Atlas›Domain XIV · Western esoteric, divinatory & new spiritual movements›Guide 194
Guide XIV-194

Lenormand and cartomancy

Johann Kaspar Hechtel1799Nuremberg
A 26 · L 60 · M 1417 interventions in the Trinity explorer
Client cardCompare
[source: …] where a claim comes from[uncertain] not confirmed in a primary source[synthesis] the writer's reconstruction

1. Introduction

Version followed: the 36-card Petit Lenormand as current guidebook publishers and deck makers describe it (Caitlín Matthews, The Complete Lenormand Oracle Handbook, Destiny Books 2014, per the publisher's description; the Prisma Visions "Learn" page; Labyrinthos Academy), with the history as the Etteilla Foundation and Robert M. Place summarise it. Playing-card cartomancy (fortune-telling with ordinary 32- or 52-card packs) is covered in outline only.

What it is. Lenormand is a divination system, not a therapy. The Petit Lenormand is a deck of 36 numbered cards, each with one everyday image (for example a rider, a house, an anchor, a cross) and, on many decks, a small inset of an ordinary playing card. Its publishers present it as a plain, "non-esoteric" kind of cartomancy that gives direct, practical answers about relationships, work, money and family. [source: Simon & Schuster/Destiny Books page for Matthews 2014; Llewellyn page for Rana George, The Essential Lenormand, 2014; Spiral Nature, Bodirsky]

History, as sources give it.

  • Marie Anne Lenormand (1772–1843) was a well-known Paris fortune-teller of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic period. Her reputed clients include Empress Josephine. The Etteilla Foundation says she read with ordinary playing cards and 32-card piquet packs, not the 36-card deck that now bears her name. [source: Etteilla Foundation, Petit Lenormand family page; Spiral Nature] Accounts that she advised Robespierre or Tsar Alexander I come from popular retellings. [uncertain: secondary, unverified]
  • The 36-card structure goes back to Das Spiel der Hoffnung ("The Game of Hope"), a race game made by Johann Kaspar Hechtel of Nuremberg. Players moved markers across 36 cards laid out in a 6 × 6 square, throwing dice. The Anchor ("Hope") was the winning card and the Cross was a trap. Its booklet also gave layouts for fortune-telling. [source: Place 2019, citing Decker, Depaulis and Dummett, A Wicked Pack of Cards; Etteilla Foundation]
  • Dates differ between sources. Place gives 1799 for the game and 1846 for the first German "Petit Le Normand". The Etteilla Foundation gives 1799 for the game's creation, 1800 for its publication by Gustav Philipp Jakob Bieling, and "the early 1850s" for commercial Lenormand decks. It calls the name "a marketing strategy" that traded on her fame after her death. [uncertain: sources conflict on dates]
  • A different 54-card Grand Jeu de Mlle Lenormand (Paris, 1845), with astrological and mythological imagery, is a separate deck. [source: Etteilla Foundation]
  • Fortune-telling with ordinary playing cards was popularised by celebrity diviners such as Lenormand. Etteilla (Jean-Baptiste Alliette) is linked mainly to tarot-based divination decks of the late 1780s. [source: Etteilla Foundation, France page]

How practitioners say it works. Cards are read as a sentence. Each card has a short set of keywords. Meaning comes from combining neighbouring cards, and the reader applies them to concrete, near-term situations. [source: Prisma Visions; Spiral Nature] Practitioners attribute any predictive power to the method itself and to the reader's intuition.

Evidence status (one line). Controlled tests of Lenormand specifically are not reported in the sources cited here [uncertain: not verified]; for psychic and card readings in general, Roe's Edinburgh doctoral thesis (1996) found "little reason on the basis of experimental evidence" to believe readers have paranormal access to client information, and explains how accurate readings feel through cold reading, Barnum-type acceptance and clients' own interpretation [source: Roe 1996].

Core idea of change in the therapist's work. The therapist does not judge whether the cards are true. A reading the client brings is treated as material that shows the client's hopes, fears, decision style and relationship to uncertainty. Roe's finding that clients make statements fit their own concerns supports using that material reflectively. The function of consulting also matters: reflection, ritual, family custom, reassurance or compulsion. [synthesis, drawing on Roe 1996]

2. Framework

No therapy protocol for Lenormand exists in the sources. The structure below has two parts: what the client goes through in a reading, as practitioners describe it, and how the therapist's work can be phased. The second part is [synthesis]. No source gives session counts, so none are stated.

A. The reading, as practitioners describe it (to understand what the client brings) [source: Prisma Visions; Labyrinthos; Matthews 2014 publisher page]

  • Question and context. The reader sets a focus, such as work or a relationship. Sometimes a card is assigned to stand for the topic or for the person asking.
  • Layout. Small spreads come first: lines of 3, 5 or 7 cards for near-term questions, and a 3 × 3 "nine-card" layout centred on the person. Larger readings use the full 36-card Grand Tableau, which practitioners present as a broad or longer-range picture.
  • Reading the cards. Pairs are read with the first card as the subject and the second as its modifier. Strings are read as a short story. Cards near the focus card weigh more than distant ones, and some cards are said to "face" a neighbour. Cards are not reversed. Most cards are treated as neutral, with a few seen as favourable or unfavourable.
  • Extra methods in the Grand Tableau. "Houses" lay each card's fixed number over the grid. "Knighting" reads cards a chess-knight's move away to bring out hidden motives. Mirroring and chaining regroup cards. Some readers use the playing-card insets: suit themes, red or black for yes/no, court cards for people.
  • Result. A concrete, often predictive statement.

B. The therapist's work: phases [synthesis]

  1. Engage and map. Goal: learn what the practice means to the client in the client's own words, using the Cultural Formulation Interview. Move on once you know who reads (self, family, paid reader, app), how often, at what cost and for what purpose.
  2. Formulate the function. Goal: tell apart reflective, devotional, cultural or recreational use from reassurance-seeking, avoidance of decisions, dependence on a reader, or financial harm. Move on once you and the client agree on whether consulting is a problem and, if so, what kind.
  3. Targeted work. Use the parts of the inventory (section 4) that fit: reflective use of readings, decision work, ERP for compulsive consulting, exploitation safety planning, grief work.
  4. Consolidate. Goal: the client consults by choice, not compulsion, and makes major decisions with more than one source of information. Relapse plan for times of stress.

Format: individual therapy. Family or couple sessions when divination is a family practice or a point of conflict. [synthesis]

3. Guiding principles

  • Neither endorse nor debunk. Do not say the cards are accurate or worthless. Attribute claims ("Lenormand readers hold that…"). [synthesis]
  • Meaning belongs to the client. Ask what the client made of a reading before offering anything. Roe's "artifact" model has clients reading statements through their own concerns. [source: Roe 1996; application synthesis]
  • Function over content. Assess what consulting does for the client (soothes, decides, connects, honours a relative) rather than arguing about card meanings. [synthesis]
  • Cultural respect. Card fortune-telling has long been a parlour and family custom in Germany and Central Europe and in France. A client may have learned it from a grandparent. Explore that heritage and do not frame it as pathology. [source: Etteilla Foundation for the history; stance synthesis]
  • Ask about help-seeking, including readers. The CFI explicitly asks about other kinds of helpers and healers, including folk, religious and spiritual ones. Ask about readers routinely. [source: APA DSM-5-TR CFI]
  • The therapist is not a reader. No readings, card pulls or interpretations "from the cards" in therapy, even if asked or skilled. You can explore the client's reading. You do not produce one. [synthesis]
  • Keep decision ownership with the client. Treat a reading as one input among several. Never let it replace medical, legal or safety advice. [synthesis]
  • Watch for compulsion and exploitation. Repeated consulting for certainty, and escalating payments to readers, are clinical targets. [source: IOCDF blog (Karr); Bromley Trading Standards; WA Consumer Protection]
  • Do not pathologise belief. Belief in divination alone is not a symptom. Assess for psychosis, mania or OCD only on the usual clinical grounds. [synthesis]
  • Do not reproduce materials. Do not hand out card-meaning tables or spread sheets from guidebooks. Refer to them by name if needed. [synthesis]

4. Intervention inventory

No published psychotherapeutic use of Lenormand or playing-card cartomancy is documented in the sources cited here [uncertain: not verified]. For tarot as a reflective tool, see XIV 192. Everything below is clinical procedure adapted to this practice. Each item says what is sourced and what is [synthesis].

4.1 Mapping the client's practice (CFI-informed)

  • Purpose / when: At intake, or whenever the client mentions readings, cards, a "reader" or a forecast. It makes the practice visible without judgement.
  • Steps:
    1. Use the CFI's help-seeking questions. The CFI explicitly asks about other helpers and healers, with probes for folk healing and religious or spiritual counselling. Add the Religion and Spirituality supplementary module if divination is part of the client's spiritual life. [source: APA DSM-5-TR CFI] Clinicians may reproduce the CFI for use with their own patients but may not modify it. Use the published form; do not invent items. [source: CFI permissions note]
    2. Ask who reads (self, a relative, a paid reader in person, by phone or online, an app), which deck (Petit Lenormand, Grand Jeu, ordinary playing cards), how often, and what it costs per month. [synthesis]
    3. Ask where the practice comes from (family, friends, online community) and what it means (fun, spiritual practice, heritage, guidance). [synthesis]
    4. Ask about the last three readings: the question, what the cards were said to show, and what the client did afterwards. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Some people I work with use cards or see a reader. Is that part of your life? I'm asking so I understand what helps you, not to judge it." / "When did you last have a reading, and what did you do with it afterwards?"
  • Watch for: guardedness that suggests expected ridicule; secrecy about money; a reader who tells the client to keep the contact secret (a scam marker per Bromley Trading Standards). It is working when the client describes the practice openly, in their own terms.

4.2 Working with a reading the client brings (reflective or projective use)

  • Purpose / when: The client wants to talk about a reading. Use it as material showing what the client fears, hopes and expects. [synthesis; rationale from Roe 1996's finding that clients interpret statements through their own concerns]
  • Steps:
    1. Ask the client to describe the reading in their own words. Do not look up card meanings or offer your own reading. [synthesis]
    2. Note that Lenormand is read as combined statements (pairs and strings). Ask which combination stood out and what sentence the client heard. [synthesis, based on the pair/string method described by Prisma Visions]
    3. Explore the client's own meaning: "What did that bring to mind in your life right now?" Track emotion, not accuracy.
    4. Name the theme in the client's language (for example fear of rejection, longing for stability) and link it to the presenting problem.
    5. Separate theme from prediction: the theme can be worked with whether or not the prediction comes true.
  • Example language (illustrative): "You said the Cross next to the House felt heavy. What does 'heavy at home' mean for you this month?" / "Let's set aside whether it will happen, and look at what it touched in you."
  • Watch for: the client pressing you to confirm the reading (shift to 4.5 if it is compulsive); a theme that opens trauma or grief (slow down). It is working when the client talks about their life rather than the cards, and links new themes to goals.

4.3 Decisions made by divination

  • Purpose / when: The client has made, or plans to make, a significant decision (relationship, job, money, health, moving, a child's care) mainly on a reading.
  • Steps: [synthesis]
    1. Find out what weight the reading has: one input, a tie-breaker, permission, or the deciding voice.
    2. Map other sources of information: facts, advice from qualified people, the client's values, the effect on others.
    3. Use a standard decision balance (pros and cons, short- and long-term) with the reading written in as one line, labelled as the client's own input.
    4. For any health, legal, safety or financial decision, check that the client has relevant professional advice. Never advise on medicines. For health questions, route the client to their doctor.
    5. Agree a delay between the reading and an irreversible action for big decisions, if the client chooses.
  • Example language (illustrative): "The reading is one voice here. What do your own values say, and what does the information you have say?" / "If the cards had said the opposite, what would you want to do?"
  • Watch for: decisions that put the client or others at risk; a reader who steers decisions in their own interest (more readings, "remedies", ceremonies). It is working when the client can say why they chose, beyond the reading.

4.4 Long-range forecasts and anticipatory dread

  • Purpose / when: After a Grand Tableau or year-ahead reading, which practitioners present as a broad or longer-range picture [source: Prisma Visions; Spiral Nature], the client is preoccupied with a predicted loss, illness or betrayal.
  • Steps: [synthesis]
    1. Get the exact wording the client remembers, then the client's interpretation (often harsher).
    2. Assess functioning: sleep, avoidance, checking, conflict with a partner "predicted" to betray.
    3. Use cognitive work on prediction (probability estimates, evidence, alternatives) without arguing about divination itself.
    4. If the dread drives repeated readings to "check" the outcome, move to 4.5.
    5. If a reading predicted illness, encourage an ordinary medical check for any actual symptoms and discourage acting on the prediction alone.
  • Example language (illustrative): "What did the reader actually say, and what has your mind added since?" / "How is living with this forecast affecting you day to day?"
  • Watch for: self-fulfilling behaviour (withdrawing from a partner who has been "read" as unfaithful); health anxiety. It is working when the forecast loses its hold on daily choices.

4.5 Compulsive consulting and reassurance-seeking: ERP framing

  • Purpose / when: The client consults cards, apps or readers many times on the same question to feel certain, the relief is short, and urges come back. Possibly within OCD, generalised anxiety or relationship anxiety.
  • Rationale: A blog on the IOCDF site (Karr) describes reassurance-seeking as a cycle. Reassurance gives brief relief, the threat returns, and the urge grows, which keeps OCD and anxiety going. ERP helps the client resist reassurance and practise tolerating uncertainty. [source: IOCDF blog, Karr] Applying this to divination is [synthesis].
  • Steps:
    1. Assess for OCD and anxiety disorders with standard measures. If OCD is present, refer to or work alongside an ERP-trained clinician. [synthesis]
    2. Build a log: trigger, question, number of readings or pulls, cost, distress before and after, how long relief lasted. [synthesis]
    3. Psychoeducation on the reassurance cycle, using the client's own log. [source: IOCDF blog]
    4. Agree response prevention in steps: delaying the urge to consult and lengthening the delay over time; removing apps; one question per reading; no repeat readings on the same question. [source: IOCDF blog describes delaying urges and gradual reduction; applying it to cards is synthesis]
    5. Practise uncertainty statements the client writes, in the spirit of "maybe that will happen, maybe not". [source: IOCDF blog]
    6. Address accommodation: a partner or friend who keeps doing readings on request. [source: IOCDF blog mentions family accommodation; application synthesis]
    7. Respect the practice. The goal is to end the compulsion, not the practice. If divination is part of the client's spiritual or cultural life, agree together what non-compulsive use looks like. [synthesis]
  • Safety and consent: Explain the rationale and get informed consent before any exposure work. Expect a temporary rise in anxiety. Stop and reassess if suicidal thinking, dissociation or severe panic appears. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Each extra reading buys a little relief and then the worry comes back louder. Shall we try waiting it out and see what happens to the urge?"
  • Watch for: reassurance-seeking moving to the therapist ("Do you think it'll be OK?"). Respond without reassuring (see 5.3). It is working when the number of consultations and the distress both fall and the client tolerates not knowing.

4.6 Costs and exploitation by paid readers

  • Purpose / when: The client pays a reader, especially by phone, online or after a street or shopping-centre approach, and the costs are rising. Or a reader has said the client is cursed, in danger or blocked.
  • What consumer regulators describe:
    • Western Australia's Commissioner for Consumer Protection describes a cheap first reading, then a claim that the person is cursed or in danger, then demands for hundreds and later thousands of dollars for ceremonies. Its advice: be very cautious about curse or danger claims, confirm the full cost before paying, and refuse pressure to pay more. Report to WA ScamNet. [source: WA Consumer Protection]
    • Bromley Trading Standards (UK) describes "psychics" contacting people by post, phone or email, selling worthless lucky charms, asking for regular payments and telling people to keep the contact secret. It points victims to their bank (159), Citizens Advice and Action Fraud. [source: Bromley Trading Standards]
    • In the US, the FTC takes reports of scams, fraud and unfair business conduct at ReportFraud.ftc.gov, whether or not the person lost money [source: FTC 2020]. In Great Britain, the Fraudulent Mediums Act 1951 was repealed in 2008 and paid psychic services were brought under consumer-protection regulations. Humanists UK describes the burden of proof that no fraud took place as lying with the trader [source: Humanists UK 2008]. The exact regulations now in force are [uncertain: not verified].
  • Steps: [synthesis unless marked]
    1. Screen: monthly spend, debts, secrecy, curse or danger claims, offers of paid "removal", gifts or ceremonies.
    2. Name the pattern as regulators describe it, neutrally, without attacking the client's beliefs.
    3. Safety plan: no further payments while you talk it through, a trusted person to show letters to, contacting the bank if card details were given. [source: Bromley Trading Standards]
    4. Support reporting to the local route if the client wishes (Action Fraud and Citizens Advice in England and Wales; WA ScamNet in Western Australia; the local consumer agency elsewhere).
    5. Work through shame and fear, especially fear that the "curse" will act if payments stop. Treat this as anxiety work (4.4, 4.5).
    6. If the client may lack capacity or be at risk of financial abuse, follow local adult-safeguarding procedures.
  • Example language (illustrative): "Whatever you believe about the cards, consumer agencies warn that being told you're cursed and must pay to fix it is a common scam pattern. Can we look at what you've paid so far?"
  • Watch for: the client hiding further payments; the reader making contact again. It is working when payments stop and the client can talk about the experience without shame.

4.7 Grief and readings

  • Purpose / when: A bereaved client consults cards or readers about the dead person, or for signs about the death or what comes after.
  • Steps: [synthesis]
    1. Explore what the readings give the client (connection, comfort, unfinished business) and what they cost (money, waiting for the next reading, delay in accepting the loss).
    2. Respect continuing-bonds practices that comfort the client and fit their tradition.
    3. Watch for exploitation of bereaved people (escalating fees, messages that create guilt or dependence) and use 4.6 if present.
    4. Assess for prolonged grief, depression and suicidal thinking (for example a wish to rejoin the dead person) with standard risk assessment.
    5. Offer grief-focused work; refer to specialist bereavement services if needed.
  • Example language (illustrative): "What do you hope a reading will tell you about her? What happens for you in the days after one?"
  • Watch for: life put on hold for readings; guilt messages; any suicide-related language, which must be assessed directly. It is working when the bond is carried in ways that support daily life.

4.8 Differential assessment without pathologising belief

  • Purpose / when: Content or behaviour around the cards raises clinical questions.
  • Steps: [synthesis]
    1. Belief in divination, or a sense of an intuition guiding readings, is common and not in itself a symptom.
    2. Consider psychosis if the client believes cards are being sent as personal messages by persecutors, has fixed referential beliefs beyond their community's norms, or has other positive symptoms. Ask the client's community or family whether the experience is typical for them, with the client's consent.
    3. Consider mania if readings come with grandiosity, no need for sleep and risky spending on "what the cards promised".
    4. Consider OCD or anxiety for repetitive checking-style consulting (4.5), and depression where readings feed hopelessness.
    5. Use the CFI to understand norms within the client's community. [source: CFI; application synthesis]
    6. If the clinical focus is a religious or spiritual problem rather than a mental disorder, ICD-10-CM Z65.8, Other specified problems related to psychosocial circumstances (includes 'Religious or spiritual problem'), may apply [source: ICD-10-CM Z65.8, Unbound Medicine]. The DSM-5-TR wording is [uncertain: not verified].
  • Example language (illustrative): "In your family, when cards seem to speak to someone, how do people usually understand that?"
  • Watch for: your own bias in either direction. It is working when the formulation stands on clinical features, not on what the client believes.

4.9 Boundaries: the therapist does not read cards

  • Purpose / when: The client asks you to pull a card or interpret their spread, or you practise cartomancy yourself.
  • Steps: [synthesis]
    1. Decline readings in therapy and explain why: your role is to help the client find their own meaning and make their own decisions.
    2. If you are also a reader, keep that practice completely separate from therapy: no readings for clients or former clients, no referrals to your own reading business, and no self-disclosure of the practice unless it clearly serves the client.
    3. Get consultation or supervision for any dual-relationship question. For multiple relationships, follow APA Ethics Code standard 3.05 [source: APA Ethics Code].
    4. Use the spiritual and religious competencies set out by Vieten et al. (2013, Psychology of Religion and Spirituality): 16 basic competencies covering attitudes, knowledge and skills, which include awareness of your own beliefs about practices like this one [source: IONS publication page; application synthesis].
  • Example language (illustrative): "I won't read the cards for you here. That would make me the authority on your life. I'd like to help you hear what you already think about this."
  • Watch for: feeling flattered or curious enough to make an exception. It is working when the client turns back to their own interpretation.

4.10 Cultural and family dimension

  • Purpose / when: Card reading is a family or community custom, or a source of conflict between generations or partners.
  • Steps: [synthesis; historical context from Etteilla Foundation]
    1. Explore the lineage: who taught the client, which deck, and what readings meant in the family.
    2. Recognise its long history as a parlour and household practice, for example the Petit Lenormand in Germany and Central Europe.
    3. With consent, involve family members when divination shapes family decisions, without taking sides on belief.
    4. If the client wishes, involve a respected figure from their community, for example a long-standing reader they trust, to discuss healthy use.
  • Example language (illustrative): "It sounds like the cards are tied to your grandmother. What does keeping that practice mean to you?"
  • Watch for: the therapist's culture-bound assumptions; a family member using readings to control choices. It is working when the client can keep the heritage and choose freely.

4.11 Children and adolescents

  • Purpose / when: A young person is distressed by readings, consults compulsively, or adults make care decisions about them by divination.
  • Steps: [synthesis]
    1. Assess distress, compulsive use (4.5) and online exposure to paid readers.
    2. Check that health and developmental needs are met through proper assessment and care, not decided by readings.
    3. Follow safeguarding procedures if needed care is refused or the young person is in a high-control or exploitative situation.
    4. Get parental consent and the young person's assent according to their age and local law.
  • Example language (illustrative): "When the reading said something scary, what did you do with that worry?"
  • Watch for: fear-based predictions given to children; secrecy. It is working when the young person can talk about the readings safely and their needs are met.

4.12 Readings about a partner, an ex or a love interest

  • Purpose / when: The client keeps consulting cards or readers about whether a partner loves them, is faithful, is "the one", or will come back. Love and relationship questions are among the practical questions Lenormand publishers say the method answers (see section 1). IOCDF clinical writers describe Relationship OCD (ROCD) as obsessive-compulsive symptoms focused on intimate relationships. They list reassurance-seeking from friends, family, therapists "or even psychics" among its compulsions, alongside checking, comparing and testing the partner. Treatment follows CBT for OCD: cognitive restructuring, ERP, imagination-based exposure and relapse prevention [source: IOCDF, Relationship OCD, Doron and Derby].
  • Steps:
    1. Map the pattern: which questions, how often, which readers or apps, and what the client does with each answer (texting the partner, checking their phone, ending things). [synthesis]
    2. Screen for ROCD (doubts about the relationship's "rightness" or about the partner's flaws), for retroactive jealousy, and for real safety concerns in the relationship. Do not assume every doubt is obsessional. [source: IOCDF ROCD for the categories; synthesis]
    3. If the pattern fits ROCD or another anxiety presentation, treat readings about the partner as one reassurance channel among several, in the 4.5 plan. [synthesis]
    4. If the reading is about an ex or someone who has said no, work with grief, rejection and hope, not with the prediction. [synthesis]
    5. If the client fears the partner, or a reader has told them to act against the partner, assess for domestic abuse and safety. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Each reading about him seems to settle things for a day. What happens to the doubt by the weekend?" / "If no card could tell you how he feels, what would you want to do about the relationship?"
  • Watch for: the partner being drawn in (readings shown to them as "evidence"); the therapist becoming the next source of reassurance (5.3). It is working when the client makes relationship choices on what happens between them and the partner, not on the cards.

4.13 App, phone and live-stream reading platforms

  • Purpose / when: The client consults through apps, paid chat or phone lines, or live-streamed readings, often late at night, with per-minute or subscription charges.
  • Steps:
    1. Look together at the platform's history: number of sessions, times of day, minutes, charges and subscriptions. [synthesis]
    2. Name digital reassurance-seeking as the IOCDF blog (Karr) describes it, if it fits: quick access shortens the cycle between doubt and relief. [source: IOCDF blog, Karr; application synthesis]
    3. Agree concrete limits the client chooses: delete or offload apps, remove saved card details, cancel subscriptions, set no-consult hours, and use a delay before any paid session. [synthesis]
    4. Explore parasocial attachment to a particular streamer or reader: what the relationship gives (company, being seen) and what else could give it. [synthesis]
    5. Where charges were deceptive or unauthorised, help the client contact their bank and report the trader: ReportFraud.ftc.gov in the US [source: FTC 2020]; the UK routes in 4.6. [source: Bromley Trading Standards]
  • Example language (illustrative): "What's it like at 2 a.m. when the app is right there? What would make it a bit harder to open?"
  • Watch for: a switch to another platform; hidden accounts; loneliness under the consulting. It is working when consulting drops, spending is visible and the client has other night-time supports.

4.14 When the client is a working reader

  • Purpose / when: The client reads cards for others, as a hobby or for money, and brings stress from that work: clients in crisis, bereaved or suicidal callers, pressure to give certainty, guilt about predictions, or platform targets. [synthesis]
  • Steps: [synthesis unless marked]
    1. Explore the work with the same curiosity as any occupation: what draws them, what they are proud of, what weighs on them.
    2. Help them set their own boundaries: which questions they decline (health, legal, pregnancy, death), how they signpost callers in crisis to emergency or crisis services, and session and income limits.
    3. Talk through their legal position as consumer bodies describe it. In Great Britain, paid psychic services have fallen under consumer-protection regulations since the 2008 repeal of the Fraudulent Mediums Act. [source: Humanists UK 2008] Refer detailed questions to a lawyer or trade body. Do not give legal advice.
    4. Work with secondary stress and guilt after a reading went badly. Supervision-like reflection is useful, but you are not their supervisor as a reader.
    5. If the client's own consulting has become compulsive, use 4.5. A professional reader can still have reassurance-seeking about their own life.
  • Example language (illustrative): "You hold a lot of other people's fear in those calls. Where does it go when you hang up?"
  • Watch for: the therapy turning into talk about card technique; the client asking you to refer people to them, or to be a client of theirs. Decline both, as in 4.9 and APA standard 3.05. It is working when the client works within limits they chose and carries less of their callers' distress.

4.15 Measuring severity and change

  • Purpose / when: Compulsive consulting is a treatment target and you need a baseline and a way to track change.
  • Steps:
    1. If OCD is present, rate severity with the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). It is a 10-item clinician-rated scale scored 0–4 per item (total 0–40), with separate obsession and compulsion subtotals. It was designed so that the score is not influenced by the type of symptom, and its developers reported excellent inter-rater reliability. [source: Archives of General Psychiatry 1989, Y-BOCS I] Use the published version under its terms and do not reproduce its items.
    2. Keep the 4.5 log as a personal measure: readings or pulls per week, minutes, money, distress before and after. [synthesis]
    3. Review both at agreed points and adjust the plan with the client. [synthesis]
  • Example language (illustrative): "Let's see where things are now, so we can tell together whether the plan is helping."
  • Watch for: measuring belief instead of impairment. Low-impairment, chosen use is not a target. Watch also for logging turning into another checking ritual. It is working when time, money and distress fall. [synthesis]

4.16 Referral and collaboration

  • Purpose / when: Part of the problem lies outside your competence or setting. [synthesis]
  • Steps: [synthesis unless marked]
    1. OCD or ROCD: refer to or work alongside an ERP-trained clinician. Medication questions go to a prescriber; never advise on medicines.
    2. Psychotic or manic features: psychiatric assessment or crisis services (4.8, 5.11).
    3. Debt, scams or financial abuse: the bank, the consumer routes in 4.6 and 4.13, and debt advice such as Citizens Advice. [source: Bromley Trading Standards for the bank and Citizens Advice routes] Adult-safeguarding procedures if the client may lack capacity or be at risk.
    4. Grief: bereavement services (4.7).
    5. Relationship safety: domestic-abuse services where 4.12 raises concerns.
    6. Children: safeguarding and assessment routes (4.11).
    7. With consent, coordinate care and share only what the client agrees to.
  • Example language (illustrative): "This part needs someone who specialises in it. I'll stay with you while we set that up."
  • Watch for: the client feeling passed on; referrals not followed up. It is working when the client takes up the referral and the services involved know their roles.

4.17 Relapse prevention and ending

  • Purpose / when: Consulting has become chosen rather than compulsive and therapy is moving towards its end (the consolidation phase in section 2). IOCDF clinical writers include relapse prevention planning in CBT for OCD and ROCD [source: IOCDF, Relationship OCD, Doron and Derby].
  • Steps: [synthesis unless marked]
    1. List early warning signs with the client: reinstalling an app, a second reading on the same question, secrecy about spending, late-night consulting.
    2. Name high-risk times: a break-up, a diagnosis, money stress, anniversaries of a death.
    3. Write a short plan: the delay rule, who the client tells, and how to restart the 4.5 steps after a lapse. Keep a lapse distinct from a relapse.
    4. Agree what the client's chosen, non-compulsive use of the cards looks like, if they keep it.
    5. Offer a review or booster contact if your service allows it.
  • Example language (illustrative): "If the urge to keep asking the cards comes back in a hard month, what will you notice first, and what will you do?"
  • Watch for: a final "reading" about whether therapy worked. Explore that urge openly. It is working when the client can explain the plan in their own words.

5. Handling problems

The sources do not address therapy problems for this practice. All guidance below is [synthesis] unless marked.

  • 5.1 The client expects ridicule and minimises. Say plainly that you ask everyone about helpers and healers, as the CFI does [source: CFI], and come back to it later. (illustrative) "No need to convince me of anything. I'm interested in what it does for you."
  • 5.2 The client wants you to say the cards are real, or that they aren't. Decline both. Reflect what the question means for them. (illustrative) "I can't settle that for you. What would change if you knew for sure?"
  • 5.3 Reassurance moves to the therapist. In compulsive consulting, giving your own forecast or comfort becomes a new compulsion. Name the pattern kindly and return to the uncertainty plan agreed in 4.5. [rationale: IOCDF blog, Karr] (illustrative) "I notice you're asking me for the certainty the cards used to give. Shall we sit with not knowing for a minute?"
  • 5.4 The client won't reduce consulting (non-adherence). Review the log together. Make steps smaller (fewer apps first, then fewer paid readers). Check whether consulting is meeting another need, such as loneliness or ritual comfort, and find other ways to meet it.
  • 5.5 Rupture after you question a reader's charges. Repair: acknowledge that it may have sounded like an attack on their beliefs, separate belief from the money pattern, and restate that the client decides. (illustrative) "I came across as dismissing something that matters to you. I'm sorry. My concern is the money, not your faith in the cards."
  • 5.6 Overwhelm after a frightening forecast or "curse". Ground the client first. Then assess risk, including suicidal thinking, with standard assessment. Then cognitive work (4.4). If a reader is threatening harm unless paid, treat it as possible fraud and use the routes in 4.6. [source: WA Consumer Protection, Bromley Trading Standards for the routes]
  • 5.7 A reading drives a risky decision now (leaving treatment, ending a relationship abruptly, a large payment). Slow it down with the agreed delay (4.3). Bring in medical, legal or financial advice. Never advise on medicines; send health questions to the treating clinician.
  • 5.8 Stuck: the client keeps re-telling readings. Shift from content to process. (illustrative) "We've gone over the cards for a while. What feeling stays with you once we stop talking about them?"
  • 5.9 Couple or family conflict over readings. Hold both views, use the decision work in 4.3 jointly, and agree household limits (for example, no readings about each other).
  • 5.10 A therapist who is also a reader is asked for readings by clients, or clients find their business online. Restate the boundary (4.9), stop any business contact with clients, and take it to supervision.
  • 5.11 Psychotic or manic features emerge. Use the usual clinical pathways (psychiatric assessment, crisis services). Stay respectful of the practice itself (4.8).
  • 5.12 Grief work stalls on readings. Explore what letting go of readings would mean (losing the person again). Move slowly, using continuing-bonds framing (4.7).
  • 5.13 The partner is drawn into relationship readings. With consent, a joint session can explain the reassurance cycle and agree that the partner will not answer "proof" questions raised by readings. Screen for safety first (4.12). [source: IOCDF ROCD for reassurance-seeking; synthesis]
  • 5.14 The client is a reader and is shaken by a caller's crisis. Ground the client, check their own risk, and help them plan how they will signpost callers in crisis in future (4.14). Avoid judging their work. [synthesis]
  • 5.15 Measures improve but the client still reads cards. This is not a failure if use is now chosen and causes no distress or harm. Leave the practice where the client holds it (4.15). [synthesis]
  • 5.16 Ending stirs the urge to consult. Name it as expected, return to the relapse plan (4.17), and avoid giving last-session reassurance. (illustrative) "It makes sense that not knowing how you'll do without these sessions brings the old pull back." [synthesis]

Sources

Web pages and articles:

Books cited:

  • Matthews, C. (2014). The Complete Lenormand Oracle Handbook: Reading the Language and Symbols of the Cards. Destiny Books (described from the publisher page).
  • George, R. (2014). The Essential Lenormand. Llewellyn (described from the publisher preview page).
  • Decker, R., Depaulis, T., & Dummett, M. A Wicked Pack of Cards (cited via Place 2019) [uncertain: not verified].

Cross-references: 192 (Tarot), 193 (Oracle and angel decks).

← Previous · XIV-193Oracle and angel decksNext · XIV-195 →I Ching