Process work (Mindell)

1. Introduction

Version followed: Arnold Mindell's process-oriented psychology ("Processwork") in its classic signal-and-channel form as presented by the Process Work Institute (PWI, Portland) and IAPOP, with movement methods from Amy Kaplan (Amy Mindell) 1986, deep-democracy and rank methods from Amy Mindell 2008, extreme-state methods from Arye 2001 and coma work from Reiss (c. 2003). Source status: of Mindell's own books, only the first two chapters of Working with the Dreaming Body (1985) are used, in the authorised Russian translation printed with a letter from Mindell in the Moscow Psychotherapeutic Journal (1993); these now support the symptom-work and amplification material. Mindell's 1983 Dream Network Journal interview is also used. River's Way, Coma, City Shadows, Working on Yourself Alone, Process Mind are cited only where other sources report them [uncertain]. Pierre Morin's JPOP article "Symptoms, Dreaming and Society" (2001) and Mindell's interview with Joy Gates ("Following the River's Way", Dream Network Journal 18(4), c. 1999) are used directly. The online thesis gives only contents and figure captions for Kaplan's movement-method chapters (6–8), so their steps remain [synthesis]. No primary source gives a session count or formal contraindications (see sections 2 and 5). Mindell's later concepts (processmind, "flirts", sentient essence work) are mentioned only where cited sources state them. [source: PWI "What is Processwork?"; Kaplan 1986; A. Mindell 2008; Mindell 1985, ch. 1–2, Russian tr. 1993]

What it is. Processwork is not a manualised therapy with fixed sessions. PWI calls it "a practice and theory of human experience": a way of noticing and following experience that can be used with individuals, couples, families, groups, organisations, people in coma or extreme states, and large-group conflict ("worldwork"). Mindell developed it from the 1970s while working as a Jungian analyst in Zürich, starting from his observation that dream images and body symptoms mirrored each other ("dreambody"). [source: PWI What is Processwork; PWI Dreambody Work; Wikipedia, Process-oriented psychology]
Core idea of change. Experience is a flow of signals in sensory "channels" (seeing, hearing, body feeling, movement, plus relationship and world). Some of it belongs to what the person identifies with (the primary process); some happens to them and lies outside their identity (the secondary process: symptoms, accidents, contradictory gestures, dream figures, conflicts). The border between them is the edge. The practitioner does not interpret; they notice secondary signals, amplify them in the channel where they appear until their meaning unfolds, and help the person approach and, at their own pace, cross the edge so that the secondary material becomes usable in everyday life. Integration is temporary: crossing one edge reveals the next. [source: PWI What is Processwork; Kaplan 1986; Cohen 1982]
Transpersonal framing. Mindell links process to the Tao, to Australian Aboriginal ideas of the Dreamtime, and to an "Essence" or "Process Mind" from which experience arises; PWI compares this to "the Tao Which Cannot Be Said". These are Mindell's own theory, not established fact, and the clinical methods below can be used without adopting them. [source: PWI What is Processwork]
Status and training. Training organisations: Zürich from 1982 (now Institut für Prozessarbeit, an accredited Swiss psychotherapy training), Portland from 1989 (PWI), Germany (2018), the UK's RSPOPUK (UKCP-accredited training), and 25+ IAPOP-recognised centres. PWI closed its Master of Arts in Processwork on 5 July 2023 (after its accreditor ACICS lost federal recognition) but continues other training, including a Certificate and Self-Guided Diploma. A Processwork diploma is not itself a licence to practise psychotherapy in the US; practise within your own licence. [source: Wikipedia; PWI program closure notice; PWI What is Processwork] [uncertain: current accreditation of individual centres not verified]

2. Framework

Processwork has no fixed phases or session count in any primary source cited; PWI describes it as following "the potentially meaningful flow of inner and outer signals", Kaplan stresses following without a fixed theory or goal, and Mindell (1985) says he works without prepared tricks or templates; asked for the most important practice, he names not doing: noticing what is happening and following it, "the river's way" (Gates interview, c. 1999). His 1985 case reports range from single encounters to repeated visits over months or years with dying patients. The only number found is a secondary directory claim (GoodTherapy) that some clients notice change in 8–12 sessions while others work longer term; it cites no study [uncertain]. What Processwork does have is a recurring sequence of attention within a session and a set of levels and formats. [source: PWI Process; Kaplan 1986; Mindell 1985, ch. 1–2, Russian tr. 1993; GoodTherapy]

Within-session sequence (structure drawn from Kaplan 1986, Arye 2001 and A. Mindell 2008; the ordering as a list is [synthesis]):

Notice and sort signals. Track verbal content, tone, posture, gestures, symptoms, images, accidents. Sort what the person identifies with (primary) from what happens to them (secondary). Goal: a working hypothesis about primary and secondary process.
Identify channels. Which channel carries the secondary signals? Is it occupied (known, completed, congruent) or unoccupied (sudden, partial, incongruent)? Goal: choose the unoccupied channel where new information is accessible.
Amplify and unfold. Strengthen the secondary signal in its own channel and let it complete itself; follow it when it switches channel. Goal: the signal reveals its content (a figure, feeling, movement, message).
Find a pattern or figure. Give the emerging material a form (a person, dream figure, animal, role) so it can be explored safely. Goal: structure that prevents the client getting lost.
Work at the edge. Notice when the client backs off, laughs, loses energy or says "I can't"; explore the beliefs holding the edge, return to it, and let the client decide whether to go over. Goal: conscious relationship with the edge, not forced crossing.
Integrate into consensus reality. Ask where and how the newly accessed quality could be used in daily life, relationships or the symptom context. [source for 6: PWI What is Processwork (integration of secondary material); concrete form [synthesis]]

Moving between steps: feedback. The only criterion the sources give is the client's feedback. Positive feedback (energy rises, signal grows, client goes further, new material appears) means continue; negative feedback or no response means change hypothesis, channel or intervention. Arye: "No feedback is negative feedback." Kaplan: how far to push depends entirely on the response. [source: Arye 2001; Kaplan 1986]

Three levels to map in any situation. Consensus reality (facts, issues, history, rank, who is involved); Dreamland (atmosphere, unspoken feelings, roles, double signals, dream figures); Essence (the deepest feeling or vision beneath a position, often shared by both sides). [source: A. Mindell 2008; PWI What is Processwork]

Formats [source: PWI What is Processwork; PWI Relationships; PWI States of Consciousness; Reiss c.2003; Mulligan]:

Individual sessions (talking, movement, symptom and dream work); no primary source cited specifies session length or frequency [uncertain]. Mindell's 1985 cases include work at the hospital bedside, often agreed with the treating physician. [source: Mindell 1985, ch. 1–2, Russian tr. 1993]
Innerwork: the client's or practitioner's own self-facilitation between sessions.
Relationship, couple and family work: the relationship itself is the unit of attention; trainees learn to tell intrapersonal, interpersonal and transpersonal levels apart.
Coma and near-death work: in hospital or at home, with family present, alongside medical care, over several days.
Extreme states: facilitating the relationship between extreme and ordinary states.
Groups and worldwork: forums from small teams to hundreds of people, often with large-group sessions, home groups of about ten, theory sessions, individual sessions and a support group running in parallel.

3. Guiding principles

Follow the process, not a programme. Practical meaning: you have no target behaviour; your job is to discover what is trying to happen. [source: Kaplan 1986; Cohen 1982; PWI Process]
Be an empirical observer, not an interpreter. Describe and amplify what you see; do not name meanings in advance. Kaplan's model attitude: "Oh, isn't that interesting, what would happen if..." [source: Kaplan 1986; Arye 2001]
Disturbances carry meaning. Symptoms, accidents, slips and conflicts are treated as information to unfold; Kaplan calls accidents "gold". [source: Kaplan 1986; PWI Innerwork]
Accept the symptom first. Explore what the symptom is doing before trying to remove it; Mindell's phrase is that "the body dreams". Practical meaning: curiosity before control, never in place of medical assessment. [source: Cohen 1982; A. Mindell 2008]
Feedback is the compass. Let the client's response, not your theory, decide the next move; silence counts as a no. [source: Arye 2001; Kaplan 1986]
Respect the edge and the client's timing. Go up to, around and slightly past the edge only as the client chooses; forced breakthroughs do not hold and can harm. [source: Kaplan 1986]
Work where the person is not. Use the unoccupied channel; avoid channels that are already occupied or dangerous (e.g. switch from threatening movement to sound). [source: Arye 2001; Kaplan 1986]
Deep democracy. Every part of a person and every voice in a group (including emotional, irrational and absent ones) deserves a hearing. Practical meaning: do not side with the client's preferred identity against their disturbances. [source: A. Mindell 2008; Mulligan]
Inner democracy in the therapist. Notice which of your own parts you favour and which you marginalise; the parts you push aside will show up as reactions to clients. [source: A. Mindell 2008; PWI Innerwork]
The therapist is an instrument. Your own feelings and reactions in session are information about the process; innerwork is the foundation of practice. [source: PWI Innerwork; Arye 2001]
Metaskills. The feeling-attitude behind a technique matters as much as the technique: belief that the person is doing something meaningful, willingness to be taught by them, willingness to change your attitude before your intervention. [source: Arye 2001; A. Mindell 2008] [uncertain: the full list in Amy Mindell's book Metaskills is not reproduced]
Rank awareness. You hold social, contextual, psychological and possibly spiritual rank; use it consciously for the client's benefit because it cannot be eliminated. [source: A. Mindell 2008]
Join altered states rather than correcting them. Meet people in extreme or near-death states inside their experience; the aim is free movement between ordinary and non-ordinary states, not forced return. [source: Arye 2001; PWI States of Consciousness]
Respect choice, including in coma. The practitioner follows, does not direct, and respects the person's right to choose about life and death. Reiss: "I am there to follow them." [source: Reiss c.2003]
Criticism contains truth. An attack is the opening signal of a process; look for the part that is right before defending. [source: Arye 2001]
Eldership. In conflict, be willing to support all sides, including sides you dislike. [source: Mulligan; A. Mindell 2008]

4. Intervention inventory

All example therapist language is illustrative unless quoted with a source. Where Kaplan 1986 lists a method only as a chapter heading (the online copy of her chapters 5–8 gives contents and captions only), steps are marked [synthesis]. Interventions 1–9 are the core individual toolkit; 10–16 cover symptoms, dreams, altered states and coma; 17–25 cover innerwork, relationships and groups.

1. Signal tracking and sorting primary from secondary process

Purpose / when: The first and continuous task of every session; tells you what to amplify. [source: Kaplan 1986; PWI What is Processwork]
Steps: (1) Listen to content while watching tone, posture, hands, feet, breath, colour, pace. (2) Mark as primary what the client identifies with and talks about intentionally ("I'm fine", "I want to be calmer"). (3) Mark as secondary what happens to them: unintended gestures, slips, sudden movements, symptoms mentioned in passing, contradictions, dream figures, people they complain about. (4) Hold the sort as a hypothesis; Kaplan notes primary and secondary can "flip-flop" moment to moment, so re-check. (5) Choose one secondary signal that recurs or carries energy.
Example language (illustrative): "While you were telling me you're fine, your hand kept tapping your knee. Could we look at that tapping for a moment?"
Watch for: The client's interest or surprise when you name the signal (positive feedback) versus flat compliance. Avoid interpreting what the signal "means".

2. Channel identification (occupied and unoccupied channels)

Purpose / when: To decide in which sensory mode to work. [source: Kaplan 1986; Arye 2001]
Steps: (1) Note the channels in use: visual (images, "I see"), auditory (tone, inner voices), proprioceptive (feelings, pain, pressure, heat), movement (gestures, posture), relationship (conflicts, interactions), world (events, groups, environment). (2) Judge each as occupied (the client knows these signals, completes them, they are congruent) or unoccupied (signals are sudden, partial, incongruent, "happen to" the client). (3) Work in the unoccupied channel carrying the secondary signal. (4) Avoid a channel that is occupied, exhausted or unsafe (Arye moved an aggressive man's process from movement to sound).
Example language (illustrative): "You talk easily about pictures. The thing you mentioned less was the pressure in your chest. Shall we feel that pressure for a moment?"
Watch for: More vivid, surprising material in the new channel; if the client returns to familiar story-telling, the channel may be occupied.

3. Working with double signals

Purpose / when: When two signals contradict each other (words say one thing, body another), the contradicting signal is often the secondary process at an edge. [source: Kaplan 1986; A. Mindell 2008]
Steps: (1) Notice the mismatch (e.g. "I'm sweet" said while a fist hits the knee; joking while crying; vowing to confront someone while looking at the floor). (2) Treat it with respect: Kaplan stresses the client is at an edge and the material is private, so ask before focusing. (3) Invite the client to embody or exaggerate the contradicting signal. (4) Ask what it expresses or how it feels from inside. (5) Let the hidden message be voiced. In A. Mindell's example, a man who embraced his downcast posture said he felt hopeless about the conversation.
Example language (illustrative): "Would you be willing to let your eyes go down even more, and see what that posture knows?"
Watch for: Relief, emotion or a new statement that fits better than the original words. If the client feels exposed, slow down and return to the primary process.

4. Amplification (general principle)

Purpose / when: To strengthen a secondary signal so its content can complete itself. Used whenever you have a promising secondary signal and permission to explore. Mindell traces the method to noticing that people already amplify their own symptoms (scratching eczema, pressing a painful eye, bending a stiff neck further); his summary is to find the process, amplify it in its channel, and let the symptom become a "medicine". Choose the channel from how the client presents the material: in his example, a client who describes a snake with gestures is invited to move like the snake, whereas one who describes its colour and shape is worked with visually. [source: Kaplan 1986; Cohen 1982; Mindell 1985, ch. 1–2, Russian tr. 1993; Wikipedia (Shafton 1995)]
Steps: (1) Pick the signal and its channel. (2) Increase it in that same channel: make the movement bigger or slower, the sensation more focused, the image more detailed, the sound louder or its pitch varied. (3) Pause and observe what happens empirically. (4) Follow if the signal changes or switches channel (see 5). (5) Stop or change if feedback is negative.
Channel-specific forms (from sources): Proprioceptive: attend to the sensation and let it intensify, note its quality (sharp, pressing, burning) [Kaplan; A. Mindell 2008]. Movement: exaggerate a posture or gesture, mirror it back, give slight resistance so the client feels their strength [Kaplan]. Auditory: match sounds, vary pitch and volume, follow unintended sounds [Arye]. Visual: ask the client to look at the image more closely or let it continue [Kaplan]. Relationship: enact the felt situation with others (Kaplan's group encircling a woman who felt "caged in") [Kaplan]. Verbal: ask the client to repeat or continue a spontaneous phrase or story [Kaplan].
Example language (illustrative): "Let that ache be exactly as strong as it wants to be for a moment. What is it like? Sharp, dull, squeezing?"
Watch for: Amplification of pain or distress must stay within what the client chooses; stop if the client is flooding (see section 5). [synthesis for flooding caution]

5. Following channel changes (channel switching)

Purpose / when: Processes move between channels (a movement becomes a pain, then an image); the practitioner follows rather than staying in one channel. [source: Kaplan 1986; Wikipedia (Totton 2003)]
Steps: (1) As you amplify, watch for a shift: the client stops moving and reports an image, or a feeling becomes a sound. (2) Drop the old channel and work in the new one. (3) If a channel stops carrying energy, deliberately suggest another (e.g. from feeling to movement: "let your hand show that feeling").
Example language (illustrative): "You've stopped moving and your eyes went somewhere. What are you seeing?"
Watch for: Getting stuck because you prefer one channel (e.g. a talk-based therapist staying verbal).

6. Pattern creation (finding a figure)

Purpose / when: To give secondary behaviour a safe, structured form so the client can try it without getting lost or frightened. Use when amplification produces energy the client cannot hold or name. [source: Kaplan 1986]
Steps: (1) Ask who or what acts like this: a person they know, a dream figure, an animal. (2) Let the client "be" that figure for a while, in movement or voice. (3) Optionally have someone else play the opposing figure. (4) Step out and reflect. Kaplan's example: a woman pushing against confinement was asked what her son does when shut in a room, and then invited to play him kicking the door.
Example language (illustrative): "Who do you know who would push like that? … Try being him for a minute; you are him now, not you."
Watch for: Kaplan notes that without a pattern clients may become lost or frightened; a figure gives distance and play.

7. Edge work

Purpose / when: When the client approaches secondary material and backs off. [source: Kaplan 1986; PWI What is Processwork]
Steps (Kaplan 1986, paraphrased): (1) Notice edge signs: sudden laughing, dropping energy, collapsing, changing the subject, statements like "I just can't". (2) Hold the edge with the client; do not let either of you jump past it. (3) Challenge gently; Kaplan's example wording is "Sure you can't" (said lightly, testing). (4) Explore the edge: what beliefs, relationships or consequences forbid going over? Whose voice says no? (5) Return to the edge several times; let the client decide when or whether to go further. (6) If they cross, help them complete the new behaviour briefly and then consider where it belongs in daily life.
Example language (illustrative): "Something stopped just then. Let's not rush past it. What would happen if you did let yourself get angry?"
Watch for: Kaplan warns forced breakthroughs often fail to hold and can harm. Psychosomatic symptoms often appear at edges (a stopped fight becomes a stomach cramp). A relaxed, curious client at the edge is progress even without crossing.

8. Working with accidents and unintentional signals

Purpose / when: Slips, knocks, dropped objects, unexpected sounds and sudden moves are treated as secondary signals. [source: Kaplan 1986; Arye 2001]
Steps: (1) Notice the accident without embarrassment. (2) Ask permission to repeat it slowly or deliberately. (3) Amplify and follow as in 4.
Example language (illustrative): "You just knocked the cup. Could you do that movement again, slowly, as if on purpose?"
Watch for: Shame or self-criticism: frame it as interesting, not as a mistake.

9. Process-oriented movement methods

Purpose / when: For movement signals, postures, walking, handshakes and couple or group space. Kaplan's catalogue: amplifying space, time and weight; mirroring; inhibiting; blocking; offering greater resistance; the hidden figure; locating the opponent within; changing channels; verbal encouragement; misinterpreting; reacting; letting the client move the therapist or vice versa. [source: Kaplan 1986, chapter 7 headings]
Steps (from her worked case): (1) Invite free movement in the room. (2) Mirror the client's movement to give feedback. (3) Play: dodge, block lightly, offer slight resistance so the client feels their own force. (4) If the client collapses or drops, catch and lower them safely. (5) Shift to another channel or a figure when movement stops carrying energy. [source: Kaplan 1986]
Steps for the other listed methods: The online copy of Kaplan's chapters 6–8 gives only the contents list and figure captions. The captions indicate: space = amplifying the direction of a movement; time = slowing down the timing of a habitual signal; weight = amplifying heaviness; inhibiting = the therapist slightly inhibits the client's motion so its impulse is felt; blocking = offering greater resistance, or stopping the client from moving back; hidden figure = the therapist plays the unseen force a symptom implies (captions show a figure constricting a woman's breathing and fists being restrained); reacting = responding as a figure (a caption reads "Playing with the Monster"); plus letting the client move you or you move the client, and creativity. Chapter 8 also lists hugs and handshakes, couple and group space, walking, posture, quick strong interventions, people who cannot move, the benefits of not moving, movements far over the edge, mixed channels and working kinesthetically on a dream. Locating the opponent within = ask where in themselves the force they push against lives; misinterpreting = offer a deliberately wrong guess so the client corrects you and clarifies. [Kaplan 1986 contents and captions; the step descriptions are synthesis inferred from those headings; Kaplan's own instructions uncertain] [uncertain]
Example language (illustrative): "I'll put my hand here and push back a little. You decide how hard you want to push."
Watch for: Touch and resistance require explicit, revocable consent, trauma screening, and clear professional boundaries; agree a stop signal before any physical contact. [synthesis] Kaplan also treats not moving, and working with people who cannot move, as legitimate variants.

10. Dreambody (symptom) work

Purpose / when: For chronic, recurring or serious body symptoms (pain, tension, colitis, skin, posture, and in Mindell's 1985 cases cancer, tumours and multiple sclerosis) explored as dream-like experiences, always alongside medical care. Mindell's premise: dreams and body symptoms mirror each other, and the "dreambody" carries information in several channels at once. [source: Cohen 1982; PWI Dreambody Work; A. Mindell 2008; Mindell 1985, ch. 1–2, Russian tr. 1993]
Steps: (1) Confirm the symptom is medically assessed and treated; the work is parallel, not instead. Mindell agreed changes such as removing a patient's corset with her doctor first. [source: Mindell 1985, ch. 1–2, Russian tr. 1993; framing synthesis] (2) Watch what the person already does with the symptom (scratching, pressing, tensing); this shows the direction the body is amplifying in. [source: Mindell 1985, ch. 1–2, Russian tr. 1993] (3) Ask the client to describe the symptom's felt quality precisely (sharp, stabbing, pressing, burning). (4) Accept rather than fight it for the session; with consent, let it intensify a little in sensation, posture or movement (Mindell had a dying man with stomach pain tense his abdomen until he felt he would burst, and he cried out that he had never fully expressed himself). [source: Mindell 1985, ch. 1–2, Russian tr. 1993] (5) Watch for the body signal that accompanies it (a gesture, grasp, curl) and amplify that (Mindell, in Cohen's report, prompted a grabbing gesture and asked what the hand was grasping for). (6) Follow the switch into image, memory, figure, sound or relationship, letting the client decide the direction. (7) Look for links to dreams: Mindell, Cohen and PWI report dream images mirroring symptoms (a dream of knives with a stabbing neck pain). (8) Ask how the quality of the symptom (e.g. sharpness, the need to express) could be lived consciously in daily life. [source: Cohen 1982; PWI Dreambody Work; Mindell 1985, ch. 1–2, Russian tr. 1993]
Example language (illustrative): "If that sharpness could do something useful in your life, where would you be sharper?"
Watch for: Blame ("you caused your illness") is not part of the method and must be avoided; critics note the risk of over-psychologising illness (see section 5). Positive signs: emotion, a fitting image, a new everyday intention. Do not promise physical change: Mindell himself says he does not know what is good for another person, that the approach often fails, and that in one of his own cases the man learned to express himself while his tumour remained. [source: Mindell 1985, ch. 1–2, Russian tr. 1993; Cohen 1982]

11. Dream work through body and channels

Purpose / when: To work with a dream not by interpretation but by experiencing its figures and qualities in channels, and to connect it with present body signals. [source: Kaplan 1986; Cohen 1982]
Steps: (1) Ask for the dream; note the figure or image with the most energy and the one the dreamer least identifies with. (2) Invite the client to feel, move or sound that figure (Kaplan lists working kinesthetically on a dream; in her case a client acted out a dream figure while others played another). (3) Notice whether current posture or symptoms already show the dream (Cohen: a client curled up saying she wanted to hide, then recalled a dream of hiding in an attic). (4) Bring the figure's quality back to the dreamer's daily life. (5) Childhood-dream variant, as one Processwork therapist describes his training on PWI's site: recall the first, a recurring or the most vivid childhood dream; treat its main figures as a polarity (in his case a frightened child and a detached, witnessing figure); approach the frightening figure in stages with the therapist, from curiosity towards compassion; step into that figure and practise its quality; then use it in daily life and in your own practice. [source: Stella, PWI blog; practitioner account, not Mindell's own procedure]
Example language (illustrative): "Stand up and be the wolf in your dream for a moment. How does it move?"
Watch for: The edge appears when the client must take on the disliked figure; treat as edge work. [uncertain: Mindell's childhood-dream and "life myth" method is named by PWI; no step-by-step procedure from Mindell himself is given here]. Childhood nightmares can be frightening to re-enter: go in stages and let the client set the pace.

12. Reading feedback and testing hypotheses

Purpose / when: Continuously, to know if an intervention is working. [source: Arye 2001; Kaplan 1986]
Steps: (1) After each intervention, watch: does energy, colour, voice or movement increase? Does new material appear? (2) Positive feedback = go on. (3) Negative or absent feedback = change the hypothesis, channel or intervention; Arye stopped verbal questions with a depressed client who did not respond. (4) Watch your own state as the client responds (Kaplan).
Example language (illustrative): "That didn't seem to fit. Let's leave it."
Watch for: Compliance looks like cooperation without energy; it is negative feedback.

13. Minimal cues and symbolic variation

Purpose / when: With people who communicate very little (dying, confused, very withdrawn, coma). [source: Arye 2001; Reiss c.2003]
Steps: (1) Pick up any small sign: a sound, word fragment, twitch, eye movement, change in breath or colour. (2) Reflect it back with small variations (Arye repeated a dying man's sound as "Dove", then "Dover"). (3) Watch the face and voice for a change that signals "yes, that one". (4) Respond to the symbolic meaning (Arye reflected the image of standing on the cliffs facing the sea).
Example language (illustrative): "Dove… Dover… you're standing at the edge, looking out."
Watch for: Brightening, increased volume or movement; stay tentative.

14. Joining altered and extreme states

Purpose / when: With people in states their culture calls abnormal (confusion, intoxication, near-death, psychiatric extreme states). Goal per PWI: help the person move freely and consciously between states, not force a return to ordinary awareness. [source: PWI States of Consciousness; Arye 2001]
Steps: (1) Notice stalemates where others answer with logic (relatives answering "Where am I?" with facts). (2) Enter the person's frame briefly: reflect their question or image symbolically. (3) Use nonverbal channels (movement, imagery, inner body experience). (4) Sit silently in the person's state if words get no feedback (Arye sat about 45 minutes with a non-responsive depressed client). (5) Facilitate the relationship between extreme and ordinary state when the person can engage.
Example language (illustrative): "Where are you? … Somewhere far away, it seems. Tell me what it's like there."
Watch for: Mindell's City Shadows (1988) frames psychiatric conditions as culturally judged extreme states; this is his theory. In practice, assess risk and coordinate with psychiatric care (section 5). [synthesis for the risk step]

15. Process-oriented coma work

Purpose / when: With people in coma, vegetative or near-death states, alongside medical rehabilitation, with family present. Requires a trained team; Reiss says it is too hard to do alone. [source: Reiss c.2003; PWI States of Consciousness]
Steps (Reiss c.2003, paraphrased): (1) Work with the medical team; medical monitoring stays their responsibility. (2) Tell the person that they will show you how to work with them. (3) Track minimal cues: twitches, eye movements, sounds, sighs, colour, blood-pressure changes reported by staff. (4) Use gentle touch as a channel, trained and visible to family and staff. (5) Facilitate movement: gently move a limb and follow if movement spreads. (6) Bring in significant voices (a spouse's voice by phone to the ear). (7) Reflect emotional news (family progress) and watch for responses such as crying. (8) Establish a yes/no code (finger lift = yes, no movement = no) and ask questions repeatedly to check consistency. (9) Hold family sessions in the room on unresolved relational issues. (10) Pace over days: body work, then binary signalling, then family work. (11) Reiss describes asking whether the person still agrees with their living will.
Example language (illustrative): "I'm here. You can show me how you want me to be with you. If you'd like me to keep going, see if you can lift this finger."
Watch for: Over-reading random movements; end-of-life questions raise serious ethical and legal issues (section 5). Practitioners need training in their own altered states.

16. Silent and auditory joining in high-arousal or withdrawn states

Purpose / when: When the usual channel is closed or dangerous: a withdrawn client (silent joining), or aggression (switch to sound). [source: Arye 2001]
Steps: Withdrawn: drop verbal interventions, sit with the client in silence, attending to your own felt sense. Aggressive: avoid the threatening movement channel, match the person's sounds, amplify pitch and volume changes, follow their unintended sounds; Arye turned a tram encounter into an improvised two-part song.
Example language (illustrative): "(matching the tone) Hmmm… HMMM…"
Watch for: Personal safety first; leave or get help if threat continues. [synthesis]

17. Innerwork (client self-practice and therapist self-work)

Purpose / when: To develop the client's own awareness between sessions, and the practitioner's capacity to use their reactions. PWI: innerwork builds on Jung's active imagination and on mindfulness, adding creativity and play. [source: PWI Innerwork]
Steps (client): (1) Sit quietly and notice what you see, hear, feel and how you move. (2) Pick the experience you least identify with. (3) Amplify it in its channel. (4) Follow when it changes channel. (5) Notice the edge and the beliefs behind it. (6) Find how the new quality could help today. [synthesis built from the channel method; the procedure in Mindell's Working on Yourself Alone (1990) is not reproduced here [uncertain]]. Mindell's own short version: relax and close your eyes; when ready, half-open them; notice what catches your attention first and let it choose itself; dwell on it; ask what its essence is; let that essence unfold in whatever way comes, such as movement or images. He offers it as a way into the source of dream images and says that working on yourself is also, in a way, working on the world. [source: Gates interview, c. 1999]
Steps (therapist): Notice your own reactions in session (fear, defensiveness, wanting to leave, dislike) as information; ask what part of you the client is reflecting. [source: Arye 2001; PWI Innerwork]
Example language (illustrative): "This week, when the headache comes, take two minutes to feel it on purpose and see what image it brings."
Watch for: Mindell's image is driving a chariot pulled by a lion, neither run over nor devoured by one's process (PWI, citing Mindell 1990). Stop if self-practice produces flooding.

18. Inner-democracy, gossip and onlooker exercises

Purpose / when: Short reflective exercises for clients stuck in blaming others, or for therapists working on their reactions. [source: A. Mindell 2008]
Steps: Inner democracy: list which inner parts you side with and which you push away; give the marginalised part a voice. Gossip: notice whom you talk about most, then ask how you are like that person in some small way. Onlooker: when a public figure enrages you, ask where you share that quality (e.g. being dogmatic or not listening).
Example language (illustrative): "You've told me a lot about your sister's bossiness. Where, in a small way, are you bossy too, and could that be useful?"
Watch for: Use only once the client feels heard; with victims of real abuse, this can feel blaming (section 5). [synthesis]

19. Role identification and role switching (relationships, families, groups)

Purpose / when: In conflicts, to recognise positions as shared roles that move between people. [source: A. Mindell 2008; PWI Relationships]
Steps (A. Mindell 2008, paraphrased): (1) Notice which role you or the client is speaking from. (2) Notice the pull towards the other position. (3) Step consciously into the other role and speak from it. (4) Notice what shifts (relief, pride, responsibility). (5) Invite others to switch too. Mindell (via PWI) adds that switching works best from a connection to one's deepest self, not as a mechanical swap.
Example language (illustrative): "Would you stand over here and speak as the teacher for a minute? What does the teacher want the students to understand?"
Watch for: Role switching between people with very unequal rank, or in abusive relationships, needs care (section 5). [synthesis]

20. Working with ghost roles

Purpose / when: When someone or something is talked about but not present (a boss, an ex, "the government"). [source: A. Mindell 2008; Mulligan]
Steps: (1) Notice who or what is repeatedly mentioned. (2) Ask how that figure is appearing here and now, including in your own behaviour. (3) Let someone voice the ghost's qualities aloud, owning them. (4) Notice how this changes openness.
Example language (illustrative): "We keep talking about your father's criticism. If his voice were here in the room, what would it say right now?"
Watch for: Relief, laughter, or a shift in atmosphere; resistance if the ghost is someone who harmed the client (do not force identification).

21. Rank mapping

Purpose / when: In therapy relationships, couples, families and groups, to see power dynamics. [source: A. Mindell 2008; Mulligan]
Steps: (1) Map social rank (economics, race, gender, education, religion, age, health, sexual orientation), contextual rank (power in this situation), psychological rank (centredness under pressure) and spiritual rank (connection to something larger). (2) Note where someone has low social but high contextual or spiritual rank. (3) Name rank differences that are affecting communication. (4) Use your own rank consciously for others.
Example language (illustrative): "I'm the therapist here and I'm also older and white; I want to check whether that makes it harder to disagree with me."
Watch for: Unconscious use of psychological or spiritual rank (being serenely superior) can make others feel off-centre.

22. Essence-level facilitation

Purpose / when: When a conflict is deadlocked at the level of positions. [source: A. Mindell 2008]
Steps: (1) Invite each person to speak from the deepest feeling or vision beneath their position. (2) Support the moment when someone does so. (3) Allow others to respond to the shared feeling before returning to issues. A. Mindell describes a 1992 Oakland forum where a participant's wail of shared pain shifted a racially tense room.
Example language (illustrative): "Beneath wanting the house sold, what's the deepest thing you're longing for?"
Watch for: Softening and common ground; no step-by-step protocol is given in the source.

23. Working with attacks and criticism

Purpose / when: When a client or group member attacks the therapist or facilitator. [source: Arye 2001]
Steps: (1) Notice your defensiveness and do not act on it. (2) Look for the truth in the criticism. (3) Admit your own feeling if relevant. (4) Invite the critic to say more. (5) Unfold what emerges (Arye found a suffering part and an inner silencing figure in the critic).
Example language (illustrative): "You're right that I missed that. Tell me more about what it was like."
Watch for: Escalation that becomes unsafe; set limits (section 5).

24. Facilitating escalation in groups ("sitting in the fire")

Purpose / when: In group conflict, to let tension be expressed in a contained way. [source: Arye 2001; Mulligan]
Steps: (1) Hold the tension between sides. (2) Encourage expression of feelings; allow controlled escalation. (3) Watch for hot spots (sudden surges of tension) and pause there. (4) Notice ghost roles and double signals. (5) Look for your own similarity to the side you dislike. (6) Support essence-level statements (22).
Example language (illustrative): "Something just happened. Let's stay with it rather than move on."
Watch for: Totton (via Wikipedia) notes the tension between supporting all sides and addressing real inequality; hold both.

25. Worldwork forum structure and eldership

Purpose / when: For running process-oriented group forums. [source: Mulligan; A. Mindell 2008]
Steps: (1) Daily large-group sessions; small home groups of about ten; daily theory sessions; individual sessions; a support group. (2) Choose topics by consensus; defer when time runs out. (3) Facilitators take a stance (for, against or neutral) openly, step out of the formal role when it creates imbalance, and aim for eldership: supporting all sides. Mulligan's summary: "awareness itself is the facilitator". Mulligan also reports "Tao selection" (spinning a pointer) to choose who works individually in demonstrations.
Example language (illustrative): "I'm going to step out of the facilitator role for a moment and speak for myself."
Watch for: Participants who become distressed need individual follow-up (the support group exists for this).

26. Integrating into consensus reality

Purpose / when: At the end of any piece of work, to connect new experience to daily life. [source: PWI What is Processwork; A. Mindell 2008]
Steps: (1) Ask what quality emerged. (2) Ask where it would help in a current situation. (3) Make a small, concrete experiment. (4) Revisit next session. [synthesis for 2–4]
Example language (illustrative): "Where this week could that fierce 'no' be useful?"
Watch for: Flip-flop back to primary identity is normal; integration is temporary and reveals the next edge.

5. Handling problems

The cited sources address some difficulties directly (feedback, edges, stalemates, attacks, unoccupied channels), and Mindell 1985 adds cautions from his own failures (below). No Processwork source cited gives formal contraindications, a screening list or a risk protocol, so most safety and screening guidance below is [synthesis].

Stuck client / nothing happens. Treat no response as negative feedback and change something: hypothesis, channel or level. Look for the unoccupied channel (if the client only talks, try movement or sound; if only feelings, try images). With very withdrawn clients, drop verbal work and join silently. [source: Arye 2001; Kaplan 1986]
"Resistance". Processwork reframes it as an edge. Do not push through; explore what holds the edge, return to it, and let the client decide. Light, playful challenge is allowed; forcing is not. [source: Kaplan 1986]
Flip-flops. When the client suddenly identifies with what was secondary (or vice versa), re-sort primary and secondary before continuing. [source: Kaplan 1986]
Overwhelm or flooding during amplification. Reduce intensity, give the material a figure or pattern (6) for distance, switch to a less charged channel, or return to the primary process and consensus reality (grounding, orientation to the room). Kaplan notes that without a pattern clients may get lost or frightened. [source: Kaplan 1986 for patterning; grounding steps [synthesis]]
Trauma. Amplifying body states or enacting figures can re-evoke trauma. Screen for trauma history and dissociation before body or movement work; establish stabilisation and a stop signal; prefer visual or verbal channels and smaller amplification for highly dysregulated clients; refer to or combine with trauma-focused treatment where indicated. [synthesis]
Touch and physical resistance. Movement and coma work use touch. Obtain explicit, specific, revocable consent; explain what you will do before doing it; keep touch within your licence and agency policy; avoid touch where a client has a history of boundary violation unless clearly wanted and safe; record it. Reiss requires touch to be trained and visible to family and staff. [source: Reiss c.2003; remainder [synthesis]]
Dual relationships and boundaries. A 2001 Oregon regulator review of PWI (reported via Wikipedia, citing Shafer 2001) followed complaints about sharing student information and unclear relationship and sexual boundaries; some allegations were found substantially correct and PWI strengthened privacy and dual-relationship policies. Training communities that mix teaching, therapy and social life need explicit boundaries. PWI publishes an ethics complaint procedure: written complaints about PWI-associated practitioners, faculty or students go to its ethics committee, which acknowledges, investigates and sends a written resolution, with escalation to Oregon's Office of Degree Authorization if the procedure fails; it covers clinical, teaching and supervisory roles [source: PWI Ethics Complaint Procedure]. Ask a client's practitioner which body's code and complaints route applies to them. [source: Wikipedia] [uncertain: secondary, unverified]
Physical symptoms. Never present symptom work as a cure or replacement for medical care; critics (Shafton 1995, via Wikipedia) say the dreambody approach can come close to psychologising all illness. Mindell's own 1985 cases were agreed with physicians where medical aids were changed, and he warns against reshaping a body to a norm: he reports a student who became depressed and suicidal after a manual therapist loosened his jaw. Morin (2001) warns that psychosomatic framing has often made ill people feel they deserved their illness, notes that patients using complementary approaches often do not tell their physicians, and places symptoms in their social context (rank, racism, sexism, socioeconomic status) rather than in the individual alone. Ask about medical assessment first; avoid any implication that the client caused or can will away their illness; coordinate with physicians. [source: Wikipedia; Morin 2001; A. Mindell 2008; Mindell 1985, ch. 1–2, Russian tr. 1993; framing [synthesis]]
Psychosis, mania and extreme states. Mindell's non-pathologising frame (City Shadows) does not remove your duty to assess risk, capacity and need for medication or hospital care. Use joining and minimal-cue methods within a care plan; involve psychiatric services; avoid amplifying states that are escalating (e.g. mania, command hallucinations to harm). [source: PWI States of Consciousness for the frame; risk steps [synthesis]]
Suicide and self-harm. Mindell (1985) reports, as one of his failures, a chronically psychotic patient with repeated suicide attempts whom he judged to be in a "dying" process; after Mindell advised that he be allowed to do what he needed, the patient obtained a gun on leave and died by suicide. Mindell concludes that he imposed an interpretation instead of following the process, and the case also involved deceiving the patient. Never treat a wish to die as a process to support or test. If a death image, a "wish to disappear" or a cliff-edge image (as in Arye's Dover example with a dying man) arises in a client not at the end of life, step out of the symbolic frame and conduct a standard suicide risk assessment and safety plan, including lethal-means counselling (safe storage or removal); return to symbolic work only when safe. [source: Mindell 1985, ch. 1–2, Russian tr. 1993 for the case; response [synthesis]]
Coma and end-of-life work. Medical monitoring belongs to medical staff. Yes/no signals in coma can be misread; Reiss checks consistency by repeating questions. Asking a person in coma about life support or a living will has major legal and ethical implications: do not act on such signals outside the treating team, the legally authorised decision-maker and local law. Work as a trained team, never alone. [source: Reiss c.2003; legal caution [synthesis]]
Aggression and personal safety. Arye moved to the auditory channel with an aggressive man; this is an option only when you are reasonably safe. Otherwise leave, get help and follow agency safety procedures. [source: Arye 2001; safety [synthesis]]
Ruptures, attacks and criticism. Look for the truth in the criticism, admit your part, invite more, and unfold the attack as the start of a process; notice your own fear or wish to leave as information. [source: Arye 2001]
Rank misuse by the therapist. Calm centredness or spiritual framing can feel superior and silence clients. Name rank differences, invite disagreement, and check whether the client is complying. [source: A. Mindell 2008]
Abuse and oppression. "Support all sides", role switching, ghost-role ownership and the gossip exercise can feel like blaming a person harmed by abuse or oppression. Prioritise safety, validation and the client's right to their position before inviting role switches; never ask a victim to "own" an abuser's qualities while risk is live; follow safeguarding and reporting duties. Totton notes worldwork's tension between all-sides support and real inequality. [source: Wikipedia (Totton 2000); response [synthesis]]
Non-adherence to innerwork. Keep homework short and specific (one symptom, two minutes); if the client does not do it, treat the reluctance itself as an edge or signal to explore, not a failure. [synthesis]
Spiritual and transpersonal concepts. Process mind, Essence, Tao, Dreamtime and "shaman" language are Mindell's frame. Use them only if they fit the client's worldview; do not present them as fact; respect Indigenous ownership of Dreaming concepts and do not present Processwork as Aboriginal practice. [synthesis; frame from PWI What is Processwork]
Group escalation. Allow controlled escalation only when facilitators can hold it; provide parallel support (Mulligan describes a support group) and individual follow-up for distressed participants; screen participants with severe mental illness before intensive forums. [source: Mulligan; screening [synthesis]]
Credentials and scope. Processwork training does not confer a licence; use methods within your own professional scope, consent and documentation standards. [synthesis]

Sources

Web sources:

Books cited (via the sources above):

Mindell, A. (1985). Working with the Dreaming Body. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (chapters 1–2 via the 1993 Russian translation above).
Mindell, A. (1982/1984). Dreambody: The Body's Role in Revealing the Self.
Mindell, A. (1988). City Shadows: Psychological Interventions in Psychiatry.
Mindell, A. (1990). Working on Yourself Alone: Inner Dreambody Work. Arkana.
Mindell, A. (1995). Sitting in the Fire.
Mindell, Amy (1995/2001). Metaskills: The Spiritual Art of Therapy.
Mindell, A. (2013). The Dance of the Ancient One. Deep Democracy Exchange.
Diamond, J. & Jones, L. S. (2004/2018). A Path Made by Walking: Process Work in Practice.

← Previous · VII-012Contemplative psychotherapy (Naropa)Next · VII-014 →Pathwork