Embodied relational therapy

1. Introduction

Version followed: Embodied-Relational Therapy (ERT) as Nick Totton describes it in his own writing (Totton 1998, "In search of the body", Self & Society 26(2); the framework of Embodied Relating, 2015, read through its contents list and a review only), plus the ERT training as described by co-trainer Allison Priestman (2013). Neither Reichian Growth Work (Totton & Edmondson, 2nd ed. 2009) nor Body Psychotherapy: An Introduction (2003) is drawn on here, so technique details from them are [uncertain]. [source: Totton 1998; Priestman 2013; Garrard 2018]

What it is. ERT is Nick Totton's integrative, neo-Reichian body psychotherapy. Totton trained in William West's Reichian "Energy Stream" work from 1981 and later trained others in it until 1992. With Em Edmondson he ran Selfheal (1988–1997), which added transference, countertransference and boundary work, and a reworked character theory, to the Reichian core. He began the postgraduate ERT training in 2001, and a "Wild Therapy" year was added later. ERT also draws on psychodynamic therapy, Hakomi, process-oriented psychology (Arnold and Amy Mindell, the source of its "meta-skills" idea), movement practices and Earth-based spirituality. [source: Priestman 2013] Totton's 1998 article already says the approach was developed with Edmondson, so the name is older than the 2001 training. [uncertain: exact date of the name] Other trainers, including Priestman and Stephen Tame, now run the training without Totton's hands-on involvement. [source: Tudor 2013; Confer and PESI speaker pages]

It is a training tradition and stance, not a manualised protocol. No published session plan, phase model or fixed technique list was found. Its authors describe it as an "integration of embodiment, relationship and process". Training is experiential: small residential groups, two trainers, no required reading or writing, and the curriculum shaped by what arises. [source: Priestman 2013] This guide therefore gives the clinical procedures Totton describes and marks everything structured beyond them as [synthesis].

How change happens. Totton defines the work by one question: "how can I breathe and relate to someone at the same time?" Change means re-establishing a fuller, more spontaneous breath, not by trying but by gradually letting go of protecting oneself from feeling. [source: Totton 1998] Embodiment and relationship cannot be separated. Disconnection from the body "protects and deepens our wounds", so restoring embodied contact in the therapy relationship is the healing resource. [source: Garrard 2018, quoting Totton 2015 p. xvi] Therapy helps a person tolerate the unconscious as a "co-inhabitor" of body and mind. [source: Garrard 2018, quoting Totton 2015 p. 199]

2. Framework

No published phases or session counts. The sources give no stages, no typical number of sessions and no criteria for moving between phases. Totton holds that therapy works best without goals ("Therapy has no goal", 2007, cited in Priestman 2013), so a staged protocol would cut against the model. [uncertain: phases may be described in Reichian Growth Work ch. 8 "Therapy" or Embodied Relating chs. 6 and 16]

Format.

Individual, open-ended psychotherapy, mostly verbal and relational, with bodywork as one option among several. Hands-on work is now used "with a minority of clients", and only when it is the best tool. [source: Totton 1998]
Session shape Totton describes: the session often begins with talk, and the client may lie down. Reluctance to lie down can itself become the focus. [source: Totton 1998]
Group and training format: a residential, modular, part-time postgraduate course over three years, plus the Wild Therapy year. It uses small groups, two trainers, check-ins and open group process. [source: Priestman 2013]

A working sequence for a session or course of therapy. This is [synthesis]: it is built from Totton's stated principles, not a published protocol. Each item is a focus to return to, not a stage to complete.

Contact and frame. Agree frame, fees and boundaries. Explain that attention to the body, breath and the relationship is part of the work, and that touch is optional and needs explicit consent. Move on once the client understands the frame and can say no.
Meeting the client's dominant mode. Work first in the mode the client already lives in, somatic or psychic (verbal and imaginal), then use body awareness as a bridge between them. [source: Totton 1998 for the bridging idea] Move on when the client can notice bodily experience without being flooded or dismissive.
Working from the outside in. Track character style, resistance and the transference as they show in posture, breath, eyes and the relationship. Interpret defences as strategies, not obstacles. [source: Totton 1998]
Deepening. As safety and contact grow, attend to breath and spontaneous impulses, with optional bodywork aimed at where the relationship charge sits. Process the transference and countertransference that the bodywork brings up. [source: Totton 1998]
Ending. There are no outcome targets. Ending is agreed relationally when the client feels able to breathe and stay in contact with more of themselves and others. Review what has changed in breath, contact and relating. [synthesis]

3. Guiding principles

[source: meta-skills and training stance from Priestman 2013; clinical stance from Totton 1998; others as tagged]

Contact. Be present as yourself, not behind a role. In practice: speak and respond as a person, and invite the client to do the same.
Awareness. Keep moment-to-moment awareness of your own experience. In practice: track your breath, tension and feelings throughout the session.
Trust. Trust the client's and the process's own wisdom. In practice: plan little, and follow what emerges.
Spontaneity. Allow spontaneous process in both people, the Reichian root value. In practice: welcome impulses, slips and surprises rather than steering round them.
Spaciousness. Leave room for the unexpected. In practice: do not fill silences or rush to technique.
Relaxation. Be "muscle soft but ready" (Priestman's phrase for Totton as trainer), and invite the client to relax rather than strive. In practice: notice when you or the client are trying hard, and soften. [source: Priestman 2013, citing Totton & Edmondson 2009 on client relaxation]
Wild mind. Embodied awareness that values dismissed experience: slips of the tongue, body symptoms, conflict, world events. It links dreaming, intuition and rational thought. In practice: treat the "irrelevant" as possibly central.
Therapy has no goal. Do not impose outcome targets. Attend to spontaneous process without trying to change it, as an "enlightenment practice" rather than illness treatment. In practice: when you notice you are pushing for change, return to curiosity. [source: Priestman 2013, citing Totton 1997 and 2007]
Breath and relationship together. The core task is staying in contact while breathing freely. In practice: notice when the client holds their breath to keep contact, or cuts contact (closing the eyes, looking away) to keep breathing. [source: Totton 1998]
Let go, don't push. Fuller breath comes from gradually releasing self-protection, not from effort. In practice: do not drive breathing. Invite awareness and allow. [source: Totton 1998]
Work from the outside inwards. Following Reich, address defence and resistance before buried impulses. In practice: comment on how the client is protecting themselves before inviting what is underneath. [source: Totton 1998]
Defences are successful strategies. Totton sees two sides in Reich, one dissolving defences and one accepting them, and he keeps both. In practice: treat each character pattern as the best solution the person found. [source: Totton 1998]
"We all do the best we possibly can." ERT's stated fundamental assumption. In practice: take a non-blaming stance toward client and self. [source: Ben-Shahar 2013, citing Totton 2005 p. 168]
Character as a map, not a diagnosis. Reichian character theory is a non-judgemental way to understand different modes of experience. In practice: use character language to empathise, never to label. [source: Totton 1998]
Transference is central, including in bodywork. Bodywork puts "two bodies in the room" and makes transference more immediate. In practice: every touch or exercise is also a relational event to explore. [source: Totton 1998; Ben-Shahar 2013]
Embodiment is information about the client system. The therapist's bodily responses, the embodied countertransference, are data. In practice: ask what your body is picking up and what it might say about the relationship. [source: Priestman 2013, citing Totton & Priestman 2012]
Bodies co-regulate below awareness. Gut feelings are produced by both bodies in the room. Every counsellor is to some degree a body psychotherapist. In practice: do not assume a feeling is only yours or only the client's. [source: Brighton Therapy Partnership 2018 workshop report]
Against the medical model. The "white coat" expert stance damps down relational feeling. In practice: avoid hiding in the expert role. [source: Totton 1998]
Touch only when it is the best tool. Consent alone does not guarantee benefit, because bodywork can repeat abuse or restimulate trauma. In practice: choose touch rarely, deliberately and with reflection. [source: Totton 1998]
Ethics and technique are one. Ethics is central, not "bolted on". Therapy is inherently risky and cannot be made wholly safe. In practice: weigh each intervention ethically as you choose it, and do not rely on rules to make it safe. [source: Priestman 2013]
Un-defensive practice. Authenticity means owning mistakes openly. In practice: when challenged, acknowledge, explore and learn rather than justify. [source: Priestman 2013, citing Totton 2010]
Educated instinct over rulebooks. Trust trained intuition grounded in personal therapy. Self-knowledge and contact matter more than intellect. In practice: keep your own therapy and supervision active. [source: Priestman 2013]
No line between "normal" and "weird" experience. Totton argues a boundary between ordinary experience and the mystical or paranormal "can never be drawn". In practice: receive unusual experiences without pathologising or endorsing them. [source: Garrard 2018, quoting Totton 2015 p. 200]
A kinder relationship to the body. Model a gentler stance toward the body than the surrounding culture does. [source: Brighton Therapy Partnership 2018]

4. Intervention inventory

Scope note. ERT has no published technique list. Below is every clinical procedure in the sources, mostly Totton 1998, Totton's 2018 workshop as reported, and Priestman 2013. Totton draws on Hakomi and process-oriented psychology, but the sources do not show which of their specific techniques ERT uses, so none are listed as ERT techniques. Reichian segment work, character-position work and "surrender" are chapter topics in Reichian Growth Work (2009), which is not drawn on here. [uncertain] Step-by-step detail beyond what the sources give is [synthesis]. Any touch requires specific training in body psychotherapy, supervision (Totton recommends transference-oriented supervision for bodyworkers), and a check of what your licence, professional body, insurer and jurisdiction allow. [source: Totton 1998 for supervision; rest synthesis]

4.1 Opening talk and choice of position (including lying down)

Purpose / when: The start of sessions where body-oriented work is possible. Totton describes sessions that often begin with talk, with the client then perhaps lying down. Reluctance to lie down can become the focus of the work. [source: Totton 1998]
Steps: (1) Begin with ordinary conversation. Let the client bring what is present. (2) Name the options without pressure: staying seated, standing, or lying on a mat or couch. Make clear that any option, including none, is fine. [synthesis on wording] (3) If the client hesitates, do not persuade. Get curious about the hesitation: what they feel in their body as they imagine lying down, what lying down near you would mean, what it reminds them of. (4) If they lie down, sit where they can see you, ask whether your position and distance feel right, and adjust. [synthesis] (5) Close by talking through what choosing or refusing the position brought up.
Example language (illustrative): "We could carry on talking like this, or you could lie down if that interests you. Either is fine. I notice you tensed a bit when I said 'lie down'. What happened there?"
Watch for: Compliance (lying down to please you), which Totton links to a "boundary" style that goes along with bodywork while "floating up to the ceiling" [source: Totton 1998]. Watch for shame or trauma cues around lying down. It is working when the client can choose freely and say what the position evokes.

4.2 Breath awareness: letting the breath come back

Purpose / when: The central ERT task, restoring fuller and more spontaneous breathing while staying in relationship. Totton follows Reich's mature view that breathing works like free association: neither can be fully done on demand. Fuller breath comes "not by trying" but by gradually letting go of self-protection against feeling. [source: Totton 1998]
Steps: (1) Seated or lying, invite the client to notice their breath without changing it. Where does it move: belly, chest, throat? Where does it seem held? (2) Keep it relational. Ask them to stay aware of you in the room while they notice their breath. (3) Reflect what you see neutrally, for example breath stopping when a topic arises. (4) Invite them to allow, not make, a little more breath, and to notice what feeling, image or impulse comes with it. (5) When a feeling comes, let it be expressed at the client's pace, then slow down and talk it through. (6) Close by returning attention to the room, the support under them and eye contact, and asking what they noticed. [steps 1–6 synthesis consistent with Totton 1998]
Example language (illustrative): "Just notice your breathing. No need to change it." "I saw your breath stop when you mentioned your father. Can you let it carry on and see what comes with it?"
Watch for: ERT's stance is the opposite of breath intensification. Totton stresses letting go, not driving the breath. Do not use forced, rapid or prolonged deep breathing. If you have training in a Reichian or neo-Reichian method that does intensify breath, screen first: pregnancy; cardiovascular, respiratory (e.g. asthma) or panic disorders; epilepsy; recent injury or surgery; psychosis; severe dissociation; active suicidality; recent trauma without stabilisation. Stop if the client feels dizzy or tingling, or shows signs of overbreathing. [synthesis: screening list not in the sources] It is working when breath deepens of its own accord while the client stays in contact with you.

4.3 Tracking the breath–contact trade-off (eyes and turning away)

Purpose / when: Totton observes that restricting breath is a way to suppress feeling, while turning away or closing the eyes is a way to keep breathing but cut contact. Use this when either pattern shows. [source: Totton 1998]
Steps: (1) Notice which the client gives up under pressure: breath or contact. (2) Name it gently as a strategy, not a fault. (3) Experiment with small doses: a few breaths with eyes open and looking at you, then free to look away, or looking away and noticing what happens to the breath. [synthesis] (4) Explore what contact while breathing feels like and when it became unsafe. (5) Close by discussing what the client learned about their way of balancing the two.
Example language (illustrative): "When you let yourself feel this, your eyes went to the window. Maybe that's how you keep breathing. What happens if you look here for a moment, then look away whenever you need to?"
Watch for: Rising panic or dissociation with sustained eye contact. Always let the client control gaze. It is working when they can stay in contact a little longer while breathing and feeling.

4.4 Reading character and working from the outside in

Purpose / when: Totton uses Reichian character theory as a non-judgemental map of different modes of experience. He follows Reich in working "from the outside inwards", interpreting resistance before impulses. Use it throughout, to choose how to meet each client. [source: Totton 1998]
Named styles in the source: "schizoid/ocular/boundary": may go along with bodywork while floating off and leaving the body. "Masochistic/anal/holding": may absorb pressure into the defence while looking for release. The full ERT character-position system (Totton & Edmondson 2009, chs. 6–7; Totton & Jacobs 2001) is not drawn on here. [uncertain]
Steps: (1) Observe how the client protects themselves in posture, breath, gaze, voice and relational style. (2) Reflect the protective pattern first, with appreciation of what it achieves (see 4.5). (3) Adapt the work to the style. For boundary-style clients, slow down, prioritise safety and presence, and check often whether they are still "here". For holding-style clients, avoid pressure and effort-based exercises, which can feed the holding, and invite letting go and choice. [synthesis drawn from Totton 1998's two descriptions] (4) Only when the defence is understood and the client wants to, invite what it holds back.
Example language (illustrative): "You've gone very quiet and still, as if part of you has stepped back. That makes sense if it's how you've stayed safe. Can we notice it together before doing anything else?"
Watch for: Using character labels as diagnosis or judgement, which Totton rejects. It is working when the client recognises their pattern with curiosity rather than shame.

4.5 Interpreting defence as a successful strategy

Purpose / when: From Totton's reading of Reich's "two sides", one that dissolves defences and one that accepts them as successful strategies. Use it whenever resistance appears. [source: Totton 1998]
Steps: (1) Name the defence as you see it. (2) Wonder aloud what it has protected the client from. (3) Invite the client to do it more deliberately and notice the effect. [uncertain/synthesis: this exaggeration step resembles Hakomi and process-work practice and is not stated in the ERT sources] (4) Explore the choice it gives them now.
Example language (illustrative): "Your shoulders came up as you said that. I wonder what they've been protecting all these years."
Watch for: Interpretation landing as criticism. It is working when the defence softens because it is understood, not because it is attacked.

4.6 Relationally charged hands-on work (touch)

Purpose / when: Totton now uses touch with a minority of clients, "when, and only when, it is the best tool". When he does, he works with the body area that carries the strongest relational charge, such as a part that wants to hold on to the therapist, push them away or turn from them. [source: Totton 1998]
Consent steps: The source requires that touch be chosen only when best, and warns that consent does not guarantee benefit. The steps below are [synthesis]: (1) Explain in plain words what touch you are proposing, where, and why. (2) Ask, and make clear that "no" is fully acceptable and changes nothing. (3) Offer a no-touch alternative, such as the client placing their own hand there, using a cushion, or exploring the impulse in movement or words. (4) Agree a stop signal, verbal and non-verbal, that ends touch at once. (5) Check in during the touch ("still OK?") and after it. (6) Revisit consent each time; never assume it carries over. (7) Record consent in notes.
Steps: (1) Help the client find where in the body the relational impulse lives, e.g. arms wanting to push, hands wanting to hold, the back wanting to turn. (2) Propose the touch that meets that impulse relationally. Examples consistent with the source: the client pushes against your palms or a cushion you hold; the client's hand holds yours; the client turns away while you stay present without touching. [synthesis] (3) Let the client lead intensity and duration. (4) Stop and talk about what the contact meant: who it evoked, what it felt like to push, hold or turn from you. (5) Close by restoring a comfortable distance and discussing it fully.
Example language (illustrative): "It sounds like your arms want to push me away. Would you like to try pushing against my hands, as hard or as softly as you like? You can stop any time by saying 'stop' or just dropping your hands. Or you could push against this cushion instead."
Watch for: Re-enactment of abuse and restimulation of trauma, which Totton names explicitly. Watch for compliance, freezing, dissociation and erotic or care-seeking transference (see 4.7). No sexual or genital touch, ever. It is working when the client can feel and express the relational impulse and then talk about it with you.

4.7 Exploring touch transferences openly

Purpose / when: After any bodywork, or when the client has fantasies about touch. Totton and Priestman name three transference patterns that touch evokes: sexual, adult–child, and "making better" (the doctor or expert). Without awareness, "a mutual trance develops". Studied openly, these fantasies are useful for exploring core beliefs and relational patterns. [source: Ben-Shahar 2013, citing Totton & Priestman 2012 p. 49]
Steps: (1) After touch, ask what it was like to be touched by you, and who or what it brought to mind. (2) Name the possible patterns lightly: being looked after, being fixed, attraction, being small. (3) Notice your own pull into a matching role: parent, healer, desired one. (4) Talk these through openly and keep boundaries clear and explicit.
Example language (illustrative): "Sometimes touch here can feel like being a child with a parent, or being fixed by a doctor, or something else. What was it like for you?"
Watch for: Erotic transference or countertransference. Discuss it, never act on it, and take it to supervision. It is working when the client can describe the relational meaning of touch instead of being carried along by it.

4.8 Embodied countertransference and visceral attunement

Purpose / when: In ERT the therapist uses their own bodily responses as information about the client system. Gut feelings are produced by both bodies in the room. Use this throughout, and especially when the session feels stuck or confusing. [source: Priestman 2013, citing Totton & Priestman 2012; Brighton Therapy Partnership 2018]
Steps: (1) Check in with yourself regularly: breath, tension, temperature, gut, impulses, sleepiness. (2) Note changes and when they happened. (3) Hold them as joint products, not as facts about the client. Ask what in the relationship might be producing them. (4) Decide whether to keep them as private data, use them to shape your next move, or disclose them tentatively. (5) If you disclose, offer it as your experience and invite the client's response. [steps synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "I notice my own breathing got very shallow as you were talking. I don't know if it has anything to do with you, but I wonder what you're noticing in yourself."
Watch for: Burdening the client with your process, or claiming certainty about their inner state. Notice your own "engrams" (see 4.10): Totton notes therapists may slip unconsciously into an authority role or a more fallible role. Awareness makes this a choice. [source: Brighton Therapy Partnership 2018] It is working when your disclosures open exploration rather than closing it.

4.9 Two-stage embodied-awareness exercise (self, then other)

Purpose / when: Training therapists, and adaptable as a client exercise for building embodied relational awareness. In Totton's 2018 workshop, participants closed their eyes and noticed their own breathing, comfort and feelings. They then turned their attention to a nearby person and sensed that person's warmth, size, breath and emotions. [source: Brighton Therapy Partnership 2018]
Steps: (1) Seated, eyes closed or gaze lowered. (2) A few minutes noticing your own breath, comfort and feelings. (3) Without moving or touching, turn your attention to the other person: their warmth, size, breath, emotional tone. (4) Return to yourself. (5) Open your eyes and share what each noticed. Check accuracy and mark what was projection. Durations are not given in the source; a few minutes per stage is [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "Let your attention rest on your own breathing for a while... Now, without looking, let yourself sense the person across from you: their warmth, their breathing, whatever you pick up... Come back to yourself... When you're ready, open your eyes and we'll compare notes."
Watch for: Closing the eyes may be unsafe for trauma survivors. Offer a lowered gaze instead. It is working when people discover they pick up more of each other than they expected and can tell sensing apart from projecting.

4.10 Working with engrams: implicit relational patterns in the body

Purpose / when: Totton describes engrams as implicit relational patterns held in the body, such as physically cringing when remembering being yelled at. He links transference to implicit procedural memory of early relationships. Use this when a bodily reaction comes with a memory or a relational moment. [source: Brighton Therapy Partnership 2018; Ben-Shahar 2013 citing Totton & Priestman 2012 p. 39]
Steps: (1) Notice the physical reaction as it happens. (2) Invite the client to notice it too, and to stay with it briefly rather than move past it. (3) Explore what the reaction "knows": what it expects from others, from you. (4) Notice whether it is happening with you now. (5) Close by making room for a different experience in the relationship, e.g. being heard rather than yelled at. [steps 3–5 synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "As you told me that, your whole body pulled in. Can you notice that for a moment? What does that pulling-in expect is about to happen?"
Watch for: Flooding with traumatic memory. Titrate, and use 5.3. It is working when the client can feel the pattern and see it as old learning rather than present truth.

4.11 Listening to somatic symptoms

Purpose / when: Totton presents listening to somatic symptoms, both voluntary and autonomic, as a healing practice in itself that can make clients feel heard. Use it when the client mentions a symptom, tension or pain. [source: Brighton Therapy Partnership 2018] This is not treatment of physical disease. Refer bodily symptoms for medical assessment. [synthesis]
Steps: (1) Invite curiosity about the symptom rather than getting rid of it. (2) Ask the client to describe it in detail. (3) Ask, without forcing meaning: "If this could speak, what might it say?" [illustrative; the specific prompt is synthesis] (4) Take the answer seriously as communication, and notice its relational content.
Example language (illustrative): "Rather than trying to get rid of the tightness in your stomach, could we listen to it for a moment? What's it like?"
Watch for: Implying symptoms are "all psychological". It is working when the client feels the symptom has been heard and new meaning or feeling emerges.

4.12 Attending to embodied language

Purpose / when: Bodily idioms ("on the tip of my tongue") show a closer link between body and meaning than people realise. Totton contrasts "full" with "empty" speech (a chapter title in Embodied Relating [uncertain]). Use this when the client uses body metaphors. [source: Brighton Therapy Partnership 2018; Routledge contents page]
Steps: (1) Notice the bodily phrase. (2) Repeat it back. (3) Invite the client to notice whether the body does what the phrase says. (4) Explore it.
Example language (illustrative): "You said it 'makes your skin crawl'. Is there anything happening on your skin right now?"
Watch for: Overdoing it until it feels like a trick. It is working when words and felt experience come together.

4.13 Exploring having, being and becoming a body

Purpose / when: Totton distinguishes three ways of relating to the body: having it (owning it), being it (it is me and I express myself through it), and becoming (a changing state that may feel different moment to moment). "Being, having, and becoming bodies" is a chapter of Embodied Relating. Use this to explore a client's relationship to their body, e.g. in body-image distress or chronic illness. [source: Brighton Therapy Partnership 2018; Routledge contents page]
Steps: (1) Introduce the three modes in plain words. (2) Ask which one feels most familiar, and which least. (3) Explore moments when each one is present. (4) Notice which mode the client takes up toward you. [steps synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "Some people mainly feel they have a body, like something they own or manage. Others feel they are their body. And sometimes it's more like the body is becoming something, changing moment to moment. Which of those is closest for you today?"
Watch for: Abstraction away from felt experience. Avoid weight or exercise targets in body-image work. It is working when the client can move between the modes with curiosity.

4.14 Following spontaneous process: "wild mind"

Purpose / when: The ERT and Wild Therapy stance of minimal planning: attend to slips of the tongue, body symptoms, conflict and world events, linking dreaming, intuition and rational thought. Use it whenever something "irrelevant" breaks in. [source: Priestman 2013; Totton 2011 Wild Therapy as cited there]
Steps: (1) Arrive without a plan, or hold your plan loosely. (2) Notice interruptions: a slip, a cough, a noise outside, a sudden image, the weather, a news event. (3) Bring them into the work as possibly meaningful. (4) Follow where they lead, using the meta-skills of trust and spaciousness. [steps synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "You just said 'mother' when you meant 'manager'. Shall we stay with that slip for a moment?"
Watch for: Losing the frame, or following your own associations instead of the client's process. It is working when unexpected material deepens the session.

4.15 Humour and play

Purpose / when: Totton works with humour, while acknowledging it is risky and that he does not always get it right. "Therapy as play" is a chapter of Embodied Relating [uncertain]. Use it when there is enough relationship to hold it. [source: Priestman 2013; Routledge contents page]
Steps: (1) Use light, playful responses only where the alliance can hold them. (2) Watch the immediate bodily response. (3) If it lands badly, raise it openly (see 5.5).
Example language (illustrative): "That was a cheeky comment of mine. How did it land?"
Watch for: Humour that carries power, gender or cultural dynamics, as in Priestman's training example. It is working when play loosens rigidity without the client feeling mocked.

4.16 Check-in and open group process (groups and training)

Purpose / when: ERT training groups open with a check-in. When a member raises distress or a conflict, the trainers open it to the group instead of keeping to the plan. [source: Priestman 2013]
Steps: (1) Morning round: each person says how they are, including in their body. (2) If distress or conflict appears, pause the curriculum. (3) Open the group to explore it, including the facilitators' own part. (4) Link what is learned back to the material when relevant.
Example language (illustrative): "Before we start, let's go round: how are you arriving this morning, body included?"
Watch for: Over-exposing a member. Facilitators must protect safety; Priestman notes a safe group where concerns can be voiced is necessary. It is working when difficulties become learning.

4.17 Bridging somatic and psychic modes

Purpose / when: Totton sees bodywork as most useful as a bridge between "somatic" and "psychic" modes, meeting the client first in their dominant mode. Use it for clients who are very verbal and cut off from the body, or very bodily and short of words. [source: Totton 1998]
Steps: (1) Identify the client's home mode. (2) Work in it until rapport is solid. (3) Invite small crossings: verbal clients notice one bodily sensation; somatic clients put one sensation into words or an image. (4) Build the links gradually. [steps synthesis]
Example language (illustrative): "You've described this really clearly. As you say it, is there anywhere in your body that agrees?"
Watch for: Pushing a client out of their safe mode too fast. It is working when the client moves more easily between feeling and saying.

5. Handling problems

5.1 Client won't lie down or refuses bodywork. Totton treats reluctance to lie down as material, not as an obstacle. Explore what the position or the bodywork means to the client, and respect the refusal fully. Verbal ERT is still ERT, since hands-on work is used with only a minority of clients. [source: Totton 1998]

5.2 Compliance and "floating off" (boundary style, dissociation). Some clients go along with bodywork while "floating up to the ceiling". [source: Totton 1998] Response [synthesis]: stop the exercise. Ask what is happening and whether they are still here. Orient to the room with eyes open, feet on the floor, naming objects, and your voice. Make it explicit that not doing an exercise is welcome. Slow down, work verbally on safety and presence, and return to body awareness only in small doses.

5.3 Overwhelm and flooding. [synthesis; not detailed in the sources] Signs include escalating breath, shaking that won't settle, panic, a fixed stare and loss of contact. Respond by stopping the body focus. Sit the client up if they are lying down, open the eyes, orient to the room, put the feet on the floor, slow the breath without forcing it, and use your calm voice and contact. Talk about it afterwards and agree smaller steps. Overwhelm runs against ERT's "let go, don't push" principle, so ask yourself whether you or the client were trying too hard.

5.4 Stuck: holding style, effort, no movement. Holding-style clients may absorb pressure into the defence while seeking release. [source: Totton 1998] Response: drop pressure and effort. Return to "therapy has no goal" (Totton 2007, in Priestman 2013), relaxation and appreciation of the defence (4.5). [synthesis on application] Check whether your own wish for change is feeding the stuckness, using embodied countertransference (4.8).

5.5 Ruptures, including those caused by the therapist. Priestman's example: Totton teased a trainee about her anger. She later raised concern that the joke had been manipulative. Totton responded without defensiveness, said he often uses humour, that it is risky, and that he doesn't always get it right, and then opened the incident to the group to explore humour, gender and power. [source: Priestman 2013] Clinical response, "un-defensive practice": acknowledge your part, avoid justifying, get curious about the client's experience and the power dynamics, and treat the repair as therapeutic work.

5.6 Touch that goes wrong (re-enactment, restimulation). Totton warns that consent does not guarantee benefit, and that bodywork can repeat abuse or restimulate trauma and defence. [source: Totton 1998] Response [synthesis]: stop touch immediately at any sign of freezing, compliance or distress. Return to distance and talk. Acknowledge the impact without defensiveness. Record it, and take it to transference-oriented supervision, which Totton recommends for bodyworkers. Re-offer touch only if the client asks and it is clearly the best tool. With trauma survivors, default to no-touch alternatives until stabilisation is solid.

5.7 Erotic transference and the "mutual trance". Touch can evoke sexual, adult–child or "making better" transferences. Unexamined, they produce a mutual trance. [source: Ben-Shahar 2013, citing Totton & Priestman 2012] Response: name and explore it openly, keep explicit boundaries, never act on it, and get supervision promptly. If your own erotic countertransference persists, pause touch altogether. [synthesis on the last step]

5.8 The therapist pushing for change. This contradicts ERT's no-goal, relaxation and trust stance. [source: Priestman 2013] Response: notice tension and effort in your own body, return to curiosity, and ask the client what they want from this moment.

5.9 "Non-adherence". ERT sets no homework and no protocol, so non-adherence in the CBT sense does not arise. [synthesis] Missed sessions, lateness or not doing a suggested between-session practice can be explored as relational communication. Handle them within the agreed frame and fee policy.

5.10 Dependency. Totton wrote "In defence of dependency" (2006, cited in Priestman 2013). It is not drawn on here, so his guidance is [uncertain]. Synthesis: do not treat dependency as pathology to be stopped early. Explore it as developmental need while keeping the frame and the client's other supports in view.

5.11 Power and authority in the room. Therapists may slip unconsciously into an authority role or a more fallible one, and awareness of one's own engrams makes this a choice. [source: Brighton Therapy Partnership 2018] Totton's "Power in the therapy room" (2009) is not drawn on here [uncertain]. Response: name power differences, including gender, culture and the expert role, and be especially careful with humour and touch across them.

5.12 Risk: suicidality, psychosis, severe dissociation, recent trauma. The sources give no risk procedures. Totton holds that therapy is inherently risky, cannot be made wholly safe, and argues against regulation. [source: Priestman 2013] Practising clinicians remain bound by their licence and local law. Response [synthesis]: carry out standard structured risk assessment at intake and whenever risk is signalled. Collaborate on safety planning, including lethal-means counselling (safe storage or removal) where relevant, and involve crisis services as required. Suspend breath deepening, eye-closing exercises and touch during acute risk, active psychosis, severe dissociation or unstabilised recent trauma. Prioritise stabilisation and grounding. Refer to medical or psychiatric care as indicated.

5.13 Unusual or "paranormal" experiences. Totton holds that no clear line can be drawn between ordinary and "weird" experience. [source: Garrard 2018] Response [synthesis]: receive such reports with respect and curiosity, while still screening for psychosis, mania or substance effects when there are other indicators.

5.14 Physical symptoms. Listening to symptoms (4.11) is psychotherapeutic, not medical treatment. Refer new, worsening or unexplained symptoms for medical assessment, and never present body work as treating physical disease. [synthesis] Reich's energy concepts ("armour", "streaming"; Reichian Growth Work has chapters on "Energy and Armour" and "Cosmic Streaming") are the school's own theory, not established physiology. [source: PCCS contents page]

5.15 Competence. ERT is learned experientially over several years, with personal therapy at its centre. [source: Priestman 2013] Using the bodywork elements (4.2–4.6) without that training is not advised. Verbal elements such as embodied countertransference (4.8), embodied language (4.12) and having/being/becoming (4.13) can be adopted more readily, with supervision. [synthesis]

Sources

Sources:

Further reading (not drawn on unless listed above):

Totton, N. & Edmondson, E. (1988; 2nd ed. 2009). Reichian Growth Work: Melting the Blocks to Life and Love. Prism / PCCS Books.
Totton, N. & Jacobs, M. (2001). Character and Personality Types. Open University Press.
Totton, N. (2003). Body Psychotherapy: An Introduction. Open University Press.
Totton, N. (Ed.) (2005). New Dimensions in Body Psychotherapy. Open University Press.
Totton, N. (2007). Therapy has no goal. (cited in Priestman 2013)
Totton, N. (2010). Boundaries and boundlessness. (cited in Priestman 2013)
Totton, N. (2011). Wild Therapy: Undomesticating Inner and Outer Worlds. PCCS Books.
Totton, N. & Priestman, A. (2012). Embodiment and relationship: two halves of one whole. (cited in Ben-Shahar 2013 and Priestman 2013; publication details not verified [uncertain])
Totton, N. (2015). Embodied Relating: The Ground of Psychotherapy. Karnac.

← Previous · IV-067Body-mind psychotherapy (Aposhyan)Next · IV-069 →Relational body psychotherapy