Atlas›Domain I · Psychodynamic & depth psychology›Guide 021
Guide I-021

British Independent tradition

Christopher BollasBritain
A 32 · L 33 · M 3524 interventions in the Trinity explorer
Client cardCompare
[source: …] where a claim comes from[uncertain] not confirmed in a primary source[synthesis] the writer's reconstruction

1. Introduction

Version followed: Christopher Bollas's version of the British Independent tradition. The core texts are The Shadow of the Object (1987), Forces of Destiny (1989) and Being a Character (1992). For free-association technique the guide uses The Freudian Moment (2007), with Free Association (2002) and The Infinite Question (2009). For breakdown it uses Catch Them Before They Fall (2013).

Status. This is not a manualised therapy. Bollas writes clinical theory and case-based essays. He gives no session protocol, phase model or fidelity scale. The guide sets out the techniques he describes. Any structure or application I derived is tagged [synthesis].

Sourcing note. The primary books and the 1983 countertransference paper are not drawn on in full. Descriptions of chapter content come from knowledge of the texts plus secondary summaries. Unconfirmed detail is tagged [uncertain].

Independent context. Bollas trained in and writes from the Independent ("Middle") Group of the British Psychoanalytical Society. This group sits between the Kleinians and the Anna Freudians. It is associated with Winnicott, Balint, Fairbairn, Heimann, Khan, Klauber, Rayner and Kohon, and was mapped by Kohon (1986) and Rayner (1991). Its working values are:

  • freedom to draw on any theory;
  • the analyst's own subjective and countertransference experience as clinical data, after Heimann (1950);
  • regression and environmental provision, after Winnicott and Balint;
  • the individuality of each analytic pair.

[source: Kohon 1986; Rayner 1991; BPAS Bollas page — the two books are cited from knowledge]

How change happens.

  • Idiom. Each person is born with an idiom: an unconscious, personal form of being. The early object world either lets it be elaborated or forecloses it.
  • The unthought known. What the infant lived but could never think persists as assumptions, moods and ways of handling the self and others. Bollas calls this the unthought known.
  • Where it re-emerges. This material does not come back as memory. It returns in how the patient uses the analyst, in dreams and moods, and in the analyst's countertransference.

Change comes about in three ways:

  • Free association. Inside the "Freudian Pair" (patient free-associating, analyst in evenly suspended attention), unconscious thinking is freed and grows.
  • The analyst as transformational object. The analyst is used as a transformational object, so the unthought known can be lived, thought and put into words.
  • Fate to destiny. The patient moves from fate (being shaped by others) toward destiny (elaborating the true self through objects).

[source: Routledge description of Shadow of the Object; BPAS Bollas page; Routledge description of Forces of Destiny; IPA Encyclopedic Dictionary p.406]

2. Framework

No formal phases exist in the primary sources. Bollas works within the ordinary open-ended psychoanalytic frame. He changes that frame only for breakdown. [source: NWAPS workshop page; New Books Network page]

Formats. Bollas's work assumes three:

  • Psychoanalysis. Four to five sessions a week, usually on the couch, open-ended and often lasting years. [source: NWAPS — "full analysis (four to five sessions a week)"; the couch and duration are standard practice, not separately sourced]
  • Psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Lower frequency. Bollas extends breakdown work to this format too. [source: NWAPS; the exact frequency is not specified (uncertain)]
  • Extended sessions for breakdown. For a limited period, sessions may expand from five a week to twice daily, seven days a week, or run from morning to early evening. They are backed by analytically minded psychiatrists and social workers, and the aim is to avoid hospitalisation. [source: New Books Network page on Catch Them Before They Fall]

Working phase model [synthesis]. Use this to orient yourself. It is not Bollas's scheme.

  • A. Opening (first weeks to months).
    • Goals: set the frame; let the patient discover unrestricted talking; observe how they use you, which is their idiom-of-use; identify character structure; screen for incipient breakdown and risk using standard risk assessment.
    • Move on when: the patient talks with some freedom, the transference has a recognisable atmosphere, and you can follow sequences of ideas.
  • B. Main work (months to years).
    • Goals: sustain free association and track the logic of its sequence; allow ordinary regression to dependence; read moods and the self-as-object; let the unthought known emerge through use of the analyst; use countertransference expressively but sparingly; work with dreams and historical sets.
    • Signs of progress: spontaneous association; the patient noticing their own sequences; richer dreams; new creative ideas (psychic genera); previously unspeakable self-states becoming speakable.
  • C. Breakdown episodes (at any point).
    • Goals: recognise the signs, name the breakdown, and move to extended sessions with medical backup.
    • Afterwards: histories and après-coup, then reflection, explanation and working through.
    • Return to B when: the acute state has been understood and the patient can manage the ordinary frame.
    • [source: Catch Them Before They Fall chapter titles; detail uncertain]
  • D. Late work and ending.
    • Goals: work through; recognise and celebrate the emerging idiom; the patient internalises the Freudian Pair as a capacity for self-analysis.
    • Ending criteria [synthesis]: the patient free-associates on their own; uses objects for self-elaboration; is more driven by destiny than by fate; and an ending date is agreed well in advance.

3. Guiding principles

  1. Free association is the method. Your main job is to protect the patient's freedom to say what comes to mind, not to steer content. [source: BPAS page; The Freudian Moment; Free Association]
  2. The Freudian Pair. Meaning arises between the patient's free talk and your evenly suspended attentiveness, so don't fix your attention on any theme in advance. [source: IPA dictionary p.406; The Freudian Moment]
  3. The logic of sequence. The unconscious thinks in the order of ideas: what follows what is the latent thought, so track the chain, not only the content. [source: BPAS page; The Infinite Question description]
  4. The receptive unconscious and psychic genera. The unconscious creates as well as represses, so leave room for new ideas to incubate. [source: BPAS page; Being a Character]
  5. Prefer the question to the answer. Opening further questions often helps more than an early interpretation. Interpret sparingly. [source: The Infinite Question description — "self-propelling interrogative drive"]
  6. Don't make everything transference. Bollas criticises the British habit of centring on the here-and-now transference because it crowds out the patient's associations. Use transference interpretation selectively. [source: BPAS page]
  7. Idiom and destiny. The aim is to elaborate the patient's personal idiom, not to adjust them to a norm. Notice where they are living out fate rather than destiny. [source: Routledge description of Forces of Destiny]
  8. The unthought known. Early object relations are known as being, not as memory, so look for them in mood, atmosphere and how you are used. [source: Routledge description of Shadow]
  9. The transformational object. Patients seek objects that change their self-state. Expect to be used this way, and notice compulsive searches for transforming objects. [source: Shadow, ch.1; BPAS page]
  10. The patient's use of the analyst. Patients use aspects of your personality to articulate their idiom. Allow yourself to be used, then think about the form that use takes. [source: Routledge description of Forces of Destiny; Winnicott 1969]
  11. Countertransference is information and can be expressed. Your states are data, and after processing they can occasionally be shared. [source: Shadow, chs.12–13; Bollas 1983]
  12. Self-analysis comes first. Analyse your own reaction before you use it. [source: Shadow, ch.13 title; content uncertain]
  13. Respect ordinary regression. Some patients need a period of dependence, being held rather than interpreted. Tolerate it. [source: Shadow, ch.14 title; content uncertain]
  14. Character is form. How someone is with you is a character's aesthetic. Read the form of their communication as much as its content. [source: Being a Character; BPAS page]
  15. Breakdown is a communication. A breakdown presents the self to another for understanding, so meet it early and intensively. [source: christopherbollas.com page on Catch Them; Routledge]
  16. The frame bends for breakdown, not for comfort. Extend sessions only for genuine breakdown and only with medical backup. [source: New Books Network; NWAPS] The criteria are [synthesis].
  17. Each analytic pair is unique. Each pair develops its own atmosphere, so don't import stock formulations. [source: BPAS page — "unique, idiomatic atmosphere"]

4. Intervention inventory

Bollas describes ways of listening and responding, not scripted exercises. The steps below put them into operational form. Unless a step is attributed to a source, the stepwise breakdown is [synthesis]. All example language is illustrative.

4.1 Inviting and protecting free association

  • Purpose: Establish the fundamental method of the Freudian Pair. Use it from the first session, and again whenever talk becomes guarded or agenda-driven. [source: BPAS page; Free Association 2002; The Freudian Moment 2007]
  • Steps:
    1. Explain the method once, briefly: say whatever comes to mind, including what seems trivial, embarrassing or irrelevant.
    2. Don't set topics or ask for updates. Let the patient start.
    3. Keep your interventions short so the patient's chain of thought stays with them.
    4. When the patient censors themselves ("that's silly"), invite the dropped thought back without interpreting it.
    5. Treat pauses and changes of subject as part of the association, not as interruptions.
  • Example language (illustrative):
    • "Just say what comes, even if it seems beside the point."
    • "You were about to say something and dropped it. What was it?"
  • Watch for: Compliant "free association" that is really a prepared report; your own urge to steer. It is working when topics shift unexpectedly, small details are reported, and the patient surprises themselves.

4.2 Evenly suspended attentiveness (the analyst's half of the Freudian Pair)

  • Purpose: Let your unconscious receive the patient's drift. Use it continuously. [source: The Infinite Question description; Freud 1912; IPA dictionary p.406]
  • Steps:
    1. Don't take notes in session and don't hold a working hypothesis too tightly.
    2. Let attention float across content, images, tone and your own passing thoughts.
    3. Notice what returns to your mind unbidden: a word, an image, a memory of an earlier session.
    4. Hold it without speaking until a pattern repeats or the sequence (4.3) gives it shape.
  • Example language: none; this is an internal stance.
  • Watch for: Drifting into private reverie that has nothing to do with the patient, or locking onto a formulation. It is working when your unbidden associations later prove linked to the material.

4.3 Tracking the logic of sequence (chains of ideas)

  • Purpose: Find the latent thought carried by the order of topics. Bollas treats this as Freud's core discovery. Use it in every session. [source: BPAS page; The Infinite Question description; The Freudian Moment]
  • Steps:
    1. Silently log the topics in order (A then B then C) and the turns between them.
    2. Ask: if these were one sentence, what would it say? Look for shared images, words or emotional valences linking topics that seem unrelated.
    3. Mark points of rupture, where a topic is abruptly dropped. Those mark resistance or a nodal point.
    4. Look across sessions too: what opens a session often comments on the end of the last one.
  • Example language (illustrative): "You went from your sister's wedding to the broken boiler to how cold this room is. They seem to be in conversation with each other."
  • Watch for: Forcing links, or making the sequence prove a theory. It is working when the patient adds a fresh association that extends the link instead of just agreeing.

4.4 Sequential interpretation

  • Purpose: Hand back to the patient the thought their associations were building. Use it when a sequence has clearly formed and the patient is near it. [source: The Infinite Question description — sessions with commentary; BPAS page]
  • Steps:
    1. Wait until the chain has repeated or condensed.
    2. Name the elements in the patient's own words, in the order they came.
    3. Offer the link as a possibility, not a verdict.
    4. Then stop and let the patient associate to it. Their next associations are the test.
  • Example language (illustrative): "First the teacher who never noticed you, then the delayed train, now my holiday. Perhaps there's a thought here about being kept waiting by people who should notice."
  • Watch for: Long explanatory interpretations, which close the field. It is working when new material appears (memories, dreams, a shift in affect), not just intellectual assent.

4.5 The question over the answer

  • Purpose: Keep unconscious inquiry going rather than closing it. Use it when you are tempted to interpret early, or when material is still unfolding. [source: The Infinite Question description]
  • Steps:
    1. Turn your nascent interpretation into an open question about a specific detail.
    2. Ask about the specific (what kind, which one, what came to mind), not "why".
    3. Accept an answer that opens a new line rather than confirming yours.
  • Example language (illustrative): "What was the colour of the coat in the dream?" "What comes to mind about that house?"
  • Watch for: Questions that interrogate or lead. It is working when the patient's questioning becomes self-propelling and they start asking their own.

4.6 Restraint, silence and incubation (psychic genera)

  • Purpose: Protect the creative unconscious work in which new ideas (genera) gestate. Use it when the patient is circling something new, fragmentary or half-formed. [source: Being a Character — "psychic genera"; BPAS page]
  • Steps:
    1. Notice material that feels new and unfinished rather than repetitive.
    2. Don't interpret it into existing (traumatic or repetitive) patterns.
    3. Tolerate silence. Reflect back minimally, if at all.
    4. Return to it later only if the patient does.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Let's leave that open for now and see where it goes."
  • Watch for: Bollas's contrast between trauma and genera. Trauma material repeats and closes in on itself; genera open out [uncertain on precise terms]. Don't mistake one for the other. It is working when ideas return later, enriched.

4.7 Noticing how the patient uses the analyst (idiom of use)

  • Purpose: Read the idiom and the unthought known in the form of the relationship. Use it throughout, and especially when content is thin. [source: Routledge description of Forces of Destiny; Winnicott 1969]
  • Steps:
    1. Ask yourself what kind of object you are being made into: audience, furniture, mother, critic, accomplice.
    2. Note which parts of your personality the patient picks out (your voice, quiet, humour, punctuality).
    3. Let yourself be used without correcting it early.
    4. When the pattern is stable, name it lightly and without accusation, as information about how they were shaped and how they shape.
  • Example language (illustrative): "I notice you check my face before you finish a sentence, as though my expression decides whether it can be said."
  • Watch for: Turning this into constant here-and-now transference interpretation (principle 6). It is working when the patient recognises the form outside the room and begins to vary it.

4.8 Receiving the unthought known through ambience and mood

  • Purpose: Let early, unrepresented experience show itself in moods and atmosphere, then put it into words. Use it with persistent moods, "stuck" atmospheres, or patients with little memory. [source: Shadow, ch.6 "Moods and the conservative process" and ch.15; Routledge description]
  • Steps:
    1. Treat a recurring mood as possibly conserving a childhood self-state, not just as a symptom.
    2. Let the mood be lived in the session rather than interpreting it away.
    3. Ask about its texture: time of day, place, sensory feel, age it feels like.
    4. Later, link it to the environment it may preserve, as a construction offered tentatively.
  • Example language (illustrative): "This Sunday-afternoon flatness you describe: does it have an age?"
  • Watch for: Premature reconstruction ("your mother was depressed") that the patient accepts without feeling. It is working when the mood becomes something the patient can step into and out of, and describe.

4.9 Recognising the search for the transformational object

  • Purpose: Identify how the patient seeks objects (people, substances, purchases, the analyst) that promise to change their self-state, as the early mother did. Use it with compulsive pursuits, idealisation, or disappointment with the analysis. [source: Shadow, ch.1; BPAS page]
  • Steps:
    1. Notice repeated hopes that a person, place or thing will transform everything.
    2. Explore the felt experience of being changed, not just the object itself.
    3. Accept that you will be invested with this hope, and expect disappointment.
    4. Help the patient see the search as a memory of early transformation, not as a plan.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Each new job seems to promise to make you someone else. I wonder what you're hoping it will do to you."
  • Watch for: Colluding by becoming the magical transformer. It is working when the patient can value ordinary, partial changes.

4.10 Reading the self-as-object

  • Purpose: See how the patient manages their own self as a parent once managed them. Use it with harsh self-neglect, overcontrol, or a patient who treats their needs as an inconvenience. [source: Shadow, ch.3 "The self as object" — content summarised from knowledge (uncertain)]
  • Steps:
    1. Notice how the patient talks to and about themselves: tone, permissions, punishments.
    2. Note how they treat their own feelings in session: dismiss, scold, hurry.
    3. Name the stance as a relationship.
  • Example language (illustrative): "When you're tired you seem to talk to yourself like a sergeant to a recruit."
  • Watch for: Moralising. It is working when the patient catches themselves doing it, and the inner voice softens or becomes curious.

4.11 Monitoring countertransference and self-analysis

  • Purpose: Process your reactions before using them, as a prerequisite to 4.12. Use it continuously, especially with strong or odd states (sleepiness, boredom, irritation, excitement). [source: Shadow, ch.13 "Self analysis and the countertransference" — content uncertain; Heimann 1950]
  • Steps:
    1. Register your state and when it began: after what words, at what point in the sequence.
    2. Separate your own life (fatigue, personal events) from what may be evoked.
    3. Associate privately to the state, between sessions if needed.
    4. Form a hypothesis about what the state might communicate: a projected self-state, an early object, or an extractive pull.
    5. Seek supervision or self-analysis when the state persists.
  • Example language: none (internal).
  • Watch for: Assuming every feeling comes from the patient. It is working when your hypothesis predicts later material.

4.12 Expressive use of the countertransference (selective disclosure)

  • Purpose: Return to the patient, in usable form, the states they have lodged in you. This makes your subjectivity available as an object, so the unthought known can be thought jointly. It is Bollas's signature departure from strict abstinence. [source: Bollas 1983 "Expressive uses of the countertransference: notes to the patient from oneself" (PEP-Web citation only); Shadow, ch.12]
  • When to use:
    • when a strong state persists across sessions and has been processed (4.11);
    • when ordinary interpretation keeps failing;
    • when the patient seems unable to represent a state except by inducing it in you.
  • Steps (the guardrails are partly [synthesis], partly my recollection of Bollas 1983 [uncertain]):
    1. Process the state first (4.11). Never disclose raw affect.
    2. Choose a moment when the patient is not in acute crisis and the alliance can bear it.
    3. Present the state as your subjective experience, explicitly provisional and possibly mistaken.
    4. Link it to the session: when it arose and in response to what.
    5. Invite the patient's associations, and their disagreement, rather than seeking agreement.
    6. Don't explain your private life or ask the patient to look after your feelings.
    7. Note in your records what you disclosed and how the patient responded.
  • Example language (illustrative):
    • "I want to tell you something that's been going on in me, because it may belong to what's happening here. When you speak about your father in that even voice, I find myself becoming very sleepy, almost absent. I'm not sure what it means. What comes to your mind?"
    • "I could be wrong about this."
  • Watch for:
    • The patient feeling burdened, seduced or blamed.
    • Disclosure that serves your relief.
    • Repeated disclosures replacing analysis.
    • It is working when the patient becomes curious and brings new material (e.g. their own experience of an absent parent), and when the disclosure reduces the enactment rather than intensifying it.
  • Ethical limit: Never disclose sexual feelings toward the patient, or personal crises. [synthesis, consistent with standard professional ethics]

4.13 Allowing ordinary regression to dependence

  • Purpose: Let a patient temporarily give up adult self-management and depend on the setting and the analyst's presence, so that early needs can be lived rather than discussed. This is in the line of Winnicott and Balint. [source: Shadow, ch.14 title; content summarised from knowledge (uncertain)]
  • When to use: With patients who become quieter, more silent, sleepier, or who use the session to simply be, when this is not a breakdown.
  • Steps:
    1. Recognise the shift and don't push for content.
    2. Reduce interpretation. Keep the frame especially reliable: time, room, your voice.
    3. Tolerate long silences and remain attentive.
    4. Later, when the patient re-emerges, talk together about what the period was like.
  • Example language (illustrative): "You don't need to fill the time. I'm here."
  • Watch for:
    • Malignant regression (Balint's term): escalating demands, acting out, or deterioration outside sessions. If that appears, return to a structured stance and consider 4.21.
    • It is working when the patient emerges with more spontaneity and less false-self compliance.

4.14 Working with dreams as experience

  • Purpose: Use the dream both as associative material and as an experience of being placed in a drama authored by another part of the self, which is the theme of "the other's play". [source: Shadow, ch.4 "At the other's play: to dream" — content uncertain]
  • Steps:
    1. Ask for the dream as remembered. Don't correct inconsistencies.
    2. Ask what it was like to be in the dream: atmosphere, the self's position, who was directing.
    3. Invite associations to separate elements and follow the sequence (4.3), including what was said just before and after the dream was reported.
    4. Note the dream's aesthetic (style, setting) as an expression of idiom.
  • Example language (illustrative): "What was it like to be the person in that dream?" "What comes to mind about the stairwell?"
  • Watch for: Decoding symbols by formula. It is working when dreams become more complex, and the patient is curious about them rather than anxious.

4.15 Evoking historical sets

  • Purpose: Recover the distinct self-states conserved in particular periods of life (a house, a school year, a summer), which may hold unthought known. [source: Forces of Destiny, ch.11 "Historical sets and the conservative process" — content uncertain]
  • When to use: When the patient mentions a period with special feeling, or when memory is generalised and flat.
  • Steps:
    1. Invite concrete detail about the era: rooms, smells, routes, music, who was around.
    2. Ask what they were like then, and what it felt like to be them.
    3. Let associations from the era run without hurrying to interpret.
    4. Link it to present moods or choices only when the patient is close to the link.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Take me into the flat you lived in when you were nine. What do you see when you come in?"
  • Watch for: Nostalgic narrative without affect. It is working when a forgotten self-state returns, the patient is surprised by who they were, and it echoes in current life.

4.16 Attending to evocative objects

  • Purpose: Read the patient's chosen objects (music, places, books, hobbies, people) as vehicles through which their idiom is articulated. Each object has its own "integrity" and evokes particular self-states. [source: Being a Character (1992); The Evocative Object World (2009); BPAS page]
  • Steps:
    1. Take reported objects seriously as self-expression, not small talk.
    2. Ask what using the object does for them: what state it brings, and what it lets them be.
    3. Notice objects that are dropped, avoided or forbidden. These are foreclosed idiom.
    4. Over time, link choices to the move from fate to destiny.
  • Example language (illustrative): "When you put that record on, who do you become?"
  • Watch for: Interpreting every object as defence. It is working when the patient can choose objects more freely, in the service of their own idiom.

4.17 Character-informed listening (Bollas's clinical portraits)

  • Purpose: Bollas describes characteristic structures, each with implications for stance. Recognise them so you know how you will be used. In all of them, the general Bollas stance holds: let yourself be used, notice it, process it, then speak. [source: chapter titles verified in Shadow and Forces; the clinical implications are my summary (uncertain) or [synthesis]]
  • Normotic illness (Shadow, ch.8): an abnormally "normal" person who is drained of subjectivity and oriented to facts and objects.
    • Stance: patient interest in tiny moments of inner life; don't mistake flatness for health. [uncertain]
  • Extractive introjection (Shadow, ch.9): one person takes over ("steals") a mental capacity from another.
    • Stance: notice when you feel emptied of a capacity (e.g. to feel or judge), and when the patient describes having been so robbed. [uncertain]
  • Loving hate (Shadow, ch.7): hate used to keep a relationship intensely alive.
    • Stance: don't retaliate or rush to resolve it. Recognise the attachment within the hate. [uncertain]
  • The liar (Shadow, ch.10): lies as communications of a self needing a fiction.
    • Stance: explore the function of the lie rather than prosecuting it. [uncertain]
  • The hysteric (Shadow, ch.11; see also Hysteria, 2000): the analyst may be pulled into a highly charged, eroticised or dramatic scene.
    • Stance: name the drama without enacting it. [uncertain]
  • The trisexual (Shadow, ch.5): a seductive person who presents as an object for both sexes while avoiding sexual experience of their own.
    • Stance: notice your enchantment. [uncertain]
  • The ghostline personality (Forces, ch.6): a person living in a vividly imagined inner world that substitutes for actual objects. [uncertain]
  • The anti-narcissist (Forces, ch.8): someone who refuses to develop or use their own gifts. [uncertain]
  • 'Tripping' (Forces, ch.7); incest trauma and 'Don't worry your father' (Forces, chs.9–10): family structures that organise a patient's fate. [uncertain]
  • Watch for: Using the labels diagnostically or as accusations. They are lenses for your countertransference, not categories to tell the patient.

4.18 Celebrating the analysand (recognising emergent idiom)

  • Purpose: Respond with genuine pleasure and recognition when true-self idiom emerges (an original thought, a playful moment, a creative act), so it meets a welcoming object rather than the indifference or appropriation it met before. [source: Forces of Destiny, ch.4 "The psychoanalyst's celebration of the analysand" — content uncertain]
  • Steps:
    1. Notice moments of spontaneity and originality.
    2. Let your interest or enjoyment show briefly and authentically.
    3. Don't praise performance or achievement. Recognise the person in the gesture.
    4. Return quickly to their associations.
  • Example language (illustrative): "That's a very particular way of seeing it, and it sounds like yours."
  • Watch for: Flattery, or reinforcing compliance with your tastes. It is working when such moments recur and the patient takes more risks.

4.19 The analyst's multiple function

  • Purpose: Recognise that you serve several functions at once and shift between them as the material requires: holding (maternal order), interpreting and naming (paternal order), and serving as an object to be used, a witness and a transformational object. [source: Forces of Destiny, ch.5 title; The Freudian Moment (maternal and paternal orders) — content uncertain]
  • Steps:
    1. Each session, ask which function is being called for: being, holding, or naming.
    2. Avoid fixing yourself in one function (e.g. always interpreting).
    3. Mark transitions gently.
  • Example language (illustrative): "I think today is more for being here than for working things out."
  • Watch for: Rationalising your own preference as the patient's need. It is working when shifts in your function track shifts in the patient's state.

4.20 "Off the wall"

  • Purpose and steps: The content of Forces of Destiny, ch.3 "Off the Wall" [uncertain]. I recall it concerns spontaneous, unexpected communications in the session, but I give no steps rather than invent technique.

4.21 Recognising and naming incipient breakdown

  • Purpose: Catch a non-psychotic patient on the verge of breakdown early. Bollas sees breakdown as presenting the self to the other for understanding. [source: christopherbollas.com page and Routledge page on Catch Them Before They Fall; NWAPS; chapter "Signs of Breakdown"]
  • Signs: The book's specific list is not drawn on [uncertain]. Signs commonly described in this kind of work [synthesis]:
    • a sense of falling apart or "going mad";
    • collapse of ordinary functioning (sleep, work, eating);
    • uncontrollable weeping or disorganisation in session;
    • the patient explicitly saying they cannot go on;
    • a sudden change in the quality of the transference.
  • Steps:
    1. Take the signs seriously and don't seal them over with reassurance.
    2. Name what you see directly and calmly.
    3. Conduct a standard suicide and risk assessment, and document it.
    4. Decide with the patient on an intensified frame (4.22) and on medical liaison.
  • Example language (illustrative): "I think you are breaking down, and I think it matters that we meet this now rather than wait. I'd like us to have much more time together over the next days."
  • Watch for: Your own wish not to see it. Bollas warns that ignored breakdowns get "sealed over". [source: New Books Network page] It is working when the patient feels met rather than alarmed.

4.22 Extended sessions

  • Purpose: Give the breakdown enough time and presence to be understood rather than suppressed. [source: New Books Network page; NWAPS; Catch Them, chs.4 "Guidelines" and 7 "Time"]
  • Steps: The format is sourced. The logistics are [synthesis].
    1. Offer intensified contact for a limited period. Bollas describes sessions twice daily, seven days a week, or a working day running from morning to early evening.
    2. Line up analytically sympathetic psychiatric and social-work backup before or at the start, as Bollas did.
    3. Agree the arrangements, fees, contact between sessions, and who else is informed.
    4. Inside the sessions, keep the ordinary analytic stance (free association, listening, minimal intrusion), but stay present and available.
    5. Taper back to the usual frequency as the acute state settles.
  • Example language (illustrative): "For the next few days we'll meet morning and afternoon. Dr X knows and is available if we need her."
  • Watch for:
    • your own exhaustion;
    • boundary drift;
    • the patient's escalating dependency;
    • risk that exceeds outpatient containment.
    Bollas argues that hospitalisation and heavy medication can foreclose the opportunity. [source: Routledge] Current standard of care still requires hospital or crisis services when risk is acute. Treat extended sessions as an addition to safety planning, never a substitute. [synthesis] It is working when the breakdown becomes a communicable experience and disorganisation lessens across days.

4.23 Histories and après-coup in breakdown work

  • Purpose: Build, with the patient, the history that made sense of the breakdown, including how later events gave earlier ones their meaning (après-coup). [source: Catch Them, ch.6 title; content uncertain]
  • Steps:
    1. In extended time, invite a detailed life history told in the patient's own order.
    2. Follow the sequence (4.3) for the pivotal events that the present crisis revives.
    3. Offer links tentatively, showing how a recent event may have retroactively charged an old one.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Let's go back to the beginning. Tell me your life as it comes to you, with as much detail as you like."
  • Watch for: A rote narrative. It is working when the breakdown starts to make emotional sense to the patient.

4.24 Reflection, explanation and working through after breakdown

  • Purpose: Consolidate a breakthrough by reflecting on what happened and explaining it to the patient more explicitly than usual, then working it through. [source: Catch Them, chs.8–10 titles; the claim that explanation is more explicit than usual is uncertain]
  • Steps:
    1. Once the acute phase settles, review the episode together: what built up, what broke, what was understood.
    2. Offer a coherent explanatory account in plain language, and invite correction.
    3. Return to the ordinary frame, and work through repetitions of the vulnerable self-state as they recur.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Looking back, I think what broke down was the way you'd kept yourself going by never needing anyone. When that stopped working, everything stopped working."
  • Watch for: Explanation that intellectualises, or a patient who can't bear to look back yet. It is working when the patient can talk about the breakdown as theirs, without shame.

5. Handling problems

Bollas does not give a troubleshooting section. Items say where they rest on his concepts; the concrete responses are mostly [synthesis].

  • Patient can't or won't free-associate (reports, agendas, silence).
    • Treat the form as communication (4.7). Ask about the gaps rather than pushing for content.
    • Normotic patients may need long periods of interest in small inner moments. [source concept: Shadow, ch.8] [synthesis]
    • Offer concrete starting points (a dream, the journey here, something they noticed) without setting an agenda. [synthesis]
  • The analysis feels stuck or repetitive.
    • Check whether you are interpreting too much or too narrowly in the transference (principle 6). Go back to tracking sequence (4.3) and ask questions (4.5).
    • Look at your countertransference (4.11): boredom or sleepiness may be the unthought known.
    • Consider whether a mood is conserving a self-state (4.8). [synthesis using Bollas concepts]
  • Resistance (dropped topics, sudden changes, "nothing comes").
    • Read the rupture point in the sequence as the nodal point. Name the switch gently ("you moved away from your brother quite suddenly") rather than confronting.
    • [source concept: logic of sequence; the response is synthesis]
  • Overwhelm or regression.
    • Tell ordinary regression to dependence (4.13) apart from breakdown (4.21) and from malignant regression.
    • For ordinary regression: stay steady and hold the frame.
    • For breakdown: extended sessions plus medical liaison.
    • For malignant escalation: more structure, fewer gratifications, and consultation. [synthesis]
    • Any suicidal ideation requires standard structured risk assessment and safety planning, and referral to crisis services or hospital when indicated, whatever your theoretical stance. [synthesis; professional standard]
  • Non-adherence (missed sessions, lateness, unpaid fees).
    • Explore it as use of the object and as communication (4.7), while keeping the frame firm and consistent: same charges, same times.
    • Don't interpret absences punitively. [synthesis]
  • Ruptures, especially after a countertransference disclosure.
    • If the patient feels burdened, blamed or seduced, acknowledge the effect plainly, take responsibility for your part, and don't defend the content.
    • Explore what the disclosure stirred up, and reduce disclosures afterwards. [synthesis, consistent with Shadow, ch.12 stance (uncertain)]
  • Idealisation of the analyst as transformational object.
    • Expect it (4.9). Don't encourage it or deflate it abruptly. Interpret the hope for magical transformation as a memory of early care. When the disappointment comes, treat it as analytic work, not failure. [source concept: Shadow, ch.1; the response is synthesis]
  • Modality-specific risks.
    • Self-disclosure creep. Keep a private rule: process first, disclose rarely, record each disclosure.
    • Your free associations crowding out the patient's. If you speak more than in brief turns, stop.
    • Extended sessions without backup. Don't offer them unless you have medical liaison, supervision and the capacity to sustain them.
    • Confusing the celebration of idiom with gratification or flattery (4.18).
    • Using the character portraits as diagnoses (4.17).
    • All of the above are [synthesis].
  • Lower-frequency or online work (not addressed by Bollas as far as verified).
    • Sequence tracking and questioning work at once a week, but expect fewer associative chains per session. Track sequences across sessions and use process notes.
    • Regression work and extended sessions need more caution at low frequency.
    • Online: watch for lost ambience, and attend more to voice, the room behind the patient, and interruptions.
    • [synthesis] [uncertain]
  • Patients who can't use an associative method (acute psychosis without backup, severe cognitive impairment, high-risk active self-harm needing structured containment).
    • Use stabilising, structured or team-based care first, and introduce associative work as capacity allows.
    • [synthesis; Bollas's own breakdown work involved psychotic and manic-depressive patients, but only with a team — source: New Books Network page]

Sources

Sources

Books and papers cited (full texts not drawn on)

  • Bollas, C. (1983). Expressive uses of the countertransference: notes to the patient from oneself. Contemporary Psychoanalysis 19:1–33.
  • Bollas, C. (1987). The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known.
  • Bollas, C. (1989). Forces of Destiny: Psychoanalysis and Human Idiom.
  • Bollas, C. (1992). Being a Character: Psychoanalysis and Self Experience.
  • Bollas, C. (2000). Hysteria.
  • Bollas, C. (2002). Free Association.
  • Bollas, C. (2007). The Freudian Moment.
  • Bollas, C. (2009). The Infinite Question.
  • Bollas, C. (2009). The Evocative Object World.
  • Bollas, C. (2013). Catch Them Before They Fall: The Psychoanalysis of Breakdown.
  • Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practising psycho-analysis.
  • Heimann, P. (1950). On counter-transference.
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1969). The use of an object.
  • Kohon, G. (ed.) (1986). The British School of Psychoanalysis: The Independent Tradition.
  • Rayner, E. (1991). The Independent Mind in British Psychoanalysis.
  • Nettleton, S. (2017). The Metapsychology of Christopher Bollas: An Introduction.
← Previous · I-020British object relationsNext · I-022 →Bionian analysis and post-Bionian field theory