1. Choose a familiar theme, such as school days, first jobs or holidays.
    2. Offer a trigger (4.8).
    3. Invite each person in turn.
    4. Link similar experiences across members.
    5. Close on a light note.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Today's theme is first jobs. Who'd like to start?"
  • Watch for:
    • A painful memory that surfaces unexpectedly. Acknowledge it, and offer an individual follow-up rather than processing it in the group.

4.22 Closure and relapse-prevention plan

  • Purpose: end the review well and protect the gains. The Handbook's visit 8 covers professional referrals, contact information, thank-you notes, and assessing outcomes three ways: tested outcomes, reviewer feedback and observed outcomes [source: Handbook contents]. Plan life after therapy, including relapse prevention [source: Wenk].
  • Steps [order and warning-sign work are synthesis]:
    1. Repeat the outcome measures and compare them with baseline (tested outcomes).
    2. Ask the client for feedback on the review (reviewer feedback), and note the changes you have observed (observed outcomes).
    3. Summarise the client's main conclusions.
    4. Identify early warning signs of low mood.
    5. List the activities and relationships the review showed to be sustaining.
    6. Agree how to keep reminiscing in helpful ways, such as the book or talking with family.
    7. Arrange professional referral where problems remain, and leave contact information.
    8. Send or give a short thank-you note.
  • Example language (illustrative): "What from these weeks do you want to hold on to, and what will tell you it's time to reach out again?"
  • Watch for:
    • Loss reactions at the ending, since the listener has become important. Name the ending early.

4.23 Life-review writing for traumatised older adults (Integrative Testimonial Therapy)

  • Purpose: a manualised, therapist-guided writing therapy that combines life review with testimony-style trauma narration, for older adults with PTSD from childhood war experiences in World War II. The developers name Testimony Therapy and Narrative Exposure Therapy as related models [source: Kuwert & Knaevelsrud, Lindau 2010 slides].
  • Format: 11 structured writing sessions over about 6 weeks, two a week, about 45 minutes each, at times the client fixes at the start of each phase. The therapist replies to each text within one working day, within a disorder-specific manual. Delivered online in the study [source: same].
  • Steps (published block structure; the instructions for each text are [uncertain]):
    1. Trauma in the life story (2 texts): the client writes the traumatic event into their life history, as moderate exposure.
    2. Resource-oriented reconstruction of the life story (7 texts): the client works through the life story with attention to strengths and resources, aimed at integration and cognitive reappraisal.
    3. Closing (2 texts): including a letter, written from today's perspective, to the child they were or another person affected. The slide layout leaves the exact mapping of texts to blocks slightly ambiguous [uncertain].
  • Exclusions used in the study: acute suicidality, alcohol or substance misuse, physical illness that prevents participation, schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. The developers note that online delivery offers no immediate crisis intervention [source: same]. Agree a crisis route before starting [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "In the next two texts, write what happened, in the order it happened, as if telling someone who needs to know. Write for about forty-five minutes, and end with a few lines about where you are today."
  • Watch for: rising intrusions or distress between texts: reply promptly, slow the pace, and move to face-to-face care if needed [synthesis]. Signs it is working: texts become more coherent and less fragmented, and the closing letter shows compassion for the younger self [synthesis].
  • Face-to-face use: the same logic (bounded exposure placed within the life story, then resource-oriented reconstruction, then a closing letter) can structure an individual life review [synthesis].

5. Handling problems

The published sources say little about handling problems. Each item is marked by where it comes from.

5.1 Stuck client: little recall, or flat factual answers

  • Narrow the question, because broad questions can feel threatening [source: Wenk].
  • Use the historical-event prompt (4.4), a timeline (4.5), photos or music (4.8), or sensory prompts (4.7) [source: Shilling; Wenk; NCT03851016].
  • If answers stay factual, add one evaluative probe per story (4.10) [synthesis].
  • If answers stay general, ask for "one particular time" (4.9) [synthesis].
  • In suspected cognitive decline, reassess cognition and shift from evaluative review to sensory reminiscence [synthesis].

5.2 Reluctance and resistance

  • Some people refuse to recall the past. For them life review is not recommended, and other services may fit better [source: Shilling].
  • Respect the right to pass on any question [source: NCT03851016].
  • Probe gently, but move on when the reviewer deflects. Recognise when a reviewer is avoiding a memory and respect that choice; full disclosure is not always reached, and that is acceptable [source: Haight & Haight 2013]. The Handbook also names a "reluctant reviewer" type; its definition is [uncertain].
  • Distinguish global unwillingness from avoidance of one period [synthesis]:
    • Global unwillingness: stop and offer present-focused therapy.
    • Avoidance of one period: name it gently, agree when and whether to address it, and keep the client in control of how much is told.
  • Example (illustrative): "I notice we've moved quickly past your thirties. We don't have to go there, but if there's something there, we could plan a session for it when you're ready."

5.3 Overwhelm, flooding or dissociation (any session, especially 4.15)

All of 5.3 is [synthesis].

  1. Stop the narration.
  2. Orient the client to the present: name the date and place, have them feel their feet on the floor, describe five things they can see.
  3. Lower arousal with slow breathing.
  4. Leave the material for now with a containment image or a closing summary: "we've put it on the timeline; it stays here".
  5. Do not let the client leave until they are oriented and calm.
  6. Shorten future sessions or prepare more stabilisation before returning.

If dissociation recurs, pause the review and refer to, or provide, phase-oriented trauma treatment.

5.4 Despair, regret and suicidal ideation in the evaluation phase

  • Butler warned that a life review can contribute to late-life depression [source: UWE paper citing Butler].
  • If a client concludes their life was wasted [synthesis]:
    1. Validate the pain.
    2. Review the timeline for disconfirming evidence (4.11).
    3. Separate regret, which can be grieved, from self-condemnation.
    4. Look for what can still be done now: repair, a message, a legacy.
  • Assess suicide risk directly when hopelessness appears. Do current standard risk assessment and safety planning, involve the medical team or GP, and step up care if needed [synthesis].
  • Very bitter clients may not benefit [source: Bohlmeijer et al., 2008]. Consider switching to CBT or behavioural activation [source: Wenk mentions these as options when needed].

5.5 Rumination: going over the same grievance

  • Shift from repeated retelling to an action:
    • reappraisal (4.13);
    • an alternative story (4.12);
    • the coping lesson the event holds (4.14).
  • Set a time limit for the topic.
  • Return to the chronological thread [synthesis].

5.6 Non-adherence: missed sessions, take-home questions not done

  • In frail or residential clients this often comes from fatigue, illness or the institution's schedule. Reschedule, split sessions, and work around meals, naps and medication [source: NCT03851016].
  • Replace written tasks with oral reflection [synthesis].
  • When health deteriorates, end with closure and give whatever life-story material exists [source: NCT03851016].

5.7 Ruptures

All of 5.7 is [synthesis].

  • Common ruptures are:
    • the listener seeming bored or judging a disclosure;
    • the client regretting having told a secret.
  • Name the rupture.
  • Repair with validation.
  • Reaffirm confidentiality and the client's ownership of the story.
  • Offer to leave the disclosure out of any book.

5.8 Modality-specific difficulties

  • Family involvement: relatives may contradict the client, try to control the content, or learn secrets. Get the client's consent for each family contribution, and keep the client's version as the one recorded [synthesis].
  • Group life review: one member may dominate, or a member's trauma may come out in the group. Contain it, and offer an individual session [synthesis].
  • Memory accuracy: do not "correct" memories or treat them as evidence. Never use suggestion, hypnosis or guided imagery to uncover memories [synthesis, Domain VI rule].
  • End of life: keep sessions short, focus on what the client most wants to say or leave, and prioritise the book or a message over full chronological coverage [synthesis].
  • Boundaries of lay reminiscence work: reminiscence needs no formal qualification [source: Wenk]. Volunteers and activity staff should hand clinical warning signs to a clinician [synthesis]. Those signs include:
    • persistent hopelessness;
    • suicidal talk;
    • trauma intrusions;
    • psychotic symptoms;
    • marked cognitive change.
  • Outcome measurement in routine practice: formal measurement is often hard to fit in [source: Shilling]. At minimum, use one depression measure before and after [synthesis].

5.9 Reviewer types named in the Handbook

The Handbook's contents introduce one reviewer type per visit: the storyteller, the reluctant reviewer, the external reviewer, the creative reviewer, the denying reviewer and the bleeding reviewer, and list "recognizing reviewer type" under the integration visit [source: Handbook publisher page]. Their definitions and the advice attached are not given in any public source used here [uncertain]. Until you have the Handbook, use only what other sources support:

  • Reluctance: see 5.2 [source: Haight & Haight 2013; Shilling].
  • Accounts that stay external, about other people or events rather than the self: the form directs reviewers to their own memories and the feelings tied to them, so ask what it was like for them [source: Haight & Haight 2013].
  • Denial: the Handbook places acceptance and denial in the summary-and-evaluation visit (headings only) [source: contents]. Do not confront; reflect what has been said and leave room to return to it [synthesis].
  • Do not guess at the other labels; read the Handbook before relying on them [synthesis].

Sources

Pages and documents used:

Further sources:

Books and papers cited [uncertain where relied on]:

  • Butler, R. N. (1963). The life review: an interpretation of reminiscence in the aged. Psychiatry, 26, 65–76. Cited through the secondary sources above.
  • Haight, B. K., & Haight, B. S. (2007). The Handbook of Structured Life Review. Health Professions Press. Used through the publisher's description and contents; the book calls its question form the Life Review Form (Appendix B).
  • Haight, B. K., & Webster, J. D. (Eds.) (1995). The Art and Science of Reminiscing. Taylor & Francis.
  • Franssen, J., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2003). Op zoek naar zin (course manual). Trimbos-instituut. Structure taken from the 2008 trial design paper; the exercises are [uncertain].
  • Lewis, M. I., & Butler, R. N. (1974). Life review therapy: putting memories to work in individual and group psychotherapy. Geriatrics, 29(11). The techniques it describes are not itemised here [uncertain].
  • Maercker, A. (2002). Life-review technique in the treatment of PTSD in elderly patients. Cited by Kuwert & Knaevelsrud.
  • Erikson, E. H.: the integrity-versus-despair stage and the earlier stages that structure Haight's visits, as cited by Shilling and the Handbook contents.

Still marked [uncertain] or [synthesis]: what the Handbook says inside each visit and about each reviewer type; the exercise-level content of Op zoek naar zin; the session formats of Watt's integrative and instrumental therapies; Maercker's own trauma session plan and readiness criteria (readiness here combines the Integrative Testimonial Therapy exclusions with general trauma practice); the techniques in Lewis & Butler (1974).

← Previous · VI-128Grief counselling (tasks, dual process, continuing bonds)Next · VI-130 →Career counselling