Atlas›Domain XIII · Contemplative & religious disciplines›Guide 210
Guide XIII-210

Catholic Charismatic Renewal

1967
A 39 · L 42 · M 1919 interventions in the Trinity explorer
Client cardCompare
[source: …] where a claim comes from[uncertain] not confirmed in a primary source[synthesis] the writer's reconstruction

1. Introduction

Version followed: the Catholic Charismatic Renewal as its Vatican-instituted international service CHARIS (Catholic Charismatic Renewal International Service) and its Doctrinal Commission publish it; the ICCRS Doctrinal Commission Guidelines on Prayers for Healing (revised 5th English edition 2012, read in the authorised Dutch translation of 2015), which apply the 2000 Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Instruction on prayers for healing; and, as one example of diocesan regulation, the Diocese of Des Moines Healing and Deliverance Ministries Norms and Guidelines (2023). Controversies in covenant communities follow church statements and major news reports only.

The Catholic Charismatic Renewal is a movement, not a therapy. Its own doctrinal commission describes it as having no members: it is "a current of new life that is prior to all organization", lived in parish prayer groups, larger covenant communities with formal commitments, and national and international service bodies [source: CHARIS Doctrinal Commission Q&A on baptism in the Spirit]. Its central claim, held as faith, is that Christians can receive a fresh, experienced outpouring of the Holy Spirit ("baptism in the Holy Spirit") that deepens knowledge of Jesus as Saviour and Lord, love of Scripture and openness to charisms such as tongues, healing, prophecy and discernment of spirits [source: CHARIS Q&A]. In the movement's own terms, change happens through God's action, received in prayer within the Church, not through technique; the doctrinal commission calls baptism in the Spirit "an act of the risen Lord that cannot be planned, organized or predicted" [source: CHARIS Q&A]. The movement is commonly dated to 1967 [uncertain: not verified; the CHARIS moderator's 2019 reference to a "stream of grace" awakened 52 years earlier points to 1967 but names no place].

The psychotherapist's work is not to lead or judge these practices but to understand what they mean in a client's life, to integrate them where the client wishes, to tell spiritual experience apart from illness without pathologising either, to protect medical care, and to recognise high-control dynamics and abuse where they occur [synthesis].

2. Framework

2.1 How the movement is organised [source: Vatican News 2019; CHARIS Q&A; CHARIS national-service guidelines 2020]

  • CHARIS. Instituted by the Dicastery for Laity, Family and Life on 8 December 2018; statutes in force from Pentecost, 9 June 2019. It replaced the International Catholic Charismatic Renewal Services (ICCRS) and the Catholic Fraternity of Charismatic Covenant Communities and Fellowships, but describes itself as "not a governing body but a Service of Communion". First moderator: Jean-Luc Moens, a married layman; first Ecclesiastical Assistant: Fr Raniero Cantalamessa OFM Cap. An international Service of Communion of 18 people assists the moderator, and each country is to form a National Service of Communion. Its three stated aims are spreading baptism in the Holy Spirit, Christian unity and service to the poor, for evangelisation.
  • Prayer groups. Local, often parish-based weekly gatherings of praise, Scripture, testimony and prayer ministry, under the local bishop's authority [source: ICCRS Guidelines §3; CHARIS Q&A].
  • Covenant communities. Communities whose members make a formal commitment and whose leaders may set formation patterns [source: CHARIS Q&A]. Some, such as People of Praise (founded in South Bend in 1971 out of the charismatic movement) and the Community of the Beatitudes (France, 1973), have been the subject of church interventions or major news reports on abuse and control (section 4, interventions 4.15 to 4.17) [source: The Guardian 2020; MinistryWatch 2021; Catholic News Agency 2011].
  • Authority. Discernment of charisms belongs to Church authority (Lumen Gentium 12, as cited by the ICCRS Guidelines). Strictly liturgical healing rites need the diocesan bishop's express permission; exorcism may be done only by a bishop or a priest with his permission [source: ICCRS Guidelines; CHARIS Q&A 2017 on deliverance]. Dioceses may issue their own binding norms, as Des Moines did in 2023.

2.2 The movement's own pathway [source: CHARIS Life in the Spirit page; CHARIS Q&A]

  1. Contact and prayer group. A person attends a prayer group or event. No membership step exists in the Renewal as such.
  2. Life in the Spirit Seminar. Traditionally seven sessions, often weekly over seven weeks, sometimes condensed into a weekend. The current CHARIS version has nine sessions: The Love of God; Sin and Salvation; Healing and Forgiveness; Faith, Conversion and New Life; Jesus is Lord; The Promise of the Holy Spirit (sanctifying action); The Promise of the Holy Spirit (charismatic action); Baptism in the Holy Spirit; Personal and Community Growth. Each has a video of about 37 to 51 minutes; local groups present it, free of charge.
  3. Praying over. Near the end, participants are prayed over, commonly with laying on of hands; the doctrinal commission asks that a priest or deacon have a defined role. It states that praying over is not a sacrament, that people "may not experience anything", and that leaders "should never say" someone not prayed over cannot have been baptised in the Spirit.
  4. Criterion for moving on. The seminar exists partly to ensure a right disposition and repentance of serious sin; unrepented sin, the commission warns, can lead people to attribute their own patterns to the Holy Spirit. There is no test of "success": fruits named are a deeper relationship with Jesus, love of Scripture and openness to charisms.
  5. Continuing formation. Pope Francis, quoted by CHARIS, asked for "suitable methods of continuing formation" after the seminar. In practice this means a prayer group, small group or covenant community.

Session counts above are the seminar's; there is no therapy session count for this movement. A therapist working alongside it sets the frequency and length of therapy by ordinary clinical judgement [synthesis].

2.3 The therapist's frame alongside it [synthesis]

  • Phase A, assessment and meaning (first sessions): religious history, where the client stands in the Renewal (prayer group, seminar, covenant community, ministry team), what practices they use and what these mean; clinical assessment as usual. Move on when the client's practices, community and any concerns are mapped and agreed goals exist.
  • Phase B, integration or differentiation: client-led use of their own prayer life as a resource where wished; careful discernment of experiences that worry the client or others; liaison with doctor, clergy or community leaders with consent. Move on when goals are progressing and risks are managed.
  • Phase C, where control or abuse is present: safety, reporting duties, support through leaving or staying, religious trauma work. Enter this phase whenever disclosures arise, not by schedule.

3. Guiding principles

  • Describe, do not adjudicate. Baptism in the Spirit, charisms, demons and healing are held as the client's tradition holds them; the therapist neither affirms them as fact nor dismisses them. Practical meaning: ask what the experience means to the client and their community. [synthesis; follows the Church's own position that judging charisms belongs to its authority, ICCRS Guidelines]
  • The therapist is not a prayer minister. No praying over, words of knowledge, tongues or deliverance in session. Practical meaning: if a client asks, name the boundary and offer referral to the parish, prayer group leaders or diocese. [synthesis]
  • The movement's own safeguards are allies. Its guidance forbids manipulation to produce phenomena, blaming the sick for lack of faith, telling someone they have a curse or condition, and giving medical or psychological advice. Practical meaning: a client harmed by a ministry that broke these rules can be told that the Church's own guidance disagrees with what happened. [source: ICCRS Guidelines §3.3; Des Moines Norms §27-28]
  • Medical care is never displaced. The Church "rightly collaborates" with medicine and psychology, and diocesan norms encourage immediate recourse to medical professionals. Practical meaning: confirm treatment continues alongside healing prayer. [source: Des Moines Norms §4-5]
  • Experience is not proof, and absence is not failure. The doctrinal commission says tongues are not proof of the Spirit and that people may experience nothing when prayed over. Practical meaning: help clients who feel "less spiritual" for lacking gifts, and do not treat intense phenomena as either holy or ill by default. [source: CHARIS Q&A on tongues; CHARIS Q&A on baptism in the Spirit]
  • Consent and choice in every ministry setting. Diocesan norms require permission before touch and allow recipients to reject words of knowledge without pressure. Practical meaning: use these as yardsticks when a client describes a ministry experience. [source: Des Moines Norms §21, §27]
  • Differentiate without pathologising. Charismatic phenomena are culturally normative in this setting; assess function, distress, control and context before considering illness. [synthesis]
  • Accountability is the test of a healthy group. Leaders of deliverance ministry are to be accountable to the bishop or his delegate. Practical meaning: ask to whom a client's community leaders answer. [source: CHARIS Q&A 2017 on deliverance]
  • Safeguarding overrides confidentiality limits in ministry and therapy alike. Practical meaning: know your mandatory reporting duties before a disclosure arrives. [source: Des Moines Norms §20; synthesis for therapy]
  • Never name or expose survivors; do not label any group. Practical meaning: describe behaviours and documented findings, not labels such as "cult". [synthesis]
  • Client-led integration. Religious material enters therapy only with the client's consent and in the client's own language. [synthesis]
  • Know the limits of your competence. Seek consultation on Catholic practice and on religious OCD when needed. [synthesis; spiritual competencies such as those set out by Vieten et al. 2013 are relevant: uncertain: not verified]

4. Intervention inventory

Part A (4.1 to 4.6) outlines the movement's practices as its own bodies publish them, so the therapist can recognise and ask about them; these are led by the Church and its ministers, never by the therapist. Part B (4.7 to 4.19) is the psychotherapist's own work. No prayer texts or ministry scripts are given.

Part A. Practices as the movement publishes them

4.1 Life in the Spirit Seminar and praying over for baptism in the Spirit

  • Purpose (as published): to give an ecclesial and community context for baptism in the Spirit, to explain it in relation to sacramental baptism, to deepen faith-expectation, and to ensure repentance of serious sin [source: CHARIS Q&A on baptism in the Spirit].
  • What it involves: the seminar sessions listed in 2.2, then praying over, usually with laying on of hands, with a priest or deacon having a defined role. The commission stresses it is not a sacrament, that nothing may be felt, and that baptism in the Spirit cannot be limited to those prayed over [source: CHARIS Q&A; CHARIS Life in the Spirit page].
  • Therapist's use: ask whether the client has done the seminar, what happened when prayed over, and what they made of it [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "You mentioned the Life in the Spirit Seminar. What was being prayed over like for you, and how has it shaped your faith since?"
  • Watch for: clients who felt nothing and conclude they are spiritually deficient (the commission's own view is that nothing may be felt); pressure from a group to produce a particular experience; seminar leaders telling someone they "cannot have been" baptised in the Spirit, which the commission says leaders should never say [source: CHARIS Q&A; synthesis].

4.2 Praying in tongues (glossolalia)

  • Purpose (as published): a charism given "for the upbuilding of the Church"; praying in tongues is "a gift of prayer rather than of preaching", directed to God, expressing praise, thanksgiving and longings that cannot be put into words [source: CHARIS Q&A on tongues].
  • What it involves: the commission distinguishes glossolalia (Spirit-given, speech-like sounds used in private or public prayer) from xenoglossia or xenolalia (speaking a real human language not learned). Paul's two forms are a public message in tongues, which needs interpretation conveying general meaning, and private prayer in tongues, by far the more common form in the Renewal today. The speaker knows they are speaking but not the content, and remains in control: they can start and stop and are not "involuntarily carried away" [source: CHARIS Q&A on tongues].
  • Discernment the movement applies: tongues are not proof of the Spirit's action; the tests cited are truth, love and right order (1 Cor 12:1-3; 13:1-3; 14:39-40) [source: CHARIS Q&A on tongues]. Diocesan norms may limit public tongues: Des Moines prohibits leaders from encouraging praying in tongues during public healing or deliverance services and treats it as a personal practice the person moderates [source: Des Moines Norms §26, Art. 17].
  • Example language (illustrative): "When you pray in tongues, what is that like, and can you start and stop it when you choose?"
  • Watch for: the published description includes voluntary control. Loss of control, speech you cannot stop, distress, or tongues appearing alongside other new unusual experiences are reasons for careful assessment (4.9), not conclusions in themselves. Also watch for shame or exclusion felt by those who do not pray in tongues [synthesis].

4.3 Resting in the Spirit

  • What it is (as published): a phenomenon in which a person being prayed for falls or rests, sometimes called "slain in the Spirit", a term the ICCRS Guidelines ask be avoided because it implies violence. The Guidelines describe it as a psychosomatic response in the person prayed for that "is as such not a charism" (translated); it can signal surrender to God but is not grace in itself [source: ICCRS Guidelines §3.3].
  • How the movement asks it be handled: not sought for its own sake or overemphasised; mature leaders direct attention to encountering the Lord; "any attempt at manipulation to provoke special phenomena must be avoided" (translated) [source: ICCRS Guidelines §3.3].
  • Example language (illustrative): "What happened in your body and mind when you rested in the Spirit, and how did you feel about it afterwards?"
  • Watch for: reports of being pushed, pressured or made to feel spiritually lacking for not falling, which conflicts with the Guidelines; injury from falls; dissociative experiences the client found frightening; prolonged episodes or loss of awareness; a group culture that treats falling as a measure of holiness [source for the manipulation standard: ICCRS Guidelines; rest synthesis].

4.4 Healing prayer and words of knowledge

  • Purpose (as published): prayer for spiritual, emotional and physical healing, alongside the sacraments of Reconciliation and Anointing of the Sick [source: Des Moines Norms §3a; ICCRS Guidelines].
  • What it involves: non-liturgical healing services, recommended to be led by an ordained minister; strictly liturgical healing rites need the bishop's express permission; praying for individuals is best done by two people; laying on of hands, sometimes with blessed oil at services of the word. Words of knowledge (perceived insights for a person or group) are "not to be seen as infallible" (translated), are not forced on anyone, and are best tested with a prayer partner. Avoid hysteria, artificiality, theatricality and sensationalism, keeping "an atmosphere of calm devotion" that still allows joyful praise [source: ICCRS Guidelines §3.2-3.3, citing CDF Instruction Arts. 1-9].
  • Pastoral rules the movement sets: if healing does not occur, the sick person "must never be reproached for lack of faith" (translated); it is wrong to claim God always wills healing in this life; accepting suffering in faith is honoured [source: ICCRS Guidelines §2.2, §2.4, §3.3]. Des Moines adds: ask before touching, touch only over clothing and generally the shoulders or upper back, invite the recipient to place their own hand on the area prayed for, never rub or massage; no public naming of illnesses, sins or curses; no telling someone they have a specific condition or curse; no medical or psychological advice [source: Des Moines Norms §21, §27-28].
  • Health claims: healing is a matter of faith in the tradition; prayer is not a treatment for physical disease and should never replace medical care [synthesis; the Church's own norms encourage medical recourse, Des Moines §4-5].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Alongside the prayer ministry, how is your medical treatment going, and is your doctor aware of what you are hoping for?"
  • Watch for: stopping medication after prayer; self-blame or blame from others for not being healed; touch that breached the norms above; words of knowledge that told the client they were cursed or sick [synthesis, measured against published norms].

4.5 Deliverance prayer, and its distinction from exorcism

  • What it is (as published): CHARIS's Doctrinal Commission (2017) distinguishes exorcism, a liturgical rite for a person believed to be possessed, "an extreme, but relatively rare, form of demonic bondage", which "may be done only by a bishop or by a priest with the permission of the bishop", from deliverance, prayer to free people from "lesser forms of demonic influence", with no set rite, which the commission says "may be carried out by any of the faithful". It names three levels: self-deliverance; occasional deliverance by mature Christians for family, friends or prayer-group members; and a regular ministry for those called to it, who should have "Christian maturity, psychological health, holiness of life, and humility" and be accountable to the bishop or his delegate. It mentions that some bishops have invited lay people trained in the Unbound model [source: CHARIS Q&A 2017 on deliverance].
  • Limits the movement and dioceses set: no one other than a designated exorcist should question or dialogue with demons [source: CHARIS Q&A 2017]. Diocesan norms can be stricter: Des Moines limits imperative commands to evil spirits to those with natural authority, forbids naming spirits aloud or interrogating them, forbids laity from using the Leo XIII exorcism formula, and forbids suggesting possession, oppression or obsession to the person; it requires at least two trained ministers (preferably including one of the same gender), ministry in public view, calm speech, Virtus safe-environment training for work with minors or vulnerable adults, gentle referral to a more competent person or professional, and immediate consultation with the pastor if overt manifestations occur [source: Des Moines Norms §13, §18-19, §32-47, Arts. 7-8, 18-24]. National bishops' conferences have issued further notes on deliverance prayer [uncertain: not verified].
  • Beliefs about causes, as published: the commission links demonic oppression to occult involvement, serious sin, or trauma and wounds that create vulnerability [source: CHARIS Q&A 2017].
  • Example language (illustrative): "You said you went for deliverance prayer. Can you tell me what happened, who was there, and how you were afterwards?"
  • Watch for: ministry done alone, in secret, at length or with restraint; telling a person they are possessed or cursed; prayer offered instead of mental health care for symptoms such as hallucinations, mood episodes or trauma responses; any involvement of children (4.14); a client's terror or shame after ministry [synthesis, measured against published norms].

4.6 Prayer groups and covenant community commitment

  • What it is (as published): prayer groups meet for praise, Scripture, teaching and prayer ministry under local leaders and the bishop. Covenant communities have formal commitment and may set their own formation patterns [source: CHARIS Q&A].
  • Documented features of some communities: The Guardian (2020) and MinistryWatch (2021, reporting a Washington Post investigation) describe, for People of Praise, a culture of "headship and submission", guidance figures (heads, and for women a "handmaid"), communal households, and a strict code against speaking ill of leaders, as former members described them [source: The Guardian 2020; MinistryWatch 2021]. These are descriptions of one community from reporting, not of the Renewal as a whole [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "What does your commitment to the community involve day to day, and who do you go to for guidance about decisions?"
  • Watch for: see 4.15.

Part B. The psychotherapist's work

4.7 Spiritual and cultural assessment

  • Purpose and when: at intake with any client who mentions charismatic prayer, a prayer group or a covenant community, and whenever religious material becomes relevant [synthesis].
  • Steps: (1) Ask permission to explore faith. (2) Map involvement: parish prayer group, Life in the Spirit Seminar, ministry team, covenant community, any formal commitment, household arrangements, who their leaders are and to whom those leaders answer. (3) Ask which practices they use (praise, tongues, healing prayer, deliverance, resting in the Spirit) and what each means to them. (4) Ask how faith helps and whether anything about it currently hurts. (5) Note supports (community, sacraments, spiritual director) and stressors. (6) A structured tool such as the DSM-5-TR Cultural Formulation Interview and its supplementary module on spirituality, religion and moral traditions can organise this [uncertain: not verified]. (7) Record in the client's own words [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Faith seems important to you. Would it be all right to ask about your prayer group and how it fits with what brings you here?" / "Who in your community do you go to when you have a big decision to make?"
  • Watch for: guardedness about community matters (a norm against speaking ill of leaders has been reported in one community, MinistryWatch 2021); the client checking whether you will respect their faith. Working signs: the client uses their own religious language freely and corrects your misunderstandings [synthesis].

4.8 Client-led integration of charismatic prayer

  • Purpose and when: when the client wants their faith to be part of therapy, for example praise or prayer as a coping resource, Scripture as a source of meaning, or the community as support [synthesis].
  • Steps: (1) Obtain explicit consent and agree what role faith will play. (2) Let the client name the practice and how they will use it outside sessions; the therapist does not lead prayer, tongues or ministry. (3) Link it to goals (for example, a praise practice before a feared task as a values-based activity, or prayer for help as part of a coping plan). (4) Review in the next session whether it helped. (5) Keep checking the client still wants this, and drop it if it becomes pressure or a vehicle for avoidance [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "You said praise steadies you. Would you like to build that into your plan for the mornings that are hardest? You decide how."
  • Watch for: prayer used to suppress emotion or avoid exposure; spiritual bypassing ("I gave it to God" ending all discussion); guilt when prayer does not lift mood. Working signs: the client reports prayer as resource rather than duty [synthesis].

4.9 Discerning intense experiences without pathologising them

  • Purpose and when: when a client or family worries about tongues, resting in the Spirit, visions, prophetic words or other strong experiences, or when new unusual experiences appear [synthesis].
  • Steps: (1) Start from normalisation within the tradition: these experiences are expected in the Renewal, and the published description of tongues includes voluntary control and of resting in the Spirit as a response not to be sought or manipulated [source: CHARIS Q&A on tongues; ICCRS Guidelines §3.3]. (2) Assess context: does it happen only in prayer settings, or spill into ordinary life? (3) Assess control: can the client start and stop it? (4) Assess function and consequences: is it consoling and integrated, or frightening, impairing, isolating? (5) Ask how the client's community and leaders view it; experiences their own group finds unusual or concerning carry more weight. (6) Screen for psychosis (fixed beliefs outside shared belief, hallucinations outside prayer, disorganisation), mania (reduced sleep need, pressured speech, grandiosity such as special mission), depression, and dissociation (amnesia, depersonalisation, prior trauma). (7) If illness is likely, arrange psychiatric assessment while respecting the faith frame; if not, and the religious or spiritual issue is itself the focus of care, DSM-5-TR lists Religious or Spiritual Problem among conditions that may be a focus of clinical attention (code Z65.8). (8) With consent, involve the client's pastor or spiritual director in discernment [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "In your prayer group, praying in tongues is something many people do. What I want to understand is whether this feels like your prayer, that you can begin and end, or something that is happening to you."
  • Watch for: two errors: calling normative charismatic practice a symptom, and missing illness because it is wrapped in religious language. Clarity from repeated assessment over time, and from collateral information, is the working sign [synthesis].

4.10 Working with beliefs about demons and deliverance experiences

  • Purpose and when: when a client believes they are oppressed by evil spirits, has received deliverance prayer, or is distressed by what happened during it [synthesis].
  • Steps: (1) Listen without arguing about the reality of spirits; reflect the meaning (fear, guilt, hope). (2) Ask concretely what was done, by whom, where, for how long, with what consent, and how the client felt during and after (4.5). (3) Compare with the published norms only if helpful to the client, for example that diocesan norms forbid suggesting possession to the person and require referral to professionals where appropriate [source: Des Moines Norms §19, §38]. (4) Treat co-occurring symptoms with standard care: trauma responses, intrusive thoughts (consider OCD, 4.12), psychosis, depression. (5) If the client wishes, encourage contact with their pastor or diocese, which holds authority over exorcism and deliverance ministry [source: CHARIS Q&A 2017]. (6) Never perform or simulate deliverance in therapy; never tell a client they are or are not oppressed [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "I am not the right person to judge spiritual matters, and I will not try to. What I can do is help with the fear, the sleeplessness and the thoughts that keep coming. Would your parish priest be someone you would want to talk to as well?"
  • Watch for: repeated ministry as reassurance-seeking; ministry substituting for medical care; any account of restraint, isolation, long sessions or minors involved, which need safeguarding responses (4.14). Working sign: distress decreasing and the client making their own choices about ministry [synthesis].

4.11 Protecting medical and psychiatric care; when healing does not come

  • Purpose and when: when a client receives healing prayer for a physical or mental illness, or feels a failure because healing has not come [synthesis].
  • Steps: (1) Ask what they hope for from healing prayer and whether their doctor knows. (2) Check medication and appointments continue; therapists do not advise on medicines, so route any wish to change treatment to the prescriber. (3) If the client fears they lack faith, share, if they wish, that the movement's own guidance says the sick must never be reproached for lack of faith, that it is wrong to claim God always wills healing in this life, and that accepting suffering in faith is honoured [source: ICCRS Guidelines §2.2, §2.4, §3.3]. (4) Work on grief, anger at God or self-blame as ordinary therapeutic material. (5) With consent, involve the doctor and pastor [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Some people in healing ministry told you it was your faith. The guidance your own Church's renewal service published says the opposite. How does it feel to hear that?"
  • Watch for: stopping treatment; delayed diagnosis; spiritual shame. Working signs: treatment continues and self-blame softens [synthesis].

4.12 Scrupulosity and religious OCD

  • Purpose and when: when concern about sin, unrepented sin blocking the Spirit, blasphemous thoughts, demonic influence, or doing prayer "right" becomes repetitive and distressing. The Renewal's own teaching links unrepented sin to ambiguous spiritual experience and oppression [source: CHARIS Q&A; CHARIS Q&A 2017], which can feed scrupulous doubt in vulnerable people [synthesis].
  • Steps: (1) Distinguish OCD, which conflicts with the person's beliefs (ego-dystonic), from healthy practice, which fits them [source: IOCDF]. (2) Identify compulsions that imitate religious acts: repeated confession, repeated requests for prayer or deliverance, reassurance from leaders, checking prayers [source: IOCDF, which names excessive prayer and confession]. (3) Offer exposure and response prevention, which the IOCDF presents, with medication, as first-line, treating scrupulosity like other OCD subtypes; medication is a matter for the prescriber [source: IOCDF]. (4) With consent, consult the client's priest or confessor so that exposures and limits on confession or ministry are framed within the client's faith; the IOCDF encourages collaboration among faith leaders, clinicians and people with OCD [source: IOCDF]. (5) Frame tolerating uncertainty as compatible with faith; the IOCDF notes that "uncertainty isn't a bad thing" [source: IOCDF].
  • Example language (illustrative): "The urge to be prayed over again tonight feels like faith, but it seems to work like the checking we talked about. Could we ask your confessor how often he thinks is right, and then practise sticking to that?"
  • Watch for: ministry teams unknowingly supplying reassurance; leaders reading OCD as lack of faith, which the IOCDF names as a stigma. Working signs: less time on rituals, more freedom in prayer [source: IOCDF; synthesis].

4.13 Challenging and adverse experiences in intense prayer

  • Purpose and when: when a client reports fear, terror, energy-like bodily sensations, changes in sense of self, light experiences or other unsettling effects after intense prayer events, retreats or ministry [synthesis].
  • Evidence base and its limits: the Varieties of Contemplative Experience study (Lindahl et al. 2017, PLOS ONE) documented meditation-related challenges, including fear and terror, energy-like somatic experiences, perceptual changes and changes in sense of self, and influencing factors such as worldview and the teacher's role, in Western Buddhist meditators [source: Cheetah House VCE page]. Its sample was Buddhist; applying it to charismatic prayer is inference [synthesis]. A systematic review of adverse effects of meditation (Farias et al. 2020, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica) [uncertain: not verified] and trauma-sensitive mindfulness adaptations (Treleaven 2018) [uncertain: not verified] are relevant for contemplative elements.
  • Steps: (1) Take the experience seriously without labelling. (2) Ground: orient to the room, slow ordinary breathing at the client's own pace, feet on the floor. (3) Reduce intensity: suggest the client discuss with their prayer leader or pastor stepping back from high-intensity events for a while, and choose quieter forms of prayer they find safe. (4) Screen as in 4.9. (5) For clients with trauma, agree choice and control over touch and posture in ministry settings; the norms on asking before touch can be a reference point [source: Des Moines Norms §21]. (6) Before intensive retreats or conferences, ask about history of psychosis, mania, trauma and recent sleep loss, and plan support. (7) Specialist support is offered by Cheetah House (consultations, support groups, training for clinicians) [source: Cheetah House VCE page].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Since the conference you have felt that shaking and fear. Let's slow things right down here first. Then we can think together about what kind of prayer feels safe for now."
  • Watch for: sleep loss, escalating unusual beliefs, dissociation, suicidal thoughts (assess risk by current standards). Working sign: return to baseline and a self-chosen pace of practice [synthesis].

4.14 Safeguarding children and vulnerable adults

  • Purpose and when: whenever a client describes children or vulnerable adults involved in deliverance, healing ministry, community discipline, or living in community households, or discloses past or present abuse [synthesis].
  • Steps: (1) Know your jurisdiction's mandatory reporting rules before they are needed. (2) Ask factual, non-leading questions about who, what, when and whether a child is at risk now. (3) Report to statutory authorities as the law requires; do not leave reporting to a church body alone. Church norms take the same line: Des Moines requires reporting of abuse of a minor, or of risk of self-harm or harm to others, to proper authorities, says ministry confidentiality is not absolute, and requires safe-environment (Virtus) training for anyone ministering to minors or vulnerable adults [source: Des Moines Norms §20, Arts. 7-8]. People of Praise told The Guardian it had adopted a child-safety policy requiring law-enforcement reporting of alleged child abuse [source: The Guardian 2020]. (4) Support the client through the process and its effects on their community ties. (5) Children's consent and assent: a child cannot meaningfully consent to deliverance ministry; ask whether parents consented, whether the child could say no, and whether any harm or fear resulted [synthesis]. Guidance from national child-safeguarding bodies on spirit-possession beliefs applies [uncertain: not verified].
  • Example language (illustrative): "What you are describing about the children in the household is something I need to take seriously, and the law requires me to pass it on. I will tell you what I am doing at each step."
  • Watch for: pressure from the community not to report to protect reputation, which a former member alleged to The Guardian [source: The Guardian 2020]; retaliation or shunning; the client's own trauma surfacing. Never name survivors in records shared beyond what reporting requires [synthesis].

4.15 Recognising high-control dynamics in covenant communities

  • Purpose and when: when a client in, or leaving, a covenant community describes leaders' involvement in personal decisions, isolation from outsiders, or fear of speaking up [synthesis].
  • What reliable sources report: former People of Praise members told The Guardian (2020) that leaders controlled members' decisions about marriage, living arrangements and child-rearing, alleged "intense subjugation of women", described being taught that outsiders were untrustworthy, and reported that members who admitted gay sex were expelled; one described leaving as "walking out from under the umbrella of protection". MinistryWatch (2021), reporting a Washington Post investigation, described a culture of "headship and submission" in which abuse could flourish, a strict code against speaking ill of leaders, and a 1980 National Catholic Reporter account of a "siege mentality". The group did not comment to The Guardian on emotional-abuse allegations [source: The Guardian 2020; MinistryWatch 2021].
  • Steps: (1) Ask about decision-making: whose approval is needed for work, relationships, money, medical care, therapy. (2) Ask about information: can members read critics, talk to former members, speak freely about leaders? (3) Ask about exit: what happens to people who leave? (4) Ask about accountability: are leaders answerable to a bishop or an independent body, and are complaints handled outside the leadership line? The movement's own deliverance guidance expects accountability to the bishop or his delegate [source: CHARIS Q&A 2017]. (5) Compare the answers with the client's own values rather than with your judgement. (6) Avoid labels; describe behaviours [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "If you decided something your head disagreed with, what would happen next?"
  • Watch for: the client reporting your questions to leaders out of obligation; dependency shifting to the therapist; risk to children (4.14). Working signs: the client weighs choices by their own values, whether they stay or leave [synthesis].

4.16 Documented abuse and church interventions: working with affected clients

  • Purpose and when: when a client belongs or belonged to a community where abuse has been documented, or is affected by news coverage [synthesis].
  • What reliable sources report:
    • Community of the Beatitudes (France). Founded in 1973 by a married couple (the founder and his wife) and another couple; recognised by the Vatican in 2002. Rome began intervening in 2007; the founder was expelled in 2008 and ordered to a life of silence and penance. In 2011 the community publicly acknowledged that he had committed "crimes against the morality of the Church" involving several women in the community, and said a second senior member, the founder's brother-in-law, had also committed abuse and had been expelled in 2010. Another former member was accused of sexually abusing more than 50 children between 1985 and 2000, with a trial then due in Rodez; its outcome is [uncertain: not verified]. A Vatican-appointed pontifical commissioner, Fr Henry Donneaud OP, oversaw reform of the statutes [source: Catholic News Agency 2011].
    • People of Praise (United States). The Guardian (2020) reported a former member's allegation of childhood sexual abuse by a man in a communal household in the 1970s and her account of being told not to discuss it for the community's sake; the community's spokesman said the abuse occurred in a different community before People of Praise existed in Minnesota, and the group hired a law firm for an independent investigation. MinistryWatch (2021), citing a Washington Post investigation, reported that Trinity School at River Ridge, a school of the group, acknowledged it had not properly handled a 2001 abuse complaint about a member who taught and coached there; one of two law firms found the complaints credible; a broader inquiry continued; the group said it now has "robust" procedures [source: The Guardian 2020; MinistryWatch 2021].
  • Steps: (1) Do not ask a client to defend or condemn their community. (2) Ask how the reports affect them: betrayal, doubt about their own experiences, loyalty conflicts, fear for children. (3) If the client discloses their own abuse, follow 4.14 and trauma-focused care; respect their choices about church processes, independent commissions and police. (4) Provide information about independent reporting routes where they exist [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "News about the founder has been hard for many people. What has it stirred up for you, and what do you need from our time right now?"
  • Watch for: self-blame; minimisation pressured by loyalty; re-traumatisation through media. Never name or identify survivors [synthesis].

4.17 Leaving or staying: religious trauma and identity

  • Purpose and when: when a client is deciding whether to leave a prayer group or covenant community, or has left [synthesis].
  • Steps: (1) Neutral stance on staying or leaving; the goal is free choice. (2) Map losses: household, friends, roles, faith practices, sometimes employment or schooling. (3) Separate faith from the group: many leave a community but stay Catholic; parishes, other prayer groups or a spiritual director may remain resources. (4) Address fear that leaving brings spiritual danger, as some former members described ("umbrella of protection") [source: The Guardian 2020]. (5) Peer support: former-member support groups exist; The Guardian reported more than two dozen former People of Praise members in one [source: The Guardian 2020]. (6) Treat trauma, depression or anxiety with standard evidence-based care [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "You can decide about the community and about your faith separately. Which one feels more urgent right now?"
  • Watch for: isolation after exit, suicidal thoughts (assess by current standards), anger at God turned inward. Working sign: a self-chosen relationship to faith [synthesis].

4.18 Collaboration with clergy, diocesan delegates and community leaders

  • Purpose and when: when the client wants input from their pastor, confessor, spiritual director or prayer-group leader, for example on scrupulosity limits, on deliverance concerns, or on returning to ministry [synthesis].
  • Steps: (1) Written consent specifying what is shared. (2) Identify who holds authority: parish priest, the bishop or his delegate for deliverance ministry and healing services, the national CHARIS Service of Communion for national coordination [source: CHARIS Q&A 2017; ICCRS Guidelines; Vatican News 2019]. (3) Share only what is needed. (4) Do not involve community leaders whose conduct is the concern. (5) Agree roles: the therapist treats mental health; clergy provide spiritual care [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "Would it help if I spoke with Father, with your permission, so we are giving you the same message about how often to go to confession?"
  • Watch for: clergy offering reassurance that feeds OCD; leaders seeking information to discipline the client [synthesis].

4.19 The therapist's stance, self-disclosure and dual relationships

  • Purpose and when: throughout, and especially if the therapist shares or rejects the client's faith or is connected to the same parish or community [synthesis].
  • Steps: (1) Do not pray over, prophesy or minister to clients. (2) Decline clinical work with people from your own prayer group or community where roles would mix, or refer. (3) Self-disclose faith only briefly and for the client's benefit. (4) Seek consultation when your own reactions (enthusiasm or aversion) affect judgement. (5) Follow your profession's ethics code on multiple relationships and competence [synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "I won't pray over you here, because my job is to be your therapist. Your parish and prayer group are the right places for that."
  • Watch for: clients treating the therapist as a spiritual authority; therapist imposing views either way [synthesis].

5. Handling problems

All guidance in this section is [synthesis] except where a source is named.

  • Client fears therapy will attack their faith. Name your stance (4.19), invite correction, and use their language. If wary, start with non-religious goals and let faith enter when they choose.
  • Client wants the therapist to pray over them, interpret a word of knowledge or confirm a spiritual diagnosis. Decline warmly, explain the role, and offer to help them take the question to their pastor or prayer leader (4.18).
  • Stuck: every problem is framed as spiritual ("it's oppression", "I just need more faith"). Do not argue. Use "both-and": work on the sleep, fear or mood while they pursue spiritual care. Point out, if useful, that the movement's own guidance expects cooperation with medicine and psychology [source: Des Moines Norms §4-5; ICCRS Guidelines §1.1].
  • Non-adherence because prayer or ministry is seen as the real cure. Explore expectations; ask the client to discuss with their pastor whether their Church asks them to drop treatment (diocesan norms point the other way) [source: Des Moines Norms §4-5, §28]. Coordinate with the prescriber; never advise on medicines.
  • Overwhelm after a conference, healing service or deliverance session. Ground, reduce intensity, screen for mania, psychosis and dissociation, and arrange urgent psychiatric care if needed (4.9, 4.13). If the client wishes, contact their pastor.
  • Family conflict: relatives think the client's tongues or resting in the Spirit is illness, or the community thinks the client's illness is spiritual. Offer a joint session focused on observable function and safety, informed by the published description of these practices (4.2, 4.3).
  • Disclosure of abuse by a leader. Follow 4.14: safety, reporting, the client's choices about church processes. Expect pressure to keep silent; one former member described such pressure to The Guardian [source: The Guardian 2020].
  • Rupture: client feels judged when you ask about community control. Repair directly: acknowledge, explain why you ask, and return the choice to the client. Avoid group labels.
  • Client reports your questions to leaders, or leaders contact you. Do not share information without written consent; remind the client of confidentiality; consider whether the client is under pressure (4.15).
  • Scrupulosity worsened by ministry. Coordinate with a confessor or priest on limits; continue ERP (4.12) [source: IOCDF].
  • Spiritual distress after leaving: fear of losing God's protection, loneliness. Separate faith from group, rebuild support, treat depression and trauma (4.17). Assess suicide risk by current standards.
  • Grief at not receiving charisms, healing or a felt experience. Share, if wanted, that the movement's own doctrinal commission says people may feel nothing when prayed over and that the sick must not be blamed for lack of faith [source: CHARIS Q&A; ICCRS Guidelines §3.3].
  • Children involved in deliverance or harsh community discipline. Safeguarding first (4.14).
  • Therapist uncertainty about Catholic teaching. Consult a priest or theologian with the client's permission, or seek supervision; do not guess at doctrine.
  • Problems not addressed by the sources: how to work with clients pressured to fall when prayed over, how to address group prophecies about personal decisions, and how to support clergy who are themselves leaving a community. Guidance above for these is entirely [synthesis].

Sources

Web sources:

Works cited:

  • Lindahl, J. R., et al. (2017). The varieties of contemplative experience: A mixed-methods study of meditation-related challenges in Western Buddhists. PLOS ONE 12(5): e0176239.
  • Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (2000). Instruction on prayers for healing (cited through the ICCRS Guidelines).
  • Also referred to [uncertain: not verified]: Farias et al. 2020, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (systematic review of adverse effects of meditation); Treleaven 2018, Trauma-Sensitive Mindfulness; Vieten et al. 2013 (spiritual and religious competencies); DSM-5-TR Cultural Formulation Interview and the Religious or Spiritual Problem category.
  • ICD-10-CM Z65.8, Other specified problems related to psychosocial circumstances (includes 'Religious or spiritual problem'), https://www.unboundmedicine.com/icd/view/ICD-10-CM/945432/all/Z65_8___Other_specified_problems_related_to_psychosocial_circumstances
← Previous · XIII-209Julian MeetingsNext · XIII-211 →Exorcism (Rituale Romanum)