Resource-oriented music therapy

1. Introduction

Version followed: Randi Rolvsjord's resource-oriented music therapy (RoMT) for individual work with adults in mental health care, as set out in (a) her empowerment paper (Rolvsjord 2004, Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 13(2); republished in Voices 2006), (b) the treatment manual written for the Bergen-led randomised trial (Rolvsjord, Gold & Stige 2005, Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 14, 15–32, DOI 10.1080/08098130509478122), as described in the trial protocol (Gold et al. 2005), and (c) her 2010 monograph (Barcelona Publishers), known here only through the publisher's contents page and Simon Procter's review. The manual paper's citation and DOI, the trial format (two 45-minute sessions a week, up to 26 in 3 months) and the client-agency study's citation (Rolvsjord 2015, Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 24, 296–321) come from the trial protocol, the trial abstract and bibliographic records. The manual paper's own text and the monograph are not paraphrased here: their content is known only through the protocol's summary, the publisher's contents page and Procter's review [uncertain]. No published step-by-step RoMT procedure was found, so technique-level detail below is partly the writer's own [synthesis] and is labelled as such. National registration details are [uncertain].

What it is: RoMT is an approach and set of therapeutic principles, not a step-by-step protocol. It was developed by Randi Rolvsjord at the Grieg Academy, University of Bergen, Norway, in the Norwegian tradition Procter traces from Even Ruud through Aasgaard and Stige [source: Procter 2010 review; UiB staff page]. It orients therapy to the client's resources, strengths and potentials rather than mainly to problems and conflicts, emphasises collaboration and equal relationships, and treats music itself as a central resource [source: Gold et al. 2005 protocol]. It draws on empowerment philosophy, positive psychology, contextual (common-factors) models of psychotherapy and music sociology [source: Gold et al. 2005; Barcelona Publishers book page]. Rolvsjord places her own practice within psychotherapy, while critics such as Procter note its overlap with Community Music Therapy [source: Procter 2010].

How change happens: change comes from the client's own resourcefulness and agency. The client exercises "craft" in therapy and uses music in their own way. Client and therapist pool their resources in a collaborative, mutually empowering relationship. Experiences of mastery, joy, emotional expression and musical participation then carry over into relationships, motivation and everyday life [source: Procter 2010; Rolvsjord 2004/2006; Barcelona book contents ("mastery and joy", "the client's craft"); Rolvsjord 2013 chapter abstract]. A resource focus is not meant to exclude problems. It is what makes constructive work on problems possible [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006].

Typical population: adults with non-organic mental disorders (ICD-10 F1–F6), including psychosis, especially clients with low motivation for other therapies. No prior musical interest or skill is required [source: Gold et al. 2005 protocol; Gold et al. 2013 abstract].

Professional frame (Domain VIII): in the trial, RoMT was delivered only by academically qualified music therapists with clinical psychiatric experience who had been specifically trained in the resource-oriented principles [source: Gold et al. 2005]. In practice this means a credentialled music therapist: for example HCPC-registered (UK, BAMT as the professional body), MT-BC via CBMT and AMTA (USA), or a master's-trained music therapist in Norway, such as Grieg Academy (UiB) graduates [uncertain: national registration details not verified]. No separate RoMT certification or licensing body is known [uncertain]. A psychotherapist without music therapy training can adopt the resource-oriented stance and principles in section 3. They should not offer active music-making (songwriting, joint playing, instrument teaching) as "music therapy". Co-work with or refer to a music therapist instead [synthesis].

2. Framework

Rolvsjord publishes no fixed phase model; sources describe principles, case processes and a trial format [source: Gold et al. 2005; Procter 2010]. The format and phase structure below separate what is sourced from what is synthesis.

Format used in the trial (sourced) [source: Gold et al. 2005 protocol]

Individual sessions of 45 minutes, two per week ("Two sessions per week will be offered"), alongside standard psychiatric care (in- or outpatient) [source: Gold et al. 2005 protocol].
Up to 26 sessions over 3 months. About 20 sessions was considered the minimum for an effect, so therapists should aim for at least 18 when the full dose is not feasible.
Fidelity: the therapist rated their own adherence after every session, and independent raters scored a videotaped sample. The manual sorts its items into general attitudes and behaviours, attitudes within musical interaction, attitudes to avoid, and attitudes that are acceptable but not necessary. The protocol does not give the item wording [uncertain].
The published trial (Norway, Austria, Australia; 144 adults) describes the intervention as "3 months of biweekly individual, resource-oriented MT" plus treatment as usual [source: Gold et al. 2013 abstract, Karger]. Read "biweekly" here as twice a week: the protocol for the same trial specifies two sessions per week, up to 26 in 3 months, whereas sessions every two weeks would allow only about 6–7 in that period [source: Gold et al. 2005 protocol; the reconciliation is my inference].
Rolvsjord's case studies were longer-term individual therapies in which songwriting and singing were central [source: Procter 2010]. Their length and frequency are not stated in the sources used [uncertain].

Working phases (my synthesis from the principles and case themes, not a published Rolvsjord model) [synthesis]

Engagement and resource discovery (about sessions 1–4). Goals: establish a collaborative, low-pressure relationship; map the client's musical history, preferences, skills and everyday music use; identify what the client wants from music. Move on when the client has a chosen musical activity and some shared language for what they want.
Collaborative music-making and building (bulk of sessions). Goals: emotional expression, building and sustaining relationship, developing interest and motivation [goals sourced: Gold et al. 2005]. Means: songs, songwriting, playing together, listening, skill-building. Problems and painful material are negotiated as they arise [source for the theme: Barcelona contents, "negotiating resources and problems"]. Move on when the client is taking initiatives and using music outside sessions, or when the agreed dose is nearing its end.
Transfer and closure (last 3–5 sessions). Goals: connect what the client did in therapy to everyday contexts [theme sourced: Rolvsjord 2013 chapter abstract; "engagement across contexts" in Rolvsjord's client-agency study]; plan continued music use (choirs, bands, lessons, own instrument access); review together what the client contributed. Ending criteria: agreed dose reached, client goals met, or the client chooses to stop.

3. Guiding principles

Each principle is followed by its practical meaning. Sources: Rolvsjord 2004/2006; Gold et al. 2005 (protocol summary of manual principles); Procter 2010 (review of the 2010 book); Rolvsjord client-agency study abstract.

Focus on strengths and potentials (manual principle, cited in protocol): in every session, look for and name what the client can do, musically and otherwise, before or alongside what is wrong.
Music as a central resource: treat the client's musical tastes, skills and uses of music as assets to build on, not as material for interpretation [source: Gold et al. 2005; Rolvsjord 2004/2006].
Tuning into the client's musical expression (manual principle, cited in protocol): when playing together, follow and support the client's musical ideas rather than leading with your own.
Collaboration and equal relationship: decide goals and activities together, with shared responsibility. The therapist keeps professional skill and the legal and professional asymmetry [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006].
Mutuality as a way of being, not identical roles: be emotionally responsive and allow the relationship to matter to you too, without handing over responsibility for care [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006].
Client in the "driving seat" [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006]: let the client choose songs, instruments, pace and direction. Your offers are options, not prescriptions.
Watch for expertise turning into control: even "empowering" techniques can become another form of expert control, so check whether the client actually wants what you are facilitating [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006, drawing on Dreier and Foucault].
"Power to", not "power over": use your influence to enable the client's action, never to steer them toward your version of health [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006].
Contextualise the individual: understand problems within the client's social, cultural, gender and political context, not only as individual pathology [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006; UiB publication list on gender politics].
Listen for and tell stories of coping: in talk, case notes and team meetings, describe the client through their resources as well as their difficulties [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006; Fairchild & Bibb 2016 on representing clients].
Clients' rights to music: musical participation and access (instruments, concerts, social music occasions) is a right to be supported, not a reward for getting well [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006].
Resources and problems are negotiated, not opposed: a resource focus makes constructive work on problems possible; do not avoid pain when the client brings it [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006; Barcelona contents ch. 10].
Verbal work also focuses on resources: when talking, reflect on what went well and what the client did [source: Gold et al. 2005].
Respect, democratic participation, mutual empowerment: these are the relational qualities Procter highlights in the book [source: Procter 2010].
Considered therapist self-disclosure: sharing your own musical resources and some personal responses is part of the relationship. Use it deliberately [source: Procter 2010]. Limits are my [synthesis] (section 5).
Pooled resources: therapy is two people working out how to use their combined skills, and no two therapists bring the same ones. Offer your own instruments, genres and arranging skills honestly [source: Procter 2010].
The client's craft and agency: clients make therapy work by taking initiatives, exerting control in sessions, committing to the relationship and engaging across contexts. Notice and support each of these [source: Rolvsjord 2015, Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 24, 296–321, abstract; a qualitative multiple case study in adult mental health care using client and therapist interviews with an adapted interpersonal process recall procedure].
Low motivation is not a barrier: music-making can engage people who decline talking therapies, and no musical background is required [source: Gold et al. 2005; Gold et al. 2013 abstract].

4. Intervention inventory

RoMT is deliberately non-prescriptive: the manual specifies attitudes and behaviours, not a fixed menu of exercises [source: Gold et al. 2005]. The activities below are those the sources used name as used in RoMT (songwriting, singing, joint music-making, listening, skill and mastery, performance and access, resource-focused talk, cross-context work, self-disclosure). The step-by-step instructions are my operationalisation of the published principles [synthesis] unless a source tag says otherwise. Example language is illustrative throughout. Nothing here reproduces manual items.

Safety for all musical work [synthesis; Domain VIII requirement]

Hearing: keep amplified playing, drum kits and headphone listening at moderate levels. Use rugs and soft furnishings in small rooms, offer foam earplugs or musician's earplugs, and keep loud passages brief. Ask about tinnitus, hyperacusis and sound sensitivity at intake. Never push volume to "release" emotion.
Musical trauma triggers: a song, genre, instrument or voice can be tied to abuse, a perpetrator, a funeral, a psychotic episode or a lost relationship. Ask at intake which music to avoid. Let the client veto any piece at any time. Prepare a grounding piece or a stop signal in advance.
Physical: keep instruments clean between clients and check for sharp edges or broken strings. In inpatient settings, check cables, strings and stands against ligature and self-harm risk under local policy.

4.1 Resource mapping: musical history and everyday music use

Purpose / when: first sessions, and whenever direction is lost. Identifies musical skills, preferences and the client's own uses of music, which the principles treat as resources [principle sourced: Rolvsjord 2004/2006; Gold et al. 2005].
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Ask what music the client listens to now, and when and why. (2) Ask about past music: lessons, choirs, bands, church, clubs, songs from family and youth. (3) Ask what music helps, and what music to avoid (trigger screen). (4) Ask about instruments or singing they have ever tried and how that went. (5) Listen to one or two chosen tracks together, if they wish. (6) Summarise the resources you heard and check with the client: "Have I got that right?" (7) Note any goals the client voices in their own words.
Example language (illustrative): "What music has been with you through hard times?" "Is there anything you've always wanted to do with music but never had the chance?" "Is there any music we should stay away from in here?"
Watch for: a client who says they are "not musical". Reframe listening and taste as resources; no skill is required [source: Gold et al. 2005]. It is working when the client brings music or ideas of their own.

4.2 Collaborative negotiation of goals and activities

Purpose / when: start of therapy, then a brief check-in each session. Puts the client in the "driving seat" and keeps collaboration and shared responsibility real [principle sourced: Rolvsjord 2004/2006].
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Offer a short menu of options: play songs you like, write a song, play together freely, listen, learn something on an instrument. (2) Let the client choose, or try one briefly and then choose. (3) Agree a loose aim in the client's words (e.g. "get my voice back"). (4) At each session start, ask what they want today. (5) Revisit aims every 4–6 sessions.
Example language (illustrative): "We can use the time however suits you. Here are some things people do..." "You're the expert on what you want from music; I can bring some skills to help."
Watch for: compliance without choice, such as "whatever you think". Offer two concrete options and wait. It is working when the client initiates choices; taking initiatives and exerting control are signs of client agency [source: Rolvsjord client-agency study abstract].

4.3 Collaborative songwriting

Purpose / when: central in Rolvsjord's published cases [source: Procter 2010; Barcelona contents, "the clients and their songs"]. Use it for emotional expression, putting experience into words and music, and creating something of the client's own. Rolvsjord also published a chapter on collaborative songwriting with mental-health clients (Rolvsjord 2005, in Baker & Wigram, eds., Songwriting), which is not drawn on [uncertain].
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Agree that the client owns the song: words, style and final say. (2) Start from what the client brings, such as a phrase, a theme, a style or a favourite song to model. (3) Brainstorm words or images and let the client select. (4) Try melodic or chord ideas and offer two or three alternatives for them to pick from. (5) Shape the structure together (verse and chorus, or free form). (6) Sing or play it through and invite changes. (7) Offer to record it, with the client controlling who hears it (see 4.8). (8) Reflect on what the client did to make it: craft, choices, persistence.
Example language (illustrative): "Which of these lines feels most like yours?" "I can try two chord ideas. Tell me which fits." "You wrote that chorus; what was it like to hear it sung?"
Watch for: the therapist's taste taking over (see principle on expertise as control). Watch for lyrics that disclose suicidal intent, abuse or current risk: these need risk assessment (section 5), not only musical reflection. It is working when the client revises the song, wants to keep it, or uses it outside sessions. In Rolvsjord's Blackbird vignette, a song became an image linking therapy to the client's daily life [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006].

4.4 Singing and playing the client's chosen songs

Purpose / when: an accessible entry point for low-motivation clients. Supports voice, identity and enjoyment. Singing was central in both book case studies [source: Procter 2010]. In a study by the trial's research group of 31 adults with low therapy motivation, "reproduction" techniques (singing or playing familiar songs, learning musical skills) were the most used and predicted gains in relational competencies [source: Mössler, Assmus, Heldal, Fuchs & Gold 2012, abstract record; whether its sample overlaps with the RoMT trial is not stated, uncertain]. Rolvsjord has also written on singing, voice and gender identity [source: UiB publication list, "A woman's voice..." 2013, not drawn on].
Steps [synthesis]: (1) The client picks a song, and you find a key that suits their voice. (2) You accompany (guitar or piano) and they sing or hum, or you sing together. (3) Repeat favourite parts. (4) Gradually offer the client more of the musical lead: start, tempo, their own harmony or instrument. (5) Afterwards, talk briefly about what the song means to them and what went well.
Example language (illustrative): "Shall we try it lower so it sits better for you?" "You came in with real strength on that chorus."
Watch for: strong emotion triggered by lyrics or associations. Pause, ask, and offer to switch songs. Watch also for shame about the voice: lower the volume and sing alongside. It is working when the client sings more fully, chooses new songs, or sings outside therapy.

4.5 Joint music-making: tuning into the client's musical expression

Purpose / when: relational and emotional work through playing together. The manual includes attitudes within musical interaction such as "tuning into the client's musical expression" [source: Gold et al. 2005]. The sources used do not specify an improvisation method for RoMT [uncertain].
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Offer accessible instruments: percussion, tuned bars, keyboard, guitar. (2) Agree whether to play freely or on a song or groove. (3) Let the client start, then match their pulse, volume and mood. (4) Support rather than lead, and offer a small variation only when it seems welcome. (5) Agree a clear ending signal. (6) Afterwards, ask what they noticed and what they liked about their own playing.
Example language (illustrative): "You start, and I'll follow you." "I heard you take us somewhere new there. Did that feel like you?"
Watch for: over-stimulation, loudness and loss of control, particularly in psychosis or mania. Keep it structured and short, and hold volume down (hearing safety). It is working when the client initiates changes and the interaction becomes more mutual.

4.6 Listening together

Purpose / when: low-threshold engagement, sharing identity and taste, and exploring the client's own uses of music. The protocol names playing or listening to music as motivating [source: Gold et al. 2005].
Steps [synthesis]: (1) The client chooses the track. (2) Agree the volume first (hearing safety). (3) Listen without interrupting. (4) Ask open questions about what they like in it and when they use it. (5) Link it to resources: what this music does for them, and how they could use that on purpose.
Example language (illustrative): "What do you want me to notice in this one?" "When do you reach for this song?"
Watch for: listening used to avoid all contact, or ruminative looping on sad music. Gently offer to play or sing a piece of it together. It is working when the client describes deliberate, helpful uses of music.

4.7 Skill-building and mastery (learning an instrument or song)

Purpose / when: when the client wants to learn. Experiences of mastery and joy, and the client's "craft", are named themes of the book [source: Barcelona contents, chs. 7 and 11; Procter 2010]. Learning musical skills is one of the "reproduction" techniques linked to gains in relational competencies in Mössler et al. 2012 (see 4.4) [source: Mössler et al. 2012 abstract record]. Rolvsjord also gave a 2007 lecture titled "'Finally it is something I can do!'" [source: UiB publication list; content not drawn on].
Steps [synthesis]: (1) The client picks the instrument and target (a riff, chords, a song). (2) Break it into small achievable steps. (3) Teach briefly and play along so it already sounds like music. (4) Name progress concretely. (5) Agree optional practice between sessions, with no penalty for not doing it. (6) Help the client access an instrument outside therapy where possible.
Example language (illustrative): "Three weeks ago that change took you ten seconds; now it's in time." "Do you want something to practise, or keep it for here?"
Watch for: the session sliding into an ordinary music lesson with no therapeutic attention, or perfectionism and self-criticism. Normalise mistakes and play along. It is working when the client feels "I can do something" and the sense of competence spreads to other areas.

4.8 Performing, recording and access to musical communities

Purpose / when: later in therapy, only if the client wants it. The empowerment paper treats access to concerts and social music occasions as a valued resource and a right. It cites Stige's example of Knut, who asked to join a brass band, to show that participation depends on others enabling access [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006]. Rolvsjord also studied women performing music in prison [source: UiB publication list, 2015; not drawn on].
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Ask whether the client wants their music heard, by whom and in what form (recording for themselves, playing for a friend or ward, open mic, choir). (2) Agree written consent for any recording and its storage, and who may hear it. (3) Rehearse and plan for nerves. (4) Debrief afterwards on what went well. (5) Help with practical access: choirs, bands, lessons, community music.
Example language (illustrative): "Would you like anyone else to hear this, or is it just for you?" "What would make it feel safe to play it for your sister?"
Watch for: pressure to perform (the therapist's or the service's agenda). Watch for exposure of identity or of sensitive lyrics. It is working when the client takes up music in their own life.

4.9 Resource-focused verbal reflection

Purpose / when: at the end of musical episodes and at the end of sessions. Verbal discussion in RoMT focuses on the client's resources [source: Gold et al. 2005]. Therapists listen for stories of coping and strength [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006].
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Ask what the client noticed about the music. (2) Point out a specific thing they did well. (3) Ask how they did it. (4) Link it to life outside, if they wish. (5) Do not interpret the music as symptoms.
Example language (illustrative): "You kept going even when you lost the beat. How did you do that?" "Where else do you manage to keep going like that?"
Watch for: praise that feels false or patronising. Be specific and honest. If the client wants to talk about a problem, follow them (4.10).

4.10 Negotiating resources and problems: working with difficult emotion

Purpose / when: when pain, symptoms or conflicts arise. The book has a chapter on "negotiating resources and problems" [source: Barcelona contents ch. 10]. Rolvsjord argues that a resource focus enables constructive work on problems rather than excluding it [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006]. Emotional expression is a stated goal [source: Gold et al. 2005]. Rolvsjord's 2004 conference paper was titled "Working with emotions through songwriting" [source: UiB list; not drawn on].
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Acknowledge the problem directly. (2) Ask whether the client wants to stay with it, express it in music, or turn to something sustaining. (3) If expressing it: use a song, lyric or improvisation that holds the feeling within a musical form. (4) Close with something stabilising, such as a known song. (5) Reflect on what helped them bear it.
Example language (illustrative): "That sounds really hard. Do you want to put some of it into the song, or shall we play something that steadies you first?"
Watch for: the resource stance used to avoid pain (toxic positivity), and the opposite risk of overwhelm (section 5). It is working when the client can approach difficult material and come back to steadiness.

4.11 Linking therapy to everyday life and contexts

Purpose / when: throughout, and especially near the end. Rolvsjord describes how therapy becomes part of everyday music use, with clients connecting experiences across contexts; her chapter's title calls the client's organ at home "the third therapist" [source: Rolvsjord 2013 chapter abstract]. "Engagement across contexts" is one of four forms of client agency she identified [source: client-agency study abstract].
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Ask how music is going between sessions. (2) Invite the client to bring what they did at home. (3) Plan specific uses together (a playlist for bad nights, a song to sing, practice). (4) Involve supports or services the client chooses. (5) Before ending, make a concrete plan for continued music.
Example language (illustrative): "What did you do with music this week?" "Which part of what we do here do you want to keep after we finish?"
Watch for: music becoming a rigid coping ritual or a channel for rumination. It is working when the client reports self-directed music use.

4.12 Therapist self-disclosure and pooling resources

Purpose / when: to build mutuality. Procter's review notes Rolvsjord's use of self-disclosure and the idea of pooled resources [source: Procter 2010].
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Share your musical skills and tastes openly ("I can play this; I don't know that style"). (2) Disclose personal responses briefly when it serves the client. (3) Return the focus to the client. (4) Do not disclose personal difficulties for your own relief.
Example language (illustrative): "Honestly, that song moved me." "I'm not great at rap, but I can do the beat if you do the words."
Watch for: role reversal, where the client starts caring for you. It is working when the client feels like a co-musician rather than a patient.

4.13 Recognising and supporting client agency

Purpose / when: throughout. Rolvsjord found that clients make therapy work by taking initiatives, exerting control in sessions, committing to the relationship and engaging across contexts [source: Rolvsjord 2015, Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 24, 296–321, abstract].
Steps [synthesis]: (1) Note client initiatives in each session. (2) Allow the client to control format, pace and endings. (3) Name their contributions in reflection and in records. (4) Review together near the end what they did to make therapy work.
Example language (illustrative): "You brought the idea for today. That changed the whole session."
Watch for: reading control-taking as "resistance". In this model it is usually agency.

4.14 Session self-rating of adherence (reflective practice)

Purpose / when: after each session, as in the trial, where therapists rated their own behaviour against the manual's principles [source: Gold et al. 2005]. The rating items are not published in the sources used, so do not reconstruct them [uncertain].
Steps [synthesis]: after each session, briefly note: whose choices shaped the session; what resources you named; whether you tuned into or overrode the client's music; whether problems were avoided or negotiated. Take patterns to supervision.
Watch for: drift toward problem-only or therapist-led work.

4.15 Assessment and outcome monitoring

Purpose / when: at the start, end and follow-up. The trial used an 11-item self-report interest-in-music scale developed for it, alongside standard measures (SANS negative symptoms, BSI-18, GAF, CGI, a modified URICA, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, SF-36 vitality subscale, IIP-32, Q-LES-Q social subscale) [source: Gold et al. 2005]. A paper on the reliability and validity of the interest-in-music scale exists [source: UiB list, 2013; uncertain].
Steps [synthesis]: use measures your service already licenses. Treat music produced in sessions as the client's creative work, never as diagnostic evidence. Do not reproduce scale items without permission.
Watch for: measurement crowding out collaboration. Share the results with the client.

5. Handling problems

The sources used say little about clinical difficulties beyond the principles. Low therapy motivation is the target condition [source: Gold et al. 2005]. Problems and resources are to be negotiated [source: Barcelona contents ch. 10; Rolvsjord 2004/2006]. Expert control is a risk [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006]. Everything else in this section is my own [synthesis].

Low motivation or a "stuck" client. This is the population RoMT was tested with [source: Gold et al. 2005; Gold et al. 2013 abstract]. Lower the demand: listen to the client's music, or play while they simply listen. Keep sessions shorter if needed. Accept attendance itself as a contribution. Offer concrete choices rather than open questions. The trial set a minimum effective dose of about 18–20 sessions, so do not judge failure early [source: Gold et al. 2005]. [synthesis for the tactics]
"Resistance" or the client taking control. Read refusal, changing activity or ending early first as agency. Exerting control is one of Rolvsjord's categories of client agency [source: client-agency study abstract]. Ask what they would prefer, and follow it within safety limits [synthesis].
Client wants only to play favourite songs and avoids problems. This is legitimate in RoMT: musical enjoyment and mastery are resources in their own right. Periodically offer, without pushing, a link to concerns. Let the client decide [synthesis, consistent with "negotiating resources and problems"].
Therapist avoids problems (toxic positivity). If the client brings pain, follow it (4.10). The resource focus is meant to enable problem work, not replace it [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006].
Overwhelm, flashbacks and musical trauma triggers. Stop or soften the music. Orient the client to the room (feet on floor, name objects, a steady pulse played quietly). Switch to a pre-agreed safe piece. Afterwards, add the trigger to the avoid list. Do not expose the client to triggering music as a technique: RoMT is not an exposure therapy [synthesis]. In psychosis or mania, keep the music structured, quieter and shorter, and avoid prolonged free improvisation if it disorganises the client [synthesis]. Patients with psychosis have described music therapy as "the opposite of treatment", a title of Solli & Rolvsjord (2015) [source: UiB list; content not drawn on].
Hearing safety and sensory overload. Agree volume limits at the start. Provide ear protection with drums and amplification. Stop if the client reports ringing, pain or distress [synthesis].
Suicide or self-harm disclosed in lyrics or talk. Treat creative disclosure as real disclosure. Pause the music and carry out a standard structured risk assessment under your service's protocol. Inform the clinical team. Collaborate on a safety plan, including lethal-means counselling (storage and removal, not method detail). Then return to the client's resources. Agree how the lyrics will be stored and who sees them [synthesis].
Non-attendance and non-adherence to practice. Practice between sessions is optional. Do not penalise missed practice. For missed sessions, contact the client warmly, and if needed offer a ward-based or shorter session. Review the format with the client [synthesis].
Ruptures (feeling patronised, misread, or musically taken over). Name it, own your part, and ask what would work better. Check whether your musical skills or tastes have dominated ("pooled resources" can tip into therapist-led sessions). Rolvsjord also warns that enablement can become a form of expert control [source: Rolvsjord 2004/2006; repair steps are synthesis].
Self-disclosure boundaries. Disclose only what serves the client. Avoid disclosing current personal crises. Watch for the client caring for you, and take it to supervision [synthesis].
Dependence and ending. The client may fear losing music or the relationship. Build continued music access early (4.11), give several sessions' notice of ending, and mark the ending musically, for example with a recording or a final song [synthesis].
Performance and recording risks. Get written, revocable consent before any recording or performance. Protect identity. Consider stigma and how a public performance could affect the client's privacy in a psychiatric setting [synthesis].
Team scepticism ("just entertainment"). Report outcomes and the client's described resources in team language, and share the trial format and findings [source for findings: Gold et al. 2013 abstract; approach is synthesis]. Describe clients through their strengths in records, as Fairchild & Bibb (2016) recommend for representation [source].
Children and young people. RoMT as published concerns adults [source: Gold et al. 2005]. Rolvsjord has more recently co-authored qualitative work with children in mental health care [source: UiB publication list, 2022–2023; titles only]. When adapting: follow local safeguarding and mandatory reporting duties; obtain parental consent and the child's assent; involve parents or carers in goals; offer age-appropriate music; never treat songs or lyrics as diagnostic evidence of abuse, though they can prompt a safeguarding conversation [synthesis].
Cultural and gender context. Ask about religious or cultural restrictions on music, singing or instruments. Notice gendered expectations about instruments and voice, a theme Rolvsjord has written on [source: UiB list, gender papers; titles only; application is synthesis].

Sources

Sources used:

Books and papers cited, content not paraphrased [uncertain beyond their titles]:

Rolvsjord, R. (2010). Resource-Oriented Music Therapy in Mental Health Care. Gilsum, NH: Barcelona Publishers.
Rolvsjord, R., Gold, C., & Stige, B. (2005). Research rigour and therapeutic flexibility: rationale for a therapy manual developed for a randomised controlled trial. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 14, 15–32. DOI 10.1080/08098130509478122. Citation as given in the protocol's reference list. Its contents are summarised here only from the protocol: general therapeutic attitudes and behaviours, specific attitudes within musical interaction, attitudes to avoid, and attitudes that are acceptable but not necessary.
Rolvsjord, R. (2005). Collaborations on songwriting with clients with mental health problems. In F. Baker & T. Wigram (Eds.), Songwriting: Methods, Techniques and Clinical Applications for Music Therapy Clinicians, Educators and Students. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Rolvsjord, R. (2007). "Blackbirds singing": Explorations of resource-oriented music therapy in mental health care (PhD thesis; listed on the UiB page; the Aalborg University music therapy PhD list reproduced by MUFiP, Region Nordjylland, gives the subtitle as "An explorational study of resource-oriented music therapy in mental health care") [uncertain: content not paraphrased].

← Previous · VIII-049Benenzon music therapy Next · VIII-051 →Iso principle