Metamorphic technique (St John)

1. Introduction

Version followed: the Metamorphic Technique® as the Metamorphic Association (UK educational charity no. 326525, founded by Gaston Saint-Pierre in 1979) and practitioners in its tradition describe it. Robert St John's earlier work, which practitioner sources call "Prenatal Therapy" and some present as "the original work of Robert St John", is noted where its published descriptions differ. [source: Metamorphic Association home page; Pierre Croset; Knight 2002; metamorphosistechnique.com]

Status: contested complementary practice. The Metamorphic Technique is a light-touch method applied to what its practitioners call the "spinal reflex" areas of the feet, hands and head. Practitioner sources trace it to the British naturopath and reflexologist Robert St John in the 1960s. His student Gaston Saint-Pierre developed and renamed it in the late 1970s and set up the Metamorphic Association in 1979; it was registered as a charity in England and Wales on 17 February 1984, with objects of promoting physical and mental health through education and training in the theory and practice of "the form of massage known as the Metamorphic Technique" [source: Charity Commission register, no. 326525]. [source: EBSCO Research Starter; Knight 2002; Metamorphic Association home page] The lineage is itself disputed: one published reader comment holds that the renaming and some changes were made without St John's consent. [source: comment on Russo 2002] [uncertain]

How change is said to happen (the method's own account, not established fact). Practitioners hold that experiences from conception to birth are stored in the body's cells as a "blueprint" or "prenatal pattern" that shapes later physical, emotional and behavioural patterns; that the spinal reflex areas correspond to this prenatal period; and that a light, non-directive touch acts as a "catalyst" so that the recipient's own "life force" or "innate intelligence" loosens "stuck" patterns. [source: Croset; Knight 2002; Webhealth (Metamorphic Association information); EBSCO] One practitioner site maps named stages of gestation onto parts of the foot and links them to life themes, and attributes energetic "blocks" to the parents' experiences during pregnancy. [source: metamorphosistechnique.com] None of these claims (cellular prenatal memory, a reflex map of gestation, a "life force") has scientific support in the sources listed here; they belong to the method's belief system.

What the method says it is not. Association-aligned sources state that it is "neither a therapy nor a treatment", does not diagnose, does not address specific conditions, takes no case history and cannot predict or guarantee outcomes. [source: Croset; Webhealth; Knight 2002] It is offered for relaxation, personal development and life transitions. [source: Croset; EBSCO]

Evidence status. An independent reference summary states that "most evidence" for the technique "is anecdotal" and that its effects have not been tested in randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trials. [source: EBSCO Research Starter, Ciulla-Bohling 2013] A newspaper medical correspondent likewise said there was no clinical evidence that it brings about any specific health benefit. [source: Irish Times 2000] No controlled trial or systematic review of the Metamorphic Technique is cited in this guide [uncertain]. Published accounts of benefit are individual case reports and testimonials, often with several concurrent treatments (for example a 2002 case report of recovery in a woman with chronic illness, written by a complementary practitioner). [source: Russo 2002] It is not a treatment for any physical disease, including cancer, or for any developmental or learning disability.

Who delivers it and how they are credentialed. Sessions and workshops are offered by members of the Metamorphic Association, which lists practitioners and teachers and holds the trademark; the charity says it aims to "uphold standards of good practice". [source: Metamorphic Association home page] Its registered activities are promoting the technique to the public through seminars, workshops and literature. [source: Charity Commission register] Association-aligned sources say no special abilities, background or medical training are required and that many people take short courses to use it with family and friends; a wellbeing directory article says it can be learned in a weekend. [source: Webhealth; Welldoing 2014] No statutory regulator for this method is named in any source used here [uncertain]. The Metamorphic Technique is not among the professions on the UK CNHC voluntary register. [source: CNHC home page] How US state massage or bodywork laws apply to it is [uncertain]. In Canada and Australia, unregistered touch practitioners fall under general complaints systems (for example the Australian National Code of Conduct for health care workers, applying to workers outside national registration such as massage therapists and counsellors). [source: HaDSCO WA 2022]

The psychotherapist's role. For most psychotherapists this is a method to understand, discuss and, when a client chooses it, refer for and integrate, not to deliver. The method is touch-based, non-verbal and explicitly non-directive and non-therapeutic in its own terms, so combining it with psychotherapy in one relationship raises competence and dual-role questions (see section 3). [synthesis]

2. Framework

The method's own structure. The sources describe no phases, staged goals or criteria for progression. [source: Croset; Knight 2002; Webhealth]

Format: a one-to-one session described as about an hour ("standard" 60 minutes), shoes and socks removed, recipient lying on a couch or sofa or sitting; for the head the recipient sits on a chair. [source: Croset; Webhealth; metamorphosistechnique.com]
Content: "feather-light" touch on the spinal reflex areas of the feet, hands and head; talking optional; no case history; no diagnosis. [source: Croset; Webhealth] The order of areas and the precise movements are taught in Association workshops and are not published in the sources used here. [uncertain]
Course length: open-ended and client-led; some clients come weekly or monthly, others as needed. [source: Knight 2002] Sources describe use in pregnancy, with children, older people and people who are dying. [source: Croset; Webhealth]
Lay learning: short workshops for family and friends; parents "especially encouraged" to learn it for their children. [source: Webhealth]
Reported after-effects: sleepiness, deep relaxation or feeling re-energised; Association information also says people may re-experience past symptoms or emotional upset "for a day or two". [source: Croset; Webhealth]

The psychotherapist's framework when a client is interested [synthesis; no source describes a psychotherapy protocol for this method]:

Exploration (within existing therapy): what draws the client, what they expect, how they understand the prenatal and life-force claims. Move on when the client's motive and expectations are clear and no medical need is being displaced.
Informed choice and screening: evidence status, contested claims, touch history, medical clearance where relevant (section 4). Move on only if the client still wishes to proceed and screening raises no bar.
Preparation and referral: choosing a practitioner, consent and stop signals, chaperone or companion if wanted, a plan for after-effects.
Concurrent phase: sessions with the practitioner; psychotherapy continues separately; brief check-ins on experience and adverse effects.
Integration and review: what the client noticed, what meaning they make, whether to continue; review after a few sessions or at any concern. End or pause on distress, dependency, boundary problems or displacement of medical care.

3. Guiding principles

Principles the method's sources describe (attributed to the method):

Detachment. The practitioner does not try to produce a result or steer the recipient; the sources say this "does not mean that they don't care". Practical meaning: expect a practitioner who will not advise, interpret or set goals. [source: Webhealth; Knight 2002]
The recipient's own "life force" does the work. Practical meaning: outcomes are framed as unpredictable and self-directed; a practitioner promising specific results departs from the method's own account. [source: Croset; Webhealth]
Non-diagnostic, no case history, not a therapy. Practical meaning: the practitioner will not screen for medical or psychological risk, so the psychotherapist and the client's doctors hold that responsibility. [source: Croset; Webhealth; Knight 2002]
Talking is optional. Practical meaning: suits clients who want change without verbal processing, but meaning-making may be left to psychotherapy. [source: Croset]
Theory not needed to benefit. Practical meaning: clients can receive sessions without adopting the prenatal or life-force beliefs; say so explicitly. [source: Webhealth]
Child sets the end. Children usually signal when they want a session to stop. Practical meaning: a child's withdrawal or restlessness ends the session. [source: Croset]

Principles for the psychotherapist [synthesis unless a source is given]:

Attribute, do not endorse. Describe prenatal-pattern, cellular-memory and life-force ideas as the method's beliefs. Practical meaning: "practitioners believe…", never "your feet hold your birth".
No treatment claims. Practical meaning: never suggest it for a mental disorder, physical disease, cancer or disability; it is at most a relaxation or personal-growth experience the client chooses.
Medical care is never displaced. Practical meaning: check that medication, medical follow-up and developmental services continue.
Consent before and during touch; the right to stop at any moment. Practical meaning: the client agrees in advance which areas may be touched and how to stop, and can withdraw consent at any time. Body-psychotherapy codes state consent is obtained before touch, monitored over time, and that the client may refuse or end touch at any time. [source: USABP Code VIII.2–5]
Never sexual touch. Practical meaning: this method involves feet, hands and head only; any touch elsewhere, any sexualised remark or any request for secrecy is a boundary violation to be reported. Codes are uniform that sexual contact with clients is prohibited and that genital or sexual touch is "always inappropriate". [source: USABP Code VIII; UKCP Code item 4; BACP 2018 para 34]
Stay within competence; separate roles. Practical meaning: mainstream psychotherapy codes contain no explicit touch provision but require practising only in forms one is trained in and referring when appropriate; a psychotherapist does not add hands-on work unless their own code allows it and they hold the training. [source: UKCP item 23–24; BACP 2018 para 13; HCPC SoP 1.1, 4.4] Body-psychotherapy codes require clients to be informed beforehand that physical techniques may be used and require careful handling when a client receives similar services from another professional. [source: EABP Ethics Guidelines Principle 7, 6.b]
Trauma-informed adaptation. Practical meaning: offer choice of position, which areas, clothed alternatives, a companion or chaperone, eyes open, and a clear stop signal; treat even light touch as potentially activating.
Protect parents from blame. Practical meaning: the method's idea that a parent's pregnancy experiences create "blocks" can induce guilt, especially in parents of a child with a disability; name it as a belief, not a cause.
Safeguarding first with children and adults at risk. Practical meaning: parental consent, the child's assent, a parent present, a practitioner with appropriate safeguarding checks, and no claims about changing a child's condition.

4. Intervention inventory

Part A describes the method's components as its practitioners publish them, so the psychotherapist knows what a client will meet; these are delivered by Metamorphic Technique practitioners, not by the psychotherapist. Part B gives the psychotherapist's own interventions alongside it. No pressures, durations or session counts below are instructions.

A1. The standard Metamorphic Technique session (practitioner-delivered)

Purpose and when used (as published): offered for relaxation, personal growth and times of transition such as crisis, career change, bereavement, divorce or illness; not for diagnosis or treatment of any condition. [source: Croset; Webhealth]
Steps (as described): no case history is taken; the recipient removes shoes and socks and lies on a couch or sofa or sits; the practitioner uses a very light, sweeping touch on the spinal reflex areas of the feet and hands, then of the head with the recipient seated; the recipient may talk or stay silent; the practitioner remains detached and does not interpret or advise. [source: Croset; Webhealth; metamorphosistechnique.com; Knight 2002] A journalist's first-session account describes light, repetitive strokes starting at the feet, then the hands and head, with the practitioner asking no questions and not saying in advance what would happen. [source: Irish Times 2000] The exact sequence and hand movements are taught in Association workshops. [uncertain]
Example language (to help a client know what to expect, illustrative): "From what practitioners publish, you'd keep your clothes on apart from shoes and socks, and they'd use a very light touch on your feet, hands and head. They won't ask about your history or give advice, and you can talk or not."
Watch for: any touch outside feet, hands and head; pressure that hurts; a practitioner who diagnoses, interprets the client's prenatal history, promises cures or advises stopping medical care (all contrary to the method's own published stance). Working well, in the client's terms: relaxation, a sense of being unhurried, no lingering distress.

A2. Sessions in pregnancy (practitioner-delivered)

Purpose (as published): practitioner sources say pregnant women may have sessions "as often as they like" and claim calmer babies and closer bonding; these are practitioner observations, not tested findings. [source: Croset; Knight 2002]
Steps: as A1. Sources state no pregnancy-specific contraindications. [source: Knight 2002; metamorphosistechnique.com] The psychotherapist checks that obstetric and midwifery care continue and that the client's midwife or doctor knows. [synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "If you'd like to try it as a way to relax during pregnancy, that's your choice. Practitioners make claims about the baby, but those haven't been tested, so I'd keep your midwife in the loop and not rely on it for anything medical."
Watch for: guilt or anxiety triggered by the idea that the mother's pregnancy experiences "pattern" the baby; avoidance of antenatal care; perinatal mood symptoms needing assessment in their own right.

A3. Family learning and parents giving sessions to their children

Purpose (as published): the Association encourages parents to learn the technique to give to their children, and says it has been used with children with learning difficulties and people with physical and mental disabilities; one practitioner says such children "have been known to enjoy" sessions and that babies often become very still. [source: Webhealth; Croset] No source here shows it changes any disability, developmental condition or learning difficulty. [source: EBSCO]
Steps (safeguarding frame for the psychotherapist to discuss with parents) [synthesis]: parental consent and the child's own assent, in words or signs the child uses; a parent present for any practitioner session; touch limited to feet, hands and head; stop at any sign of the child wanting to stop (practitioner sources also say children signal the end [source: Croset]); practitioner with safeguarding training and checks appropriate to their country (for example a DBS check in the UK); medical, therapy and educational services for the child continue unchanged.
Example language (illustrative): "If your child enjoys it and it's a calm time together, that can be worth something. It isn't a treatment for her condition, and nothing about it means anything you felt in pregnancy caused her disability."
Watch for: parental guilt or self-blame; hope invested in a cure that sets up disappointment; pressure on a reluctant child; a practitioner seeing the child alone; reduction of therapies or medical follow-up.

A4. Self-application

Purpose: practitioner sources describe the technique as a "self-empowering tool", and one practitioner site lists a self-treatment page. [source: Croset; metamorphosistechnique.com] Its content is [uncertain].
Steps: none are given here; a client wanting to self-apply would learn it in an Association workshop. [synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "If you'd like to use it on your own as a way to wind down, notice how you feel before and after, and we can talk about what comes up."
Watch for: compulsive or ritualised use to manage anxiety; use in place of agreed coping or safety plans.

B1. Deciding whether to suggest or support it

Purpose: to decide whether supporting a client's interest is appropriate. [synthesis]
Steps: (1) Establish who raised it; generally respond to client interest rather than recommend it, given the absence of evidence. (2) Clarify the goal (relaxation, curiosity, personal growth, a rite of transition) versus a clinical goal (curing depression, illness or a child's disability). (3) Support only non-clinical goals; for clinical goals, offer evidence-based options and say it is not a treatment. (4) Check for bars in B3. (5) Record the discussion.
Example language (illustrative): "What are you hoping it would give you? If it's a calm, gentle experience, that's a reasonable thing to try. If it's to treat the depression, I'd want us to keep working on that with what has evidence behind it."
Watch for: hope that a non-verbal method will bypass painful therapy work; a client in crisis seeking a quick fix; signs the client is being recruited or pressured by someone else.

B2. Informed-choice conversation about claims and evidence

Purpose: to let the client choose knowing what is claimed and what is known. [synthesis]
Steps: (1) Describe the method neutrally (A1). (2) Name the beliefs as beliefs: prenatal pattern stored in cells, a spinal reflex map of gestation, a guiding "life force". (3) State evidence status: mostly anecdotal, no controlled trials in the sources [source: EBSCO]. (4) State the method's own disclaimers: not a therapy, no diagnosis, outcomes unpredictable [source: Croset; Webhealth]. (5) Note the Association says the theory need not be believed to receive sessions [source: Webhealth]. (6) Ask what the client makes of this.
Example language (illustrative): "Practitioners believe experiences before birth leave patterns that a light touch on the feet can help loosen. There isn't research showing that, and they themselves say it isn't a treatment. You don't have to believe the theory to find it relaxing."
Watch for: a client who feels judged for interest; or one who takes your neutrality as endorsement. Working: the client can say back what is claimed and what is not known.

B3. Physical and psychological safety screening

Purpose: the method's practitioners take no case history and describe no contraindications, so screening falls to the psychotherapist and the client's clinicians. [source: Croset; Knight 2002; Webhealth] [synthesis]
Steps: (1) Ask about foot, hand or scalp conditions (open wounds, infections, recent fractures or surgery, severe skin disease, painful neuropathy) and suggest the client checks with their doctor if any apply. (2) Confirm ongoing medical care and medication are unchanged. (3) Screen for trauma involving touch, dissociation, active psychosis or mania, severe agitation, or current crisis; postpone in acute states. (4) For adults who may lack capacity, follow local capacity and best-interest procedures. (5) For children, apply A3's safeguarding frame.
Example language (illustrative): "Before you book, a couple of checks: is there anything going on with your feet, hands or scalp, any wounds or recent injuries? And is there any history of touch that might make this harder than it looks?"
Watch for: minimisation of touch history; a client stopping medication on the strength of "self-healing" claims; health conditions the practitioner will not ask about.

B4. Choosing a practitioner and referral

Purpose: to help the client find someone who works to the method's own published standards and basic safety norms. [synthesis]
Steps: (1) The Metamorphic Association lists practitioners and teachers [source: Metamorphic Association home page]; no statutory register is known from the sources used [uncertain]. (2) Suggest the client ask about training, insurance, a complaints route, safeguarding checks if children are involved, and whether a companion may attend. (3) Agree whether the client wants you and the practitioner to communicate; obtain written consent if so. (4) Confirm the practitioner will not diagnose, advise on medication or work beyond feet, hands and head. (5) Do not take or give referral fees (EABP 5.d) [source: EABP Ethics Guidelines].
Example language (illustrative): "It's fine to ask them how they trained, whether they're insured and how you'd raise a concern. A good practitioner won't mind those questions."
Watch for: a practitioner who discourages questions or companions, claims to treat conditions, or seeks to see a child alone.

B5. Preparing a client with a trauma history for touch

Purpose: to reduce the risk of re-traumatisation from even light touch. [synthesis]
Steps: (1) Explore what touch means to the client and which areas feel safe. (2) Agree in advance a stop word or gesture, and rehearse saying it. (3) Encourage the client to tell the practitioner which areas are off limits (for example the head), to keep eyes open, sit rather than lie, or bring a companion. (4) Agree grounding strategies the client already uses. (5) Plan a check-in soon after the session. Consent is not a one-off: body-psychotherapy codes say it should be monitored, since early consent may not anticipate what surfaces. [source: USABP Code VIII.3–5]
Example language (illustrative): "You can stop at any moment, for any reason, without explaining. Let's practise how you'd say it: maybe just 'I'd like to stop now'."
Watch for: freeze or compliance (saying yes while shutting down), dissociation, flashbacks, shame afterwards; a client who cannot imagine saying stop is not ready.

B6. Integrating the session experience in psychotherapy

Purpose: to make use of what the client noticed, since the method itself leaves meaning-making to the recipient. [source: Croset ("non talk" technique)] [synthesis]
Steps: (1) Ask open questions about bodily sensations, emotions, images and memories during and after. (2) Track what the client values in being touched without being asked to speak. (3) Link observations to therapy goals only as the client agrees. (4) Separate the client's experience from the method's explanations; avoid validating specific "prenatal memories" as historical fact.
Example language (illustrative): "What did you notice in your body during and afterwards? … What was it like to be with someone who didn't ask you anything?"
Watch for: idealisation of the practitioner or devaluing of talking therapy; split transference; emerging memories (see B7).

B7. Responding to prenatal-pattern narratives and recovered-memory beliefs

Purpose: to respect the client's meaning-making without endorsing untestable claims of prenatal memory or creating blame. [synthesis]
Steps: (1) Explore what the story means to the client now. (2) Treat images as present-day experience, not verified history. (3) Gently name that prenatal memory claims are the method's belief, not established fact. (4) Watch for blame of parents, especially the mother. (5) If the client reports "recovered" memories of abuse arising from sessions, proceed with standard caution about suggestion and memory, without dismissing distress.
Example language (illustrative): "That image of being stuck clearly matters to you. Whatever its origin, it seems to fit how you feel now: stuck at the start of things. Shall we look at that?"
Watch for: fixed explanations that close down other work; rifts with parents built on untestable narratives.

B8. Recognising and passing on adverse effects

Purpose: to spot reactions early and connect the client with the right help. [synthesis]
Steps: (1) Ask about after-effects at each check-in; the Association itself says past symptoms or emotional upset may recur for a day or two. [source: Webhealth] (2) Treat persistent or severe distress, new physical symptoms, or deterioration as needing clinical assessment, not as "release". (3) Pass on physical concerns to the GP or doctor; psychological deterioration is assessed in therapy, with risk assessment as standard. (4) With consent, tell the practitioner. (5) Pause sessions while any concern is open.
Example language (illustrative): "Some upset afterwards can happen, but if it lasts or you feel worse, that's a reason to pause and to check it out, not something to push through."
Watch for: practitioners or clients reframing worsening as a "healing crisis"; delays in seeking medical care.

B9. Recognising boundary violations and supporting reports

Purpose: to protect clients from exploitation in an unregulated touch setting. [synthesis]
Steps: (1) Ask directly whether anything in sessions felt uncomfortable, including touch outside feet, hands and head, sexualised comments, requests for secrecy, pressure to buy more sessions or to stop medical care. (2) Believe and document. (3) Explain routes: the practitioner's association (the Metamorphic Association for its members), police for sexual assault, and general health-complaints bodies where they exist (for example in Australia, state complaints entities under the National Code for unregistered workers). [source: HaDSCO WA 2022; AMT complaint-resolution page] (4) For children or adults at risk, follow local safeguarding procedures.
Example language (illustrative): "Has anything happened in those sessions that didn't sit right? You won't be in trouble for telling me, and it isn't your fault."
Watch for: self-blame, minimising, reluctance because the practitioner was "kind"; your own pull to defend or attack the method.

B10. When the psychotherapist is also a trained practitioner

Purpose: to manage role conflict. [synthesis]
Steps: (1) Check your own professional code: mainstream codes contain no explicit touch clause but require competence, clear boundaries and referral when appropriate; only body-psychotherapy codes regulate touch directly. [source: UKCP Code; BACP 2018; HCPC SoP; USABP Code; EABP Ethics Guidelines] (2) Default: refer to another practitioner rather than give sessions to your own psychotherapy clients. (3) If your code and training allow touch, inform the client beforehand that physical techniques may be used (EABP Principle 7), obtain and document informed consent, ideally written (USABP VIII.2), revisit it over time, and take it to supervision. (4) Never present the method as part of evidence-based treatment.
Example language (illustrative): "I do practise this, but I think it's cleaner for our work if you see someone else for it, so this space stays for talking."
Watch for: blurred roles, dependency, the client feeling unable to refuse touch from their therapist.

5. Handling problems

The method's sources address few difficulties beyond saying outcomes are unpredictable, symptoms or upset may briefly recur, and children signal when to stop. [source: Croset; Webhealth] Everything below is [synthesis] unless a source is given.

Client expects it to cure a condition (depression, chronic pain, cancer, a child's disability). Restate that the method's own practitioners say it is not a treatment and that evidence is anecdotal [source: Croset; Webhealth; EBSCO]; keep evidence-based care in place; if the client goes ahead, frame it as a relaxation experience and agree to review.
Client stops medication or medical follow-up citing "self-healing". Treat as a safety issue: explore the decision, encourage discussion with the prescriber, and involve medical colleagues with consent. Use standard risk assessment if mental-state deterioration follows.
Overwhelm, flashbacks or dissociation during or after a session. Use the client's grounding plan; pause sessions; review touch preparation (B5); assess whether trauma-focused work is needed first. Do not accept "stuck energy releasing" as a reason to continue through distress.
Freeze and compliance with touch. Some clients cannot say stop in the moment. Rehearse non-verbal stop signals, consider a companion, sitting position and eyes open, or decide not to proceed.
"Healing crisis" framing of deterioration. The Association describes brief recurrence of symptoms or upset [source: Webhealth]; persistent or worsening symptoms need medical or psychological assessment, not more sessions.
Parental guilt or blame. If a parent links their child's difficulties to their own pregnancy because of the method's prenatal-pattern idea, name it clearly as a belief without evidence, address guilt directly, and offer support for the parent in their own right.
Child unwilling or distressed. The child's refusal ends it, whatever the parent hopes; practitioner sources also say children show when they want to stop. [source: Croset] Explore the parent's motive and the child's experience.
Split between practitioner and therapist (idealisation, "they understand me without words"). Explore what the non-verbal experience offers that therapy has lacked; consider whether more body-aware or less verbally demanding approaches within your competence would help; avoid competing with the practitioner.
Dependency or escalating sessions and costs. Sources describe open-ended frequency [source: Knight 2002]; review cost, motive and effect; explore whether sessions are replacing coping skills or relationships.
Boundary violation disclosed. Follow B9; prioritise safety, documentation and reporting; for children or adults at risk, safeguarding procedures override confidentiality as local law and your code require.
Rupture over your scepticism. Acknowledge that the client's experience is real to them, separate it from the method's explanations, and repair: "I may have sounded dismissive of something that helped you."
Client wants you to give sessions. Follow B10; the default is referral and a clear account of why roles are kept separate.
Lineage confusion. Clients may meet different versions ("Metamorphosis", "Prenatal Therapy", "the original work of Robert St John", the trademarked Metamorphic Technique) with differing claims, including maps of gestation on the foot. [source: metamorphosistechnique.com; comment on Russo 2002] Help the client compare what each practitioner claims and promises against the safety points in B4.

Sources

Web pages:

Books:

Saint-Pierre, G. & Shapiro, D. (1989). The Metamorphic Technique: Principles and Practice (2nd revised edition). Element. [uncertain: details per catalogue description]
Saint-Pierre, G. The Universal Principles and the Metamorphic Technique: The Keys to Healing and Enlightenment. ISBN 9781903816608, 308 pp.; the current publisher's page (Collective Ink) gives the date 04/12/2003, the EBSCO bibliography gives O Books, 2004 [uncertain: original imprint and year].
Saint-Pierre, G., et al. (2008). A Compendium of the Metamorphic Technique. [uncertain: details as listed in the EBSCO bibliography]

← Previous · X-035Vertical reflex therapy (Booth)Next · X-037 →Acupressure