Flower essences (Australian bush, FES and others)

1. Introduction

Version followed: flower essence systems as their own organisations describe them, mainly Australian Bush Flower Essences (Ian White) and the Flower Essence Society / Flower Essence Services (FES, California; Richard Katz and Patricia Kaminski), with the Alaskan Flower Essence Project as an example of the many other producers that run their own practitioner certification. Bach Flower Remedies are the original system and appear here only where general sources discuss them together. Sections 1–3 describe the method as its organisations publish it; section 4 is the psychotherapist's own work when a client uses, is offered, or practises flower essences. The psychotherapist never performs, sells, prescribes or recommends essences.

What it is. Flower essences are liquid preparations made from flowers (and, in some ranges, from other plants, gems, crystals or "environments"), most of them preserved with alcohol, chosen to match a person's emotional state rather than a physical illness [source: Cancer Research UK, Essence therapy]. Followers believe each essence carries the "healing energy" of its natural source; Bach held that illness arises when mind and body are out of tune and defined 38 emotional states, each with one remedy [source: Cancer Research UK]. Proponents describe an effect through a subtle "energy" passed from the flower into the remedy rather than through pharmacological action [source: Ernst 2010]. These are the systems' own beliefs, reported as attributed.

Core idea of change, as the organisations state it.

Australian Bush Flower Essences: the publisher describes essences that act on mind and emotions, sharpen conscious awareness, build intuition, "dissolve limiting beliefs" and draw out qualities such as love, courage and joy; the founder describes them as working on emotions with "a flow on effect to the physical healing" [source: Findhorn Press / Simon & Schuster book page; Pittwater Online News 2011 profile]. The founder, a naturopath and kinesiology practitioner from a family of herbalists, reports that information about Australian flowering plants came to him during meditations in healing circles he ran; the range later added White Light Essences (described as working "at the soul level") and Light Frequency Essences [source: Pittwater Online News 2011]. The 1993 founding book covers fifty essences [source: Simon & Schuster page].
FES: founded in 1979 by Richard Katz, co-directed with Patricia Kaminski since 1980, part of the non-profit Earth-Spirit since 1982; it describes itself as an international membership organisation promoting plant and empirical clinical research, training and certifying practitioners, publishing, and running a referral network [source: Flower Essence Society profile on Issuu]. FES publishes assessment material for choosing among North American essences and Bach's English remedies (e.g. Kaminski, Choosing Flower Essences: An Assessment Guide, 2015) [source: Issuu listing]. The detailed FES theory of "soul qualities" is not set out here [uncertain: not verified].
Alaskan Flower Essence Project: frames essences as "vibrational healing" tools linked to the "collective consciousness" of living beings, with practice centred on client self-understanding and documented personal growth [source: Alaskan Flower Essence Project, 2014 Certification Program].

Evidence status (one line): a systematic review of seven randomised trials of Bach flower remedies concluded that the most reliable trials "fail to show efficacy" [source: Ernst 2010]; essences do not prevent, control or cure cancer [source: Cancer Research UK].

2. Framework

2a. How the method is delivered (as organisations publish it)

Self-use: essences are sold in health-food shops, chemists and online and can be chosen without a practitioner [source: Cancer Research UK].
Practitioner consultation: a fee-paying consultation in which the practitioner asks how the person feels, considers personality type, and selects one or a blend of essences according to emotional state rather than illness [source: Cancer Research UK]. Practitioner backgrounds include naturopathy and kinesiology (the Bush founder's own training) and dedicated essence-practitioner certification [source: Simon & Schuster page; FES Issuu profile].
Course of work (Alaskan model, as one published example): client writes an intake in their own words describing situation and goals; practitioner and client set goals together; work proceeds in repeated "cycles", each closed by a client self-evaluation form and a practitioner case-evaluation form; a summary report reviews how goals were met or changed. Certification requires a seven-day practitioner training, three documented case histories each with at least four consultations over six months, and written essence profiles, with a reading and processing fee; the Project itself certifies [source: Alaskan Flower Essence Project 2014 Certification Program]. (Cycle lengths and dosing are not given here.)
Teaching networks: the Bush range is taught through workshops in Australia and overseas; in 2011 about 80 teachers ran Bush workshops nationally [source: Pittwater Online News 2011]. FES runs training, certification and international seminars [source: FES Issuu profile]. Course content and levels for FES and Bush certification [uncertain: not verified].

2b. Regulation and status, main jurisdictions (one line each)

UK: in January 2014 the MHRA stopped regulating Bach remedies as medicines and classified them as foods; food health-claim rules apply, and some remedies contain enough alcohol that they cannot carry health claims [source: CAP advice, 29 Dec 2020]. The British Association of Flower Essence Producers advises on production, labelling and advertising; UK law prevents essence therapists from advising on cancer treatment or using wording that makes essences sound medicinal [source: Cancer Research UK]. Practitioners are not statutorily regulated; voluntary registers include COREP, the British Flower & Vibrational Essences Association and the GRCCT [source: Cancer Research UK].
USA: "the FDA regulates health products" [source: Cancer Research UK]; the product category under which individual essences are marketed [uncertain: not verified]. Advertising claims are subject to industry self-regulation: in 2007 the National Advertising Division recommended discontinuing stress-and-anxiety performance claims for a flower-remedy cream because the study offered tested a different product [source: Drug Store News 2007].
Australia: lower-risk complementary medicines on the AUST L pathway are self-certified by sponsors with no TGA premarket assessment of efficacy; the TGA handles advertising complaints [source: Harvey et al. 2020]; the listing status of specific Bush essence products [uncertain: not verified]. Unregistered practitioners fall under state health-complaints codes [uncertain: not verified].
Canada and EU outside UK: [uncertain: not verified].

2c. The psychotherapist's framework alongside it [synthesis]

No fixed session count; the work is woven into ordinary therapy sessions.

Inquire and record (intake and periodic review): ask about all complementary use, record product type, source, who advised it, cost, and what it is for. Move on when the use is documented and the client feels unjudged.
Understand meaning (one or more sessions as relevant): explanatory model, hopes, what draws the client. Move on when you can state the client's own account back to them accurately.
Support decisions and coordinate (only if there is a decision or a medical interface): values clarification, information routes, consent to contact prescriber/pharmacist. Move on when the client has made an informed choice or declined further discussion.
Monitor risk throughout: escalate to risk response (section 4.6) at any point if medical care is delayed, a child is affected, alcohol content matters clinically, or there is financial or group pressure.
Return to therapy goals: essence use becomes one more piece of the client's coping and meaning-making, revisited at reviews.

3. Guiding principles

Ask without judgement. Practical meaning: routine, neutral questions about all complementary use, so clients disclose rather than conceal [synthesis].
Describe, attribute, do not adjudicate. Energy, vibration, soul and devic concepts are the system's own; report them as "the system holds that…", neither affirming nor ridiculing [synthesis].
Never perform, sell, prescribe or recommend. Practical meaning: no essences in the room, no choosing for the client, no referrals for commission, no endorsement of a brand or practitioner [synthesis; APA 3.06 Conflict of Interest].
Respect autonomy and dignity. The client decides what they use; your job is informed choice, not compliance [source: APA General Principle E].
Stay within competence. Do not give opinions on essences, alcohol content effects or interactions; route to the prescriber or pharmacist [source: APA 2.01 Boundaries of Competence].
Base judgements on established knowledge. When asked "do they work?", give the one-line evidence status and the regulator's position, not your private view [source: APA 2.04].
Avoid harm first. Any sign that essences are replacing needed medical or psychiatric care takes priority over rapport [source: APA 3.04 Avoiding Harm].
No exploitation or blurred roles. Do not train, buy from, or sell to clients in this field; manage dual roles if the client is a practitioner [source: APA 3.05, 3.08].
Cooperate with other professionals. With consent, inform and coordinate with the client's doctor or pharmacist and, where relevant, the essence practitioner [source: APA 3.09].
Informed consent about your own role. Tell clients early that you will ask about complementary use, that you neither endorse nor oppose it, and when you would share information with their doctor [source: APA 10.01; synthesis].
Emotional-state language is a door, not a diagnosis. Essence systems match products to emotional states; the client's chosen descriptions can be explored therapeutically without treating them as clinical formulations [synthesis].
Document. Record what is used, the client's reasons, risk discussions, consents and contacts [synthesis].

[source for section 3 ethics standards: APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct]

4. Intervention inventory

All interventions below are the psychotherapist's own work alongside flower essence use. They are [synthesis] unless a source is tagged. The therapist never performs, sells, prescribes or recommends essences.

4.1 Routine, non-judgemental inquiry and recording

Purpose / when: at intake and at periodic reviews; whenever a client mentions remedies, "drops", sprays, Rescue-type products, a naturopath or kinesiologist, or a new practitioner. Essences are widely self-purchased, so clients may not think of them as "treatment" worth mentioning [source: Cancer Research UK, on self-purchase].
Steps: (1) Normalise: say you ask everyone about everything they use for wellbeing. (2) Ask open questions: what, since when, for what, chosen by whom (self, shop, practitioner, online quiz, friend). (3) Ask about form and whether the product contains alcohol (as a fact on the label, not advice). (4) Ask whether their doctor or pharmacist knows. (5) Ask about cost and any courses or memberships. (6) Record neutrally in the notes, using the client's words for the purpose.
Example language (illustrative): "I ask everyone about anything they use to look after their mood or health, from herbal teas to flower remedies to practitioners they see. There are no right answers here. Is there anything like that you use?" / "What do you take it for, in your own words?"
Watch for: hesitation or apology (signals expected judgement; slow down); use described as replacing prescribed medication or psychiatric care (go to 4.6); several practitioners or escalating spending. Working: the client volunteers updates at later sessions.

4.2 Exploring meaning, hopes and the explanatory model

Purpose / when: once use is known and it matters to the client; especially when essences are tied to identity, a practitioner relationship, or hopes about change. Essence systems match products to emotional states and qualities such as courage or joy [source: Cancer Research UK; Simon & Schuster page], so the client's choice often encodes how they see their problem.
Steps: (1) Ask what drew them (control, hope, gentleness, distrust of medicine, connection to nature or spirituality, community, family tradition). (2) Ask what they expect to change and how they would notice it. (3) Elicit their explanatory model of their difficulty (energy, emotional blockage, soul lesson, stress, chemistry) and how essences fit it. (4) Reflect it back accurately, without correcting. (5) Link to therapy goals: where does the model overlap with what you are working on together? (6) Note any meanings that carry risk (e.g. symptoms read as "emotional release").
Example language (illustrative): "When you chose that essence, what were you hoping it would help you feel?" / "So in the way you see it, the anxiety is something stuck that needs releasing. Tell me more about that."
Watch for: distrust of medicine rooted in past medical harm (validate the experience; it is clinically important); magical or rigid thinking emerging as a new symptom (consider mental-state review); idealisation of a practitioner. Working: the client can describe their own model and also hold your role as separate.

4.3 Using the client's chosen "quality" words as therapeutic material

Purpose / when: when a client describes essences in terms of qualities they want more of (courage, trust, letting go, confidence). This is not an essence technique; it is ordinary exploration of client language, applied to material they bring [synthesis].
Steps: (1) Ask which quality the essence is meant to bring. (2) Explore when the client already shows a little of that quality. (3) Identify what gets in the way (beliefs, situations, relationships). (4) Plan, within your own modality (CBT experiment, ACT values work, compassion-focused practice etc.), small steps toward it. (5) Keep authorship with the client: the change is credited to what they do, without disputing the role they give the essence.
Example language (illustrative): "You said the remedy is for courage. When did you last act with even a bit of courage this week?" / "Whatever helps you feel steadier, what would courage look like on Monday at that meeting?"
Watch for: you drifting into endorsing or selecting essences (stop; restate your role); client attributing all gains to the product and none to their effort (gently widen the account). Working: client names their own actions as part of change.

4.4 Supporting informed, values-based decisions

Purpose / when: when the client is weighing essences against, or alongside, medical, psychiatric or psychological treatment; when a practitioner, family member or group is pushing a choice; when spending is significant.
Steps: (1) Clarify the decision in the client's words. (2) Elicit values (safety, naturalness, autonomy, evidence, cost, family harmony). (3) Offer the neutral information you can stand behind: the one-line evidence status (section 1) and the regulator's position (section 2b); for health questions, route to the doctor or pharmacist. (4) Distinguish "alongside" from "instead of": essence organisations and cancer charities present essences as complementary, and Cancer Research UK advises telling cancer doctors before using them [source: Cancer Research UK]. (5) Use a simple pros/cons or values grid of your own; no published decision aid specific to flower essences is cited here [uncertain: not verified]. (6) Accept the client's decision; document the discussion.
Example language (illustrative): "You're the one who decides. My part is making sure you've got what you need to decide well. What matters most to you here?" / "Using something alongside your treatment is one decision; using it instead is a different one. Which are we talking about?"
Watch for: coercion in either direction (yours or others'); pressure to stop medicines "to let the essences work" (go to 4.5 and 4.6). Working: the client can state their reasons and has the information they asked for.

4.5 Coordination with the doctor or pharmacist (with consent)

Purpose / when: whenever there is a medical interface: prescribed medication, pregnancy, alcohol-sensitive conditions or recovery from alcohol use, children, cancer or other serious illness, or the client considering changing medication.
Steps: (1) Explain why coordination helps. (2) Obtain explicit, specific consent: who, what, for what purpose. (3) Encourage the client to tell the prescriber or pharmacist themselves first, and offer a letter or call if they prefer. (4) Share facts only (product, use, client's reasons, your concerns about delay or alcohol content); do not give pharmacological opinions. (5) Never advise starting, stopping or changing any medicine or remedy; direct those questions to the prescriber. (6) Record consent and contacts.
Example language (illustrative): "Many of these drops contain some alcohol, and your doctor or pharmacist is the right person to say whether that matters for you. Would you be willing to mention it, or would you like me to?" (Cancer Research UK notes many remedies contain small amounts of alcohol and that people concerned should speak to their doctor or practitioner [source: Cancer Research UK].)
Watch for: refusal of consent (respect it unless a safeguarding or serious-risk threshold is met; explain those limits in advance). Working: the medical team knows, and the client feels supported rather than reported on.

4.6 Risk recognition and response

Purpose / when: throughout. Flower essences are generally described as low in direct physical risk [source: Cancer Research UK]; the clinically important risks are indirect.
Steps (screen for each, respond proportionately):
1. Delay or replacement of medical or psychiatric care: ask directly whether anything has been stopped, postponed or not started. If yes, explore reasons, give the evidence line, encourage contact with the treating clinician, and document. Essences do not prevent, control or cure cancer [source: Cancer Research UK]; any claim that they treat a physical disease is the seller's claim.
2. Reinterpreting symptoms: some followers interpret rashes as stored emotions being released [source: Cancer Research UK]. Encourage medical review of new physical symptoms rather than accepting this reading [synthesis].
3. Alcohol content: relevant to clients in recovery from alcohol use, pregnancy, children, and some medicines; route all questions to the doctor or pharmacist [source: Cancer Research UK on alcohol; synthesis on groups].
4. Children: essences are sometimes given to children and animals (the Alaskan programme accepts child cases) [source: Alaskan Flower Essence Project]. Explore consent and the child's assent; safeguarding applies if a child is deprived of needed medical care [synthesis; see 4.9].
5. Mental-health deterioration: essences chosen for "emotional states" can stand in for assessment of depression, suicidality or psychosis. Carry out standard risk assessment when mood or thinking worsens; do not accept "working through it with essences" as a safety plan [synthesis].
6. Financial exploitation and certification businesses: tiered trainings, certification fees, multiple practitioner consultations, and product blends can add up; certification routes may require paid training, case work and processing fees [source: Alaskan Flower Essence Project]. Ask about spending and pressure to buy or train [synthesis].
7. Group and practitioner pressure: watch for a practitioner or group discouraging medical care, isolating the client, or claiming special spiritual authority. Explore autonomy and support exits [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "Has anyone suggested you stop or put off any treatment while you use the essences?" / "I'm not going to tell you to stop using them. I do want to make sure your doctor sees that rash."
Watch for: minimisation, secrecy, sudden withdrawal from medical appointments, rising spending. Working: the client keeps medical care and can talk openly about both.

4.7 Health anxiety and somatic symptom presentations

Purpose / when: when essence use is driven by persistent illness worry, reassurance-seeking, or medically unexplained symptoms, or when buying successive remedies functions as a safety behaviour. Cross-reference Domain II for the full protocols.
Steps: (1) Formulate the cycle (trigger, threat appraisal, checking or remedy-taking, short-term relief, maintained worry). (2) Without targeting the essence itself, identify whether remedy-seeking is functioning as reassurance. (3) Apply established approaches from Domain II (CBT for health anxiety, somatic symptom approaches) to the worry and safety behaviours as a whole. (4) Coordinate with the GP to avoid fragmented care. (5) Let the client decide about essences; work on the cycle, not the product [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "When the worry spikes, what do you reach for first? And how long does the relief last?"
Watch for: substitution (one remedy replaced by another check); shame. Working: less checking and reassurance-seeking overall.

4.8 Managing your own role, conflicts of interest and dual roles

Purpose / when: when a client asks you to recommend, choose or bring essences; when a client is an essence practitioner or trainee; when you yourself use or train in essences.
Steps: (1) State your role: you do not recommend, sell or select remedies. (2) Do not sell products or courses to clients or take referral fees [source: APA 3.06; synthesis]. (3) If the client is a practitioner, keep therapy focused on their goals; avoid becoming their customer, student or colleague [source: APA 3.05]. (4) If you have personal interest in essences, keep it out of the therapy; seek supervision. (5) Document how the request was handled.
Example language (illustrative): "That's not something I recommend or choose for clients, either way. What I can do is help you think through what you want from it."
Watch for: a pull to please or impress the client by sharing your views. Working: the client accepts the role boundary and continues to disclose.

4.9 Children, families, consent and safeguarding

Purpose / when: a parent is giving essences to a child, or a family disagrees about essences versus medical treatment.
Steps: (1) Explore the parent's reasons and hopes (4.2). (2) Ask whether the child's doctor knows, and encourage disclosure. (3) Seek the child's assent and views appropriate to age. (4) Check that the child is receiving needed medical care, vaccination as advised by their health service, and adequate nutrition. (5) If a child is being deprived of necessary medical care, follow local safeguarding procedures [synthesis]. Never name the child in external communications beyond what the safeguarding process requires.
Example language (illustrative): "It sounds like you want something gentle for her. Alongside that, is her doctor still following up the asthma?"
Watch for: parental defensiveness; a practitioner advising against medical care for a child. Working: medical care continues and the family can discuss choices openly.

4.10 Reporting routes

Purpose / when: misleading advertising, disease-treatment claims, a product or practitioner causing harm, or practitioner misconduct.
Steps: (1) Discuss with the client and seek consent unless there is a mandatory duty. (2) Choose the route: UK advertising claims to the ASA (CAP rules restrict health claims for flower remedies) [source: CAP advice 2020]; UK product questions via the MHRA (remedies now classified as foods) or trading standards [source: CAP advice 2020; trading standards route: synthesis]; UK practitioners via their voluntary register (COREP, BFVEA, GRCCT) [source: Cancer Research UK]; Australia advertising and listed-medicine complaints to the TGA [source: Harvey et al. 2020]; US advertising to the FTC or industry self-regulation, products to the FDA [synthesis; NAD route illustrated by Drug Store News 2007]. (3) Children: safeguarding route always takes priority. (4) Your own professional body for concerns about a registered colleague using essences in place of indicated treatment [source: APA 3.04; synthesis]. (5) Document.
Example language (illustrative): "That leaflet says the drops cure depression. Claims like that can be reported to the advertising regulator. Would you like to do that, or shall we look at it together?"
Watch for: client fear of upsetting a practitioner they like; respect their choice where no mandatory duty applies. Working: concern is lodged, and the therapeutic relationship holds.

4.11 Documentation and review

Purpose / when: every session where complementary use, risk or coordination is discussed.
Steps: record products used (in the client's words), reasons, information given, decisions, consents, contacts with other professionals, risk screening, and reports made; review at each formal review point [synthesis].
Example language (illustrative): "I'll note that you're using the essences for sleep worries and that you'll mention them to your pharmacist. Is that accurate?"
Watch for: notes that read as endorsement or ridicule; keep them factual. Working: another clinician could pick up the thread.

5. Handling problems

The essence organisations' own materials do not address psychotherapy-side problems; all guidance in this section is [synthesis] unless tagged.

Client asks "Do you believe in them?" Avoid both endorsement and dismissal. Give your role and the one-line evidence status if asked, then return to their experience. (Illustrative) "My job isn't to rule on that. What I can say is that trials so far haven't shown clear effects. What matters more here is what they mean to you."
Client asks you to choose or approve a blend. Decline warmly, restate role (4.8), and redirect to what they hope the blend will do (4.2, 4.3).
Concealment discovered late. Treat as information about expected judgement, not as a rupture by the client. Repair: acknowledge you may have seemed sceptical; re-run 4.1.
Rupture after you raised risk. If the client hears concern as attack, name it, apologise for any impact, separate concern about delay of care from views on essences, and return to shared goals.
Stuck: client attributes all change to essences and disengages from therapy work. Do not argue the mechanism. Use 4.3 to locate their own actions in recent gains; review goals together; ask what therapy should now focus on.
Non-adherence to medical treatment justified by essence beliefs. Explore the specific fears behind stopping (side effects, dependence, identity). With consent, involve the prescriber. Never advise on the medicine yourself. Escalate under 4.6 if risk is high.
Overwhelm from conflicting advice (doctor, practitioner, family, internet). Slow down; map each voice; use a values grid (4.4); identify the one next step the client controls. Cancer Research UK advises caution about internet information not backed by research [source: Cancer Research UK].
Family conflict about essences. Hold a joint session if useful; each person states hopes and fears; separate the shared aim (wellbeing) from disputed means; protect the client's autonomy and any child's safety (4.9).
Client is training as an essence practitioner and seeks your validation or referrals. Maintain boundaries (4.8); explore what the training means for identity and income; watch for financial strain from tiered courses and certification fees (4.6).
Physical symptom reframed as "emotional release". Acknowledge the client's framework, then separate it from the practical step of a medical check (4.6).
Escalating purchases or practitioner dependence. Explore function (reassurance, connection, control); consider health-anxiety formulation (4.7); review spending and supports.
Group or practitioner discouraging medical care, or high-control dynamics. Explore experiences of pressure, isolation, special authority claims; support the client's own judgement; consider reporting routes (4.10).
Client in alcohol recovery using alcohol-preserved drops. Raise it neutrally as a label fact and route to their doctor, pharmacist and recovery supports; do not advise on alternatives yourself.
Therapist's own reactions (scepticism, enthusiasm). Notice countertransference; use supervision; keep notes factual.

Sources

Web sources:

Books cited:

White, I. (1993). Australian Bush Flower Essences. Findhorn Press.
Kaminski, P. (2015). Choosing Flower Essences: An Assessment Guide. Flower Essence Services.

Items marked [uncertain: not verified]: FES theory of soul qualities and FES/Bush course levels; US product category for essences; Australian listing status of Bush products and state codes for unregistered practitioners; Canadian and EU regulation; any published decision aid for flower essences.

← Previous · XII-067Bach flower remedies Next · XII-069 →Gem elixirs